State Farm Field House · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | WRST | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects YALE 77–74 · win probability YALE 61%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 150.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: YALE has more of the edges
YALE 2, WRST 0 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
YALE has played the 141st-hardest schedule, WRST the 264th. A record against a soft schedule means less
YALE offense vs WRST defense
Offense 125th of 366 against a defense 215th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: YALE plays 66.4 a game (301st fastest), WRST 69.1 (171st). Faster games mean more points
Turnovers
Turnover rate: YALE 14.0%, WRST 16.1%. Forced: YALE 16.2%, WRST 16.6%
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: YALE 55.6 and allows 51.6; WRST 54.3 and allows 52.4
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: YALE 35.1, WRST 37.4. Allowed: YALE 26.8, WRST 33.3
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: YALE 42%, WRST 32%. Transfers in: YALE 0, WRST 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
WRST offense vs YALE defense
Offense 148th of 366 against a defense 136th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: YALE 34.2%, WRST 32.8%. Defensive: YALE 70.3%, WRST 70.6%
Even
Three-pointers
YALE hits 39.4% and allows 35.0%; WRST hits 36.4% and allows 34.3%. Threes are 36.1% and 34.2% of their shots
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | YALE -3.3 | — |
| Total | — | 150.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | YALE 76.9 · WRST 73.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | YALE -2.1 | — |
| 1H total | 70.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | YALE 36.2 · WRST 34.1 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | |
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Yale
29 games played
Straight up
22-7
76% wins
Against the spread
12-17
41% covers · avg −0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-14
52% overs · avg +1.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | W 97-68 | -5.5 | W +23.5 | 147.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 97-60 | -6.5 | W +30.5 | 156.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 86-79 | -20.5 | L −13.5 | 150.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 18 | vs | L 77-86 | -8.5 | L −17.5 | 153.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 73-67 | -17.5 | L −11.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 74-63 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 148.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 97-94 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | O 191 |
| Nov 30 | @ | W 77-74 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 80-66 | -12.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 93-82 | -17.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 78-102 | +15.5 | L −8.5 | 171.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 5 | @ | W 70-53 | -8.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 60-76 | -7.5 | L −23.5 | 142.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 102-68 | -9.5 | W +24.5 | 174.5 | U 170 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 91-74 | -9.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 77-60 | -6.5 | W +10.5 | 157.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 83-68 | -15.5 | L −0.5 | 155.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 65-67 | -11.5 | L −13.5 | 141.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 6 | vs | W 81-69 | -15.5 | L −3.5 | 140.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 9 | @ | W 87-81 | -6.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 13 | @ | W 83-70 | -9.5 | W +3.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 76-75 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 74-70 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 69-72 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 164.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 60-54 | -6.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 114 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 78-53 | -14.5 | W +10.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 88-76 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 163.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 15 | vs | L 84-88 | -9.5 | L −13.5 | 144.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 17 | vs | L 67-68 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | U 135 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
NAVY
W 97-68
+23.5
11
@
QUIN
