Cassell Coliseum · at Virginia Tech
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | VT | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects VT 86–65 · win probability VT 97%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 150.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: VT has more of the edges
ODU 0, VT 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
ODU offense vs VT defense
Offense 240th of 366 against a defense 72nd, on the model’s ratings
VT offense vs ODU defense
Offense 68th of 366 against a defense 222nd, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: ODU 34.7, VT 34.0. Allowed: ODU 42.0, VT 28.8
Context
Schedule so far
ODU has played the 188th-hardest schedule, VT the 74th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: ODU 15.4%, VT 14.9%. Forced: ODU 14.5%, VT 17.3%
Home court
VT at home. This season: VT 0-0 at home, ODU 0-0 away
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: ODU 26.0%, VT 31.9%. Defensive: ODU 69.7%, VT 67.4%
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: ODU 50.6 and allows 50.8; VT 52.2 and allows 50.9
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: ODU 34%, VT 47%. Transfers in: ODU 4, VT 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: ODU plays 70.8 a game (81st fastest), VT 69.8 (127th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Three-pointers
ODU hits 36.0% and allows 32.0%; VT hits 35.5% and allows 30.6%. Threes are 36.2% and 39.7% of their shots
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | VT -21.0 | — |
| Total | — | 150.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | ODU 64.9 · VT 85.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | VT -12.4 | — |
| 1H total | 70.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | ODU 29.1 · VT 41.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 8-2 80% | |
| 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
ODU 0–1 VTVT leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · ODU 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2022-23 | ODU 71 vs VT 75 | VT -13.5 | ODU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Old Dominion
32 games played
Straight up
11-21
34% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg +1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
21-11
66% overs · avg +2.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 72-87 | +16.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 60-57 | -8.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 73-96 | +15.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 69-99 | +10.5 | L −19.5 | 150.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 88-56 | -11.5 | W +20.5 | 156.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 71-75 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 75-89 | +22.5 | W +8.5 | 147.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 30 | @ | L 75-88 | +8.5 | L −4.5 | 163.5 | U 163 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 77-86 | +12.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 61-73 | +16.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 77-68 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 74-76 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 58-73 | +14.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 73-81 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 136.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 86-93 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 161.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 70-66 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 69-70 | +6.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 84-87 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 162.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 75-73 | +7.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 77-83 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 75-71 | +9.5 | W +13.5 | 159.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 64-81 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 143.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 79-85 | -14.5 | L −20.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 78-72 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 79-81 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 78-55 | -3.5 | W +19.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 83-72 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 135.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 81-86 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 88-97 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 159.5 | O 185 |
