Michelob ULTRA Arena · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | AUB | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects AUB 77–73 · win probability AUB 65%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 150.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: WVU has more of the edges
WVU 1, AUB 0 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: WVU plays 65.3 a game (336th fastest), AUB 69.7 (136th). Faster games mean more points
Shooting
Effective FG%: WVU 51.6 and allows 48.5; AUB 53.0 and allows 53.7
Context
Schedule so far
WVU has played the 62nd-hardest schedule, AUB the 10th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
WVU offense vs AUB defense
Offense 77th of 366 against a defense 41st, on the model’s ratings
Even
Three-pointers
WVU hits 33.0% and allows 34.3%; AUB hits 34.4% and allows 36.7%. Threes are 43.0% and 40.2% of their shots
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: WVU 23%, AUB 38%. Transfers in: WVU 6, AUB 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: WVU 30.5%, AUB 37.0%. Defensive: WVU 71.4%, AUB 69.1%
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: WVU 16.8%, AUB 14.6%. Forced: WVU 17.8%, AUB 16.3%
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: WVU 35.1, AUB 43.2. Allowed: WVU 29.3, AUB 34.3
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Even
AUB offense vs WVU defense
Offense 16th of 366 against a defense 19th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | AUB -4.4 | — |
| Total | — | 150.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | WVU 72.9 · AUB 77.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | AUB -2.5 | — |
| 1H total | 70.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | WVU 33.9 · AUB 36.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | |
| 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
WVU 1–0 AUBWVU leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · WVU 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2022-23 | AUB 77 @ WVU 80 | WVU -4.5 | AUB W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
West Virginia
35 games played
Straight up
21-14
60% wins
Against the spread
18-17
51% covers · avg +0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-22
37% overs · avg −1.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 70-54 | -19.5 | L −3.5 | 136.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 73-65 | -15.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 69-47 | -17.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 116 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 71-49 | -5.5 | W +16.5 | 134.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 81-59 | -24.5 | L −2.5 | 135.5 | O 140 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 67-70 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 132.5 | O 137 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 68-78 | -5.5 | L −15.5 | 140.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 70-38 | -21.5 | W +10.5 | 127.5 | U 108 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 91-49 | -31.5 | W +10.5 | 134.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 66-75 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 90-58 | -27.5 | W +4.5 | 132.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 88-89 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 86-51 | -42.5 | L −7.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 59-80 | +16.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 62-60 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 132.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 86-75 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 139.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 48-77 | +13.5 | L −15.5 | 127.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 72-61 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 75-63 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 145.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 53-88 | +17.5 | L −17.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 59-54 | -7.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 53-63 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 139.5 | U 116 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 59-54 | +5.5 | W +10.5 | 127.5 | U 113 |
