Arizona Wildcats at Auburn Tigers: Model Line and Edge

Fri, Nov 13, 9:00 PM ETNeville Arena · at Auburn

#5ARIZArizona AP #5

LineNo line yet

Total—

Season records: Arizona and Auburn
ARIZ	This season	AUB
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects ARIZ 83–76 · win probability ARIZ 73%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Winner

Line

—

no line yet

Total

—

model 158.5

Model edge

—

No market line yet

Public

—

No split yet for this game

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: ARIZ has more of the edges

ARIZ 4, AUB 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

ARIZBig

Three-pointers

ARIZ hits 36.6% and allows 31.4%; AUB hits 34.4% and allows 36.7%. Threes are 26.4% and 40.2% of their shots

ARIZBig

Shooting

Effective FG%: ARIZ 54.7 and allows 45.3; AUB 53.0 and allows 53.7

ARIZSmall

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: ARIZ 38.4%, AUB 37.0%. Defensive: ARIZ 73.1%, AUB 69.1%

ARIZSmall

Free throws

Free throw rate: ARIZ 43.9, AUB 43.2. Allowed: ARIZ 27.1, AUB 34.3

AUBSmall

Home court

AUB at home. This season: AUB 0-0 at home, ARIZ 0-0 away

Context

Tempo

About 71 possessions: ARIZ plays 71.6 a game (49th fastest), AUB 69.7 (136th). Faster games mean more points

Even

ARIZ offense vs AUB defense

Offense 4th of 366 against a defense 41st, on the model’s ratings

Even

Turnovers

Turnover rate: ARIZ 15.1%, AUB 14.6%. Forced: ARIZ 16.2%, AUB 16.3%

Even

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: ARIZ 29%, AUB 38%. Transfers in: ARIZ 5, AUB 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Even

AUB offense vs ARIZ defense

Offense 16th of 366 against a defense 7th, on the model’s ratings

Context

Schedule so far

ARIZ has played the 11th-hardest schedule, AUB the 10th. A record against a soft schedule means less

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	—	ARIZ -7.0	—
Total	—	158.5	—
Projected score	—	ARIZ 82.7 · AUB 75.8

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	ARIZ -4.3	—
1H total	74.0	—
1H projected score	ARIZ 39.1 · AUB 34.9	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
ARIZ WWWWL	23-16	59%	5-5	—
AUB LLLWW	16-22	42%	7-11	—

Venue/role: ARIZ away; AUB home. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
ARIZ OUOUO	20-19	51%	36-3
AUB UOUOO	22-16	58%	22-16

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
ARIZ	9-1 90%	7-3 70%	6-4 60%
AUB	7-3 70%	4-6 40%	6-4 60%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

Arizona

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 18	vs CONN	W71–67WU
Nov 23	vs CSU	No recent meeting
Dec 1	vs NOLA	No recent meeting

Auburn

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 17	vs WVU	L77–80WO
Nov 24	vs LIP	No recent meeting
Dec 1	@ CLEM	No recent meeting

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

Recent meetings

Since 2021-22

ARIZ 1–0 AUBARIZ leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · ARIZ 1-0 ATS

Date	Result	Line	Covered
Dec 6, 2025-26	AUB 68 @ ARIZ 97	ARIZ -11.5	ARIZ W

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

Arizona

39 games played

Straight up

36-3

92% wins

Against the spread

23-16

59% covers · avg +2.9 pts vs the line

Over / Under

20-19

51% overs · avg −1.5 pts vs the total

Straight up

36-392%

W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W L L W W W W W W W W W W W W W L