| Feb 27 | @ | W 81-73 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 87-80 | -9.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 84-88 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
M-OH
L 72-87
+1.5
11
vs
NORF
W 60-57
−5.5
15
@
GW
L 73-96
−7.5
18
@
XAV
L 69-99
−19.5
21
vs
MORG
W 88-56
+20.5
23
@
DREX
L 71-75
−0.5
25
@
VILL
L 75-89
+8.5
30
@
W&M
L 75-88
−4.5
6
@
RICH
L 77-86
+3.5
13
@
GMU
L 61-73
+4.5
17
vs
JMU
W 77-68
+11.5
20
vs
CCU
L 74-76
−5.5
28
@
MD
L 58-73
−0.5
31
vs
APP
L 73-81
−9.5
3
vs
GASO
L 86-93
−5.5
8
@
CCU
W 70-66
+8.5
10
@
JMU
L 69-70
+5.5
15
@
GASO
L 84-87
+2.5
17
@
APP
W 75-73
+9.5
21
vs
TROY
L 77-83
−0.5
28
@
ARST
W 75-71
+13.5
31
@
TXST
L 64-81
−14.5
4
vs
ULM
L 79-85
−20.5
7
vs
OHIO
W 78-72
+9.5
11
vs
MRSH
L 79-81
+1.5
14
vs
GAST
W 78-55
+19.5
16
vs
UL
W 83-72
+4.5
21
@
USM
L 81-86
−0.5
24
@
MRSH
L 88-97
−1.5
27
@
GAST
W 81-73
+6.5
3
vs
ULM
W 87-80
−2.5
4
vs
GASO
L 84-88
−1.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
M-OH
L 72-87
+5.5
11
vs
NORF
W 60-57
−32.5
15
@
GW
L 73-96
+13.5
18
@
XAV
L 69-99
+17.5
21
vs
MORG
W 88-56
−12.5
23
@
DREX
L 71-75
+3.5
25
@
VILL
L 75-89
+16.5
30
@
W&M
L 75-88
−0.5
6
@
RICH
L 77-86
+9.5
13
@
GMU
L 61-73
−10.5
17
vs
JMU
W 77-68
−3.5
20
vs
CCU
L 74-76
+2.5
28
@
MD
L 58-73
−23.5
31
vs
APP
L 73-81
+17.5
3
vs
GASO
L 86-93
+17.5
8
@
CCU
W 70-66
−15.5
10
@
JMU
L 69-70
−8.5
15
@
GASO
L 84-87
+8.5
17
@
APP
W 75-73
+7.5
21
vs
TROY
L 77-83
+7.5
28
@
ARST
W 75-71
−13.5
31
@
TXST
L 64-81
+1.5
4
vs
ULM
L 79-85
+9.5
7
vs
OHIO
W 78-72
−6.5
11
vs
MRSH
L 79-81
+4.5
14
vs
GAST
W 78-55
−14.5
16
vs
UL
W 83-72
+19.5
21
@
USM
L 81-86
+19.5
24
@
MRSH
L 88-97
+25.5
27
@
GAST
W 81-73
+4.5
3
vs
ULM
W 87-80
+9.5
4
vs
GASO
L 84-88
+14.5
over 21under 11avg +2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Virginia Tech
32 games played
Straight up
19-13
59% wins
Against the spread
19-13
59% covers · avg +1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-15
53% overs · avg +3.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 98-67 | -18.5 | W +12.5 | 146.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 107-101 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 157.5 | O 208 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 94-59 | -12.5 | W +22.5 | 158.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 84-76 | -18.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 78-61 | -24.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 66-64 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 66-77 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 68-86 | +2.5 | L −15.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 86-83 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 149.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 73-62 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 11 | vs | W 96-74 | -20.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 82-53 | -27.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 82-81 | -12.5 | L −11.5 | 158.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 95-85 | +5.5 | W +15.5 | 153.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 78-81 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 68-69 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 148.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 78-75 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 76-77 | +8.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 89-76 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 76-74 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 71-85 | +14.5 | W +0.5 | 160.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 71-65 | -9.5 | L −3.5 | 155.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 58-72 | +13.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 73-82 | +10.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 76-66 | +8.5 | W +18.5 | 138.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 69-92 | -4.5 | L −27.5 | 156.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 66-67 | +8.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 82-63 | -3.5 | W +15.5 | 150.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 82-89 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 72-63 | -11.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 72-76 | +11.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 89-95 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 150.5 | O 184 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
CHSO
W 98-67
+12.5
8
vs
PROV
W 107-101
+8.5
12
vs
JOES
W 94-59
+22.5
16
vs
CLT
W 84-76
−10.5
19
vs
BRY
W 78-61
−7.5
26
vs
CSU
W 66-64
−2.5
27
vs
SMC
L 66-77
−5.5
28
vs
VCU
L 68-86
−15.5
2
@
SC
W 86-83
+5.5
6
vs
GMU
W 73-62
+6.5
11
vs
WCU
W 96-74
+1.5
14
vs
UMES
W 82-53
+1.5
20
vs
ELON
W 82-81
