Gallagher-Iba Arena · at Oklahoma St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | OKST | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects OKST 90–69 · win probability OKST 96%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 159.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: OKST has more of the edges
CARK 2, OKST 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
OKST offense vs CARK defense
Offense 23rd of 366 against a defense 241st, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
CARK has played the 241st-hardest schedule, OKST the 60th. A record against a soft schedule means less
CARK offense vs OKST defense
Offense 231st of 366 against a defense 99th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: CARK 15.4%, OKST 15.7%. Forced: CARK 19.1%, OKST 15.7%
Free throws
Free throw rate: CARK 31.2, OKST 39.4. Allowed: CARK 30.1, OKST 31.4
Three-pointers
CARK hits 35.5% and allows 35.2%; OKST hits 33.9% and allows 36.0%. Threes are 48.7% and 35.5% of their shots
Home court
OKST at home. This season: OKST 0-0 at home, CARK 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 73 possessions: CARK plays 70.2 a game (105th fastest), OKST 74.8 (6th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: CARK 62%, OKST 41%. Transfers in: CARK 2, OKST 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: CARK 28.8%, OKST 30.8%. Defensive: CARK 72.6%, OKST 69.7%
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: CARK 54.0 and allows 54.9; OKST 52.0 and allows 53.1
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | OKST -20.6 | — |
| Total | — | 159.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | CARK 69.4 · OKST 90 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | OKST -12.1 | — |
| 1H total | 74.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | CARK 31.2 · OKST 43.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | |
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 8-2 80% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
C Arkansas
32 games played
Straight up
20-12
63% wins
Against the spread
20-12
63% covers · avg +5.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-16
50% overs · avg +3.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 54-94 | +31.5 | L −8.5 | 157.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 56-93 | +35.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 77-84 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 56-74 | +16.5 | L −1.5 | 134.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 92-65 | +4.5 | W +31.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 81-60 | -5.5 | W +15.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 57-80 | +12.5 | L −10.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 85-47 | -3.5 | W +34.5 | 138.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 68-75 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 72-83 | +36.5 | W +25.5 | 158.5 | U 155 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 82-99 | +24.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 85-83 | +2.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 93-73 | -11.5 | W +8.5 | 147.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 78-84 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 75-79 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 62-60 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 136.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 98-69 | -12.5 | W +16.5 | 164.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 86-65 | -3.5 | W +17.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 100-90 | +5.5 | W +15.5 | 158.5 | O 190 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 90-81 | -4.5 | W +4.5 | 151.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 81-60 | -10.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 86-78 | +3.5 | W +11.5 | 155.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 9 | @ | W 72-65 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 84-76 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 79-62 | -10.5 | W +6.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 88-76 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 149.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 71-75 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 93-88 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 84-79 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 163.5 | U 163 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 86-73 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 73-63 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 93-98 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 157.5 | O 191 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
UNC
L 54-94
−8.5
11
@
ARK
L 56-93
−1.5
16
vs
SAM
L 77-84
−0.5
20
@
UNT
L 56-74
−1.5
23
vs
EWU
W 92-65
+31.5
25
vs
EIU
W 81-60
+15.5
29
@
ETSU
L 57-80
−10.5
3
vs
LR
W 85-47
+34.5
7
@
ETAM
L 68-75
−4.5
13
@
VAN
L 72-83
+25.5
21
@
SMU
L 82-99
+7.5
1
vs
FGCU
W 85-83
+4.5
