TD Arena · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MINN | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects OKST 77–73 · win probability OKST 63%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 149.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MINN has more of the edges
OKST 1, MINN 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: OKST plays 74.8 a game (6th fastest), MINN 63.6 (362nd). Faster games mean more points
Shooting
Effective FG%: OKST 52.0 and allows 53.1; MINN 53.9 and allows 51.9
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: OKST 30.8%, MINN 26.8%. Defensive: OKST 69.7%, MINN 70.5%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: OKST 41%, MINN 66%. Transfers in: OKST 6, MINN 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Three-pointers
OKST hits 33.9% and allows 36.0%; MINN hits 34.1% and allows 34.6%. Threes are 35.5% and 47.1% of their shots
Even
MINN offense vs OKST defense
Offense 120th of 366 against a defense 99th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
OKST has played the 60th-hardest schedule, MINN the 71st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: OKST 15.7%, MINN 16.6%. Forced: OKST 15.7%, MINN 16.8%
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: OKST 39.4, MINN 35.8. Allowed: OKST 31.4, MINN 26.9
Even
OKST offense vs MINN defense
Offense 23rd of 366 against a defense 22nd, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | OKST -3.8 | — |
| Total | — | 149.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | OKST 76.8 · MINN 73 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | OKST -2.4 | — |
| 1H total | 70.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | OKST 36.2 · MINN 33.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 8-2 80% | |
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Oklahoma St
35 games played
Straight up
20-15
57% wins
Against the spread
16-19
46% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
21-14
60% overs · avg +3.4 pts vs the total
Against the spread
16-1946%
2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 95-71 | -20.5 | W +3.5 | 165.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 87-63 | +2.5 | W +26.5 | 174.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 94-67 | -30.5 | L −3.5 | 168.5 | U 161 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 85-69 | -20.5 | L −4.5 | 154.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 103-95 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 177.5 | O 198 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 95-81 | -23.5 | L −9.5 | 155.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 27 | @ | W 86-81 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 159.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 93-83 | -13.5 | L −3.5 | 169.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 84-78 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 76-85 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 169.5 | U 161 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 91-79 | -27.5 | L −15.5 | 161.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 94-89 | -19.5 | L −14.5 | 176.5 | O 183 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 103-77 | -20.5 | W +5.5 | 164.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 80-102 | +12.5 | L −9.5 | 167.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 87-76 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 175.5 | U 163 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 71-83 | +19.5 | W +7.5 | 165.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 79-94 | +1.5 | L −13.5 | 165.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 84-83 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 175.5 | U 167 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 65-68 | +8.5 | W +5.5 | 161.