| Feb 8 | vs | L 63-70 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 139.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 74-67 | +3.5 | W +10.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 56-61 | -10.5 | L −15.5 | 133.5 | U 117 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 54-60 | +4.5 | L −1.5 | 133.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 84-91 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 79-71 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 63-65 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 77-62 | -4.5 | W +10.5 | 142.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 48-68 | +3.5 | L −16.5 | 141.5 | U 116 |
| Apr 2 | vs | W 82-77 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | O 159 |
| Apr 4 | vs | W 87-70 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 137.5 | O 157 |
| Apr 5 | vs | W 89-82 | +3.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | O 171 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
MSM
W 70-54
−3.5
6
vs
CAM
W 73-65
−7.5
9
vs
LEH
W 69-47
+4.5
13
vs
PITT
W 71-49
+16.5
17
vs
LAF
W 81-59
−2.5
21
vs
CLEM
L 67-70
+1.5
23
vs
XAV
L 68-78
−15.5
30
vs
MERC
W 70-38
+10.5
3
vs
COPP
W 91-49
+10.5
6
vs
WAKE
L 66-75
−11.5
9
vs
LR
W 90-58
+4.5
13
vs
OSU
L 88-89
+2.5
22
vs
MVSU
W 86-51
−7.5
2
@
ISU
L 59-80
−4.5
6
vs
CIN
W 62-60
+3.5
10
vs
KU
W 86-75
+13.5
13
@
HOU
L 48-77
−15.5
17
vs
COLO
W 72-61
+4.5
21
@
ASU
W 75-63
+13.5
24
@
ARIZ
L 53-88
−17.5
27
vs
KSU
W 59-54
−2.5
31
vs
BAY
L 53-63
−12.5
5
@
CIN
W 59-54
+10.5
8
vs
TTU
L 63-70
−2.5
14
@
UCF
W 74-67
+10.5
18
vs
UTAH
L 56-61
−15.5
21
@
TCU
L 54-60
−1.5
24
@
OKST
L 84-91
−5.5
28
vs
BYU
W 79-71
+10.5
3
@
KSU
L 63-65
−5.5
6
vs
UCF
W 77-62
+10.5
11
vs
BYU
L 48-68
−16.5
2
vs
STAN
W 82-77
+2.5
4
vs
CREI
W 87-70
+15.5
5
vs
OU
W 89-82
+10.5
covered 18didn’t cover 17avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
MSM
W 70-54
−12.5
6
vs
CAM
W 73-65
−0.5
9
vs
LEH
W 69-47
−23.5
13
vs
PITT
W 71-49
−14.5
17
vs
LAF
W 81-59
+4.5
21
vs
CLEM
L 67-70
+4.5
23
vs
XAV
L 68-78
+5.5
30
vs
MERC
W 70-38
−19.5
3
vs
COPP
W 91-49
+5.5
6
vs
WAKE
L 66-75
−2.5
9
vs
LR
W 90-58
+15.5
13
vs
OSU
L 88-89
+31.5
22
vs
MVSU
W 86-51
−0.5
2
@
ISU
L 59-80
−3.5
6
vs
CIN
W 62-60
−10.5
10
vs
KU
W 86-75
+21.5
13
@
HOU
L 48-77
−2.5
17
vs
COLO
W 72-61
−8.5
21
@
ASU
W 75-63
−7.5
24
@
ARIZ
L 53-88
−2.5
27
vs
KSU
W 59-54
−33.5
31
vs
BAY
L 53-63
−23.5
5
@
CIN
W 59-54
−14.5
8
vs
TTU
L 63-70
−6.5
14
@
UCF
W 74-67
+0.5
18
vs
UTAH
L 56-61
−16.5
21
@
TCU
L 54-60
−19.5
24
@
OKST
L 84-91
+30.5
28
vs
BYU
W 79-71
+8.5
3
@
KSU
L 63-65
−15.5
6
vs
UCF
W 77-62
−3.5
11
vs
BYU
L 48-68
−25.5
2
vs
STAN
W 82-77
+23.5
4
vs
CREI
W 87-70
+19.5
5
vs
OU
W 89-82
+29.5
over 13under 22avg −1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Auburn
38 games played
Straight up
22-16
58% wins
Against the spread
16-22
42% covers · avg −1.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
22-16
58% overs · avg +4.3 pts vs the total
Against the spread
16-2242%
2 straight covers2 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 95-90 | -24.5 | L −19.5 | 153.5 | O 185 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 95-57 | -23.5 | W +14.5 | 148.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 93-62 | -27.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 72-73 | +7.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 112-66 | -30.5 | W +15.5 | 156.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 84-73 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 155.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 72-102 | +4.5 | L −25.5 | 163.