Schottenstein Center · at Ohio State
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | OSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects OSU 88–62 · win probability OSU 99%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 149.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: OSU has more of the edges
YSU 0, OSU 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
YSU has played the 304th-hardest schedule, OSU the 34th. A record against a soft schedule means less
YSU offense vs OSU defense
Offense 267th of 366 against a defense 35th, on the model’s ratings
OSU offense vs YSU defense
Offense 36th of 366 against a defense 264th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
YSU hits 33.8% and allows 35.5%; OSU hits 35.7% and allows 31.9%. Threes are 49.4% and 40.1% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: YSU 31.4, OSU 37.2. Allowed: YSU 36.0, OSU 34.7
Shooting
Effective FG%: YSU 53.6 and allows 52.3; OSU 56.2 and allows 50.2
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: YSU 8%, OSU 37%. Transfers in: YSU 6, OSU 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
OSU at home. This season: OSU 0-0 at home, YSU 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: YSU plays 68.9 a game (188th fastest), OSU 67.2 (275th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: YSU 18.8%, OSU 15.3%. Forced: YSU 17.8%, OSU 15.6%
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: YSU 30.4%, OSU 30.4%. Defensive: YSU 69.3%, OSU 70.0%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | OSU -26.8 | — |
| Total | — | 149.9 | — |
| Projected score | — | YSU 61.6 · OSU 88.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | OSU -15.8 | — |
| 1H total | 70.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | YSU 27.1 · OSU 43 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | |
| 5-5 50% | 8-2 80% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
YSU 0–1 OSUOSU leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · YSU 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2024-25 | YSU 47 @ OSU 81 | OSU -18.5 | OSU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Youngstown St
29 games played
Straight up
12-17
41% wins
Against the spread
10-19
34% covers · avg −1.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-14
52% overs · avg +0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 59-74 | +14.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 7 | @ | W 90-81 | +15.5 | W +24.5 | 152.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 80-84 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 75-92 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 62-68 | -5.5 | L −11.5 | 152.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 67-61 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 163.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 87-64 | -14.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 69-68 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 78-55 | -6.5 | W +16.5 | 171.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 77-80 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 74-65 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 68-73 | -9.5 | L −14.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 1 | vs | L 83-85 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 79-94 | +4.5 | L −10.5 | 146.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 69-71 | -4.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 83-93 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 78-80 | -8.5 | L −10.5 | 152.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 88-81 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 139.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 64-65 | -6.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 85-76 | -10.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 90-61 | +2.5 | W +31.5 | 147.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 66-72 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 86-82 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 70-76 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 151.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 106-82 | -11.5 | W +12.5 | 157.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 64-58 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 65-78 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 63-85 | +1.5 | L −20.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Mar 4 | @ | L 53-68 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 143.5 | U 121 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
PITT
L 59-74
−0.5
7
@
GCU
W 90-81
+24.5
15
@
SBU
L 80-84
