United Center · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UK | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects KU 80–78 · win probability KU 56%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 157.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UK has more of the edges
KU 0, UK 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: KU 29.3%, UK 33.2%. Defensive: KU 70.1%, UK 70.0%
Turnovers
Turnover rate: KU 15.6%, UK 15.4%. Forced: KU 13.8%, UK 15.5%
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: KU plays 68.8 a game (193rd fastest), UK 69.9 (123rd). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: KU 9%, UK 26%. Transfers in: KU 5, UK 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: KU 32.2, UK 37.4. Allowed: KU 27.4, UK 36.4
Even
Three-pointers
KU hits 34.6% and allows 30.6%; UK hits 34.2% and allows 31.8%. Threes are 35.2% and 39.7% of their shots
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: KU 51.2 and allows 45.0; UK 53.4 and allows 48.9
Even
KU offense vs UK defense
Offense 17th of 366 against a defense 32nd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Context
Schedule so far
KU has played the 2nd-hardest schedule, UK the 5th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
UK offense vs KU defense
Offense 13th of 366 against a defense 15th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | KU -1.7 | — |
| Total | — | 157.5 | — |
| Projected score | — | KU 79.6 · UK 77.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | KU -1.1 | — |
| 1H total | 73.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | KU 37.4 · UK 36.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
KU 2–1 UKKU leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · KU has won the last 2 meetings · KU 1-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2023-24 | UK 84 vs KU 89 | KU -6.5 | UK W |
| Jan 28, 2022-23 | KU 77 @ UK 68 | UK -2.5 | KU W |
| Jan 29, 2021-22 | UK 80 @ KU 62 | KU -5 | UK W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Kansas
35 games played
Straight up
24-11
69% wins
Against the spread
21-14
60% covers · avg +1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-24
31% overs · avg −4.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 94-51 | -30.5 | W +12.5 | 152.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 74-87 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 77-46 | -25.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 76-57 | -22.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 18 | vs | L 66-78 | +10.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 71-61 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 71-60 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 81-76 | +7.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 56-61 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | U 117 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 80-60 | -5.5 | W +14.5 | 150.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 77-76 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 73-49 | -14.5 | W +9.5 | 137.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 90-61 | -14.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 75-81 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 104-100 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 143.5 | O 204 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 75-86 | -2.5 | L −13.5 | 139.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 84-63 | +3.5 | W +24.5 | 152.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 16 | vs | W 80-62 | -7.5 | W +10.5 | 156.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 75-69 | -4.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 86-62 | -4.5 | W +19.5 | 158.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 90-82 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 159.