3 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

23-1659%

W L L W W L W W W L W L L W W W L L W W W L W L L L W L W W L W L W W W W W L

3 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

20-1951%

O U U U U O O O U O U O O O O O O U U U O U U O U U U O U U O U O O O U O U O

2 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	vsFLA	W 93-87	+3.5	W +9.5	164.5	O 180
Nov 7	vsUTU	W 93-67	-33.5	L −7.5	162.5	U 160
Nov 11	vsNAU	W 84-49	-35.5	L −0.5	163.5	U 133
Nov 14	vsUCLA	W 69-65	-1.5	W +2.5	153.5	U 134
Nov 19	@CONN	W 71-67	+4.5	W +8.5	156.5	U 138
Nov 24	vsDEN	W 103-73	-32.5	L −2.5	154.5	O 176
Nov 29	vsNORF	W 98-61	-35.5	W +1.5	146.5	O 159
Dec 6	vsAUB	W 97-68	-11.5	W +17.5	162.5	O 165
Dec 13	vsALA	W 96-75	-2.5	W +18.5	178.5	U 171
Dec 16	vsACU	W 96-62	-34.5	L −0.5	145.5	O 158
Dec 20	vsSDSU	W 68-45	-13.5	W +9.5	153.5	U 113
Dec 22	vsBCU	W 107-71	-39.5	L −3.5	154.5	O 178
Dec 29	vsSDST	W 99-71	-31.5	L −3.5	159.5	O 170
Jan 3	@UTAH	W 97-78	-17.5	W +1.5	162.5	O 175
Jan 7	vsKSU	W 101-76	-17.5	W +7.5	171.5	O 177
Jan 10	@TCU	W 86-73	-7.5	W +5.5	157.5	O 159
Jan 14	vsASU	W 89-82	-21.5	L −14.5	167.5	O 171
Jan 17	@UCF	W 84-77	-9.5	L −2.5	165.5	U 161
Jan 21	vsCIN	W 77-51	-13.5	W +12.5	152.5	U 128
Jan 24	vsWVU	W 88-53	-17.5	W +17.5	143.5	U 141
Jan 26	@BYU	W 86-83	-1.5	W +1.5	166.5	O 169
Jan 31	@ASU	W 87-74	-14.5	L −1.5	163.5	U 161
Feb 7	vsOKST	W 84-47	-20.5	W +16.5	168.5	U 131
Feb 9	@KU	L 78-82	-5.5	L −9.5	152.5	O 160
Feb 14	vsTTU	L 75-78	-8.5	L −11.5	156.5	U 153
Feb 18	vsBYU	W 75-68	-11.5	L −4.5	165.5	U 143
Feb 21	@HOU	W 73-66	+6.5	W +13.5	142.5	U 139
Feb 24	@BAY	W 87-80	-7.5	L −0.5	155.5	O 167
Feb 28	vsKU	W 84-61	-9.5	W +13.5	151.5	U 145
Mar 2	vsISU	W 73-57	-7.5	W +8.5	149.5	U 130
Mar 7	@COLO	W 89-79	-13.5	L −3.5	156.5	O 168
Mar 12	vsUCF	W 81-59	-15.5	W +6.5	159.5	U 140
Mar 13	vsISU	W 82-80	-3.5	L −1.5	144.5	O 162
Mar 14	vsHOU	W 79-74	-1.5	W +3.5	138.5	O 153
Mar 20	vsLIU	W 92-58	-30.5	W +3.5	147.5	O 150
Mar 22	vsUSU	W 78-66	-11.5	W +0.5	153.5	U 144
Mar 26	vsARK	W 109-88	-8.5	W +12.5	166.5	O 197
Mar 28	vsPUR	W 79-64	-5.5	W +9.5	152.5	U 143
Apr 4	vsMICH	L 73-91	-1.5	L −19.5	157.5	O 164

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

FLA

W 93-87

+9.5

UTU

W 93-67

−7.5

NAU

W 84-49

−0.5

UCLA

W 69-65

+2.5

CONN

W 71-67

+8.5

DEN

W 103-73

−2.5

NORF

W 98-61

+1.5

AUB

W 97-68

+17.5

ALA

W 96-75

+18.5

ACU

W 96-62

−0.5

SDSU

W 68-45

+9.5

BCU

W 107-71

−3.5

SDST

W 99-71

−3.5

UTAH

W 97-78

+1.5

KSU

W 101-76

+7.5

TCU

W 86-73

+5.5

ASU

W 89-82

−14.5

UCF

W 84-77

−2.5

CIN

W 77-51

+12.5

WVU

W 88-53

+17.5

BYU

W 86-83

+1.5

ASU

W 87-74

−1.5

OKST

W 84-47

+16.5

L 78-82

−9.5

TTU

L 75-78

−11.5

BYU

W 75-68

−4.5

HOU

W 73-66

+13.5

BAY

W 87-80

−0.5

W 84-61

+13.5

ISU

W 73-57

+8.5

COLO

W 89-79

−3.5

UCF

W 81-59

+6.5

ISU

W 82-80

−1.5

HOU

W 79-74

+3.5

LIU

W 92-58

+3.5

USU

W 78-66

+0.5

ARK

W 109-88

+12.5

PUR

W 79-64

+9.5

MICH

L 73-91

−19.5

covered 23didn’t cover 16avg +2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

