State Farm Field House · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | BEL | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects BEL 77–76 · win probability BEL 53%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 152.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: YALE has more of the edges
YALE 4, BEL 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: YALE plays 66.4 a game (301st fastest), BEL 70.5 (94th). Faster games mean more points
Turnovers
Turnover rate: YALE 14.0%, BEL 18.0%. Forced: YALE 16.2%, BEL 17.4%
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: YALE 34.2%, BEL 28.8%. Defensive: YALE 70.3%, BEL 70.8%
Free throws
Free throw rate: YALE 35.1, BEL 32.5. Allowed: YALE 26.8, BEL 30.7
YALE offense vs BEL defense
Offense 125th of 366 against a defense 192nd, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: YALE 55.6 and allows 51.6; BEL 61.0 and allows 49.9
Even
Three-pointers
YALE hits 39.4% and allows 35.0%; BEL hits 41.0% and allows 34.2%. Threes are 36.1% and 45.7% of their shots
Even
BEL offense vs YALE defense
Offense 118th of 366 against a defense 136th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Context
Schedule so far
YALE has played the 141st-hardest schedule, BEL the 146th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: YALE 42%, BEL 41%. Transfers in: YALE 0, BEL 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | BEL -0.8 | — |
| Total | — | 152.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | YALE 75.9 · BEL 76.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | BEL -0.4 | — |
| 1H total | 71.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | YALE 35.5 · BEL 35.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | |
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 8-2 80% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Yale
29 games played
Straight up
22-7
76% wins
Against the spread
12-17
41% covers · avg −0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-14
52% overs · avg +1.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | W 97-68 | -5.5 | W +23.5 | 147.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 97-60 | -6.5 | W +30.5 | 156.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 86-79 | -20.5 | L −13.5 | 150.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 18 | vs | L 77-86 | -8.5 | L −17.5 | 153.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 73-67 | -17.5 | L −11.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 74-63 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 148.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 97-94 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | O 191 |
| Nov 30 | @ | W 77-74 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 80-66 | -12.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 93-82 | -17.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 78-102 | +15.5 | L −8.5 | 171.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 5 | @ | W 70-53 | -8.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 60-76 | -7.5 | L −23.5 | 142.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 102-68 | -9.5 | W +24.5 | 174.5 | U 170 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 91-74 | -9.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 77-60 | -6.5 | W +10.5 | 157.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 83-68 | -15.5 | L −0.5 | 155.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 65-67 | -11.5 | L −13.5 | 141.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 6 | vs | W 81-69 | -15.5 | L −3.5 | 140.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 9 | @ | W 87-81 | -6.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 13 | @ | W 83-70 | -9.5 | W +3.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 76-75 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 74-70 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 69-72 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 164.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 60-54 | -6.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 114 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 78-53 | -14.5 | W +10.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 88-76 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 163.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 15 | vs | L 84-88 | -9.5 | L −13.5 | 144.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 17 | vs | L 67-68 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | U 135 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
NAVY
W 97-68
+23.5
11
@
QUIN
W 97-60