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 2 | @ | W 64-61 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 155.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 71-59 | -18.5 | L −6.5 | 150.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 82-78 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 56-74 | +7.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 81-69 | -7.5 | W +4.5 | 158.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 68-84 | -8.5 | L −24.5 | 139.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 23 | vs | W 69-56 | +2.5 | W +15.5 | 138.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 61-84 | +9.5 | L −13.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 60-70 | -5.5 | L −15.5 | 151.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 104-85 | -17.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | O 189 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 78-73 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 47-69 | +5.5 | L −16.5 | 139.5 | U 116 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 68-60 | -14.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 22 | vs | L 65-67 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
GB
W 94-51
+12.5
7
@
UNC
L 74-87
−10.5
11
vs
AMCC
W 77-46
+5.5
15
vs
PRIN
W 76-57
−3.5
18
vs
DUKE
L 66-78
−1.5
24
vs
ND
W 71-61
+4.5
25
vs
SYR
W 71-60
+6.5
26
vs
TENN
W 81-76
+12.5
2
vs
CONN
L 56-61
−1.5
7
vs
MIZ
W 80-60
+14.5
13
@
NCSU
W 77-76
+2.5
16
vs
TOW
W 73-49
+9.5
22
vs
DAV
W 90-61
+14.5
3
@
UCF
L 75-81
−10.5
6
vs
TCU
W 104-100
−2.5
10
@
WVU
L 75-86
−13.5
13
vs
ISU
W 84-63
+24.5
16
vs
BAY
W 80-62
+10.5
20
@
COLO
W 75-69
+1.5
24
@
KSU
W 86-62
+19.5
31
vs
BYU
W 90-82
+5.5
2
@
TTU
W 64-61
+6.5
7
vs
UTAH
W 71-59
−6.5
9
vs
ARIZ
W 82-78
+9.5
14
@
ISU
L 56-74
−10.5
18
@
OKST
W 81-69
+4.5
21
vs
CIN
L 68-84
−24.5
23
vs
HOU
W 69-56
+15.5
28
@
ARIZ
L 61-84
−13.5
3
@
ASU
L 60-70
−15.5
7
vs
KSU
W 104-85
+1.5
12
vs
TCU
W 78-73
+0.5
13
vs
HOU
L 47-69
−16.5
20
vs
CBU
W 68-60
−6.5
22
vs
SJU
L 65-67
+1.5
covered 21didn’t cover 14avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
GB
W 94-51
−7.5
7
@
UNC
L 74-87
+1.5
11
vs
AMCC
W 77-46
−22.5
15
vs
PRIN
W 76-57
−11.5
18
vs
DUKE
L 66-78
−5.5
24
vs
ND
W 71-61
−11.5
25
vs
SYR
W 71-60
−13.5
26
vs
TENN
W 81-76
+16.5
2
vs
CONN
L 56-61
−24.5
7
vs
MIZ
W 80-60
−10.5
13
@
NCSU
W 77-76
+4.5
16
vs
TOW
W 73-49
−15.5
22
vs
DAV
W 90-61
+11.5
3
@
UCF
L 75-81
−1.5
6
vs
TCU
W 104-100
+60.5
10
@
WVU
L 75-86
+21.5
13
vs
ISU
W 84-63
−5.5
16
vs
BAY
W 80-62
−14.5
20
@
COLO
W 75-69
−11.5
24
@
KSU
W 86-62
−10.5
31
vs
BYU
W 90-82
+12.5
2
@
TTU
W 64-61
−30.5
7
vs
UTAH
W 71-59
−20.5
9
vs
ARIZ
W 82-78
+7.5
14
@
ISU
L 56-74
−17.5
18
@
OKST
W 81-69
−8.5
21
vs
CIN
L 68-84
+12.5
23
vs
HOU
W 69-56
−13.5
28
@
ARIZ
L 61-84
−6.5
3
@
ASU
L 60-70
−21.5
7
vs
KSU
W 104-85
+31.5
12
vs
TCU
W 78-73
+4.5
13
vs
HOU
L 47-69
−23.5
20
vs
CBU
W 68-60
−14.5
22
vs
SJU
L 65-67
−12.5
over 11under 24avg −4.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Kentucky
36 games played
Straight up
22-14
61% wins
Against the spread
18-18
50% covers · avg −1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-18
50% overs · avg −0.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 77-51 | -31.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 107-59 | -32.5 | W +15.5 | 157.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 88-96 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 173.5 | O 184 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 99-53 | -35.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 18 | vs | L 66-83 | -3.5 | L −20.5 | 152.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 88-46 | -35.5 | W +6.5 | 159.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 104-54 | -37.5 | W +12.5 | 157.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 64-67 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 163.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 5 | vs | L 59-94 | +5.5 | L −29.5 | 159.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 103-67 | -42.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 72-60 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 156.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 78-66 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 154.5 | U 144 |