W 97-60
+30.5
15
vs
STBK
W 86-79
−13.5
18
vs
URI
L 77-86
−17.5
21
vs
GB
W 73-67
−11.5
23
vs
COFC
W 74-63
+4.5
24
vs
AKR
W 97-94
+4.5
30
@
UVM
W 77-74
−3.5
7
vs
UIC
W 80-66
+1.5
10
vs
UALB
W 93-82
−6.5
29
@
ALA
L 78-102
−8.5
5
@
BRWN
W 70-53
+8.5
10
@
PRIN
L 60-76
−23.5
17
vs
COR
W 102-68
+24.5
19
vs
COLU
W 91-74
+7.5
24
@
PENN
W 77-60
+10.5
30
vs
DART
W 83-68
−0.5
31
vs
HARV
L 65-67
−13.5
6
vs
BRWN
W 81-69
−3.5
9
@
HOW
W 87-81
−0.5
13
@
DART
W 83-70
+3.5
14
@
HARV
W 76-75
−3.5
21
vs
PENN
W 74-70
−5.5
27
@
COR
L 69-72
−7.5
28
@
COLU
W 60-54
−0.5
7
vs
PRIN
W 78-53
+10.5
14
vs
COR
W 88-76
+6.5
15
vs
PENN
L 84-88
−13.5
17
vs
UNCW
L 67-68
−5.5
covered 12didn’t cover 17avg −0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
NAVY
W 97-68
+17.5
11
@
QUIN
W 97-60
+0.5
15
vs
STBK
W 86-79
+14.5
18
vs
URI
L 77-86
+9.5
21
vs
GB
W 73-67
−8.5
23
vs
COFC
W 74-63
−11.5
24
vs
AKR
W 97-94
+34.5
30
@
UVM
W 77-74
+3.5
7
vs
UIC
W 80-66
−2.5
10
vs
UALB
W 93-82
+29.5
29
@
ALA
L 78-102
+8.5
5
@
BRWN
W 70-53
−19.5
10
@
PRIN
L 60-76
−6.5
17
vs
COR
W 102-68
−4.5
19
vs
COLU
W 91-74
+14.5
24
@
PENN
W 77-60
−20.5
30
vs
DART
W 83-68
−4.5
31
vs
HARV
L 65-67
−9.5
6
vs
BRWN
W 81-69
+9.5
9
@
HOW
W 87-81
+20.5
13
@
DART
W 83-70
+1.5
14
@
HARV
W 76-75
+12.5
21
vs
PENN
W 74-70
−6.5
27
@
COR
L 69-72
−23.5
28
@
COLU
W 60-54
−33.5
7
vs
PRIN
W 78-53
−6.5
14
vs
COR
W 88-76
+0.5
15
vs
PENN
L 84-88
+27.5
17
vs
UNCW
L 67-68
−13.5
over 15under 14avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Wright St
33 games played
Straight up
21-12
64% wins
Against the spread
21-12
64% covers · avg +2.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-17
48% overs · avg +3.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ | L 67-77 | +14.5 | W +4.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 71-81 | -5.5 | L −15.5 | 159.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 92-59 | +6.5 | W +39.5 | 156.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 72-76 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 157.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 25 | @ | W 79-62 | -9.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 69-94 | +14.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 68-69 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 86-58 | -6.5 | W +21.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 74-76 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 16 | vs | L 76-83 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 70-64 | -10.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 88-73 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 76-70 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 4 | @ | W 81-77 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 162.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 9 | @ | W 84-82 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 148.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 11 | @ | W 94-84 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 161.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 93-83 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 79-85 | -15.5 | L −21.5 | 156.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 88-80 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 155.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 30 | @ | W 76-69 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 83-75 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 66-72 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 73-68 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 74-77 | -11.5 | L −14.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 102-90 | -7.5 | W +4.5 | 157.5 | O 192 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 85-73 | -11.5 | W +0.5 | 160.5 | U 158 |
| Feb 22 | vs | L 68-81 | -4.5 | L −17.5 | 146.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 74-70 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 92-91 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 153.5 | O 183 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 90-61 | -14.5 | W +14.5 | 162.5 | U 151 |
| Mar 9 | vs | W 103-90 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 157.5 | O 193 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 66-63 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 129 |
| Mar 20 | vs | L 73-82 | +17.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | O 155 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@
CAL
L 67-77
+4.5
11
vs
TOL
L 71-81
−15.5
15
vs
RAD
W 92-59
+39.5
16
vs
KENT
L 72-76
+0.5
25
@
STET
W 79-62
+7.5
28
@
BTLR
L 69-94
−10.5
3
@
YSU
L 68-69
+2.5
7
vs
GB
W 86-58
+21.5
13
@
MRSH
L 74-76
+1.5
16
vs
M-OH