FLA

W 93-87

+15.5

UTU

W 93-67

−2.5

NAU

W 84-49

−30.5

UCLA

W 69-65

−19.5

CONN

W 71-67

−18.5

DEN

W 103-73

+21.5

NORF

W 98-61

+12.5

AUB

W 97-68

+2.5

ALA

W 96-75

−7.5

ACU

W 96-62

+12.5

SDSU

W 68-45

−40.5

BCU

W 107-71

+23.5

SDST

W 99-71

+10.5

UTAH

W 97-78

+12.5

KSU

W 101-76

+5.5

TCU

W 86-73

+1.5

ASU

W 89-82

+3.5

UCF

W 84-77

−4.5

CIN

W 77-51

−24.5

WVU

W 88-53

−2.5

BYU

W 86-83

+2.5

ASU

W 87-74

−2.5

OKST

W 84-47

−37.5

L 78-82

+7.5

TTU

L 75-78

−3.5

BYU

W 75-68

−22.5

HOU

W 73-66

−3.5

BAY

W 87-80

+11.5

W 84-61

−6.5

ISU

W 73-57

−19.5

COLO

W 89-79

+11.5

UCF

W 81-59

−19.5

ISU

W 82-80

+17.5

HOU

W 79-74

+14.5

LIU

W 92-58

+2.5

USU

W 78-66

−9.5

ARK

W 109-88

+30.5

PUR

W 79-64

−9.5

MICH

L 73-91

+6.5

over 20under 19avg −1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin

Auburn

38 games played

Straight up

22-16

58% wins

Against the spread

16-22

42% covers · avg −1.6 pts vs the line

Over / Under

22-16

58% overs · avg +4.3 pts vs the total

Straight up

22-1658%

W W W L W W L W W L W L W L L W L W W W W L L L L L W L L W L W L W W W W W

5 straight wins4 of last 4 won

Against the spread

16-2242%

L W W W W W L W W L L L W W L W L L W W L L L L L L L L L W L W L L L L W W

2 straight covers2 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

22-1658%

O O O O O O O U U O O U U O O U O U U U O U O U U O U O O O O U U U O U O O

2 straight overs3 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	vsBCU	W 95-90	-24.5	L −19.5	153.5	O 185
Nov 6	vsMRMK	W 95-57	-23.5	W +14.5	148.5	O 152
Nov 11	vsWOF	W 93-62	-27.5	W +3.5	152.5	O 155
Nov 16	vsHOU	L 72-73	+7.5	W +6.5	140.5	O 145
Nov 19	vsJKST	W 112-66	-30.5	W +15.5	156.5	O 178
Nov 24	vsORE	W 84-73	-4.5	W +6.5	155.5	O 157
Nov 25	vsMICH	L 72-102	+4.5	L −25.5	163.5	O 174
Nov 26	vsSJU	W 85-74	+4.5	W +15.5	166.5	U 159
Dec 3	vsNCSU	W 83-73	-5.5	W +4.5	162.5	U 156
Dec 6	@ARIZ	L 68-97	+11.5	L −17.5	162.5	O 165
Dec 13	vsUTC	W 92-78	-19.5	L −5.5	150.5	O 170
Dec 20	vsPUR	L 60-88	+7.5	L −20.5	152.5	U 148
Dec 29	vsQUC	W 106-65	-25.5	W +15.5	171.5	U 171
Jan 3	@UGA	L 100-104	+6.5	W +2.5	173.5	O 204
Jan 6	vsTA&M	L 88-90	-6.5	L −8.5	168.5	O 178
Jan 10	vsARK	W 95-73	-2.5	W +19.5	169.5	U 168
Jan 14	@MIZ	L 74-84	-1.5	L −11.5	153.5	O 158
Jan 17	vsSC	W 71-67	-13.5	L −9.5	152.5	U 138
Jan 20	@MISS	W 78-66	-3.5	W +8.5	151.5	U 144
Jan 24	@FLA	W 76-67	+11.5	W +20.5	159.5	U 143
Jan 28	vsTEX	W 88-82	-6.5	L −0.5	154.5	O 170
Jan 31	@TENN	L 69-77	+5.5	L −2.5	147.5	U 146
Feb 7	vsALA	L 92-96	-2.5	L −6.5	175.5	O 188
Feb 10	vsVAN	L 76-84	-3.5	L −11.5	161.5	U 160
Feb 14	@ARK	L 75-88	+7.5	L −5.5	165.5	U 163
Feb 18	@MSST	L 85-91	-5.5	L −11.5	155.5	O 176
Feb 21	vsUK	W 75-74	-3.5	L −2.5	153.5	U 149
Feb 24	@OU	L 79-91	-3.5	L −15.5	157.5	O 170
Feb 28	vsMISS	L 79-85	-10.5	L −16.5	153.5	O 164
Mar 3	vsLSU	W 88-74	-10.5	W +3.5	155.5	O 162
Mar 7	@ALA	L 84-96	+5.5	L −6.5	175.5	O 180
Mar 11	vsMSST	W 79-61	-8.5	W +9.5	160.5	U 140
Mar 12	vsTENN	L 62-72	+5.5	L −4.5	144.5	U 134
Mar 17	vsUSA	W 78-67	-18.5	L −7.5	151.5	U 145
Mar 22	vsSEA	W 91-85	-14.5	L −8.5	145.5	O 176
Mar 25	vsNEV	W 75-69	-8.5	L −2.5	151.5	U 144
Apr 2	vsILST	W 88-66	-7.5	W +14.5	149.5	O 154
Apr 5	vsTLSA	W 92-86	-5.5	W +0.5	158.5	O 178