| Dec 23 | vs | W 99-85 | -34.5 | L −20.5 | 152.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 74-89 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 173.5 | U 163 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 68-73 | -12.5 | L −17.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 92-68 | -10.5 | W +13.5 | 152.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 75-74 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 80-78 | +6.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 85-80 | -7.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 72-63 | -11.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 55-80 | +5.5 | L −19.5 | 155.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 85-77 | +6.5 | W +14.5 | 159.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 94-78 | -8.5 | W +7.5 | 152.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 74-71 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 83-92 | +12.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 17 | vs | L 78-86 | -6.5 | L −14.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 74-75 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 24 | @ | W 72-63 | -7.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 91-77 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 157.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 85-96 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 162.5 | O 181 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 77-84 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 162.5 | U 161 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 87-82 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 151.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 78-72 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 148.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 63-71 | +10.5 | W +2.5 | 161.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 89-84 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | O 173 |
| Mar 22 | vs | L 63-82 | +5.5 | L −13.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
NICH
W 77-51
−5.5
7
vs
VAL
W 107-59
+15.5
11
@
LOU
L 88-96
−2.5
14
vs
EIU
W 99-53
+10.5
18
vs
MSU
L 66-83
−20.5
21
vs
L-MD
W 88-46
+6.5
26
vs
TNTC
W 104-54
+12.5
2
vs
UNC
L 64-67
−10.5
5
vs
GONZ
L 59-94
−29.5
9
vs
NCCU
W 103-67
−6.5
13
vs
IU
W 72-60
+8.5
20
vs
SJU
W 78-66
+10.5
23
vs
BELL
W 99-85
−20.5
3
@
ALA
L 74-89
−9.5
7
vs
MIZ
L 68-73
−17.5
10
vs
MSST
W 92-68
+13.5
14
@
LSU
W 75-74
−2.5
17
@
TENN
W 80-78
+8.5
21
vs
TEX
W 85-80
−2.5
24
vs
MISS
W 72-63
−2.5
27
@
VAN
L 55-80
−19.5
31
@
ARK
W 85-77
+14.5
4
vs
OU
W 94-78
+7.5
7
vs
TENN
W 74-71
+1.5
14
@
FLA
L 83-92
+3.5
17
vs
UGA
L 78-86
−14.5
21
@
AUB
L 74-75
+2.5
24
@
SC
W 72-63
+1.5
28
vs
VAN
W 91-77
+12.5
3
@
TA&M
L 85-96
−9.5
7
vs
FLA
L 77-84
−1.5
11
vs
LSU
W 87-82
−3.5
12
vs
MIZ
W 78-72
+3.5
13
vs
FLA
L 63-71
+2.5
20
vs
SCU
W 89-84
+1.5
22
vs
ISU
L 63-82
−13.5
covered 18didn’t cover 18avg −1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
NICH
W 77-51
−29.5
7
vs
VAL
W 107-59
+8.5
11
@
LOU
L 88-96
+10.5
14
vs
EIU
W 99-53
+4.5
18
vs
MSU
L 66-83
−3.5
21
vs
L-MD
W 88-46
−25.5
26
vs
TNTC
W 104-54
+0.5
2
vs
UNC
L 64-67
−32.5
5
vs
GONZ
L 59-94
−6.5
9
vs
NCCU
W 103-67
+21.5
13
vs
IU
W 72-60
−24.5
20
vs
SJU
W 78-66
−10.5
23
vs
BELL
W 99-85
+31.5
3
@
ALA
L 74-89
−10.5
7
vs
MIZ
L 68-73
−9.5
10
vs
MSST
W 92-68
+7.5
14
@
LSU
W 75-74
