Stephen C. O'Connell Center · at Florida
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | FLA | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects FLA 99–55 · win probability FLA 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 154.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: FLA has more of the edges
JAX 0, FLA 8 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: JAX 50.0 and allows 54.8; FLA 54.1 and allows 46.1
Context
Schedule so far
JAX has played the 247th-hardest schedule, FLA the 9th. A record against a soft schedule means less
JAX offense vs FLA defense
Offense 232nd of 366 against a defense 4th, on the model’s ratings
FLA offense vs JAX defense
Offense 1st of 366 against a defense 210th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: JAX 32.8, FLA 39.0. Allowed: JAX 42.7, FLA 34.0
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: JAX plays 65.7 a game (322nd fastest), FLA 72.0 (34th). Faster games mean more points
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: JAX 31.7%, FLA 43.4%. Defensive: JAX 70.9%, FLA 75.2%
Three-pointers
JAX hits 31.8% and allows 36.3%; FLA hits 31.2% and allows 32.1%. Threes are 37.4% and 37.0% of their shots
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: JAX 27%, FLA 85%. Transfers in: JAX 6, FLA 1. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
FLA at home. This season: FLA 0-0 at home, JAX 0-0 away
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: JAX 17.2%, FLA 16.4%. Forced: JAX 15.0%, FLA 15.2%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | FLA -43.7 | — |
| Total | — | 154.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | JAX 55.3 · FLA 99 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | FLA -25.9 | — |
| 1H total | 72.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | JAX 23.1 · FLA 49 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | |
| 8-2 80% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
JAX 0–1 FLAFLA leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · JAX 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2024-25 | JAX 60 @ FLA 81 | FLA -24.5 | JAX W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Jacksonville
30 games played
Straight up
10-20
33% wins
Against the spread
12-18
40% covers · avg −1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-18
40% overs · avg +1.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 69-86 | +18.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 64-85 | +17.5 | L −3.5 | 156.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 69-67 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 57-79 | +16.5 | L −5.5 | 136.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 69-64 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 53-68 | +2.5 | L −12.5 | 135.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 85-82 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 65-88 | +5.5 | L −17.5 | 145.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 75-112 | +26.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | O 187 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 65-72 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 63-87 | +23.5 | L −0.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 57-76 | +12.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 68-71 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 140.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 51-77 | +4.5 | L −21.5 | 154.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 75-43 | -1.5 | W +30.5 | 141.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 60-62 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 136.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 90-68 | +1.5 | W +23.5 | 133.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 70-77 | -4.5 | L −11.5 | 138.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 81-76 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 70-65 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 49-68 | -1.5 | L −20.5 | 136.5 | U 117 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 84-93 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 73-87 | -1.5 | L −15.5 | 138.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 62-67 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 63-56 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 84-86 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 61-65 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 89-85 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 85-61 | -1.5 | W +22.5 | 151.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 79-82 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 161 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
MIA
L 69-86
+1.5
11
@
HPU
L 64-85
−3.5
15
@
VMI
W 69-67
+0.5
18
@
GMU
L 57-79
−5.5
24
vs
BCU
W 69-64
+8.5
25
vs
PAC
L 53-68
−12.5
