TD Arena · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | OKST | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects OKST 82–80 · win probability OKST 60%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 161.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: VT has more of the edges
VT 3, OKST 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
VT hits 35.5% and allows 30.6%; OKST hits 33.9% and allows 36.0%. Threes are 39.7% and 35.5% of their shots
Turnovers
Turnover rate: VT 14.9%, OKST 15.7%. Forced: VT 17.3%, OKST 15.7%
Shooting
Effective FG%: VT 52.2 and allows 50.9; OKST 52.0 and allows 53.1
Context
Tempo
About 72 possessions: VT plays 69.8 a game (127th fastest), OKST 74.8 (6th). Faster games mean more points
OKST offense vs VT defense
Offense 23rd of 366 against a defense 72nd, on the model’s ratings
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: VT 34.0, OKST 39.4. Allowed: VT 28.8, OKST 31.4
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: VT 31.9%, OKST 30.8%. Defensive: VT 67.4%, OKST 69.7%
Even
VT offense vs OKST defense
Offense 68th of 366 against a defense 99th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
VT has played the 74th-hardest schedule, OKST the 60th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: VT 47%, OKST 41%. Transfers in: VT 8, OKST 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | OKST -2.9 | — |
| Total | — | 161.9 | — |
| Projected score | — | VT 79.5 · OKST 82.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | OKST -1.6 | — |
| 1H total | 75.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | VT 37 · OKST 38.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | |
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 8-2 80% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
VT 1–0 OKSTVT leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · VT 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2022-23 | OKST 65 vs VT 70 | VT -2.5 | VT W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Virginia Tech
32 games played
Straight up
19-13
59% wins
Against the spread
19-13
59% covers · avg +1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-15
53% overs · avg +3.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 98-67 | -18.5 | W +12.5 | 146.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 107-101 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 157.5 | O 208 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 94-59 | -12.5 | W +22.5 | 158.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 84-76 | -18.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 78-61 | -24.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 66-64 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 66-77 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 68-86 | +2.5 | L −15.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 86-83 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 149.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 73-62 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 11 | vs | W 96-74 | -20.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 82-53 | -27.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 82-81 | -12.5 | L −11.5 | 158.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 95-85 | +5.5 | W +15.5 | 153.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 78-81 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 68-69 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 148.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 78-75 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 76-77 | +8.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 89-76 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 76-74 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 71-85 | +14.5 | W +0.5 | 160.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 71-65 | -9.5 | L −3.5 | 155.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 58-72 | +13.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 73-82 | +10.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 76-66 | +8.5 | W +18.5 | 138.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 69-92 | -4.5 | L −27.5 | 156.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 66-67 | +8.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 82-63 | -3.5 | W +15.5 | 150.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 82-89 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 72-63 | -11.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 72-76 | +11.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 89-95 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 150.5 | O 184 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
CHSO
W 98-67
+12.5
8
vs
PROV
W 107-101
+8.5
12
vs
JOES
W 94-59
+22.5
16
vs
CLT
W 84-76
−10.5
19
vs
BRY
W 78-61
−7.5
26
vs
CSU
W 66-64
−2.5
27
vs
SMC
L 66-77
−5.5
28
vs
VCU
L 68-86
−15.5
2
@
SC
W 86-83
+5.5
6
vs
GMU
W 73-62
+6.5
11
vs
WCU
W 96-74
+1.5
14
vs
UMES
W 82-53
+1.5
20
vs
ELON
W 82-81
−11.5
31
vs
UVA
W 95-85
+15.5
3
@
WAKE