−2.5
17
@
TENN
W 80-78
+12.5
21
vs
TEX
W 85-80
+12.5
24
vs
MISS
W 72-63
−10.5
27
@
VAN
L 55-80
−20.5
31
@
ARK
W 85-77
+2.5
4
vs
OU
W 94-78
+19.5
7
vs
TENN
W 74-71
−2.5
14
@
FLA
L 83-92
+20.5
17
vs
UGA
L 78-86
+2.5
21
@
AUB
L 74-75
−4.5
24
@
SC
W 72-63
−16.5
28
vs
VAN
W 91-77
+10.5
3
@
TA&M
L 85-96
+18.5
7
vs
FLA
L 77-84
−1.5
11
vs
LSU
W 87-82
+17.5
12
vs
MIZ
W 78-72
+1.5
13
vs
FLA
L 63-71
−27.5
20
vs
SCU
W 89-84
+15.5
22
vs
ISU
L 63-82
−1.5
over 18under 18avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Kansas has the better starters
Position by position: Kansas 1, Kentucky 0, even 4
KansasBetterKentucky
G L. Blyden TR16.5 pts · 4.1 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 85
=Even
G A. Wilkins TR18.2 pts · 2 reb · 4.7 ast
Score 81
G D. Parker TR18.6 pts · 5.9 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 94
=Even
G Z. Diallo TR15.7 pts · 3.9 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 96
F K. Dawes TR12.5 pts · 8.8 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 91
←KUBig
G J. Morton TR7.8 pts · 1.8 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 48
F T. Kaufman-Renn TR14.2 pts · 8.3 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 98
=Even
F M. Momcilovic TR16.9 pts · 3.1 reb · 1 ast
Score 97
C C. Reeves TR11 pts · 7.8 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 94
=Even
F J. McBride TR15.4 pts · 5.6 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 87
KansasBetterKentucky
KU offense17th of 366 · +8.6
=Even
UK defense32nd of 366 · +3.5
KU defense15th of 366 · +6.3
=Even
UK offense13th of 366 · +9.5
Backcourt+5.7 · 2 players
=Even
Backcourt+4.9 · 3 players
Frontcourt+13.0 · 3 players
←KUBig
Frontcourt+8.1 · 2 players
Bench+0.1 · 3 players
→UKBig
Bench+5.1 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestKU betterUK betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
L. Blyden34 min · TRD. Parker30 min · TRK. Rosario12 minW. Thengvall2 minT. StokesNewT. PerryNew
Forwards
K. Dawes31 min · TRT. Kaufman-Renn28 min · TRD. AdkinsNewA. RichmondNewG. MordiniNew
Centers
C. Reeves21 min · TRP. Mbiya5 min
Guards
A. Wilkins30 min · TRZ. Diallo30 min · TRJ. Morton25 min · TRK. Williams19 minM. WilliamsNewZ. HawthorneNew
Forwards
M. Momcilovic30 min · TRJ. McBride27 min · TRT. Noah11 minR. PotterNewO. N'DiayeNewB. HawthorneNew
Centers
F. Kepnang23 min · TRM. Moreno23 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75.1 #161 | Points per game | 80.5 #55 |
| 1.09 #152 | Points per possession | 1.15 #57 |
| 68.8 #193 | Pace (possessions) | 69.9 #123 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.2 #186 | Effective FG% | 53.4 #87 |
| 34.6 #139 | 3-point % | 34.2 #158 |
| 35.2 #268 | 3-point attempt rate | 39.7 #180 |
| 32.2 #255 | Free throw rate | 37.4 #119 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.6 #111 | Turnover rate | 15.4 #98 |
| 29.3 #227 | Offensive rebound rate | 33.2 #84 |
| 13.9 #150 | Assists per game | 15.9 #50 |
| Defense | ||
| 69.1 #47 | Points allowed | 74.3 #167 |
| 1.00 #28 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #115 |
| 45.0 #2 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.9 #63 |
| 30.6 #24 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.8 #55 |
| 13.8 #340 | Turnovers forced | 15.5 #248 |
| 70.1 #152 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.0 #158 |
| 5.4 #310 | Steals per game | 7.0 #123 |
| 5.8 #6 | Blocks per game | 4.6 #33 |
Kansas
24-11 in 2025-26 overall · 13-7 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs St John's65–67
- Wvs CA Baptist68–60
- Lvs Houston47–69
- Wvs TCU78–73
- Wvs Kansas St104–85
A week or more of rest.
Kentucky
22-14 in 2025-26 overall · 12-9 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Iowa State63–82
- Wvs Santa Clara89–84
- Lvs Florida63–71
- Wvs Missouri78–72
- Wvs LSU87–82
A week or more of rest.