−11.5
31
vs
UVA
W 95-85
+15.5
3
@
WAKE
L 78-81
+2.5
7
vs
STAN
L 68-69
−4.5
10
vs
CAL
W 78-75
−2.5
14
@
SMU
L 76-77
+7.5
17
vs
ND
W 89-76
+6.5
21
@
SYR
W 76-74
+5.5
24
@
LOU
L 71-85
+0.5
27
vs
GT
W 71-65
−3.5
31
vs
DUKE
L 58-72
−0.5
7
@
NCSU
L 73-82
+1.5
11
@
CLEM
W 76-66
+18.5
14
vs
FSU
L 69-92
−27.5
17
@
MIA
L 66-67
+7.5
21
vs
WAKE
W 82-63
+15.5
28
@
UNC
L 82-89
+0.5
3
vs
BC
W 72-63
−2.5
7
@
UVA
L 72-76
+7.5
10
vs
WAKE
L 89-95
−4.5
covered 19didn’t cover 13avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
CHSO
W 98-67
+18.5
8
vs
PROV
W 107-101
+50.5
12
vs
JOES
W 94-59
−5.5
16
vs
CLT
W 84-76
+14.5
19
vs
BRY
W 78-61
−12.5
26
vs
CSU
W 66-64
−23.5
27
vs
SMC
L 66-77
−1.5
28
vs
VCU
L 68-86
+0.5
2
@
SC
W 86-83
+19.5
6
vs
GMU
W 73-62
−9.5
11
vs
WCU
W 96-74
+17.5
14
vs
UMES
W 82-53
−4.5
20
vs
ELON
W 82-81
+4.5
31
vs
UVA
W 95-85
+26.5
3
@
WAKE
L 78-81
+5.5
7
vs
STAN
L 68-69
−11.5
10
vs
CAL
W 78-75
+4.5
14
@
SMU
L 76-77
−2.5
17
vs
ND
W 89-76
+21.5
21
@
SYR
W 76-74
−2.5
24
@
LOU
L 71-85
−4.5
27
vs
GT
W 71-65
−19.5
31
vs
DUKE
L 58-72
−18.5
7
@
NCSU
L 73-82
+0.5
11
@
CLEM
W 76-66
+3.5
14
vs
FSU
L 69-92
+4.5
17
@
MIA
L 66-67
−15.5
21
vs
WAKE
W 82-63
−5.5
28
@
UNC
L 82-89
+21.5
3
vs
BC
W 72-63
−7.5
7
@
UVA
L 72-76
+2.5
10
vs
WAKE
L 89-95
+33.5
over 17under 15avg +3.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Virginia Tech has the better starters
Position by position: Old Dominion 0, Virginia Tech 5, even 0
Old DominionBetterVirginia Tech
G B. Benjamin TR5.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 32
→VTBig
G E. Copeland TR14.5 pts · 3.7 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 67
G Z. Wiggins6 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 46
→VTBig
G B. Hammond13.2 pts · 2.3 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 89
G S. Hubbard3.2 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 10
→VTBig
G I. Elohim TR12.2 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 71
F Z. Weluche-Ume TR11.1 pts · 7.3 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 29
→VTBig
G T. Johnson8 pts · 4.5 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 77
F J. Turner6.2 pts · 3.7 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 30
→VTBig
F A. Hansberry14.3 pts · 7.4 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 92
Old DominionBetterVirginia Tech
ODU offense240th of 366 · -7.3
→VTBig
VT defense72nd of 366 · +0.8
ODU defense222nd of 366 · -5.8
→VTBig
VT offense68th of 366 · +1.8
Backcourt-3.8 · 3 players
→VTBig
Backcourt+4.7 · 4 players
Frontcourt-2.9 · 2 players
→VTBig
Frontcourt+3.8 · 1 player
Bench-3.2 · 5 players
→VTBig
Bench+1.5 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestODU betterVT betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
B. Benjamin20 min · TRZ. Wiggins18 minS. Hubbard16 minK. Thurmon11 min · TRC. Parker3 minR. Hellams2 min
Forwards
Z. Weluche-Ume31 min · TRJ. Turner21 minK. Howze10 min · TRB. Nacey8 minJ. NwekeNewL. MartiniNew
Guards
E. Copeland32 min · TRB. Hammond32 minI. Elohim29 min · TRT. Johnson26 minJ. Curry24 min · TRB. Johnson21 min · TR
Forwards
A. Hansberry31 minM. Heide19 min · TRK. Atak14 min · TRS. Jones7 min
Centers
M. Sagnia12 min · TRS. DavisNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75.7 #150 | Points per game | 78.8 #85 |
| 1.06 #217 | Points per possession | 1.13 #89 |
| 70.8 #81 | Pace (possessions) | 69.8 #127 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.6 #203 | Effective FG% | 52.2 #134 |
| 36.0 #60 | 3-point % | 35.5 #88 |
| 36.2 #245 | 3-point attempt rate | 39.7 #179 |
| 34.7 #189 | Free throw rate | 34.0 #209 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.4 #95 | Turnover rate | 14.9 #60 |
| 26.0 #323 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.9 #129 |
| 12.9 #218 | Assists per game | 14.4 #122 |
| Defense | ||
| 78.7 #283 | Points allowed | 74.9 #184 |
| 1.12 #263 | Points allowed per possession | 1.07 #141 |
| 50.8 #145 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.9 #147 |
| 32.0 #62 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.6 #26 |
| 14.5 #321 | Turnovers forced | 17.3 #131 |
| 69.7 #176 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.4 #284 |
| 5.7 #275 | Steals per game | 6.4 #187 |
| 3.1 #208 | Blocks per game | 3.2 #190 |
Old Dominion
11-21 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs GA Southern84–88
- Wvs UL Monroe87–80
- W@ Georgia St81–73
- L@ Marshall88–97
- L@ Southern Miss81–86
A week or more of rest.
Virginia Tech
19-13 in 2025-26 overall · 8-11 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Wake Forest89–95
- L@ Virginia72–76
- Wvs Boston College72–63
- L@ North Carolina82–89
- Wvs Wake Forest82–63
A week or more of rest.