L 76-83
−5.5
22
vs
EMU
W 70-64
−4.5
29
vs
OAK
W 88-73
+11.5
1
vs
MILW
W 76-70
+2.5
4
@
IUIN
W 81-77
−4.5
9
@
DETM
W 84-82
−3.5
11
@
OAK
W 94-84
+14.5
15
vs
YSU
W 93-83
+5.5
21
vs
CLE
L 79-85
−21.5
24
vs
NKU
W 88-80
+6.5
30
@
MILW
W 76-69
+4.5
1
@
GB
W 83-75
+4.5
4
@
RMU
L 66-72
−7.5
7
vs
PFW
W 73-68
−1.5
12
vs
DETM
L 74-77
−14.5
15
@
CLE
W 102-90
+4.5
19
vs
IUIN
W 85-73
+0.5
22
vs
RMU
L 68-81
−17.5
25
@
PFW
W 74-70
+2.5
28
@
NKU
W 92-91
+4.5
4
vs
CLE
W 90-61
+14.5
9
vs
NKU
W 103-90
+14.5
10
vs
DETM
W 66-63
−1.5
20
vs
UVA
L 73-82
+8.5
covered 21didn’t cover 12avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@
CAL
L 67-77
−4.5
11
vs
TOL
L 71-81
−7.5
15
vs
RAD
W 92-59
−5.5
16
vs
KENT
L 72-76
−9.5
25
@
STET
W 79-62
−6.5
28
@
BTLR
L 69-94
+12.5
3
@
YSU
L 68-69
−7.5
7
vs
GB
W 86-58
+1.5
13
@
MRSH
L 74-76
+0.5
16
vs
M-OH
L 76-83
+9.5
22
vs
EMU
W 70-64
−8.5
29
vs
OAK
W 88-73
+1.5
1
vs
MILW
W 76-70
−1.5
4
@
IUIN
W 81-77
−4.5
9
@
DETM
W 84-82
+17.5
11
@
OAK
W 94-84
+16.5
15
vs
YSU
W 93-83
+34.5
21
vs
CLE
L 79-85
+7.5
24
vs
NKU
W 88-80
+12.5
30
@
MILW
W 76-69
−6.5
1
@
GB
W 83-75
+13.5
4
@
RMU
L 66-72
−9.5
7
vs
PFW
W 73-68
−9.5
12
vs
DETM
L 74-77
−0.5
15
@
CLE
W 102-90
+34.5
19
vs
IUIN
W 85-73
−2.5
22
vs
RMU
L 68-81
+2.5
25
@
PFW
W 74-70
−6.5
28
@
NKU
W 92-91
+29.5
4
vs
CLE
W 90-61
−11.5
9
vs
NKU
W 103-90
+35.5
10
vs
DETM
W 66-63
−24.5
20
vs
UVA
L 73-82
+8.5
over 16under 17avg +3.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Yale 0, Wright St 0, even 5
YaleBetterWright St
G T. Mullin11.8 pts · 2.4 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 63
=Even
G C. O'Hara TR14.2 pts · 4.4 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 66
G J. Brathwaite6.6 pts · 1.8 reb · 1 ast
Score 35
=Even
G D. Pangonis8.9 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 30
G C. Wallace1.2 pts · 0.6 reb · 0.6 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G C. Traylor TR3.8 pts · 1.1 reb · 2 ast
Score 21
F R. Fox9.8 pts · 1.9 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 76
=Even
G A. Holden5.8 pts · 3.8 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 78
F J. Sullivan1.3 pts · 0.7 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F K. Pickett8.5 pts · 5.5 reb · 1 ast
Score 67
YaleBetterWright St
YALE offense125th of 366 · -3.3
←YALESmall
WRST defense215th of 366 · -5.6
YALE defense136th of 366 · -2.8
=Even
WRST offense148th of 366 · -4.5
Backcourt-1.1 · 3 players
←YALESmall
Backcourt-2.5 · 4 players
Frontcourt+0.5 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt+0.6 · 1 player
Bench-0.5 · 4 players
=Even
Bench-0.7 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestYALE betterWRST betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Mullin28 minJ. Brathwaite19 minC. Wallace4 minJ. Basima3 minA. Loving3 minJ. Tsai2 min
Forwards
R. Fox18 minJ. Sullivan5 minD. Ogunyemi3 minC. MayNewT. WinklerNewC. BolteNew
Centers
J. OwareNew
Guards
C. O'Hara33 min · TRD. Pangonis27 minC. Traylor17 min · TRA. Holden14 minI. Milijasevic8 min · TRP. DouglasNew
Forwards
K. Pickett23 minS. JohnsonNewN. LewisNew
Centers
N. Djapa10 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.1 #64 | Points per game | 79.8 #72 |
| 1.21 #10 | Points per possession | 1.16 #54 |
| 66.4 #301 | Pace (possessions) | 69.1 #171 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.6 #26 | Effective FG% | 54.3 #56 |
| 39.4 #3 | 3-point % | 36.4 #44 |
| 36.1 #247 | 3-point attempt rate | 34.2 #290 |
| 35.1 #172 | Free throw rate | 37.4 #120 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.0 #22 | Turnover rate | 16.1 #149 |
| 34.2 #62 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.8 #91 |
| 15.8 #53 | Assists per game | 13.2 #199 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.8 #102 | Points allowed | 75.6 #206 |
| 1.08 #166 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #201 |
| 51.6 #192 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.4 #238 |
| 35.0 #250 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.3 #203 |
| 16.2 #207 | Turnovers forced | 16.6 #179 |
| 70.3 #147 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.6 #129 |
| 5.3 #314 | Steals per game | 7.1 #114 |
| 3.2 #193 | Blocks per game | 4.4 #47 |
Yale
22-7 in 2025-26 overall · 12-4 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UNC Wilmington67–68
- Lvs Penn84–88
- Wvs Cornell88–76
- Wvs Princeton78–53
- W@ Columbia60–54
A week or more of rest.
Wright St
21-12 in 2025-26 overall · 18-5 in conference · Horizon League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Virginia73–82
- Wvs Detroit Mercy66–63
- Wvs N Kentucky103–90
- Wvs Cleveland St90–61
- W@ N Kentucky92–91
A week or more of rest.