UNF Arena · at North Florida
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UNF | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects CARK 81–76 · win probability CARK 69%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 156.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: CARK has more of the edges
CARK 3, UNF 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: CARK 15.4%, UNF 17.8%. Forced: CARK 19.1%, UNF 12.8%
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: CARK 28.8%, UNF 25.2%. Defensive: CARK 72.6%, UNF 62.4%
CARK offense vs UNF defense
Offense 231st of 366 against a defense 363rd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
CARK has played the 241st-hardest schedule, UNF the 168th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Home court
UNF at home. This season: UNF 0-0 at home, CARK 0-0 away
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: CARK 31.2, UNF 28.8. Allowed: CARK 30.1, UNF 31.4
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: CARK plays 70.2 a game (105th fastest), UNF 72.3 (31st). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: CARK 62%, UNF 45%. Transfers in: CARK 2, UNF 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: CARK 54.0 and allows 54.9; UNF 52.9 and allows 56.3
Even
UNF offense vs CARK defense
Offense 228th of 366 against a defense 241st, on the model’s ratings
Even
Three-pointers
CARK hits 35.5% and allows 35.2%; UNF hits 35.0% and allows 35.1%. Threes are 48.7% and 51.7% of their shots
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | CARK -5.8 | — |
| Total | — | 156.7 | — |
| Projected score | — | CARK 81.2 · UNF 75.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | CARK -3.5 | — |
| 1H total | 73.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | CARK 38.4 · UNF 34.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | |
| 2-8 20% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 6 since 2021-22
CARK 4–2 UNFCARK leads · 6 games since 2021-22 · CARK has won the last 2 meetings · CARK 4-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2025-26 | UNF 69 @ CARK 98 | CARK -12.5 | CARK W |
| Feb 15, 2024-25 | UNF 83 @ CARK 84 | CARK +8.5 | CARK W |
| Jan 16, 2024-25 | CARK 80 @ UNF 92 | UNF -11.5 | UNF W |
| Feb 10, 2023-24 | CARK 79 @ UNF 77 | UNF -10.5 | CARK W |
| Jan 26, 2022-23 | UNF 85 @ CARK 88 | CARK +2.5 | CARK W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
C Arkansas
32 games played
Straight up
20-12
63% wins
Against the spread
20-12
63% covers · avg +5.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-16
50% overs · avg +3.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 54-94 | +31.5 | L −8.5 | 157.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 56-93 | +35.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 77-84 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 56-74 | +16.5 | L −1.5 | 134.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 92-65 | +4.5 | W +31.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 81-60 | -5.5 | W +15.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 57-80 | +12.5 | L −10.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 85-47 | -3.5 | W +34.5 | 138.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 68-75 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 72-83 | +36.5 | W +25.5 | 158.5 | U 155 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 82-99 | +24.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 85-83 | +2.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 93-73 | -11.5 | W +8.5 | 147.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 78-84 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 75-79 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 62-60 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 136.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 98-69 | -12.5 | W +16.5 | 164.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 86-65 | -3.5 | W +17.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 100-90 | +5.5 | W +15.5 | 158.5 | O 190 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 90-81 | -4.5 | W +4.5 | 151.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 81-60 | -10.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 86-78 | +3.5 | W +11.5 | 155.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 9 | @ | W 72-65 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 84-76 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 79-62 | -10.5 | W +6.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 88-76 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 149.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 71-75 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 93-88 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 84-79 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 163.5 | U 163 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 86-73 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 73-63 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 93-98 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 157.5 | O 191 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