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 71-84 | +10.5 | L −2.5 | 162.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 81-69 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 166.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 99-92 | +8.5 | W +15.5 | 167.5 | O 191 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 47-84 | +20.5 | L −16.5 | 168.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 76-85 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 163.5 | U 161 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 92-95 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 156.5 | O 187 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 69-81 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 158.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 69-83 | +3.5 | L −10.5 | 162.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 91-84 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 68-91 | +9.5 | L −13.5 | 151.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 111-104 | +8.5 | W +15.5 | 167.5 | O 215 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 75-82 | +13.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 92-83 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 164.5 | O 175 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 88-95 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 158.5 | O 183 |
| Mar 17 | vs | W 84-80 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 22 | vs | L 70-96 | -2.5 | L −28.5 | 164.5 | O 166 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
ORU
W 95-71
+3.5
9
vs
TA&M
W 87-63
+26.5
12
vs
PV
W 94-67
−3.5
16
vs
AMCC
W 85-69
−4.5
19
vs
USF
W 103-95
+4.5
22
vs
NICH
W 95-81
−9.5
27
@
NU
W 86-81
+7.5
2
vs
SHSU
W 93-83
−3.5
6
vs
GCU
W 84-78
+4.5
13
vs
OU
L 76-85
−6.5
18
vs
KC
W 91-79
−15.5
21
vs
CSUF
W 94-89
−14.5
29
vs
BCU
W 103-77
+5.5
3
@
TTU
L 80-102
−9.5
6
vs
UCF
W 87-76
+9.5
10
@
ISU
L 71-83
+7.5
13
vs
BAY
L 79-94
−13.5
17
vs
KSU
W 84-83
−1.5
20
@
TCU
L 65-68
+5.5
24
vs
ISU
L 71-84
−2.5
31
@
UTAH
W 81-69
+10.5
4
vs
BYU
W 99-92
+15.5
7
@
ARIZ
L 47-84
−16.5
10
@
ASU
L 76-85
−5.5
14
vs
TCU
L 92-95
−1.5
18
vs
KU
L 69-81
−4.5
21
@
COLO
L 69-83
−10.5
24
vs
WVU
W 91-84
+5.5
28
@
CIN
L 68-91
−13.5
3
@
UCF
W 111-104
+15.5
7
vs
HOU
L 75-82
+6.5
10
vs
COLO
W 92-83
+10.5
11
vs
TCU
L 88-95
+0.5
17
vs
DAV
W 84-80
−2.5
22
vs
WICH
L 70-96
−28.5
covered 16didn’t cover 19avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
ORU
W 95-71
+0.5
9
vs
TA&M
W 87-63
−24.5
12
vs
PV
W 94-67
−7.5
16
vs
AMCC
W 85-69
−0.5
19
vs
USF
W 103-95
+20.5
22
vs
NICH
W 95-81
+20.5
27
@
NU
W 86-81
+7.5
2
vs
SHSU
W 93-83
+6.5
6
vs
GCU
W 84-78
+6.5
13
vs
OU
L 76-85
−8.5
18
vs
KC
W 91-79
+8.5
21
vs
CSUF
W 94-89
+6.5
29
vs
BCU
W 103-77
+15.5
3
@
TTU
L 80-102
+14.5
6
vs
UCF
W 87-76
−12.5
10
@
ISU
L 71-83
−11.5
13
vs
BAY
L 79-94
+7.5
17
vs
KSU
W 84-83
−8.5
20
@
TCU
L 65-68
−28.5
24
vs
ISU
L 71-84
−7.5
31
@
UTAH
W 81-69
−16.5
4
vs
BYU
W 99-92
+23.5
7
@
ARIZ
L 47-84
−37.5
10
@
ASU
L 76-85
−2.5
14
vs
TCU
L 92-95
+30.5
18
vs
KU
L 69-81
−8.5
21
@
COLO
L 69-83
−10.5
24
vs
WVU
W 91-84
+30.5
28
@
CIN
L 68-91
+7.5
3
@
UCF
W 111-104
+47.5
7
vs
HOU
L 75-82
+5.5
10
vs
COLO
W 92-83
+10.5
11
vs
TCU
L 88-95
+24.5
17
vs
DAV
W 84-80
+9.5
22
vs
WICH
L 70-96
+1.5
over 21under 14avg +3.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Minnesota
33 games played
Straight up
15-18
45% wins
Against the spread
13-20
39% covers · avg −1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-21
36% overs · avg −4.3 pts vs the total
Against the spread
13-2039%