+5.5
19
@
TOL
L 75-92
−15.5
23
vs
UNCG
L 62-68
−11.5
24
vs
GASO
W 67-61
+4.5
28
vs
CHST
W 87-64
+8.5
3
vs
WRST
W 69-68
−2.5
6
@
IUIN
W 78-55
+16.5
17
@
RMU
L 77-80
−0.5
20
vs
UPST
W 74-65
+2.5
29
vs
DETM
L 68-73
−14.5
1
vs
OAK
L 83-85
−3.5
4
@
NKU
L 79-94
−10.5
7
vs
PFW
L 69-71
−6.5
15
@
WRST
L 83-93
−5.5
17
@
CLE
L 78-80
−10.5
22
vs
GB
W 88-81
−0.5
24
vs
MILW
L 64-65
−7.5
30
vs
IUIN
W 85-76
−1.5
4
@
PFW
W 90-61
+31.5
7
vs
RMU
L 66-72
−9.5
12
@
OAK
W 86-82
+7.5
15
@
DETM
L 70-76
−10.5
18
vs
CLE
W 106-82
+12.5
22
vs
NKU
W 64-58
+3.5
25
@
MILW
L 65-78
−14.5
28
@
GB
L 63-85
−20.5
4
@
RMU
L 53-68
−11.5
covered 10didn’t cover 19avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
PITT
L 59-74
−12.5
7
@
GCU
W 90-81
+18.5
15
@
SBU
L 80-84
+17.5
19
@
TOL
L 75-92
+6.5
23
vs
UNCG
L 62-68
−22.5
24
vs
GASO
W 67-61
−35.5
28
vs
CHST
W 87-64
+4.5
3
vs
WRST
W 69-68
−7.5
6
@
IUIN
W 78-55
−38.5
17
@
RMU
L 77-80
+16.5
20
vs
UPST
W 74-65
−2.5
29
vs
DETM
L 68-73
−5.5
1
vs
OAK
L 83-85
+10.5
4
@
NKU
L 79-94
+26.5
7
vs
PFW
L 69-71
−5.5
15
@
WRST
L 83-93
+34.5
17
@
CLE
L 78-80
+5.5
22
vs
GB
W 88-81
+29.5
24
vs
MILW
L 64-65
−22.5
30
vs
IUIN
W 85-76
+7.5
4
@
PFW
W 90-61
+3.5
7
vs
RMU
L 66-72
−5.5
12
@
OAK
W 86-82
+12.5
15
@
DETM
L 70-76
−5.5
18
vs
CLE
W 106-82
+30.5
22
vs
NKU
W 64-58
−30.5
25
@
MILW
L 65-78
−4.5
28
@
GB
L 63-85
+6.5
4
@
RMU
L 53-68
−22.5
over 15under 14avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Ohio State
34 games played
Straight up
21-13
62% wins
Against the spread
18-16
53% covers · avg +1.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-18
47% overs · avg −1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 118-102 | -33.5 | L −17.5 | 172.5 | O 220 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 94-68 | -24.5 | W +1.5 | 159.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 75-53 | -23.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 64-63 | -9.5 | L −8.5 | 156.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 91-58 | -26.5 | W +6.5 | 159.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 113-60 | -30.5 | W +22.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 66-67 | -5.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 86-82 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 9 | vs | L 80-88 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 89-88 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 70-71 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 23 | vs | W 89-63 | -28.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 2 | @ | W 80-73 | -9.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 5 | vs | L 69-72 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 72-62 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 152.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 11 | @ | L 74-81 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 86-74 | -4.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 82-74 | -7.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 23 | @ | L 62-74 | +16.5 | W +4.5 | 165.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 26 | vs | W 84-78 | -11.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 82-92 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 82-62 | -6.5 | W +13.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 8 | vs | L 61-82 | +8.5 | L −12.5 | 161.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 89-82 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 66-70 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 86-69 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 60-66 | +10.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 57-74 | +6.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 82-74 | +6.5 | W +14.5 | 149.5 | O 156 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 94-62 | -7.5 | W +24.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 91-78 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 72-69 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 67-71 | +12.5 | W +8.5 | 155.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 64-66 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
IUIN
W 118-102
−17.5
7
vs
PFW
W 94-68
+1.5
11
vs
APP
W 75-53
−1.5
16
vs
ND
W 64-63
−8.5
20
vs
WMU
W 91-58
+6.5
25
vs
MSM
W 113-60
+22.5
28
@
PITT
L 66-67
−6.5
6
@
NU
W 86-82
+2.5
9
vs
ILL
L 80-88
−4.5
13
vs
WVU
W 89-88
−2.5
20
vs
UNC
L 70-71
+1.5
23
vs
GRAM
W 89-63
−2.5
2
@
RUTG
W 80-73
−2.5
5
vs
NEB
L 69-72
−5.5
8
@
ORE
W 72-62
+11.5
11
@
WASH
L 74-81
−5.5
17
vs
UCLA
W 86-74
+7.5
20
vs
MINN
W 82-74
+0.5
23
@
MICH
L 62-74
+4.5
26
vs
PSU
W 84-78
−5.5
31
@
WIS
L 82-92
−5.5
5
@
MD
W 82-62
+13.5
8
vs
MICH
L 61-82
−12.5
11
vs
USC
W 89-82