UNC
L 54-94
−8.5
11
@
ARK
L 56-93
−1.5
16
vs
SAM
L 77-84
−0.5
20
@
UNT
L 56-74
−1.5
23
vs
EWU
W 92-65
+31.5
25
vs
EIU
W 81-60
+15.5
29
@
ETSU
L 57-80
−10.5
3
vs
LR
W 85-47
+34.5
7
@
ETAM
L 68-75
−4.5
13
@
VAN
L 72-83
+25.5
21
@
SMU
L 82-99
+7.5
1
vs
FGCU
W 85-83
+4.5
3
vs
STET
W 93-73
+8.5
8
@
BELL
L 78-84
−8.5
10
@
EKU
L 75-79
−5.5
15
vs
JAX
W 62-60
−5.5
17
vs
UNF
W 98-69
+16.5
22
@
WGA
W 86-65
+17.5
28
@
QUC
W 100-90
+15.5
31
vs
EKU
W 90-81
+4.5
4
vs
UNA
W 81-60
+10.5
7
@
LIP
W 86-78
+11.5
9
@
UNA
W 72-65
+0.5
11
vs
BELL
W 84-76
−0.5
14
vs
WGA
W 79-62
+6.5
19
@
STET
W 88-76
+2.5
21
@
FGCU
L 71-75
−5.5
25
@
APSU
W 93-88
+9.5
28
vs
QUC
W 84-79
+2.5
6
vs
BELL
W 86-73
+6.5
7
vs
FGCU
W 73-63
+5.5
8
vs
QUC
L 93-98
−6.5
covered 20didn’t cover 12avg +5.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
UNC
L 54-94
−9.5
11
@
ARK
L 56-93
−9.5
16
vs
SAM
L 77-84
+9.5
20
@
UNT
L 56-74
−4.5
23
vs
EWU
W 92-65
+2.5
25
vs
EIU
W 81-60
+1.5
29
@
ETSU
L 57-80
−7.5
3
vs
LR
W 85-47
−6.5
7
@
ETAM
L 68-75
−2.5
13
@
VAN
L 72-83
−3.5
21
@
SMU
L 82-99
+24.5
1
vs
FGCU
W 85-83
+11.5
3
vs
STET
W 93-73
+18.5
8
@
BELL
L 78-84
+7.5
10
@
EKU
L 75-79
−2.5
15
vs
JAX
W 62-60
−14.5
17
vs
UNF
W 98-69
+2.5
22
@
WGA
W 86-65
−3.5
28
@
QUC
W 100-90
+31.5
31
vs
EKU
W 90-81
+19.5
4
vs
UNA
W 81-60
−6.5
7
@
LIP
W 86-78
+8.5
9
@
UNA
W 72-65
−8.5
11
vs
BELL
W 84-76
+9.5
14
vs
WGA
W 79-62
−9.5
19
@
STET
W 88-76
+14.5
21
@
FGCU
L 71-75
−6.5
25
@
APSU
W 93-88
+28.5
28
vs
QUC
W 84-79
−0.5
6
vs
BELL
W 86-73
+4.5
7
vs
FGCU
W 73-63
−8.5
8
vs
QUC
L 93-98
+33.5
over 16under 16avg +3.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
North Florida
30 games played
Straight up
5-25
17% wins
Against the spread
18-12
60% covers · avg +1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +3.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ | L 64-104 | +43.5 | W +3.5 | 169.5 | U 168 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 66-99 | +41.5 | W +8.5 | 155.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 78-86 | +10.5 | W +2.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 83-92 | +9.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 82-85 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 63-72 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 58-109 | +42.5 | L −8.5 | 166.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 61-84 | +30.5 | W +7.5 | 159.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 90-113 | +10.5 | L −12.5 | 163.5 | O 203 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 67-105 | +37.5 | L −0.5 | 171.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 28 | vs | L 82-90 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 83-102 | +15.5 | L −3.5 | 162.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 74-82 | +18.5 | W +10.5 | 172.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 73-85 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 164.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 82-89 | +11.5 | W +4.5 | 173.5 | U 171 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 105-91 | +9.5 | W +23.5 | 157.5 | O 196 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 69-98 | +12.5 | L −16.5 | 164.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 87-85 | +8.5 | W +10.5 | 166.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 117-114 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 164.5 | O 231 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 77-84 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 165.5 | U 161 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 94-100 | +10.5 | W +4.5 | 165.5 | O 194 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 81-73 | +5.5 | W +13.5 | 166.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 72-91 | +15.5 | L −3.5 | 178.5 | U 163 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 81-90 | +13.5 | W +4.5 | 163.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 56-63 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 153.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 76-77 | +11.5 | W +10.5 | 166.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 71-76 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 161.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 76-70 | +6.5 | W +12.5 | 160.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 61-85 | +1.5 | L −22.5 | 151.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 85-93 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 160.5 | O 178 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@