2
vs
FAMU
W 85-82
−7.5
6
@
FIU
L 65-88
−17.5
14
@
TA&M
L 75-112
−10.5
17
@
FAMU
L 65-72
−10.5
22
@
FSU
L 63-87
−0.5
1
@
LIP
L 57-76
−6.5
3
@
APSU
L 68-71
+7.5
8
vs
QUC
L 51-77
−21.5
10
vs
WGA
W 75-43
+30.5
15
@
CARK
L 60-62
+5.5
17
@
UNA
W 90-68
+23.5
22
vs
BELL
L 70-77
−11.5
24
vs
EKU
W 81-76
+3.5
29
vs
LIP
W 70-65
+8.5
31
vs
FGCU
L 49-68
−20.5
5
@
QUC
L 84-93
−0.5
7
@
WGA
L 73-87
−15.5
11
@
STET
L 62-67
−7.5
14
vs
UNF
W 63-56
−0.5
18
@
FGCU
L 84-86
+4.5
21
vs
APSU
L 61-65
+2.5
26
vs
STET
W 89-85
−3.5
28
@
UNF
W 85-61
+22.5
4
vs
BELL
L 79-82
−1.5
covered 12didn’t cover 18avg −1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
MIA
L 69-86
+12.5
11
@
HPU
L 64-85
−7.5
15
@
VMI
W 69-67
−15.5
18
@
GMU
L 57-79
−0.5
24
vs
BCU
W 69-64
−10.5
25
vs
PAC
L 53-68
−14.5
2
vs
FAMU
W 85-82
+28.5
6
@
FIU
L 65-88
+7.5
14
@
TA&M
L 75-112
+39.5
17
@
FAMU
L 65-72
−2.5
22
@
FSU
L 63-87
−9.5
1
@
LIP
L 57-76
−14.5
3
@
APSU
L 68-71
−1.5
8
vs
QUC
L 51-77
−26.5
10
vs
WGA
W 75-43
−23.5
15
@
CARK
L 60-62
−14.5
17
@
UNA
W 90-68
+24.5
22
vs
BELL
L 70-77
+8.5
24
vs
EKU
W 81-76
+14.5
29
vs
LIP
W 70-65
−7.5
31
vs
FGCU
L 49-68
−19.5
5
@
QUC
L 84-93
+30.5
7
@
WGA
L 73-87
+21.5
11
@
STET
L 62-67
−9.5
14
vs
UNF
W 63-56
−34.5
18
@
FGCU
L 84-86
+33.5
21
vs
APSU
L 61-65
−16.5
26
vs
STET
W 89-85
+35.5
28
@
UNF
W 85-61
−5.5
4
vs
BELL
L 79-82
+16.5
over 12under 18avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Florida
35 games played
Straight up
27-8
77% wins
Against the spread
19-16
54% covers · avg +1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-20
43% overs · avg −2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 87-93 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 164.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 104-64 | -43.5 | L −3.5 | 169.5 | U 168 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 78-76 | -17.5 | L −15.5 | 180.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 82-68 | -10.5 | W +3.5 | 171.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 80-45 | -36.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | U 125 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 80-84 | -11.5 | L −15.5 | 155.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 90-78 | -12.5 | L −0.5 | 169.5 | U 168 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 66-67 | +9.5 | W +8.5 | 157.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 9 | vs | L 73-77 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 80-70 | -14.5 | L −4.5 | 162.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 102-61 | -44.5 | L −3.5 | 156.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 90-60 | -27.5 | W +2.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 94-72 | -35.5 | L −13.5 | 160.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 74-76 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 154.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 92-77 | -9.5 | W +5.5 | 172.5 | U 169 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 91-67 | -4.5 | W +19.5 | 151.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 96-79 | -7.5 | W +9.5 | 157.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 98-94 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 164.5 | O 192 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 79-61 | -15.5 | W +2.5 | 158.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 67-76 | -11.5 | L −20.5 | 159.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 95-48 | -13.5 | W +33.5 | 151.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 1 | vs | W 100-77 | -9.5 | W +13.5 | 176.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 86-67 | -5.5 | W +13.5 | 167.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 86-66 | -8.5 | W +11.5 | 164.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 92-83 | -12.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 76-62 | -23.5 | L −9.5 | 156.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 94-75 | -13.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 84-71 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 111-77 | -9.5 | W +24.5 | 169.5 | O 188 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 108-74 | -20.5 | W +13.5 | 161.5 | O 182 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 84-77 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 162.5 | U 161 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 71-63 | -10.5 | L −2.5 | 161.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 74-91 | -7.5 | L −24.5 | 161.5 | O 165 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 114-55 | -35.5 | W +23.5 | 154.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 22 | vs | L 72-73 | -10.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
ARIZ
L 87-93
−9.5
6
vs
UNF
W 104-64
−3.5
11
vs
FSU
W 78-76
−15.5
16
vs
MIA
W 82-68
+3.5
21
vs
MRMK
W 80-45
−1.5
27
vs
TCU
L 80-84
−15.5
28
vs
PROV
W 90-78