L 78-81
+2.5
7
vs
STAN
L 68-69
−4.5
10
vs
CAL
W 78-75
−2.5
14
@
SMU
L 76-77
+7.5
17
vs
ND
W 89-76
+6.5
21
@
SYR
W 76-74
+5.5
24
@
LOU
L 71-85
+0.5
27
vs
GT
W 71-65
−3.5
31
vs
DUKE
L 58-72
−0.5
7
@
NCSU
L 73-82
+1.5
11
@
CLEM
W 76-66
+18.5
14
vs
FSU
L 69-92
−27.5
17
@
MIA
L 66-67
+7.5
21
vs
WAKE
W 82-63
+15.5
28
@
UNC
L 82-89
+0.5
3
vs
BC
W 72-63
−2.5
7
@
UVA
L 72-76
+7.5
10
vs
WAKE
L 89-95
−4.5
covered 19didn’t cover 13avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
CHSO
W 98-67
+18.5
8
vs
PROV
W 107-101
+50.5
12
vs
JOES
W 94-59
−5.5
16
vs
CLT
W 84-76
+14.5
19
vs
BRY
W 78-61
−12.5
26
vs
CSU
W 66-64
−23.5
27
vs
SMC
L 66-77
−1.5
28
vs
VCU
L 68-86
+0.5
2
@
SC
W 86-83
+19.5
6
vs
GMU
W 73-62
−9.5
11
vs
WCU
W 96-74
+17.5
14
vs
UMES
W 82-53
−4.5
20
vs
ELON
W 82-81
+4.5
31
vs
UVA
W 95-85
+26.5
3
@
WAKE
L 78-81
+5.5
7
vs
STAN
L 68-69
−11.5
10
vs
CAL
W 78-75
+4.5
14
@
SMU
L 76-77
−2.5
17
vs
ND
W 89-76
+21.5
21
@
SYR
W 76-74
−2.5
24
@
LOU
L 71-85
−4.5
27
vs
GT
W 71-65
−19.5
31
vs
DUKE
L 58-72
−18.5
7
@
NCSU
L 73-82
+0.5
11
@
CLEM
W 76-66
+3.5
14
vs
FSU
L 69-92
+4.5
17
@
MIA
L 66-67
−15.5
21
vs
WAKE
W 82-63
−5.5
28
@
UNC
L 82-89
+21.5
3
vs
BC
W 72-63
−7.5
7
@
UVA
L 72-76
+2.5
10
vs
WAKE
L 89-95
+33.5
over 17under 15avg +3.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Oklahoma St
35 games played
Straight up
20-15
57% wins
Against the spread
16-19
46% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
21-14
60% overs · avg +3.4 pts vs the total
Against the spread
16-1946%
2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 95-71 | -20.5 | W +3.5 | 165.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 87-63 | +2.5 | W +26.5 | 174.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 94-67 | -30.5 | L −3.5 | 168.5 | U 161 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 85-69 | -20.5 | L −4.5 | 154.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 103-95 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 177.5 | O 198 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 95-81 | -23.5 | L −9.5 | 155.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 27 | @ | W 86-81 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 159.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 93-83 | -13.5 | L −3.5 | 169.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 84-78 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 76-85 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 169.5 | U 161 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 91-79 | -27.5 | L −15.5 | 161.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 94-89 | -19.5 | L −14.5 | 176.5 | O 183 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 103-77 | -20.5 | W +5.5 | 164.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 80-102 | +12.5 | L −9.5 | 167.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 87-76 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 175.5 | U 163 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 71-83 | +19.5 | W +7.5 | 165.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 79-94 | +1.5 | L −13.5 | 165.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 84-83 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 175.5 | U 167 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 65-68 | +8.5 | W +5.5 | 161.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 71-84 | +10.5 | L −2.5 | 162.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 81-69 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 166.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 99-92 | +8.5 | W +15.5 | 167.5 | O 191 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 47-84 | +20.5 | L −16.5 | 168.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 76-85 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 163.5 | U 161 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 92-95 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 156.5 | O 187 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 69-81 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 158.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 69-83 | +3.5 | L −10.5 | 162.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 91-84 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 68-91 | +9.5 | L −13.5 | 151.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 111-104 | +8.5 | W +15.5 | 167.5 | O 215 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 75-82 | +13.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 92-83 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 164.5 | O 175 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 88-95 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 158.5 | O 183 |
| Mar 17 | vs | W 84-80 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 22 | vs | L 70-96 | -2.5 | L −28.5 | 164.5 | O 166 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
ORU
W 95-71
+3.5
9
vs
TA&M
W 87-63
+26.5
12
vs
PV
W 94-67
−3.5
16
vs
AMCC
W 85-69
−4.5
19
vs
USF
W 103-95
+4.5
22
vs
NICH
W 95-81
−9.5
27
@
NU
W 86-81
+7.5
2
vs
SHSU
W 93-83
