Watsco Center · at Miami
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MIA | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MIA 83–83 · win probability MIA 50%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 165.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MIA has more of the edges
ALA 2, MIA 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: ALA 32.4%, MIA 37.2%. Defensive: ALA 67.2%, MIA 74.1%
Three-pointers
ALA hits 35.8% and allows 33.8%; MIA hits 34.9% and allows 35.8%. Threes are 54.3% and 31.9% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 72 possessions: ALA plays 74.7 a game (7th fastest), MIA 69.2 (170th). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
ALA has played the 1st-hardest schedule, MIA the 75th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: ALA 13.1%, MIA 16.1%. Forced: ALA 12.8%, MIA 18.3%
Shooting
Effective FG%: ALA 55.2 and allows 49.2; MIA 55.3 and allows 51.8
Home court
MIA at home. This season: MIA 0-0 at home, ALA 0-0 away
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: ALA 36.0, MIA 37.1. Allowed: ALA 32.0, MIA 29.5
Even
MIA offense vs ALA defense
Offense 30th of 366 against a defense 54th, on the model’s ratings
Even
ALA offense vs MIA defense
Offense 2nd of 366 against a defense 26th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: ALA 46%, MIA 52%. Transfers in: ALA 3, MIA 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | MIA -0.1 | — |
| Total | — | 165.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | ALA 82.5 · MIA 82.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ALA -0.1 | — |
| 1H total | 77.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | ALA 38.6 · MIA 38.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | |
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
ALA 1–0 MIAALA leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · ALA 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2021-22 | MIA 64 vs ALA 96 | ALA -9 | ALA W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Alabama
35 games played
Straight up
25-10
71% wins
Against the spread
16-19
46% covers · avg +1.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-16
54% overs · avg +0.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 91-62 | -36.5 | L −7.5 | 170.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 8 | @ | W 103-96 | +4.5 | W +11.5 | 172.5 | O 199 |
| Nov 13 | vs | L 80-87 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 172.5 | U 167 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 90-86 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 180.5 | U 176 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 85-95 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 178.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 115-76 | -13.5 | W +25.5 | 181.5 | O 191 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 105-72 | -14.5 | W +18.5 | 166.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 90-84 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 165.5 | O 174 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 97-55 | -33.5 | W +8.5 | 171.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 75-96 | +2.5 | L −18.5 | 178.5 | U 171 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 104-93 | -14.5 | L −3.5 | 178.5 | O 197 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 92-81 | -20.5 | L −9.5 | 182.5 | U 173 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 102-78 | -15.5 | W +8.5 | 171.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 89-74 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 173.5 | U 163 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 90-96 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 176.5 | O 186 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 88-92 | -11.5 | L −15.5 | 177.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 97-82 | -4.5 | W +10.5 | 171.