Bud Walton Arena · at Arkansas
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ARK | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ARK 103–54 · win probability ARK 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 157.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ARK has more of the edges
MVSU 0, ARK 8 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
ARK offense vs MVSU defense
Offense 6th of 366 against a defense 366th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
MVSU has played the 327th-hardest schedule, ARK the 8th. A record against a soft schedule means less
MVSU offense vs ARK defense
Offense 366th of 366 against a defense 47th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
MVSU hits 29.5% and allows 37.2%; ARK hits 38.2% and allows 31.8%. Threes are 30.2% and 33.0% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: MVSU 45.2 and allows 55.5; ARK 56.4 and allows 51.8
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MVSU 26.4%, ARK 32.0%. Defensive: MVSU 64.5%, ARK 69.1%
Free throws
Free throw rate: MVSU 33.9, ARK 35.9. Allowed: MVSU 50.8, ARK 31.2
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MVSU 21.9%, ARK 12.2%. Forced: MVSU 17.1%, ARK 15.5%
Home court
ARK at home. This season: ARK 0-0 at home, MVSU 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 72 possessions: MVSU plays 70.2 a game (111th fastest), ARK 73.8 (12th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MVSU 0%, ARK 19%. Transfers in: MVSU 2, ARK 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | ARK -49.3 | — |
| Total | — | 157.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | MVSU 54 · ARK 103.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ARK -29.2 | — |
| 1H total | 73.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | MVSU 22.1 · ARK 51.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | |
| 8-2 80% | 5-5 50% | 8-2 80% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Miss Valley St
32 games played
Straight up
2-30
6% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg +0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg +1.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 55-106 | +34.5 | L −16.5 | 145.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 60-108 | +38.5 | L −9.5 | 159.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 56-88 | +41.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 75-81 | +26.5 | W +20.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 73-80 | +20.5 | W +13.5 | 154.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 70-86 | +21.5 | W +5.5 | 138.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 84-120 | +42.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | O 204 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 52-66 | +9.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 8 | @ | L 49-108 | +38.5 | L −20.5 | 160.5 | U 157 |
| Dec 16 | vs | L 64-88 | +17.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 49-96 | +40.5 | L −6.5 | 164.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 51-86 | +42.5 | W +7.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 69-93 | +44.5 | W +20.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 69-89 | +13.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 5 | vs | L 51-71 | +10.5 | L −9.5 | 135.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 69-70 | +18.5 | W +17.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 12 | @ | L 51-84 | +12.5 | L −20.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 63-79 | +16.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 48-62 | +11.5 | L −2.5 | 139.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 69-80 | +20.5 | W +9.5 | 141.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 70-78 | +10.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 81-97 | +8.5 | L −7.5 | 143.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 9 | vs | L 66-74 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 140.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 65-72 | +15.5 | W +8.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 55-92 | +16.5 | L −20.5 | 142.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 62-72 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 72-71 | +11.5 | W +12.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 23 | @ | L 62-83 | +16.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 70-69 | +14.5 | W +15.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 64-67 | +9.5 | W +6.5 | 139.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 77-85 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 52-77 | +13.5 | L −11.5 | 135.5 | U 129 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