3
vs
STET
W 93-73
+8.5
8
@
BELL
L 78-84
−8.5
10
@
EKU
L 75-79
−5.5
15
vs
JAX
W 62-60
−5.5
17
vs
UNF
W 98-69
+16.5
22
@
WGA
W 86-65
+17.5
28
@
QUC
W 100-90
+15.5
31
vs
EKU
W 90-81
+4.5
4
vs
UNA
W 81-60
+10.5
7
@
LIP
W 86-78
+11.5
9
@
UNA
W 72-65
+0.5
11
vs
BELL
W 84-76
−0.5
14
vs
WGA
W 79-62
+6.5
19
@
STET
W 88-76
+2.5
21
@
FGCU
L 71-75
−5.5
25
@
APSU
W 93-88
+9.5
28
vs
QUC
W 84-79
+2.5
6
vs
BELL
W 86-73
+6.5
7
vs
FGCU
W 73-63
+5.5
8
vs
QUC
L 93-98
−6.5
covered 20didn’t cover 12avg +5.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
UNC
L 54-94
−9.5
11
@
ARK
L 56-93
−9.5
16
vs
SAM
L 77-84
+9.5
20
@
UNT
L 56-74
−4.5
23
vs
EWU
W 92-65
+2.5
25
vs
EIU
W 81-60
+1.5
29
@
ETSU
L 57-80
−7.5
3
vs
LR
W 85-47
−6.5
7
@
ETAM
L 68-75
−2.5
13
@
VAN
L 72-83
−3.5
21
@
SMU
L 82-99
+24.5
1
vs
FGCU
W 85-83
+11.5
3
vs
STET
W 93-73
+18.5
8
@
BELL
L 78-84
+7.5
10
@
EKU
L 75-79
−2.5
15
vs
JAX
W 62-60
−14.5
17
vs
UNF
W 98-69
+2.5
22
@
WGA
W 86-65
−3.5
28
@
QUC
W 100-90
+31.5
31
vs
EKU
W 90-81
+19.5
4
vs
UNA
W 81-60
−6.5
7
@
LIP
W 86-78
+8.5
9
@
UNA
W 72-65
−8.5
11
vs
BELL
W 84-76
+9.5
14
vs
WGA
W 79-62
−9.5
19
@
STET
W 88-76
+14.5
21
@
FGCU
L 71-75
−6.5
25
@
APSU
W 93-88
+28.5
28
vs
QUC
W 84-79
−0.5
6
vs
BELL
W 86-73
+4.5
7
vs
FGCU
W 73-63
−8.5
8
vs
QUC
L 93-98
+33.5
over 16under 16avg +3.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Oklahoma St
35 games played
Straight up
20-15
57% wins
Against the spread
16-19
46% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
21-14
60% overs · avg +3.4 pts vs the total
Against the spread
16-1946%
2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 95-71 | -20.5 | W +3.5 | 165.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 87-63 | +2.5 | W +26.5 | 174.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 94-67 | -30.5 | L −3.5 | 168.5 | U 161 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 85-69 | -20.5 | L −4.5 | 154.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 103-95 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 177.5 | O 198 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 95-81 | -23.5 | L −9.5 | 155.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 27 | @ | W 86-81 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 159.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 93-83 | -13.5 | L −3.5 | 169.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 84-78 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 76-85 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 169.5 | U 161 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 91-79 | -27.5 | L −15.5 | 161.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 94-89 | -19.5 | L −14.5 | 176.5 | O 183 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 103-77 | -20.5 | W +5.5 | 164.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 80-102 | +12.5 | L −9.5 | 167.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 87-76 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 175.5 | U 163 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 71-83 | +19.5 | W +7.5 | 165.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 79-94 | +1.5 | L −13.5 | 165.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 84-83 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 175.5 | U 167 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 65-68 | +8.5 | W +5.5 | 161.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 71-84 | +10.5 | L −2.5 | 162.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 81-69 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 166.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 99-92 | +8.5 | W +15.5 | 167.5 | O 191 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 47-84 | +20.5 | L −16.5 | 168.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 76-85 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 163.5 | U 161 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 92-95 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 156.5 | O 187 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 69-81 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 158.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 69-83 | +3.5 | L −10.5 | 162.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 91-84 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 68-91 | +9.5 | L −13.5 | 151.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 111-104 | +8.5 | W +15.5 | 167.5 | O 215 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 75-82 | +13.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 92-83 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 164.5 | O 175 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 88-95 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 158.5 | O 183 |
| Mar 17 | vs | W 84-80 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 22 | vs | L 70-96 | -2.5 | L −28.5 | 164.5 | O 166 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
ORU
W 95-71
+3.5
9
vs
TA&M
W 87-63
+26.5
12
vs
PV
W 94-67
−3.5
16
vs
AMCC
W 85-69
−4.5
19
vs