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

BCU

W 95-90

−19.5

MRMK

W 95-57

+14.5

WOF

W 93-62

+3.5

HOU

L 72-73

+6.5

JKST

W 112-66

+15.5

ORE

W 84-73

+6.5

MICH

L 72-102

−25.5

SJU

W 85-74

+15.5

NCSU

W 83-73

+4.5

ARIZ

L 68-97

−17.5

UTC

W 92-78

−5.5

PUR

L 60-88

−20.5

QUC

W 106-65

+15.5

UGA

L 100-104

+2.5

TA&M

L 88-90

−8.5

ARK

W 95-73

+19.5

MIZ

L 74-84

−11.5

W 71-67

−9.5

MISS

W 78-66

+8.5

FLA

W 76-67

+20.5

TEX

W 88-82

−0.5

TENN

L 69-77

−2.5

ALA

L 92-96

−6.5

VAN

L 76-84

−11.5

ARK

L 75-88

−5.5

MSST

L 85-91

−11.5

W 75-74

−2.5

L 79-91

−15.5

MISS

L 79-85

−16.5

LSU

W 88-74

+3.5

ALA

L 84-96

−6.5

MSST

W 79-61

+9.5

TENN

L 62-72

−4.5

USA

W 78-67

−7.5

SEA

W 91-85

−8.5

NEV

W 75-69

−2.5

ILST

W 88-66

+14.5

TLSA

W 92-86

+0.5

covered 16didn’t cover 22avg −1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

BCU

W 95-90

+31.5

MRMK

W 95-57

+3.5

WOF

W 93-62

+2.5

HOU

L 72-73

+4.5

JKST

W 112-66

+21.5

ORE

W 84-73

+1.5

MICH

L 72-102

+10.5

SJU

W 85-74

−7.5

NCSU

W 83-73

−6.5

ARIZ

L 68-97

+2.5

UTC

W 92-78

+19.5

PUR

L 60-88

−4.5

QUC

W 106-65

−0.5

UGA

L 100-104

+30.5

TA&M

L 88-90

+9.5

ARK

W 95-73

−1.5

MIZ

L 74-84

+4.5

W 71-67

−14.5

MISS

W 78-66

−7.5

FLA

W 76-67

−16.5

TEX

W 88-82

+15.5

TENN

L 69-77

−1.5

ALA

L 92-96

+12.5

VAN

L 76-84

−1.5

ARK

L 75-88

−2.5

MSST

L 85-91

+20.5

W 75-74

−4.5

L 79-91

+12.5

MISS

L 79-85

+10.5

LSU

W 88-74

+6.5

ALA

L 84-96

+4.5

MSST

W 79-61

−20.5

TENN

L 62-72

−10.5

USA

W 78-67

−6.5

SEA

W 91-85

+30.5

NEV

W 75-69

−7.5

ILST

W 88-66

+4.5

TLSA

W 92-86

+19.5

over 22under 16avg +4.3 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

Auburn has the better starters

Position by position: Arizona 1, Auburn 2, even 2

ArizonaBetterAuburn

G D. Dixon TR6.5 pts · 2.3 reb · 2.7 ast Score 55

AUBSmall

G T. Pettiford15.4 pts · 3 reb · 3.8 ast Score 88

G J. Mandaquit TR5.2 pts · 2.1 reb · 3.2 ast Score 62

AUBSmall

G K. Overton14.1 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.3 ast Score 90

