Arena-Auditorium · at Wyoming
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | WYO | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects WYO 80–70 · win probability WYO 81%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 150.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: WYO has more of the edges
APSU 3, WYO 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
APSU has played the 318th-hardest schedule, WYO the 105th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: APSU 37.6, WYO 35.5. Allowed: APSU 32.8, WYO 47.9
WYO offense vs APSU defense
Offense 124th of 366 against a defense 240th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: APSU 29.7%, WYO 34.0%. Defensive: APSU 71.1%, WYO 72.0%
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: APSU plays 70.1 a game (114th fastest), WYO 67.6 (252nd). Faster games mean more points
Turnovers
Turnover rate: APSU 15.4%, WYO 16.3%. Forced: APSU 17.9%, WYO 16.8%
Three-pointers
APSU hits 35.3% and allows 33.2%; WYO hits 33.0% and allows 32.8%. Threes are 38.0% and 43.0% of their shots
Home court
WYO at home. This season: WYO 0-0 at home, APSU 0-0 away
APSU offense vs WYO defense
Offense 174th of 366 against a defense 130th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: APSU 30%, WYO 45%. Transfers in: APSU 2, WYO 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: APSU 53.0 and allows 52.2; WYO 51.8 and allows 52.0
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | WYO -10.2 | — |
| Total | — | 150.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | APSU 70 · WYO 80.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | WYO -6.0 | — |
| 1H total | 70.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | APSU 32.2 · WYO 38.1 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
APSU 0–1 WYOWYO leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · APSU 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2025-26 | APSU 65 @ WYO 79 | WYO -5.5 | WYO W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Austin Peay
29 games played
Straight up
20-9
69% wins
Against the spread
14-15
48% covers · avg +1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-15
48% overs · avg +2.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | W 74-54 | -1.5 | W +18.5 | 136.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 65-79 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 153.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 69-63 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 65-72 | +20.5 | W +13.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 75-84 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 77-59 | -6.5 | W +11.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 84-96 | +8.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 50-63 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 151.5 | U 113 |
| Dec 12 | vs | W 76-75 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 102-83 | -15.5 | W +3.5 | 162.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 71-68 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 140.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 82-71 | +3.5 | W +14.5 | 153.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 81-69 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 74-72 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 78-82 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 83-62 | -6.5 | W +14.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 73-65 | -16.5 | L −8.5 | 148.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 90-82 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 151.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 81-78 | -7.5 | L −4.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 87-76 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 156.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 91-62 | -12.5 | W +16.5 | 145.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 95-87 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 161.5 | O 182 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 90-70 | -9.5 | W +10.5 | 153.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 77-76 | -11.5 | L −10.5 | 166.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 65-61 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 88-93 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 152.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 97-111 | -5.5 | L −19.5 | 153.5 | O 208 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 69-60 | -11.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | U 129 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 83-90 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 161.5 | O 173 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