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 85-74 | +4.5 | W +15.5 | 166.5 | U 159 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 83-73 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 162.5 | U 156 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 68-97 | +11.5 | L −17.5 | 162.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 92-78 | -19.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 60-88 | +7.5 | L −20.5 | 152.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 106-65 | -25.5 | W +15.5 | 171.5 | U 171 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 100-104 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 173.5 | O 204 |
| Jan 6 | vs | L 88-90 | -6.5 | L −8.5 | 168.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 95-73 | -2.5 | W +19.5 | 169.5 | U 168 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 74-84 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 71-67 | -13.5 | L −9.5 | 152.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 78-66 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 76-67 | +11.5 | W +20.5 | 159.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 88-82 | -6.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 69-77 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 147.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 92-96 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 175.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 10 | vs | L 76-84 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 161.5 | U 160 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 75-88 | +7.5 | L −5.5 | 165.5 | U 163 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 85-91 | -5.5 | L −11.5 | 155.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 75-74 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 79-91 | -3.5 | L −15.5 | 157.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 79-85 | -10.5 | L −16.5 | 153.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 88-74 | -10.5 | W +3.5 | 155.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 84-96 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 175.5 | O 180 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 79-61 | -8.5 | W +9.5 | 160.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 62-72 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 17 | vs | W 78-67 | -18.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 91-85 | -14.5 | L −8.5 | 145.5 | O 176 |
| Mar 25 | vs | W 75-69 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | U 144 |
| Apr 2 | vs | W 88-66 | -7.5 | W +14.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
| Apr 5 | vs | W 92-86 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 158.5 | O 178 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
BCU
W 95-90
−19.5
6
vs
MRMK
W 95-57
+14.5
11
vs
WOF
W 93-62
+3.5
16
vs
HOU
L 72-73
+6.5
19
vs
JKST
W 112-66
+15.5
24
vs
ORE
W 84-73
+6.5
25
vs
MICH
L 72-102
−25.5
26
vs
SJU
W 85-74
+15.5
3
vs
NCSU
W 83-73
+4.5
6
@
ARIZ
L 68-97
−17.5
13
vs
UTC
W 92-78
−5.5
20
vs
PUR
L 60-88
−20.5
29
vs
QUC
W 106-65
+15.5
3
@
UGA
L 100-104
+2.5
6
vs
TA&M
L 88-90
−8.5
10
vs
ARK
W 95-73
+19.5
14
@
MIZ
L 74-84
−11.5
17
vs
SC
W 71-67
−9.5
20
@
MISS
W 78-66
+8.5
24
@
FLA
W 76-67
+20.5
28
vs
TEX
W 88-82
−0.5
31
@
TENN
L 69-77
−2.5
7
vs
ALA
L 92-96
−6.5
10
vs
VAN
L 76-84
−11.5
14
@
ARK
L 75-88
−5.5
18
@
MSST
L 85-91
−11.5
21
vs
UK
W 75-74
−2.5
24
@
OU
L 79-91
−15.5
28
vs
MISS
L 79-85
−16.5
3
vs
LSU
W 88-74
+3.5
7
@
ALA
L 84-96
−6.5
11
vs
MSST
W 79-61
+9.5
12
vs
TENN
L 62-72
−4.5
17
vs
USA
W 78-67
−7.5
22
vs
SEA
W 91-85
−8.5
25
vs
NEV
W 75-69
−2.5
2
vs
ILST
W 88-66
+14.5
5
vs
TLSA
W 92-86
+0.5
covered 16didn’t cover 22avg −1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
BCU
W 95-90
+31.5
6
vs
MRMK
W 95-57
+3.5
11
vs
WOF
W 93-62
+2.5
16
vs
HOU
L 72-73
+4.5
19
vs
JKST
W 112-66
+21.5
24
vs
ORE
W 84-73
+1.5
25
vs
MICH
L 72-102
+10.5
26
vs
SJU
W 85-74
−7.5
3
vs
NCSU
W 83-73
−6.5
6
@
ARIZ
L 68-97
+2.5
13
vs