+30.5
15
vs
STBK
W 86-79
−13.5
18
vs
URI
L 77-86
−17.5
21
vs
GB
W 73-67
−11.5
23
vs
COFC
W 74-63
+4.5
24
vs
AKR
W 97-94
+4.5
30
@
UVM
W 77-74
−3.5
7
vs
UIC
W 80-66
+1.5
10
vs
UALB
W 93-82
−6.5
29
@
ALA
L 78-102
−8.5
5
@
BRWN
W 70-53
+8.5
10
@
PRIN
L 60-76
−23.5
17
vs
COR
W 102-68
+24.5
19
vs
COLU
W 91-74
+7.5
24
@
PENN
W 77-60
+10.5
30
vs
DART
W 83-68
−0.5
31
vs
HARV
L 65-67
−13.5
6
vs
BRWN
W 81-69
−3.5
9
@
HOW
W 87-81
−0.5
13
@
DART
W 83-70
+3.5
14
@
HARV
W 76-75
−3.5
21
vs
PENN
W 74-70
−5.5
27
@
COR
L 69-72
−7.5
28
@
COLU
W 60-54
−0.5
7
vs
PRIN
W 78-53
+10.5
14
vs
COR
W 88-76
+6.5
15
vs
PENN
L 84-88
−13.5
17
vs
UNCW
L 67-68
−5.5
covered 12didn’t cover 17avg −0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
NAVY
W 97-68
+17.5
11
@
QUIN
W 97-60
+0.5
15
vs
STBK
W 86-79
+14.5
18
vs
URI
L 77-86
+9.5
21
vs
GB
W 73-67
−8.5
23
vs
COFC
W 74-63
−11.5
24
vs
AKR
W 97-94
+34.5
30
@
UVM
W 77-74
+3.5
7
vs
UIC
W 80-66
−2.5
10
vs
UALB
W 93-82
+29.5
29
@
ALA
L 78-102
+8.5
5
@
BRWN
W 70-53
−19.5
10
@
PRIN
L 60-76
−6.5
17
vs
COR
W 102-68
−4.5
19
vs
COLU
W 91-74
+14.5
24
@
PENN
W 77-60
−20.5
30
vs
DART
W 83-68
−4.5
31
vs
HARV
L 65-67
−9.5
6
vs
BRWN
W 81-69
+9.5
9
@
HOW
W 87-81
+20.5
13
@
DART
W 83-70
+1.5
14
@
HARV
W 76-75
+12.5
21
vs
PENN
W 74-70
−6.5
27
@
COR
L 69-72
−23.5
28
@
COLU
W 60-54
−33.5
7
vs
PRIN
W 78-53
−6.5
14
vs
COR
W 88-76
+0.5
15
vs
PENN
L 84-88
+27.5
17
vs
UNCW
L 67-68
−13.5
over 15under 14avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Belmont
31 games played
Straight up
25-6
81% wins
Against the spread
18-13
58% covers · avg +2.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-12
61% overs · avg +4.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 79-63 | -15.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 87-79 | -13.5 | L −5.5 | 158.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 83-60 | -7.5 | W +15.5 | 171.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 75-68 | -12.5 | L −5.5 | 158.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 94-57 | -21.5 | W +15.5 | 157.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 87-72 | -4.5 | W +10.5 | 163.5 | U 159 |
| Nov 30 | @ | W 96-73 | -2.5 | W +20.5 | 152.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 76-84 | -6.5 | L −14.5 | 156.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 7 | @ | W 83-62 | -3.5 | W +17.5 | 153.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 87-84 | -12.5 | L −9.5 | 154.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 16 | @ | W 83-78 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 19 | @ | W 84-58 | +1.5 | W +27.5 | 150.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 80-81 | -7.5 | L −8.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 88-78 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 153.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 4 | vs | L 67-68 | -6.5 | L −7.5 | 158.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 78-65 | +2.5 | W +15.5 | 137.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 78-76 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 78-74 | -11.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 73-68 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 80-69 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 78-77 | -5.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 103-86 | -3.5 | W +13.5 | 163.5 | O 189 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 103-90 | -9.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | O 193 |
| Feb 6 | @ | W 68-62 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 151.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 84-95 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 152.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 91-86 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 138.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 87-70 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 166.5 | U 157 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 87-70 | -12.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 98-64 | -18.5 | W +15.5 | 152.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 1 | @ | L 74-81 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 79-100 | -12.5 | L −33.5 | 152.5 | O 179 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
AF
W 79-63
+0.5
8
vs
TNST
W 87-79
−5.5
15
@
ORU
W 83-60
+15.5
19
vs
LIP
W 75-68
−5.5
24
vs
SFPA
W 94-57
+15.5
26
vs
TOL
W 87-72
+10.5
30
@
COFC
W 96-73
+20.5
3
vs
RICH
L 76-84
−14.5
7
@
MTSU
W 83-62
+17.5
13
vs
UIC
W 87-84
−9.5
16
@
EVAN
W 83-78
−3.5
19
@
UCI
W 84-58
+27.5
29
@
INST
L 80-81