−0.5
2
@
DUKE
L 66-67
+8.5
9
vs
CONN
L 73-77
+0.5
13
vs
GW
W 80-70
−4.5
17
vs
SFPA
W 102-61
−3.5
21
vs
COLG
W 90-60
+2.5
29
vs
DART
W 94-72
−13.5
3
@
MIZ
L 74-76
−9.5
6
vs
UGA
W 92-77
+5.5
10
vs
TENN
W 91-67
+19.5
13
@
OU
W 96-79
+9.5
17
@
VAN
W 98-94
+2.5
20
vs
LSU
W 79-61
+2.5
24
vs
AUB
L 67-76
−20.5
28
@
SC
W 95-48
+33.5
1
vs
ALA
W 100-77
+13.5
7
@
TA&M
W 86-67
+13.5
11
@
UGA
W 86-66
+11.5
14
vs
UK
W 92-83
−3.5
17
vs
SC
W 76-62
−9.5
21
@
MISS
W 94-75
+5.5
25
@
TEX
W 84-71
+6.5
28
vs
ARK
W 111-77
+24.5
3
vs
MSST
W 108-74
+13.5
7
@
UK
W 84-77
+1.5
13
vs
UK
W 71-63
−2.5
14
vs
VAN
L 74-91
−24.5
20
vs
PV
W 114-55
+23.5
22
vs
IOWA
L 72-73
−11.5
covered 19didn’t cover 16avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
ARIZ
L 87-93
+15.5
6
vs
UNF
W 104-64
−1.5
11
vs
FSU
W 78-76
−26.5
16
vs
MIA
W 82-68
−21.5
21
vs
MRMK
W 80-45
−33.5
27
vs
TCU
L 80-84
+8.5
28
vs
PROV
W 90-78
−1.5
2
@
DUKE
L 66-67
−24.5
9
vs
CONN
L 73-77
+4.5
13
vs
GW
W 80-70
−12.5
17
vs
SFPA
W 102-61
+6.5
21
vs
COLG
W 90-60
−6.5
29
vs
DART
W 94-72
+5.5
3
@
MIZ
L 74-76
−4.5
6
vs
UGA
W 92-77
−3.5
10
vs
TENN
W 91-67
+6.5
13
@
OU
W 96-79
+17.5
17
@
VAN
W 98-94
+27.5
20
vs
LSU
W 79-61
−18.5
24
vs
AUB
L 67-76
−16.5
28
@
SC
W 95-48
−8.5
1
vs
ALA
W 100-77
+0.5
7
@
TA&M
W 86-67
−14.5
11
@
UGA
W 86-66
−12.5
14
vs
UK
W 92-83
+20.5
17
vs
SC
W 76-62
−18.5
21
@
MISS
W 94-75
+16.5
25
@
TEX
W 84-71
−2.5
28
vs
ARK
W 111-77
+18.5
3
vs
MSST
W 108-74
+20.5
7
@
UK
W 84-77
−1.5
13
vs
UK
W 71-63
−27.5
14
vs
VAN
L 74-91
+3.5
20
vs
PV
W 114-55
+14.5
22
vs
IOWA
L 72-73
−0.5
over 15under 20avg −2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Florida has the better starters
Position by position: Jacksonville 0, Florida 5, even 0
JacksonvilleBetterFlorida
G C. Williams TR16.1 pts · 3.6 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 65
→FLASmall
G D. Aberdeen TR13.5 pts · 2.5 reb · 3.4 ast
Score 90
G J. Phillips TR15.5 pts · 5 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 59
→FLASmall
G B. Fland11.6 pts · 2.5 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 89
G H. Wood11.6 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 64
→FLASmall
F T. Haugh17.1 pts · 6.1 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 97
G E. Sterck6.5 pts · 2.1 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 23
→FLABig
F A. Condon15.1 pts · 7.5 reb · 3.6 ast
Score 98
F J. Morrow TR7.8 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 58
→FLABig
C R. Chinyelu10.9 pts · 11.2 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 97
JacksonvilleBetterFlorida
JAX offense232nd of 366 · -7.1
→FLABig
FLA defense4th of 366 · +10.4
JAX defense210th of 366 · -5.4
→FLABig
FLA offense1st of 366 · +17.0
Backcourt-1.9 · 4 players
→FLABig
Backcourt+5.2 · 2 players
Frontcourt-0.2 · 1 player
→FLABig
Frontcourt+17.1 · 3 players
Bench-1.1 · 4 players
→FLABig
Bench+3.0 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestJAX betterFLA betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. Williams33 min · TRJ. Phillips31 min · TRH. Wood28 minE. Sterck25 minR. Loux1 minL. BuckinghamNew
Forwards
J. Morrow21 min · TRR. Stirling15 min · TRN. Turner6 min · TRJ. Newell2 min · TR
Centers
S. MbingazoNew
Guards
D. Aberdeen31 min · TRB. Fland30 minU. Klavzar21 minI. Brown13 minC. Ingram6 minA. Lloyd5 min
Forwards
T. Haugh33 minA. Condon31 minD. PetrovicNewA. ButajevasNew
Centers
R. Chinyelu25 minV. Mikic3 minJ. LayNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 69.5 #293 | Points per game | 87.1 #5 |
| 1.06 #237 | Points per possession | 1.21 #7 |
| 65.7 #322 | Pace (possessions) | 72.0 #34 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.0 #232 | Effective FG% | 54.1 #63 |
| 31.8 #289 | 3-point % | 31.2 #315 |
| 37.4 #223 | 3-point attempt rate | 37.0 #230 |
| 32.8 #242 | Free throw rate | 39.0 #80 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.2 #222 | Turnover rate | 16.4 #162 |
| 31.7 #137 | Offensive rebound rate | 43.4 #2 |
| 11.1 #335 | Assists per game | 17.0 #26 |
| Defense | ||
| 75.2 #194 | Points allowed | 71.5 #93 |
| 1.14 #313 | Points allowed per possession | 0.99 #19 |
| 54.8 #325 | Opponent effective FG% | 46.1 #10 |
| 36.3 #318 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.1 #66 |
| 15.0 #290 | Turnovers forced | 15.2 #269 |
| 70.9 #115 | Defensive rebound rate | 75.2 #7 |
| 6.3 #206 | Steals per game | 6.6 #158 |
| 2.8 #261 | Blocks per game | 5.0 #16 |
Jacksonville
10-20 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · Atlantic Sun Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Bellarmine79–82
- W@ North Florida85–61
- Wvs Stetson89–85
- Lvs Austin Peay61–65
- L@ FGCU84–86
A week or more of rest.
Florida
27-8 in 2025-26 overall · 17-3 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Iowa72–73
- Wvs Prairie View114–55
- Lvs Vanderbilt74–91
- Wvs Kentucky71–63
- W@ Kentucky84–77
A week or more of rest.