−0.5
14
vs
UVA
L 66-70
+1.5
17
vs
WIS
W 86-69
+15.5
22
@
MSU
L 60-66
+4.5
25
@
IOWA
L 57-74
−10.5
1
vs
PUR
W 82-74
+14.5
4
@
PSU
W 94-62
+24.5
7
vs
IU
W 91-78
+9.5
12
vs
IOWA
W 72-69
+4.5
13
vs
MICH
L 67-71
+8.5
19
vs
TCU
L 64-66
−4.5
covered 18didn’t cover 16avg +1.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
IUIN
W 118-102
+47.5
7
vs
PFW
W 94-68
+2.5
11
vs
APP
W 75-53
−19.5
16
vs
ND
W 64-63
−29.5
20
vs
WMU
W 91-58
−10.5
25
vs
MSM
W 113-60
+21.5
28
@
PITT
L 66-67
−15.5
6
@
NU
W 86-82
+12.5
9
vs
ILL
L 80-88
+5.5
13
vs
WVU
W 89-88
+31.5
20
vs
UNC
L 70-71
−16.5
23
vs
GRAM
W 89-63
−1.5
2
@
RUTG
W 80-73
+1.5
5
vs
NEB
L 69-72
−14.5
8
@
ORE
W 72-62
−18.5
11
@
WASH
L 74-81
−0.5
17
vs
UCLA
W 86-74
+13.5
20
vs
MINN
W 82-74
+12.5
23
@
MICH
L 62-74
−29.5
26
vs
PSU
W 84-78
+8.5
31
@
WIS
L 82-92
+18.5
5
@
MD
W 82-62
−6.5
8
vs
MICH
L 61-82
−18.5
11
vs
USC
W 89-82
+18.5
14
vs
UVA
L 66-70
−10.5
17
vs
WIS
W 86-69
−2.5
22
@
MSU
L 60-66
−20.5
25
@
IOWA
L 57-74
−10.5
1
vs
PUR
W 82-74
+6.5
4
@
PSU
W 94-62
+3.5
7
vs
IU
W 91-78
+20.5
12
vs
IOWA
W 72-69
+0.5
13
vs
MICH
L 67-71
−17.5
19
vs
TCU
L 64-66
−15.5
over 16under 18avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Ohio State has the better starters
Position by position: Youngstown St 0, Ohio State 5, even 0
Youngstown StBetterOhio State
G L. Holmstrom TR10.9 pts · 2.2 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 30
→OSUBig
G J. Mobley15.7 pts · 2.4 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 93
G J. Haynes3.9 pts · 1.5 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 16
→OSUBig
G J. Pippen TR13.9 pts · 4 reb · 4.6 ast
Score 90
G J. Tyler TR4.3 pts · 0.9 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 18
→OSUBig
G J. Williams TR14.9 pts · 4.5 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 92
G J. Nwankwo TR3 pts · 2.4 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 28
→OSUBig
G C. Givens TR9.4 pts · 2.1 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 65
F J. Coleman TR3.9 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 5
→OSUBig
F A. Bynum9.7 pts · 4.9 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 73
Youngstown StBetterOhio State
YSU offense267th of 366 · -8.1
→OSUBig
OSU defense35th of 366 · +3.3
YSU defense264th of 366 · -6.8
→OSUBig
OSU offense36th of 366 · +5.2
Backcourt-5.5 · 4 players
→OSUBig
Backcourt+9.1 · 4 players
Frontcourt-1.8 · 1 player
→OSUSmall
Frontcourt+1.1 · 1 player
Bench-2.0 · 2 players
→OSUSmall
Bench+1.0 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestYSU betterOSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
L. Holmstrom27 min · TRJ. Haynes15 minJ. Tyler13 min · TRJ. Nwankwo12 min · TRD. Aekins7 min · TRJ. LivingstonNew
Forwards
J. Coleman13 min · TRJ. Moupadele12 min · TRL. LokhmanchukNewE. Summers-LivingstonNew
Centers
K. AmoakoNew
Guards
J. Mobley32 minJ. Pippen31 min · TRJ. Williams30 min · TRC. Givens26 min · TRB. Nash2 minM. HerroNew
Forwards
A. Bynum29 minA. Jelavic16 min · TRJ. OjianwunaNewA. ThompsonNewA. SmithNewV. LazarevicNew
Centers
I. Njegovan11 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75.1 #162 | Points per game | 79.3 #76 |
| 1.09 #160 | Points per possession | 1.18 #31 |
| 68.9 #188 | Pace (possessions) | 67.2 #275 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.6 #76 | Effective FG% | 56.2 #19 |
| 33.8 #184 | 3-point % | 35.7 #72 |
| 49.4 #17 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.1 #170 |
| 31.4 #272 | Free throw rate | 37.2 #122 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.8 #314 | Turnover rate | 15.3 #91 |
| 30.4 #182 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.4 #185 |
| 14.0 #144 | Assists per game | 14.5 #117 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.9 #185 | Points allowed | 72.6 #120 |
| 1.09 #190 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #164 |
| 52.3 #228 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.2 #114 |
| 35.5 #280 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.9 #57 |
| 17.8 #106 | Turnovers forced | 15.6 #243 |
| 69.3 #191 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.0 #160 |
| 6.7 #151 | Steals per game | 4.8 #340 |
| 3.5 #146 | Blocks per game | 2.4 #311 |
Youngstown St
12-17 in 2025-26 overall · 8-13 in conference · Horizon League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Robert Morris53–68
- L@ Green Bay63–85
- L@ Milwaukee65–78
- Wvs N Kentucky64–58
- Wvs Cleveland St106–82
A week or more of rest.
Ohio State
21-13 in 2025-26 overall · 13-9 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs TCU64–66
- Lvs Michigan67–71
- Wvs Iowa72–69
- Wvs Indiana91–78
- W@ Penn State94–62
A week or more of rest.