AF
W 74-54
+18.5
11
@
WYO
L 65-79
−8.5
15
@
UNCG
W 69-63
+7.5
18
@
MISS
L 65-72
+13.5
21
@
TLSA
L 75-84
−0.5
25
vs
NIU
W 77-59
+11.5
3
@
KENT
L 84-96
−3.5
7
@
RGV
L 50-63
−10.5
12
vs
ETSU
W 76-75
+4.5
1
vs
UNF
W 102-83
+3.5
3
vs
JAX
W 71-68
−7.5
8
@
FGCU
W 82-71
+14.5
10
@
STET
W 81-69
+2.5
15
vs
EKU
W 74-72
−5.5
17
@
LIP
L 78-82
−1.5
22
vs
FGCU
W 83-62
+14.5
23
vs
STET
W 73-65
−8.5
28
@
EKU
W 90-82
+5.5
31
@
WGA
W 81-78
−4.5
4
vs
LIP
W 87-76
+6.5
7
vs
UNA
W 91-62
+16.5
11
@
QUC
W 95-87
+10.5
14
vs
BELL
W 90-70
+10.5
19
@
UNF
W 77-76
−10.5
21
@
JAX
W 65-61
−2.5
25
vs
CARK
L 88-93
−9.5
28
@
BELL
L 97-111
−19.5
6
vs
STET
W 69-60
−2.5
7
vs
QUC
L 83-90
−9.5
covered 14didn’t cover 15avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
AF
W 74-54
−8.5
11
@
WYO
L 65-79
−9.5
15
@
UNCG
W 69-63
−13.5
18
@
MISS
L 65-72
−8.5
21
@
TLSA
L 75-84
+10.5
25
vs
NIU
W 77-59
−11.5
3
@
KENT
L 84-96
+26.5
7
@
RGV
L 50-63
−38.5
12
vs
ETSU
W 76-75
+7.5
1
vs
UNF
W 102-83
+22.5
3
vs
JAX
W 71-68
−1.5
8
@
FGCU
W 82-71
−0.5
10
@
STET
W 81-69
−0.5
15
vs
EKU
W 74-72
−7.5
17
@
LIP
L 78-82
+4.5
22
vs
FGCU
W 83-62
−10.5
23
vs
STET
W 73-65
−10.5
28
@
EKU
W 90-82
+20.5
31
@
WGA
W 81-78
+8.5
4
vs
LIP
W 87-76
+6.5
7
vs
UNA
W 91-62
+7.5
11
@
QUC
W 95-87
+20.5
14
vs
BELL
W 90-70
+6.5
19
@
UNF
W 77-76
−13.5
21
@
JAX
W 65-61
−16.5
25
vs
CARK
L 88-93
+28.5
28
@
BELL
L 97-111
+54.5
6
vs
STET
W 69-60
−24.5
7
vs
QUC
L 83-90
+11.5
over 14under 15avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Wyoming
32 games played
Straight up
17-15
53% wins
Against the spread
15-17
47% covers · avg +1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-16
50% overs · avg +0.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | vs | W 92-82 | -15.5 | L −5.5 | 154.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 79-65 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 93-56 | -11.5 | W +25.5 | 160.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 70-78 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 156.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 75-67 | -15.5 | L −7.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 101-59 | -9.5 | W +32.5 | 153.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 30 | @ | L 72-76 | +19.5 | W +15.5 | 152.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 93-80 | -14.5 | L −1.5 | 156.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 106-79 | -14.5 | W +12.5 | 161.5 | O 185 |
| Dec 15 | vs | W 87-72 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 70-82 | -2.5 | L −14.5 | 147.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 68-56 | -14.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 58-78 | +7.5 | L −12.5 | 151.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 98-66 | -4.5 | W +27.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 83-92 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 57-74 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 148.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 60-63 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 65-81 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 66-62 | -13.5 | L −9.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 62-94 | +13.5 | L −18.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 68-57 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 63-72 | +12.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 83-85 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 68-79 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 140.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 92-82 | -9.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 70-65 | +7.5 | W +12.5 | 144.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 62-72 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 66-62 | -20.5 | L −16.5 | 145.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 83-73 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 88-78 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 148.5 | O 166 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 70-73 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 17 | @ | L 70-74 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
vs
CSUF
W 92-82
−5.5
11
vs
APSU
W 79-65
+8.5
15
vs
PORT
W 93-56
+25.5
19
@
SHSU
L 70-78
−6.5
23
vs
NORF
W 75-67
−7.5
26
vs
DEN
W 101-59
+32.5
30
@
TTU
L 72-76
+15.5
6
vs
DART
W 93-80
−1.5
9
vs
SDAK
W 106-79
+12.5
15
vs
SDST
W 87-72
+11.5
20
vs
GCU
L 70-82
−14.5
30
@
AF
W 68-56
−2.5
3
@
UNM
L 58-78
−12.5
6
vs
UNLV
W 98-66
+27.5
10