USF
W 103-95
+4.5
22
vs
NICH
W 95-81
−9.5
27
@
NU
W 86-81
+7.5
2
vs
SHSU
W 93-83
−3.5
6
vs
GCU
W 84-78
+4.5
13
vs
OU
L 76-85
−6.5
18
vs
KC
W 91-79
−15.5
21
vs
CSUF
W 94-89
−14.5
29
vs
BCU
W 103-77
+5.5
3
@
TTU
L 80-102
−9.5
6
vs
UCF
W 87-76
+9.5
10
@
ISU
L 71-83
+7.5
13
vs
BAY
L 79-94
−13.5
17
vs
KSU
W 84-83
−1.5
20
@
TCU
L 65-68
+5.5
24
vs
ISU
L 71-84
−2.5
31
@
UTAH
W 81-69
+10.5
4
vs
BYU
W 99-92
+15.5
7
@
ARIZ
L 47-84
−16.5
10
@
ASU
L 76-85
−5.5
14
vs
TCU
L 92-95
−1.5
18
vs
KU
L 69-81
−4.5
21
@
COLO
L 69-83
−10.5
24
vs
WVU
W 91-84
+5.5
28
@
CIN
L 68-91
−13.5
3
@
UCF
W 111-104
+15.5
7
vs
HOU
L 75-82
+6.5
10
vs
COLO
W 92-83
+10.5
11
vs
TCU
L 88-95
+0.5
17
vs
DAV
W 84-80
−2.5
22
vs
WICH
L 70-96
−28.5
covered 16didn’t cover 19avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
ORU
W 95-71
+0.5
9
vs
TA&M
W 87-63
−24.5
12
vs
PV
W 94-67
−7.5
16
vs
AMCC
W 85-69
−0.5
19
vs
USF
W 103-95
+20.5
22
vs
NICH
W 95-81
+20.5
27
@
NU
W 86-81
+7.5
2
vs
SHSU
W 93-83
+6.5
6
vs
GCU
W 84-78
+6.5
13
vs
OU
L 76-85
−8.5
18
vs
KC
W 91-79
+8.5
21
vs
CSUF
W 94-89
+6.5
29
vs
BCU
W 103-77
+15.5
3
@
TTU
L 80-102
+14.5
6
vs
UCF
W 87-76
−12.5
10
@
ISU
L 71-83
−11.5
13
vs
BAY
L 79-94
+7.5
17
vs
KSU
W 84-83
−8.5
20
@
TCU
L 65-68
−28.5
24
vs
ISU
L 71-84
−7.5
31
@
UTAH
W 81-69
−16.5
4
vs
BYU
W 99-92
+23.5
7
@
ARIZ
L 47-84
−37.5
10
@
ASU
L 76-85
−2.5
14
vs
TCU
L 92-95
+30.5
18
vs
KU
L 69-81
−8.5
21
@
COLO
L 69-83
−10.5
24
vs
WVU
W 91-84
+30.5
28
@
CIN
L 68-91
+7.5
3
@
UCF
W 111-104
+47.5
7
vs
HOU
L 75-82
+5.5
10
vs
COLO
W 92-83
+10.5
11
vs
TCU
L 88-95
+24.5
17
vs
DAV
W 84-80
+9.5
22
vs
WICH
L 70-96
+1.5
over 21under 14avg +3.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Oklahoma St has the better starters
Position by position: C Arkansas 0, Oklahoma St 3, even 2
C ArkansasBetterOklahoma St
G L. Moore9.6 pts · 2.8 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 28
→OKSTBig
G K. Clary10.6 pts · 2.9 reb · 4.6 ast
Score 78
G T. Robinson14.2 pts · 5.6 reb · 2 ast
Score 89
=Even
G K. Natt TR11.3 pts · 8.2 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 94
G C. McCormick9.1 pts · 3.4 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 44
=Even
G J. Walker TR11.2 pts · 2.1 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 55
G H. Beauchamp4.3 pts · 1.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 8
→OKSTBig
F J. Burks TR13.3 pts · 4.8 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 90
F M. Marable3.7 pts · 4.4 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 3
→OKSTBig
F P. Fallah14.7 pts · 6 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 97
C ArkansasBetterOklahoma St
CARK offense231st of 366 · -7.1
→OKSTBig
OKST defense99th of 366 · -0.7
CARK defense241st of 366 · -6.4
→OKSTBig
OKST offense23rd of 366 · +7.5
Backcourt-2.6 · 4 players
→OKSTBig
Backcourt+4.0 · 3 players
Frontcourt-3.0 · 1 player
→OKSTBig
Frontcourt+7.7 · 2 players
Bench-1.8 · 4 players
→OKSTBig
Bench+2.4 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestCARK betterOKST betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
L. Moore30 minT. Robinson28 minC. McCormick23 minH. Beauchamp15 minO. Dehrmann3 minJ. Shulman3 min
Forwards
M. Marable21 minT. Anderson12 min · TRS. Saadi9 min · TRA. HoernerNew
Guards
K. Clary28 minK. Natt27 min · TRJ. Walker26 min · TRL. Bogavac24 min · TRR. Crotty10 minJ. MontonatiNew
Forwards
J. Burks28 min · TRP. Fallah26 minA. Grbovic20 min · TRB. Ahmed13 minM. Ragland6 minL. AllmondNew
Centers
J. Halaifonua20 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 79.3 #77 | Points per game | 83.9 #21 |
| 1.13 #90 | Points per possession | 1.12 #110 |
| 70.2 #105 | Pace (possessions) | 74.8 #6 |
| Shooting | ||
| 54.0 #68 | Effective FG% | 52.0 #144 |
| 35.5 #89 | 3-point % | 33.9 #176 |
| 48.7 #21 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.5 #260 |
| 31.2 #278 | Free throw rate | 39.4 #70 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.4 #92 | Turnover rate | 15.7 #117 |
| 28.8 #240 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.8 #169 |
| 16.0 #46 | Assists per game | 14.6 #113 |
| Defense | ||
| 76.0 #216 | Points allowed | 83.2 #349 |
| 1.08 #180 | Points allowed per possession | 1.12 #265 |
| 54.9 #328 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.1 #272 |
| 35.2 #262 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.0 #304 |
| 19.1 #45 | Turnovers forced | 15.7 #240 |
| 72.6 #48 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.7 #178 |
| 8.5 #18 | Steals per game | 7.1 #120 |
| 1.9 #351 | Blocks per game | 2.7 #285 |
C Arkansas
20-12 in 2025-26 overall · 17-4 in conference · United Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Queens University Royals93–98
- Wvs FGCU73–63
- Wvs Bellarmine86–73
- Wvs Queens University Royals84–79
- W@ Austin Peay93–88
A week or more of rest.
Oklahoma St
20-15 in 2025-26 overall · 7-13 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Wichita St70–96
- Wvs Davidson84–80
- Lvs TCU88–95
- Wvs Colorado92–83
- Lvs Houston75–82
A week or more of rest.