UTC
W 92-78
+19.5
20
vs
PUR
L 60-88
−4.5
29
vs
QUC
W 106-65
−0.5
3
@
UGA
L 100-104
+30.5
6
vs
TA&M
L 88-90
+9.5
10
vs
ARK
W 95-73
−1.5
14
@
MIZ
L 74-84
+4.5
17
vs
SC
W 71-67
−14.5
20
@
MISS
W 78-66
−7.5
24
@
FLA
W 76-67
−16.5
28
vs
TEX
W 88-82
+15.5
31
@
TENN
L 69-77
−1.5
7
vs
ALA
L 92-96
+12.5
10
vs
VAN
L 76-84
−1.5
14
@
ARK
L 75-88
−2.5
18
@
MSST
L 85-91
+20.5
21
vs
UK
W 75-74
−4.5
24
@
OU
L 79-91
+12.5
28
vs
MISS
L 79-85
+10.5
3
vs
LSU
W 88-74
+6.5
7
@
ALA
L 84-96
+4.5
11
vs
MSST
W 79-61
−20.5
12
vs
TENN
L 62-72
−10.5
17
vs
USA
W 78-67
−6.5
22
vs
SEA
W 91-85
+30.5
25
vs
NEV
W 75-69
−7.5
2
vs
ILST
W 88-66
+4.5
5
vs
TLSA
W 92-86
+19.5
over 22under 16avg +4.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Auburn has the better starters
Position by position: West Virginia 1, Auburn 2, even 2
West VirginiaBetterAuburn
G F. Bizjack TR17.1 pts · 2.2 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 88
=Even
G T. Pettiford15.4 pts · 3 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 88
G S. Traore TR9 pts · 3.4 reb · 2 ast
Score 46
→AUBBig
G K. Overton14.1 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 90
G M. Somerville TR8 pts · 3 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 54
→AUBSmall
G K. King TR7.3 pts · 3.4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 83
F B. Lorient11.9 pts · 5.2 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 91
=Even
F T. Dowd TR14.5 pts · 10.3 reb · 2 ast
Score 83
F J. Buchanan TR12.8 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 89
←WVUSmall
F A. Olsen TR17 pts · 4.1 reb · 1 ast
Score 66
West VirginiaBetterAuburn
WVU offense77th of 366 · +0.9
=Even
AUB defense41st of 366 · +2.8
WVU defense19th of 366 · +5.5
=Even
AUB offense16th of 366 · +8.7
Backcourt+1.3 · 3 players
→AUBBig
Backcourt+6.5 · 3 players
Frontcourt+6.2 · 2 players
←WVUSmall
Frontcourt+3.6 · 2 players
Bench+1.6 · 3 players
→AUBSmall
Bench+3.8 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestWVU betterAUB betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
F. Bizjack34 min · TRS. Traore29 min · TRM. Somerville26 min · TRJ. Sanon21 min · TRA. Jenkins16 minM. FeenaneNew
Forwards
B. Lorient29 minJ. Buchanan28 min · TRM. OlejaszNew
Centers
M. Sylla21 min · TRA. DioumNewA. SeiniNew
Guards
T. Pettiford32 minK. Overton32 minK. King19 min · TRB. Muschalek6 minS. Walker5 minD. Cardwell1 min
Forwards
T. Dowd37 min · TRA. Olsen37 min · TRO. Freeman12 min · TRJ. BowmanNew
Centers
B. Oboye18 min · TRN. NgoyNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 70.6 #271 | Points per game | 83.0 #27 |
| 1.08 #183 | Points per possession | 1.19 #19 |
| 65.3 #336 | Pace (possessions) | 69.7 #136 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.6 #166 | Effective FG% | 53.0 #104 |
| 33.0 #227 | 3-point % | 34.4 #147 |
| 43.0 #118 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.2 #166 |
| 35.1 #173 | Free throw rate | 43.2 #19 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.8 #188 | Turnover rate | 14.6 #45 |
| 30.5 #178 | Offensive rebound rate | 37.0 #15 |
| 12.8 #228 | Assists per game | 13.2 #198 |
| Defense | ||
| 65.7 #11 | Points allowed | 78.8 #287 |
| 1.01 #34 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #281 |
| 48.5 #50 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.7 #291 |
| 34.3 #201 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.7 #336 |
| 17.8 #108 | Turnovers forced | 16.3 #201 |
| 71.4 #86 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.1 #196 |
| 6.3 #195 | Steals per game | 7.5 #83 |
| 3.1 #204 | Blocks per game | 4.1 #63 |
West Virginia
21-14 in 2025-26 overall · 9-10 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Oklahoma89–82
- Wvs Creighton87–70
- Wvs Stanford82–77
- Lvs BYU48–68
- Wvs UCF77–62
A week or more of rest.
Auburn
22-16 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Tulsa92–86
- Wvs Illinois St88–66
- Wvs Nevada75–69
- Wvs Seattle U91–85
- Wvs South Alabama78–67
A week or more of rest.