FLA
L 64-104
+3.5
12
@
TENN
L 66-99
+8.5
19
@
WOF
L 78-86
+2.5
22
vs
USM
L 83-92
+0.5
23
vs
PV
L 82-85
+0.5
2
vs
SIUE
L 63-72
−1.5
7
@
GONZ
L 58-109
−8.5
13
@
DAY
L 61-84
+7.5
18
@
CHSO
L 90-113
−12.5
21
@
MIA
L 67-105
−0.5
28
vs
COLU
L 82-90
+3.5
1
@
APSU
L 83-102
−3.5
3
@
LIP
L 74-82
+10.5
8
vs
WGA
L 73-85
−9.5
10
vs
QUC
L 82-89
+4.5
15
@
UNA
W 105-91
+23.5
17
@
CARK
L 69-98
−16.5
22
vs
EKU
W 87-85
+10.5
24
vs
BELL
W 117-114
+6.5
29
vs
STET
L 77-84
−5.5
31
vs
LIP
L 94-100
+4.5
5
@
WGA
W 81-73
+13.5
7
@
QUC
L 72-91
−3.5
11
@
FGCU
L 81-90
+4.5
14
@
JAX
L 56-63
+0.5
19
vs
APSU
L 76-77
+10.5
21
@
STET
L 71-76
−3.5
26
vs
FGCU
W 76-70
+12.5
28
vs
JAX
L 61-85
−22.5
4
vs
WGA
L 85-93
−4.5
covered 18didn’t cover 12avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@
FLA
L 64-104
−1.5
12
@
TENN
L 66-99
+9.5
19
@
WOF
L 78-86
+2.5
22
vs
USM
L 83-92
+20.5
23
vs
PV
L 82-85
+6.5
2
vs
SIUE
L 63-72
−18.5
7
@
GONZ
L 58-109
+0.5
13
@
DAY
L 61-84
−14.5
18
@
CHSO
L 90-113
+39.5
21
@
MIA
L 67-105
+0.5
28
vs
COLU
L 82-90
+9.5
1
@
APSU
L 83-102
+22.5
3
@
LIP
L 74-82
−16.5
8
vs
WGA
L 73-85
−6.5
10
vs
QUC
L 82-89
−2.5
15
@
UNA
W 105-91
+38.5
17
@
CARK
L 69-98
+2.5
22
vs
EKU
W 87-85
+5.5
24
vs
BELL
W 117-114
+66.5
29
vs
STET
L 77-84
−4.5
31
vs
LIP
L 94-100
+28.5
5
@
WGA
W 81-73
−12.5
7
@
QUC
L 72-91
−15.5
11
@
FGCU
L 81-90
+7.5
14
@
JAX
L 56-63
−34.5
19
vs
APSU
L 76-77
−13.5
21
@
STET
L 71-76
−14.5
26
vs
FGCU
W 76-70
−14.5
28
vs
JAX
L 61-85
−5.5
4
vs
WGA
L 85-93
+17.5
over 16under 14avg +3.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
C Arkansas has the better starters
Position by position: C Arkansas 2, North Florida 0, even 3
C ArkansasBetterNorth Florida
G L. Moore9.6 pts · 2.8 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 28
=Even
G K. Jackson14.8 pts · 3.4 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 38
G T. Robinson14.2 pts · 5.6 reb · 2 ast
Score 89
←CARKBig
G B. Plummer7.2 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 3
G C. McCormick9.1 pts · 3.4 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 44
←CARKSmall
G M. Lee7.8 pts · 5.6 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 29
G H. Beauchamp4.3 pts · 1.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 8
=Even
G E. Placer TR8.3 pts · 1.9 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 21
F M. Marable3.7 pts · 4.4 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 3
=Even
G E. Elliott TR4.2 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 8
C ArkansasBetterNorth Florida
CARK offense231st of 366 · -7.1
←CARKBig
UNF defense363rd of 366 · -12.0
CARK defense241st of 366 · -6.4
=Even
UNF offense228th of 366 · -7.0
Backcourt-2.6 · 4 players
←CARKBig
Backcourt-12.6 · 5 players
Frontcourt-3.0 · 1 player
=No call
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
Bench-1.8 · 4 players
→UNFSmall
Bench-0.7 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestCARK betterUNF betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
L. Moore30 minT. Robinson28 minC. McCormick23 minH. Beauchamp15 minO. Dehrmann3 minJ. Shulman3 min
Forwards
M. Marable21 minT. Anderson12 min · TRS. Saadi9 min · TRA. HoernerNew
Guards
K. Jackson33 minB. Plummer27 minM. Lee26 minE. Placer26 min · TRE. Elliott22 min · TRG. Jacobs3 min
Forwards
A. Bryant8 min · TRA. BegajNewI. BrownNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 79.3 #77 | Points per game | 77.1 #112 |
| 1.13 #90 | Points per possession | 1.06 #218 |
| 70.2 #105 | Pace (possessions) | 72.3 #31 |
| Shooting | ||
| 54.0 #68 | Effective FG% | 52.9 #106 |
| 35.5 #89 | 3-point % | 35.0 #117 |
| 48.7 #21 | 3-point attempt rate | 51.7 #7 |
| 31.2 #278 | Free throw rate | 28.8 #333 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.4 #92 | Turnover rate | 17.8 #261 |
| 28.8 #240 | Offensive rebound rate | 25.2 #335 |
| 16.0 #46 | Assists per game | 13.4 #185 |
| Defense | ||
| 76.0 #216 | Points allowed | 89.6 #365 |
| 1.08 #180 | Points allowed per possession | 1.24 #364 |
| 54.9 #328 | Opponent effective FG% | 56.3 #349 |
| 35.2 #262 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.1 #253 |
| 19.1 #45 | Turnovers forced | 12.8 #360 |
| 72.6 #48 | Defensive rebound rate | 62.4 #361 |
| 8.5 #18 | Steals per game | 4.6 #352 |
| 1.9 #351 | Blocks per game | 1.4 #364 |
C Arkansas
20-12 in 2025-26 overall · 17-4 in conference · United Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Queens University Royals93–98
- Wvs FGCU73–63
- Wvs Bellarmine86–73
- Wvs Queens University Royals84–79
- W@ Austin Peay93–88
A week or more of rest.
North Florida
5-25 in 2025-26 overall · 5-14 in conference · Atlantic Sun Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs West Georgia85–93
- Lvs Jacksonville61–85
- Wvs FGCU76–70
- L@ Stetson71–76
- Lvs Austin Peay76–77
A week or more of rest.