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 83-81 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 177.5 | U 164 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 73-79 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 167.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 90-64 | -10.5 | W +15.5 | 167.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 1 | @ | L 77-100 | +9.5 | L −13.5 | 176.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 100-97 | -8.5 | L −5.5 | 180.5 | O 197 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 96-92 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 175.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 93-74 | -6.5 | W +12.5 | 164.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 89-75 | -17.5 | L −3.5 | 170.5 | U 164 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 117-115 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 181.5 | O 232 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 90-83 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 172.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 100-75 | -12.5 | W +12.5 | 176.5 | U 175 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 71-69 | +5.5 | W +7.5 | 162.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 88-98 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 179.5 | O 186 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 96-84 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 175.5 | O 180 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 79-80 | -12.5 | L −13.5 | 166.5 | U 159 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 90-70 | -11.5 | W +8.5 | 158.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 90-65 | -1.5 | W +23.5 | 164.5 | U 155 |
| Mar 27 | vs | L 77-90 | +9.5 | L −3.5 | 172.5 | U 167 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
UND
W 91-62
−7.5
8
@
SJU
W 103-96
+11.5
13
vs
PUR
L 80-87
−10.5
19
vs
ILL
W 90-86
+6.5
24
vs
GONZ
L 85-95
−5.5
25
vs
UNLV
W 115-76
+25.5
26
vs
MD
W 105-72
+18.5
3
vs
CLEM
W 90-84
−2.5
7
vs
UTSA
W 97-55
+8.5
13
vs
ARIZ
L 75-96
−18.5
17
vs
USF
W 104-93
−3.5
21
vs
KENN
W 92-81
−9.5
29
vs
YALE
W 102-78
+8.5
3
vs
UK
W 89-74
+9.5
7
@
VAN
L 90-96
−2.5
10
vs
TEX
L 88-92
−15.5
13
@
MSST
W 97-82
+10.5
17
@
OU
W 83-81
−3.5
24
vs
TENN
L 73-79
−10.5
27
vs
MIZ
W 90-64
+15.5
1
@
FLA
L 77-100
−13.5
4
vs
TA&M
W 100-97
−5.5
7
@
AUB
W 96-92
+6.5
11
@
MISS
W 93-74
+12.5
14
vs
SC
W 89-75
−3.5
18
vs
ARK
W 117-115
−1.5
21
@
LSU
W 90-83
−0.5
25
vs
MSST
W 100-75
+12.5
28
@
TENN
W 71-69
+7.5
3
@
UGA
L 88-98
−11.5
7
vs
AUB
W 96-84
+6.5
13
vs
MISS
L 79-80
−13.5
20
vs
HOF
W 90-70
+8.5
22
vs
TTU
W 90-65
+23.5
27
vs
MICH
L 77-90
−3.5
covered 16didn’t cover 19avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
UND
W 91-62
−17.5
8
@
SJU
W 103-96
+26.5
13
vs
PUR
L 80-87
−5.5
19
vs
ILL
W 90-86
−4.5
24
vs
GONZ
L 85-95
+1.5
25
vs
UNLV
W 115-76
+9.5
26
vs
MD
W 105-72
+10.5
3
vs
CLEM
W 90-84
+8.5
7
vs
UTSA
W 97-55
−19.5
13
vs
ARIZ
L 75-96
−7.5
17
vs
USF
W 104-93
+18.5
21
vs
KENN
W 92-81
−9.5
29
vs
YALE
W 102-78
+8.5
3
vs
UK
W 89-74
−10.5
7
@
VAN
L 90-96
+9.5
10
vs
TEX
L 88-92
+2.5
13
@
MSST
W 97-82
+7.5
17
@
OU
W 83-81
−13.5
24
vs
TENN
L 73-79
−15.5
27
vs
MIZ
W 90-64
−13.5
1
@
FLA
L 77-100
+0.5
4
vs
TA&M
W 100-97
+16.5
7
@
AUB
W 96-92
+12.5
11
@
MISS
W 93-74
+2.5
14
vs
SC
W 89-75
−6.5
18
vs
ARK
W 117-115
+50.5
21
@
LSU
W 90-83
+0.5
25
vs
MSST
W 100-75
−1.5
28
@
TENN
W 71-69
−22.5
3
@
UGA
L 88-98
+6.5
7
vs
AUB
W 96-84
+4.5
13
vs
MISS
L 79-80
−7.5
20
vs
HOF
W 90-70
+1.5
22
vs
TTU
W 90-65
−9.5
27
vs
MICH
L 77-90
−5.5
over 19under 16avg +0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Miami
35 games played
Straight up
26-9
74% wins
Against the spread
19-16
54% covers · avg +1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
21-14