4 straight misses ATS0 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 87-60 | -28.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 95-50 | -31.5 | W +13.5 | 152.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 60-83 | +7.5 | L −15.5 | 158.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 72-65 | -25.5 | L −18.5 | 146.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 66-54 | -27.5 | L −15.5 | 144.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 65-77 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 68-72 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 142.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 75-86 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 138.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 73-64 | +7.5 | W +16.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 57-85 | +19.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 89-53 | -21.5 | W +14.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 78-50 | -13.5 | W +14.5 | 145.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 60-43 | -25.5 | L −8.5 | 139.5 | U 103 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 84-78 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 138.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 70-67 | +4.5 | W +7.5 | 130.5 | O 137 |
| Jan 9 | vs | L 69-70 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 75-78 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 67-77 | +15.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 74-82 | +7.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 57-76 | +4.5 | L −14.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 63-67 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 1 | @ | L 75-77 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 76-73 | +8.5 | W +11.5 | 136.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 8 | vs | L 62-67 | -10.5 | L −15.5 | 138.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 57-69 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 138.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 17 | @ | W 61-44 | +3.5 | W +20.5 | 136.5 | U 105 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 80-61 | -8.5 | W +10.5 | 136.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 67-77 | +22.5 | W +12.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 78-73 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 136.5 | O 151 |
| Mar 4 | @ | L 47-77 | +7.5 | L −22.5 | 138.5 | U 124 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 67-66 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 133.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 67-72 | -6.5 | L −11.5 | 135.5 | O 139 |
| Apr 1 | vs | L 48-67 | +3.5 | L −15.5 | 146.5 | U 115 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
GWEB
W 87-60
−1.5
8
vs
ALCN
W 95-50
+13.5
12
@
MIZ
L 60-83
−15.5
15
vs
GB
W 72-65
−18.5
18
vs
CHST
W 66-54
−15.5
22
vs
SF
L 65-77
−13.5
27
vs
STAN
L 68-72
−1.5
28
vs
SCU
L 75-86
−5.5
3
vs
IU
W 73-64
+16.5
10
@
PUR
L 57-85
−8.5
14
vs
TXSO
W 89-53
+14.5
21
vs
CAM
W 78-50
+14.5
29
vs
FDU
W 60-43
−8.5
3
@
NU
W 84-78
+10.5
6
vs
IOWA
W 70-67
+7.5
9
vs
USC
L 69-70
−4.5
13
vs
WIS
L 75-78
−1.5
17
@
ILL
L 67-77
+5.5
20
@
OSU
L 74-82
−0.5
24
vs
NEB
L 57-76
−14.5
28
@
WIS
L 63-67
+5.5
1
@
PSU
L 75-77
−4.5
4
vs
MSU
W 76-73
+11.5
8
vs
MD
L 62-67
−15.5
14
@
WASH
L 57-69
−5.5
17
@
ORE
W 61-44
+20.5
21
vs
RUTG
W 80-61
+10.5
24
@
MICH
L 67-77
+12.5
28
vs
UCLA
W 78-73
+6.5
4
@
IU
L 47-77
−22.5
7
vs
NU
W 67-66
−3.5
11
vs
RUTG
L 67-72
−11.5
1
vs
BAY
L 48-67
−15.5
covered 13didn’t cover 20avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
GWEB
W 87-60
−1.5
8
vs
ALCN
W 95-50
−7.5
12
@
MIZ
L 60-83
−15.5
15
vs
GB
W 72-65
−9.5
18
vs
CHST
W 66-54
−24.5
22
vs
SF
L 65-77
+1.5
27
vs
STAN
L 68-72
−2.5
28
vs
SCU
L 75-86
+22.5
3
vs
IU
W 73-64
−7.5
10
@
PUR
L 57-85
−1.5
14
vs
TXSO
W 89-53
−2.5
21
vs
CAM
W 78-50
−17.5
29
vs
FDU
W 60-43
−36.5
3
@
NU
W 84-78
+23.5
6
vs
IOWA
W 70-67
+6.5
9