UAB
L 55-106
−16.5
7
@
MUR
L 60-108
−9.5
12
@
HAW
L 56-88
+9.5
14
vs
UTU
L 75-81
+20.5
15
vs
MAN
L 73-80
+13.5
22
@
CSUB
L 70-86
+5.5
25
@
TA&M
L 84-120
+6.5
3
@
ULM
L 52-66
−4.5
8
@
KSU
L 49-108
−20.5
16
vs
TAR
L 64-88
−6.5
19
@
FSU
L 49-96
−6.5
22
@
WVU
L 51-86
+7.5
29
@
OU
L 69-93
+20.5
3
vs
ALST
L 69-89
−6.5
5
vs
AAMU
L 51-71
−9.5
10
@
PV
L 69-70
+17.5
12
@
TXSO
L 51-84
−20.5
17
vs
BCU
L 63-79
+0.5
19
vs
FAMU
L 48-62
−2.5
28
@
SOU
L 69-80
+9.5
31
vs
UAPB
L 70-78
+2.5
7
vs
JKST
L 81-97
−7.5
9
vs
ALCN
L 66-74
−2.5
14
@
AAMU
L 65-72
+8.5
16
@
ALST
L 55-92
−20.5
19
vs
PV
L 62-72
−1.5
21
vs
TXSO
W 72-71
+12.5
23
@
GRAM
L 62-83
−4.5
28
@
UAPB
W 70-69
+15.5
3
@
ALCN
L 64-67
+6.5
5
@
JKST
L 77-85
+3.5
9
vs
GRAM
L 52-77
−11.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
UAB
L 55-106
+15.5
7
@
MUR
L 60-108
+8.5
12
@
HAW
L 56-88
−7.5
14
vs
UTU
L 75-81
+10.5
15
vs
MAN
L 73-80
−1.5
22
@
CSUB
L 70-86
+17.5
25
@
TA&M
L 84-120
+49.5
3
@
ULM
L 52-66
−31.5
8
@
KSU
L 49-108
−3.5
16
vs
TAR
L 64-88
+9.5
19
@
FSU
L 49-96
−19.5
22
@
WVU
L 51-86
−0.5
29
@
OU
L 69-93
+8.5
3
vs
ALST
L 69-89
+13.5
5
vs
AAMU
L 51-71
−13.5
10
@
PV
L 69-70
−13.5
12
@
TXSO
L 51-84
−7.5
17
vs
BCU
L 63-79
−2.5
19
vs
FAMU
L 48-62
−29.5
28
@
SOU
L 69-80
+7.5
31
vs
UAPB
L 70-78
+4.5
7
vs
JKST
L 81-97
+34.5
9
vs
ALCN
L 66-74
−0.5
14
@
AAMU
L 65-72
−1.5
16
@
ALST
L 55-92
+4.5
19
vs
PV
L 62-72
−19.5
21
vs
TXSO
W 72-71
−0.5
23
@
GRAM
L 62-83
+8.5
28
@
UAPB
W 70-69
−8.5
3
@
ALCN
L 64-67
−8.5
5
@
JKST
L 77-85
+17.5
9
vs
GRAM
L 52-77
−6.5
over 14under 18avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Arkansas
37 games played
Straight up
28-9
76% wins
Against the spread
23-14
62% covers · avg +1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
22-15
59% overs · avg +8.1 pts vs the total
Against the spread
23-1462%
2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 109-77 | -26.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | O 186 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 66-69 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 155.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 93-56 | -35.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 79-75 | -24.5 | L −20.5 | 158.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 84-83 | -23.5 | L −22.5 | 168.5 | U 167 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 115-61 | -29.5 | W +24.5 | 159.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 71-80 | +12.5 | W +3.5 | 159.5 | U 151 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 89-80 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 166.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 82-58 | -19.5 | W +4.5 | 161.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 93-86 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 155.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 108-80 | -23.5 | W +4.5 | 169.5 | O 188 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 85-94 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 103-74 | -23.5 | W +5.5 | 159.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 86-75 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 158.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 94-87 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 73-95 | +2.5 | L −19.5 | 169.5 | U 168 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 108-74 | -12.5 | W +21.5 | 155.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 76-90 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 181.5 | U 166 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 93-68 | -1.5 | W +23.5 | 173.5 | U 161 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 85-81 | -10.5 | L −6.5 | 163.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 27 | @ | W 83-79 | -3.5 | W +0.5 | 167.5 | U 162 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 77-85 | -6.5 | L −14.5 | 159.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 88-68 | -5.5 | W +14.5 | 163.5 | U 156 |