60% overs · avg +0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 86-69 | -18.5 | L −1.5 | 142.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 101-61 | -16.5 | W +23.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 102-61 | -34.5 | W +6.5 | 161.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 68-82 | +10.5 | L −3.5 | 171.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 99-72 | -19.5 | W +7.5 | 164.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 97-41 | -34.5 | W +21.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 62-72 | +7.5 | L −2.5 | 165.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 78-65 | -5.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 75-66 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 88-64 | -19.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 104-79 | -35.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | O 183 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 98-81 | -22.5 | L −5.5 | 161.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 105-67 | -37.5 | W +0.5 | 171.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 76-69 | -9.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 81-77 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 91-81 | -15.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 81-69 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 59-69 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 63-65 | -10.5 | L −12.5 | 163.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 85-76 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 79-70 | -9.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 85-86 | -11.5 | L −12.5 | 148.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 74-68 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 10 | vs | W 75-66 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 77-76 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 157.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 67-66 | -8.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 83-86 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 24 | @ | W 83-73 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 76-54 | -15.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 77-69 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 156.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 89-92 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | O 181 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 78-73 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 153.5 | U 151 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 62-84 | +3.5 | L −18.5 | 146.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 80-66 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 144.5 | O 146 |
| Mar 22 | vs | L 69-79 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
JAX
W 86-69
−1.5
6
vs
BCU
W 101-61
+23.5
10
vs
STET
W 102-61
+6.5
16
vs
FLA
L 68-82
−3.5
20
vs
ELON
W 99-72
+7.5
23
vs
DSU
W 97-41
+21.5
27
vs
BYU
L 62-72
−2.5
28
vs
GTWN
W 78-65
+7.5
2
@
MISS
W 75-66
+10.5
6
vs
USM
W 88-64
+4.5
13
vs
ULM
W 104-79
−10.5
16
vs
FIU
W 98-81
−5.5
21
vs
UNF
W 105-67
+0.5
30
vs
PITT
W 76-69
−2.5
7
@
WAKE
W 81-77
+5.5
10
vs
GT
W 91-81
−5.5
13
@
ND
W 81-69
+6.5
17
@
CLEM
L 59-69
−5.5
20
vs
FSU
L 63-65
−12.5
24
@
SYR
W 85-76
+7.5
28
vs
STAN
W 79-70
−0.5
31
vs
CAL
L 85-86
−12.5
7
@
BC
W 74-68
−2.5
10
vs
UNC
W 75-66
+7.5
14
@
NCSU
W 77-76
+6.5
17
vs
VT
W 67-66
−7.5
21
@
UVA
L 83-86
+4.5
24
@
FSU
W 83-73
+7.5
28
vs
BC
W 76-54
+6.5
4
@
SMU
W 77-69
+9.5
7
vs
LOU
L 89-92
−4.5
12
vs
LOU
W 78-73
+6.5
13
vs
UVA
L 62-84
−18.5
20
vs
MIZ
W 80-66
+12.5
22
vs
PUR
L 69-79
−1.5
covered 19didn’t cover 16avg +1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
JAX
W 86-69
+12.5
6
vs
BCU
W 101-61
+7.5
10
vs
STET
W 102-61
+1.5
16
vs
FLA
L 68-82
−21.5
20
vs
ELON
W 99-72
+6.5
23
vs
DSU
W 97-41
−13.5
27
vs
BYU
L 62-72
−31.5
28
vs
GTWN
W 78-65
−8.5
2
@
MISS
W 75-66
−4.5
6
vs
USM
W 88-64
+6.5
13
vs
ULM
W 104-79