vs
USC
L 69-70
−8.5
13
vs
WIS
L 75-78
+6.5
17
@
ILL
L 67-77
+1.5
20
@
OSU
L 74-82
+12.5
24
vs
NEB
L 57-76
−7.5
28
@
WIS
L 63-67
−16.5
1
@
PSU
L 75-77
+9.5
4
vs
MSU
W 76-73
+12.5
8
vs
MD
L 62-67
−9.5
14
@
WASH
L 57-69
−12.5
17
@
ORE
W 61-44
−31.5
21
vs
RUTG
W 80-61
+4.5
24
@
MICH
L 67-77
−1.5
28
vs
UCLA
W 78-73
+14.5
4
@
IU
L 47-77
−14.5
7
vs
NU
W 67-66
−0.5
11
vs
RUTG
L 67-72
+3.5
1
vs
BAY
L 48-67
−31.5
over 12under 21avg −4.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Oklahoma St has the better starters
Position by position: Oklahoma St 2, Minnesota 0, even 3
Oklahoma StBetterMinnesota
G K. Clary10.6 pts · 2.9 reb · 4.6 ast
Score 78
=Even
G I. Asuma10.9 pts · 4 reb · 3.7 ast
Score 64
G K. Natt TR11.3 pts · 8.2 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 94
←OKSTBig
G M. Palmer TR4.6 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 43
G J. Walker TR11.2 pts · 2.1 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 55
=Even
F B. Durkin10.2 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 65
F J. Burks TR13.3 pts · 4.8 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 90
=Even
F J. Crocker-Johnson13.4 pts · 6.8 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 81
F P. Fallah14.7 pts · 6 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 97
←OKSTBig
F G. Grove4 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 59
Oklahoma StBetterMinnesota
OKST offense23rd of 366 · +7.5
=Even
MINN defense22nd of 366 · +5.2
OKST defense99th of 366 · -0.7
=Even
MINN offense120th of 366 · -2.8
Backcourt+4.0 · 3 players
←OKSTBig
Backcourt-0.5 · 2 players
Frontcourt+7.7 · 2 players
←OKSTBig
Frontcourt+2.9 · 3 players
Bench+2.4 · 5 players
←OKSTBig
Bench-2.3 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestOKST betterMINN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. Clary28 minK. Natt27 min · TRJ. Walker26 min · TRL. Bogavac24 min · TRR. Crotty10 minJ. MontonatiNew
Forwards
J. Burks28 min · TRP. Fallah26 minA. Grbovic20 min · TRB. Ahmed13 minM. Ragland6 minL. AllmondNew
Centers
J. Halaifonua20 min · TR
Guards
I. Asuma34 minM. Palmer18 min · TRK. Evans18 min · TRK. Shinholster13 minN. Groves6 min · TRW. Grady6 min · TR
Forwards
B. Durkin33 minJ. Crocker-Johnson32 minG. Grove21 minN. AndersonNew
Centers
M. Kordel4 min · TRC. MpoyiNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 83.9 #21 | Points per game | 69.4 #294 |
| 1.12 #110 | Points per possession | 1.10 #147 |
| 74.8 #6 | Pace (possessions) | 63.6 #362 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.0 #144 | Effective FG% | 53.9 #69 |
| 33.9 #176 | 3-point % | 34.1 #164 |
| 35.5 #260 | 3-point attempt rate | 47.1 #31 |
| 39.4 #70 | Free throw rate | 35.8 #159 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.7 #117 | Turnover rate | 16.6 #170 |
| 30.8 #169 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.8 #304 |
| 14.6 #113 | Assists per game | 17.0 #25 |
| Defense | ||
| 83.2 #349 | Points allowed | 68.5 #38 |
| 1.12 #265 | Points allowed per possession | 1.07 #139 |
| 53.1 #272 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.9 #207 |
| 36.0 #304 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.6 #229 |
| 15.7 #240 | Turnovers forced | 16.8 #168 |
| 69.7 #178 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.5 #137 |
| 7.1 #120 | Steals per game | 6.3 #197 |
| 2.7 #285 | Blocks per game | 2.7 #284 |
Oklahoma St
20-15 in 2025-26 overall · 7-13 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Wichita St70–96
- Wvs Davidson84–80
- Lvs TCU88–95
- Wvs Colorado92–83
- Lvs Houston75–82
A week or more of rest.
Minnesota
15-18 in 2025-26 overall · 8-13 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Baylor48–67
- Lvs Rutgers67–72
- Wvs Northwestern67–66
- L@ Indiana47–77
- Wvs UCLA78–73
A week or more of rest.