F I. Kharchenkov10.4 pts · 4.3 reb · 2.3 ast Score 83

Even

G K. King TR7.3 pts · 3.4 reb · 1.6 ast Score 83

F R. Godfrey TR12 pts · 5.3 reb · 1.6 ast Score 96

Even

F T. Dowd TR14.5 pts · 10.3 reb · 2 ast Score 83

C M. Krivas10.4 pts · 8.2 reb · 1.1 ast Score 95

ARIZSmall

F A. Olsen TR17 pts · 4.1 reb · 1 ast Score 66

ArizonaBetterAuburn

ARIZ offense4th of 366 · +11.0

Even

AUB defense41st of 366 · +2.8

ARIZ defense7th of 366 · +8.8

Even

AUB offense16th of 366 · +8.7

Backcourt-0.3 · 2 players

AUBBig

Backcourt+6.5 · 3 players

Frontcourt+10.8 · 3 players

ARIZBig

Frontcourt+3.6 · 2 players

Bench-0.1 · 4 players

AUBBig

Bench+3.8 · 5 players

Score, worst to bestARIZ betterAUB betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

Arizona

Guards

D. Dixon22 min · TRJ. Mandaquit20 min · TRA. Arnold2 minJ. Cook1 minB. JamesNewC. HolmesNew

Forwards

I. Kharchenkov28 minR. Godfrey25 min · TRE. Otten15 min · TRU. Jarusevicius11 min · TRM. MawutNewE. AiyamenkhueNew

Centers

M. Krivas25 min

Auburn

Guards

T. Pettiford32 minK. Overton32 minK. King19 min · TRB. Muschalek6 minS. Walker5 minD. Cardwell1 min

Forwards

T. Dowd37 min · TRA. Olsen37 min · TRO. Freeman12 min · TRJ. BowmanNew

Centers

B. Oboye18 min · TRN. NgoyNew

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

ARIZ86.2 #11

AUB83.0 #27

Points per possession

ARIZ1.21 #11

AUB1.19 #19

Pace (possessions)

ARIZ71.6 #49

AUB69.7 #136

Shooting

Effective FG%

ARIZ54.7 #45

AUB53.0 #104

3-point %

ARIZ36.6 #37

AUB34.4 #147

3-point attempt rate

ARIZ26.4 #363

AUB40.2 #166

Free throw rate

ARIZ43.9 #11

AUB43.2 #19

Possessions

Turnover rate

ARIZ15.1 #76

AUB14.6 #45

Offensive rebound rate

ARIZ38.4 #5

AUB37.0 #15

Assists per game

ARIZ16.4 #38

AUB13.2 #198

Defense

Points allowed

ARIZ69.4 #53

AUB78.8 #287

Points allowed per possession

ARIZ0.97 #6

AUB1.13 #281

Opponent effective FG%

ARIZ45.3 #4

AUB53.7 #291

Opponent 3-point %

ARIZ31.4 #42

AUB36.7 #336

Turnovers forced

ARIZ16.2 #209

AUB16.3 #201

Defensive rebound rate

ARIZ73.1 #34

AUB69.1 #196

Steals per game

ARIZ7.4 #95

AUB7.5 #83

Blocks per game

ARIZ4.2 #55

AUB4.1 #63

ARIZ		AUB
Scoring
86.2 #11	Points per game	83.0 #27
1.21 #11	Points per possession	1.19 #19
71.6 #49	Pace (possessions)	69.7 #136
Shooting
54.7 #45	Effective FG%	53.0 #104
36.6 #37	3-point %	34.4 #147
26.4 #363	3-point attempt rate	40.2 #166
43.9 #11	Free throw rate	43.2 #19
Possessions
15.1 #76	Turnover rate	14.6 #45
38.4 #5	Offensive rebound rate	37.0 #15
16.4 #38	Assists per game	13.2 #198
Defense
69.4 #53	Points allowed	78.8 #287
0.97 #6	Points allowed per possession	1.13 #281
45.3 #4	Opponent effective FG%	53.7 #291
31.4 #42	Opponent 3-point %	36.7 #336
16.2 #209	Turnovers forced	16.3 #201
73.1 #34	Defensive rebound rate	69.1 #196
7.4 #95	Steals per game	7.5 #83
4.2 #55	Blocks per game	4.1 #63

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Arizona

36-3 in 2025-26 overall · 19-2 in conference · Big 12 Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Michigan73–91
Wvs Purdue79–64
Wvs Arkansas109–88
Wvs Utah State78–66
Wvs Long Island92–58

A week or more of rest.

Auburn

22-16 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Southeastern Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Wvs Tulsa92–86
Wvs Illinois St88–66
Wvs Nevada75–69
Wvs Seattle U91–85
Wvs South Alabama78–67

A week or more of rest.

Arizona Wildcats at Auburn Tigers

What could decide it: ARIZ has more of the edges

Market

Model vs market

1st-half model

ATS

Totals

Last 10 games

Next 3 games

Recent meetings

ATS History · 2025-26

Arizona

Auburn

Auburn has the better starters

Depth chart

Matchup stats

Arizona

Auburn