+29.5
16
vs
FIU
W 98-81
+17.5
21
vs
UNF
W 105-67
+0.5
30
vs
PITT
W 76-69
+0.5
7
@
WAKE
W 81-77
+0.5
10
vs
GT
W 91-81
+15.5
13
@
ND
W 81-69
+6.5
17
@
CLEM
L 59-69
−15.5
20
vs
FSU
L 63-65
−35.5
24
@
SYR
W 85-76
+11.5
28
vs
STAN
W 79-70
+1.5
31
vs
CAL
L 85-86
+22.5
7
@
BC
W 74-68
+0.5
10
vs
UNC
W 75-66
−15.5
14
@
NCSU
W 77-76
−4.5
17
vs
VT
W 67-66
−15.5
21
@
UVA
L 83-86
+23.5
24
@
FSU
W 83-73
+3.5
28
vs
BC
W 76-54
−13.5
4
@
SMU
W 77-69
−10.5
7
vs
LOU
L 89-92
+25.5
12
vs
LOU
W 78-73
−2.5
13
vs
UVA
L 62-84
−0.5
20
vs
MIZ
W 80-66
+1.5
22
vs
PUR
L 69-79
+1.5
over 21under 14avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Miami has the better starters
Position by position: Alabama 1, Miami 2, even 2
AlabamaBetterMiami
G A. Holloway16.8 pts · 2.8 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 99
←ALASmall
G B. Bland TR13.6 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 74
G A. Allen11.4 pts · 6.9 reb · 3.1 ast
Score 94
=Even
G A. Lewis TR12.2 pts · 3 reb · 5.3 ast
Score 92
F D. Fielder TR14.4 pts · 5.4 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 98
=Even
F D. Goode TR15.7 pts · 8.6 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 94
F J. Davis-Fleming TR3.7 pts · 4.8 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 59
→MIASmall
F S. Henderson13.8 pts · 4.9 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 81
F B. Garrison TR4.7 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 73
→MIASmall
F M. Reneau18.9 pts · 6.5 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 98
AlabamaBetterMiami
ALA offense2nd of 366 · +13.7
=Even
MIA defense26th of 366 · +4.3
ALA defense54th of 366 · +1.5
=Even
MIA offense30th of 366 · +6.0
Backcourt+8.7 · 2 players
←ALABig
Backcourt+4.0 · 2 players
Frontcourt+5.2 · 3 players
→MIABig
Frontcourt+12.3 · 3 players
Bench+0.5 · 4 players
→MIASmall
Bench+3.0 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestALA betterMIA betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
A. Holloway28 minA. Allen28 minP. Murphy3 minC. CloerNewQ. SamuelsNewA. DiazNew
Forwards
D. Fielder24 min · TRJ. Davis-Fleming20 min · TRB. Garrison16 min · TRL. Jemison16 minK. Bristow13 minJ. RichardsonNew
Centers
C. Onyejiaka6 minT. St. LouisNew
Guards
B. Bland34 min · TRA. Lewis31 min · TRD. Allen24 minN. Dorn23 min · TRL. Cason19 min · TRQ. Berger17 min · TR
Forwards
D. Goode31 min · TRS. Henderson31 minM. Reneau29 minR. Miller19 min · TRM. Allen19 minC. GaskinsNew
Centers
S. Cyril21 min · TRE. RyzhovNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 91.2 #1 | Points per game | 81.5 #39 |
| 1.22 #5 | Points per possession | 1.18 #38 |
| 74.7 #7 | Pace (possessions) | 69.2 #170 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.2 #34 | Effective FG% | 55.3 #32 |
| 35.8 #66 | 3-point % | 34.9 #127 |
| 54.3 #1 | 3-point attempt rate | 31.9 #331 |
| 36.0 #150 | Free throw rate | 37.1 #125 |
| Possessions | ||
| 13.1 #10 | Turnover rate | 16.1 #147 |
| 32.4 #111 | Offensive rebound rate | 37.2 #14 |
| 16.3 #39 | Assists per game | 16.2 #42 |
| Defense | ||
| 82.7 #343 | Points allowed | 71.2 #79 |
| 1.11 #232 | Points allowed per possession | 1.03 #60 |
| 49.2 #73 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.8 #198 |
| 33.8 #170 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.8 #296 |
| 12.8 #361 | Turnovers forced | 18.3 #87 |
| 67.2 #295 | Defensive rebound rate | 74.1 #19 |
| 6.4 #186 | Steals per game | 7.9 #48 |
| 5.0 #17 | Blocks per game | 3.3 #174 |
Alabama
25-10 in 2025-26 overall · 13-6 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Michigan77–90
- Wvs Texas Tech90–65
- Wvs Hofstra90–70
- Lvs Ole Miss79–80
- Wvs Auburn96–84
A week or more of rest.
Miami
26-9 in 2025-26 overall · 14-6 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Purdue69–79
- Wvs Missouri80–66
- Lvs Virginia62–84
- Wvs Louisville78–73
- Lvs Louisville89–92
A week or more of rest.