−8.5
1
vs
BRAD
W 88-78
+6.5
4
vs
SIU
L 67-68
−7.5
7
@
UNI
W 78-65
+15.5
10
@
DRKE
W 78-76
−2.5
13
vs
VAL
W 78-74
−7.5
17
@
SIU
W 73-68
+1.5
24
vs
ILST
W 80-69
+5.5
28
@
VAL
W 78-77
−4.5
31
vs
MUR
W 103-86
+13.5
3
vs
DRKE
W 103-90
+3.5
6
@
UIC
W 68-62
+4.5
9
@
BRAD
L 84-95
−12.5
12
vs
UNI
W 91-86
+0.5
15
@
MUR
W 87-70
+15.5
21
vs
INST
W 87-70
+4.5
25
vs
EVAN
W 98-64
+15.5
1
@
ILST
L 74-81
−8.5
6
vs
DRKE
L 79-100
−33.5
covered 18didn’t cover 13avg +2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
AF
W 79-63
−2.5
8
vs
TNST
W 87-79
+7.5
15
@
ORU
W 83-60
−28.5
19
vs
LIP
W 75-68
−15.5
24
vs
SFPA
W 94-57
−6.5
26
vs
TOL
W 87-72
−4.5
30
@
COFC
W 96-73
+16.5
3
vs
RICH
L 76-84
+3.5
7
@
MTSU
W 83-62
−8.5
13
vs
UIC
W 87-84
+16.5
16
@
EVAN
W 83-78
+13.5
19
@
UCI
W 84-58
−8.5
29
@
INST
L 80-81
+1.5
1
vs
BRAD
W 88-78
+12.5
4
vs
SIU
L 67-68
−23.5
7
@
UNI
W 78-65
+5.5
10
@
DRKE
W 78-76
+5.5
13
vs
VAL
W 78-74
+5.5
17
@
SIU
W 73-68
−10.5
24
vs
ILST
W 80-69
−1.5
28
@
VAL
W 78-77
+9.5
31
vs
MUR
W 103-86
+25.5
3
vs
DRKE
W 103-90
+38.5
6
@
UIC
W 68-62
−21.5
9
@
BRAD
L 84-95
+26.5
12
vs
UNI
W 91-86
+38.5
15
@
MUR
W 87-70
−9.5
21
vs
INST
W 87-70
+0.5
25
vs
EVAN
W 98-64
+9.5
1
@
ILST
L 74-81
+4.5
6
vs
DRKE
L 79-100
+26.5
over 19under 12avg +4.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Yale has the better starters
Position by position: Yale 2, Belmont 1, even 2
YaleBetterBelmont
G T. Mullin11.8 pts · 2.4 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 63
←YALESmall
G J. Jenkins8.8 pts · 4.5 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 42
G J. Brathwaite6.6 pts · 1.8 reb · 1 ast
Score 35
→BELBig
G J. Smiley8.5 pts · 1.9 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 81
G C. Wallace1.2 pts · 0.6 reb · 0.6 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G I. West2.8 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 7
F R. Fox9.8 pts · 1.9 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 76
←YALESmall
F K. Fish TR7.2 pts · 3.3 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 47
F J. Sullivan1.3 pts · 0.7 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F E. Dillon7.8 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 76
YaleBetterBelmont
YALE offense125th of 366 · -3.3
←YALESmall
BEL defense192nd of 366 · -4.5
YALE defense136th of 366 · -2.8
=Even
BEL offense118th of 366 · -2.7
Backcourt-1.1 · 3 players
←YALESmall
Backcourt-2.4 · 3 players
Frontcourt+0.5 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt+0.5 · 2 players
Bench-0.5 · 4 players
=Even
Bench-0.6 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestYALE betterBEL betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Mullin28 minJ. Brathwaite19 minC. Wallace4 minJ. Basima3 minA. Loving3 minJ. Tsai2 min
Forwards
R. Fox18 minJ. Sullivan5 minD. Ogunyemi3 minC. MayNewT. WinklerNewC. BolteNew
Centers
J. OwareNew
Guards
J. Jenkins24 minJ. Smiley17 minI. West17 minM. Zobrist5 min · TRC. Haynes5 minA. Ristic3 min · TR
Forwards
K. Fish19 min · TRE. Dillon16 minG. Lemke2 minC. KnowlesNewC. GersmehlNew
Centers
V. Neugebauer8 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.1 #64 | Points per game | 83.5 #23 |
| 1.21 #10 | Points per possession | 1.18 #33 |
| 66.4 #301 | Pace (possessions) | 70.5 #94 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.6 #26 | Effective FG% | 61.0 #1 |
| 39.4 #3 | 3-point % | 41.0 #1 |
| 36.1 #247 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.7 #51 |
| 35.1 #172 | Free throw rate | 32.5 #248 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.0 #22 | Turnover rate | 18.0 #272 |
| 34.2 #62 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.8 #241 |
| 15.8 #53 | Assists per game | 18.5 #6 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.8 #102 | Points allowed | 74.1 #158 |
| 1.08 #166 | Points allowed per possession | 1.05 #95 |
| 51.6 #192 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.9 #93 |
| 35.0 #250 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.2 #197 |
| 16.2 #207 | Turnovers forced | 17.4 #126 |
| 70.3 #147 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.8 #118 |
| 5.3 #314 | Steals per game | 6.0 #241 |
| 3.2 #193 | Blocks per game | 3.5 #151 |
Yale
22-7 in 2025-26 overall · 12-4 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UNC Wilmington67–68
- Lvs Penn84–88
- Wvs Cornell88–76
- Wvs Princeton78–53
- W@ Columbia60–54
A week or more of rest.
Belmont
25-6 in 2025-26 overall · 16-5 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Drake79–100
- L@ Illinois St74–81
- Wvs Evansville98–64
- Wvs Indiana St87–70
- W@ Murray St87–70
A week or more of rest.