−3.5
6
vs
GCU
W 84-78
+4.5
13
vs
OU
L 76-85
−6.5
18
vs
KC
W 91-79
−15.5
21
vs
CSUF
W 94-89
−14.5
29
vs
BCU
W 103-77
+5.5
3
@
TTU
L 80-102
−9.5
6
vs
UCF
W 87-76
+9.5
10
@
ISU
L 71-83
+7.5
13
vs
BAY
L 79-94
−13.5
17
vs
KSU
W 84-83
−1.5
20
@
TCU
L 65-68
+5.5
24
vs
ISU
L 71-84
−2.5
31
@
UTAH
W 81-69
+10.5
4
vs
BYU
W 99-92
+15.5
7
@
ARIZ
L 47-84
−16.5
10
@
ASU
L 76-85
−5.5
14
vs
TCU
L 92-95
−1.5
18
vs
KU
L 69-81
−4.5
21
@
COLO
L 69-83
−10.5
24
vs
WVU
W 91-84
+5.5
28
@
CIN
L 68-91
−13.5
3
@
UCF
W 111-104
+15.5
7
vs
HOU
L 75-82
+6.5
10
vs
COLO
W 92-83
+10.5
11
vs
TCU
L 88-95
+0.5
17
vs
DAV
W 84-80
−2.5
22
vs
WICH
L 70-96
−28.5
covered 16didn’t cover 19avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
ORU
W 95-71
+0.5
9
vs
TA&M
W 87-63
−24.5
12
vs
PV
W 94-67
−7.5
16
vs
AMCC
W 85-69
−0.5
19
vs
USF
W 103-95
+20.5
22
vs
NICH
W 95-81
+20.5
27
@
NU
W 86-81
+7.5
2
vs
SHSU
W 93-83
+6.5
6
vs
GCU
W 84-78
+6.5
13
vs
OU
L 76-85
−8.5
18
vs
KC
W 91-79
+8.5
21
vs
CSUF
W 94-89
+6.5
29
vs
BCU
W 103-77
+15.5
3
@
TTU
L 80-102
+14.5
6
vs
UCF
W 87-76
−12.5
10
@
ISU
L 71-83
−11.5
13
vs
BAY
L 79-94
+7.5
17
vs
KSU
W 84-83
−8.5
20
@
TCU
L 65-68
−28.5
24
vs
ISU
L 71-84
−7.5
31
@
UTAH
W 81-69
−16.5
4
vs
BYU
W 99-92
+23.5
7
@
ARIZ
L 47-84
−37.5
10
@
ASU
L 76-85
−2.5
14
vs
TCU
L 92-95
+30.5
18
vs
KU
L 69-81
−8.5
21
@
COLO
L 69-83
−10.5
24
vs
WVU
W 91-84
+30.5
28
@
CIN
L 68-91
+7.5
3
@
UCF
W 111-104
+47.5
7
vs
HOU
L 75-82
+5.5
10
vs
COLO
W 92-83
+10.5
11
vs
TCU
L 88-95
+24.5
17
vs
DAV
W 84-80
+9.5
22
vs
WICH
L 70-96
+1.5
over 21under 14avg +3.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Virginia Tech has the better starters
Position by position: Virginia Tech 1, Oklahoma St 0, even 4
Virginia TechBetterOklahoma St
G E. Copeland TR14.5 pts · 3.7 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 67
=Even
G K. Clary10.6 pts · 2.9 reb · 4.6 ast
Score 78
G B. Hammond13.2 pts · 2.3 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 89
=Even
G K. Natt TR11.3 pts · 8.2 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 94
G I. Elohim TR12.2 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 71
←VTSmall
G J. Walker TR11.2 pts · 2.1 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 55
G T. Johnson8 pts · 4.5 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 77
=Even
F J. Burks TR13.3 pts · 4.8 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 90
F A. Hansberry14.3 pts · 7.4 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 92
=Even
F P. Fallah14.7 pts · 6 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 97
Virginia TechBetterOklahoma St
VT offense68th of 366 · +1.8
=Even
OKST defense99th of 366 · -0.7
VT defense72nd of 366 · +0.8
=Even
OKST offense23rd of 366 · +7.5
Backcourt+4.7 · 4 players
=Even
Backcourt+4.0 · 3 players
Frontcourt+3.8 · 1 player
→OKSTBig
Frontcourt+7.7 · 2 players
Bench+1.5 · 5 players
=Even
Bench+2.4 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestVT betterOKST betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
E. Copeland32 min · TRB. Hammond32 minI. Elohim29 min · TRT. Johnson26 minJ. Curry24 min · TRB. Johnson21 min · TR
Forwards
A. Hansberry31 minM. Heide19 min · TRK. Atak14 min · TRS. Jones7 min
Centers
M. Sagnia12 min · TRS. DavisNew
Guards
K. Clary28 minK. Natt27 min · TRJ. Walker26 min · TRL. Bogavac24 min · TRR. Crotty10 minJ. MontonatiNew
Forwards
J. Burks28 min · TRP. Fallah26 minA. Grbovic20 min · TRB. Ahmed13 minM. Ragland6 minL. AllmondNew
Centers
J. Halaifonua20 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 78.8 #85 | Points per game | 83.9 #21 |
| 1.13 #89 | Points per possession | 1.12 #110 |
| 69.8 #127 | Pace (possessions) | 74.8 #6 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.2 #134 | Effective FG% | 52.0 #144 |
| 35.5 #88 | 3-point % | 33.9 #176 |
| 39.7 #179 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.5 #260 |
| 34.0 #209 | Free throw rate | 39.4 #70 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.9 #60 | Turnover rate | 15.7 #117 |
| 31.9 #129 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.8 #169 |
| 14.4 #122 | Assists per game | 14.6 #113 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.9 #184 | Points allowed | 83.2 #349 |
| 1.07 #141 | Points allowed per possession | 1.12 #265 |
| 50.9 #147 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.1 #272 |
| 30.6 #26 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.0 #304 |
| 17.3 #131 | Turnovers forced | 15.7 #240 |
| 67.4 #284 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.7 #178 |
| 6.4 #187 | Steals per game | 7.1 #120 |
| 3.2 #190 | Blocks per game | 2.7 #285 |
Virginia Tech
19-13 in 2025-26 overall · 8-11 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Wake Forest89–95
- L@ Virginia72–76
- Wvs Boston College72–63
- L@ North Carolina82–89
- Wvs Wake Forest82–63
A week or more of rest.
Oklahoma St
20-15 in 2025-26 overall · 7-13 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Wichita St70–96
- Wvs Davidson84–80
- Lvs TCU88–95
- Wvs Colorado92–83
- Lvs Houston75–82
A week or more of rest.