@
NEV
L 83-92
−5.5
14
vs
SDSU
L 57-74
−15.5
17
@
FRES
L 60-63
−6.5
20
vs
BOIS
L 65-81
−14.5
24
vs
SJSU
W 66-62
−9.5
28
@
USU
L 62-94
−18.5
31
vs
CSU
W 68-57
+9.5
3
@
SDSU
L 63-72
+3.5
7
vs
USU
L 83-85
+7.5
14
@
CSU
L 68-79
−7.5
17
vs
FRES
W 92-82
+0.5
21
@
GCU
W 70-65
+12.5
24
@
BOIS
L 62-72
−1.5
28
vs
AF
W 66-62
−16.5
3
vs
NEV
W 83-73
+11.5
7
@
SJSU
W 88-78
+3.5
11
vs
UNLV
L 70-73
−0.5
17
@
WICH
L 70-74
+1.5
covered 15didn’t cover 17avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
vs
CSUF
W 92-82
+19.5
11
vs
APSU
W 79-65
−9.5
15
vs
PORT
W 93-56
−11.5
19
@
SHSU
L 70-78
−8.5
23
vs
NORF
W 75-67
+0.5
26
vs
DEN
W 101-59
+6.5
30
@
TTU
L 72-76
−4.5
6
vs
DART
W 93-80
+16.5
9
vs
SDAK
W 106-79
+23.5
15
vs
SDST
W 87-72
+9.5
20
vs
GCU
L 70-82
+4.5
30
@
AF
W 68-56
−22.5
3
@
UNM
L 58-78
−15.5
6
vs
UNLV
W 98-66
+9.5
10
@
NEV
L 83-92
+31.5
14
vs
SDSU
L 57-74
−17.5
17
@
FRES
L 60-63
−22.5
20
vs
BOIS
L 65-81
+0.5
24
vs
SJSU
W 66-62
−13.5
28
@
USU
L 62-94
+7.5
31
vs
CSU
W 68-57
−17.5
3
@
SDSU
L 63-72
−6.5
7
vs
USU
L 83-85
+18.5
14
@
CSU
L 68-79
+6.5
17
vs
FRES
W 92-82
+25.5
21
@
GCU
W 70-65
−9.5
24
@
BOIS
L 62-72
−12.5
28
vs
AF
W 66-62
−17.5
3
vs
NEV
W 83-73
+12.5
7
@
SJSU
W 88-78
+17.5
11
vs
UNLV
L 70-73
−10.5
17
@
WICH
L 70-74
−4.5
over 16under 16avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Wyoming has the better starters
Position by position: Austin Peay 1, Wyoming 2, even 2
Austin PeayBetterWyoming
G Z. Collins13.7 pts · 3.2 reb · 4.2 ast
Score 60
=Even
G C. Jefferson TR12.7 pts · 1.9 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 48
G C. Love TR7.2 pts · 2.6 reb · 1 ast
Score 44
→WYOSmall
G K. Bennett10.1 pts · 4.8 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 76
G S. Hugie TR4.4 pts · 2.4 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 32
→WYOBig
G N. Meyer12.7 pts · 4.9 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 83
G C. Ryans NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
F R. Sondors TR10.4 pts · 4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 15
F R. Marshall16.3 pts · 7 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 92
←APSUSmall
F G. Gores7.3 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 65
Austin PeayBetterWyoming
APSU offense174th of 366 · -5.4
=Even
WYO defense130th of 366 · -2.4
APSU defense240th of 366 · -6.3
→WYOSmall
WYO offense124th of 366 · -3.3
Backcourt-1.7 · 4 players
→WYOBig
Backcourt+1.8 · 3 players
Frontcourt+3.8 · 1 player
←APSUBig
Frontcourt-2.2 · 2 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-1.4 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestAPSU betterWYO betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
Z. Collins30 minC. Love25 min · TRS. Hugie12 min · TRC. RyansNewP. SingletonNewT. ToddNew
Forwards
R. Marshall30 minD. BoldenNewA. DavisNew
Guards
C. Jefferson31 min · TRK. Bennett28 minN. Meyer28 minU. Rojas17 minP. Gerrits10 min · TRM. De MartinNew
Forwards
R. Sondors29 min · TRG. Gores18 minM. Curtis9 min · TRM. MoraNewN. SummersNewC. PohlNew
Centers
L. RufNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 79.0 #79 | Points per game | 76.2 #137 |
| 1.13 #91 | Points per possession | 1.13 #92 |
| 70.1 #114 | Pace (possessions) | 67.6 #252 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.0 #105 | Effective FG% | 51.8 #154 |
| 35.3 #99 | 3-point % | 33.0 #234 |
| 38.0 #215 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.0 #116 |
| 37.6 #110 | Free throw rate | 35.5 #166 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.4 #94 | Turnover rate | 16.3 #155 |
| 29.7 #214 | Offensive rebound rate | 34.0 #66 |
| 15.3 #76 | Assists per game | 14.1 #141 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.6 #179 | Points allowed | 72.9 #131 |
| 1.06 #119 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #169 |
| 52.2 #227 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.0 #211 |
| 33.2 #137 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.8 #108 |
| 17.9 #103 | Turnovers forced | 16.8 #164 |
| 71.1 #100 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.0 #66 |
| 8.4 #22 | Steals per game | 6.6 #169 |
| 2.2 #329 | Blocks per game | 2.4 #318 |
Austin Peay
20-9 in 2025-26 overall · 16-4 in conference · United Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Queens University Royals83–90
- Wvs Stetson69–60
- L@ Bellarmine97–111
- Lvs C Arkansas88–93
- W@ Jacksonville65–61
A week or more of rest.
Wyoming
17-15 in 2025-26 overall · 9-12 in conference · Mountain West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Wichita St70–74
- Lvs UNLV70–73
- W@ San José St88–78
- Wvs Nevada83–73
- Wvs Air Force66–62
A week or more of rest.