| Feb 10 | @ | W 91-62 | -4.5 | W +24.5 | 159.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 88-75 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 165.5 | U 163 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 115-117 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 181.5 | O 232 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 94-86 | -9.5 | L −1.5 | 159.5 | O 180 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 99-84 | -7.5 | W +7.5 | 170.5 | O 183 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 77-111 | +9.5 | L −24.5 | 169.5 | O 188 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 105-85 | -6.5 | W +13.5 | 163.5 | O 190 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 88-84 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 163.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 82-79 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 166.5 | U 161 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 93-90 | -8.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | O 183 |
| Mar 15 | vs | W 86-75 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 165.5 | U 161 |
| Mar 19 | vs | W 97-78 | -14.5 | W +4.5 | 158.5 | O 175 |
| Mar 21 | vs | W 94-88 | -12.5 | L −6.5 | 171.5 | O 182 |
| Mar 26 | vs | L 88-109 | +8.5 | L −12.5 | 166.5 | O 197 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
SOU
W 109-77
+5.5
8
@
MSU
L 66-69
−0.5
11
vs
CARK
W 93-56
+1.5
14
vs
SAM
W 79-75
−20.5
18
vs
WIN
W 84-83
−22.5
21
vs
JKST
W 115-61
+24.5
27
vs
DUKE
L 71-80
+3.5
3
vs
LOU
W 89-80
+10.5
6
vs
FRES
W 82-58
+4.5
13
vs
TTU
W 93-86
+9.5
16
vs
QUC
W 108-80
+4.5
20
vs
HOU
L 85-94
−3.5
29
vs
JMU
W 103-74
+5.5
3
vs
TENN
W 86-75
+12.5
7
@
MISS
W 94-87
+3.5
10
@
AUB
L 73-95
−19.5
14
vs
SC
W 108-74
+21.5
17
@
UGA
L 76-90
−11.5
20
vs
VAN
W 93-68
+23.5
24
vs
LSU
W 85-81
−6.5
27
@
OU
W 83-79
+0.5
31
vs
UK
L 77-85
−14.5
7
@
MSST
W 88-68
+14.5
10
@
LSU
W 91-62
+24.5
14
vs
AUB
W 88-75
+5.5
18
@
ALA
L 115-117
+1.5
21
vs
MIZ
W 94-86
−1.5
25
vs
TA&M
W 99-84
+7.5
28
@
FLA
L 77-111
−24.5
4
vs
TEX
W 105-85
+13.5
7
@
MIZ
W 88-84
+6.5
13
vs
OU
W 82-79
−3.5
14
vs
MISS
W 93-90
−5.5
15
vs
VAN
W 86-75
+13.5
19
vs
HAW
W 97-78
+4.5
21
vs
HPU
W 94-88
−6.5
26
vs
ARIZ
L 88-109
−12.5
covered 23didn’t cover 14avg +1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
SOU
W 109-77
+35.5
8
@
MSU
L 66-69
−20.5
11
vs
CARK
W 93-56
−9.5
14
vs
SAM
W 79-75
−4.5
18
vs
WIN
W 84-83
−1.5
21
vs
JKST
W 115-61
+16.5
27
vs
DUKE
L 71-80
−8.5
3
vs
LOU
W 89-80
+2.5
6
vs
FRES
W 82-58
−21.5
13
vs
TTU
W 93-86
+23.5
16
vs
QUC
W 108-80
+18.5
20
vs
HOU
L 85-94
+32.5
29
vs
JMU
W 103-74
+17.5
3
vs
TENN
W 86-75
+2.5
7
@
MISS
W 94-87
+27.5
10
@
AUB
L 73-95
−1.5
14
vs
SC
W 108-74
+26.5
17
@
UGA
L 76-90
−15.5
20
vs
VAN
W 93-68
−12.5
24
vs
LSU
W 85-81
+2.5
27
@
OU
W 83-79
−5.5
31
vs
UK
L 77-85
+2.5
7
@
MSST
W 88-68
−7.5
10
@
LSU
W 91-62
−6.5
14
vs
AUB
W 88-75
−2.5
18
@
ALA
L 115-117
+50.5
21
vs
MIZ
W 94-86
+20.5
25
vs
TA&M
W 99-84
+12.5
28
@
FLA
L 77-111
+18.5
4
vs
TEX
W 105-85
+26.5
7
@
MIZ
W 88-84
+8.5
13
vs
OU
W 82-79
−5.5
14
vs
MISS
W 93-90
+23.5
15
vs
VAN
W 86-75
−4.5
19
vs
HAW
W 97-78
+16.5
21
vs
HPU
W 94-88
+10.5
26
vs
ARIZ
L 88-109
+30.5
over 22under 15avg +8.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Arkansas has the better starters
Position by position: Miss Valley St 0, Arkansas 1, even 4
Miss Valley StBetterArkansas
G T. Foster TR5.9 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 20
→ARKBig
G B. Richmond11.2 pts · 4.3 reb · 2 ast
Score 85
G T. James TR0.5 pts · 0.4 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G J. Wilkinson TR17.4 pts · 2 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 98
G E. Pippins NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
G A. Brown0.1 pts · 0 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
G A. Abrams NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
F C. Bowser TR13.7 pts · 5.8 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 91
F T. Williams NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
F I. Sealy2.9 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.6 ast
Not ranked
Miss Valley StBetterArkansas
MVSU offense366th of 366 · -17.5
→ARKBig
ARK defense47th of 366 · +2.2
MVSU defense366th of 366 · -14.3
→ARKBig
ARK offense6th of 366 · +10.8
Backcourt-2.1 · 4 players
→ARKBig
Backcourt+5.9 · 3 players
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
=No call
Frontcourt+3.7 · 2 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-0.0 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestMVSU betterARK betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Foster20 min · TRT. James3 min · TRE. PippinsNewA. AbramsNewM. AngloNewC. CameronNew
Forwards
T. WilliamsNewQ. PangNewG. MartinezNewH. WilsonNewM. McCoyNew
Centers
T. WuNew
Guards
B. Richmond28 minJ. Wilkinson26 min · TRA. Brown2 minA. Kelley2 minJ. SmithNewD. ThompsonNew
Forwards
C. Bowser30 min · TRI. Sealy7 minP. SemedoNewM. MakerNewJ. AndrewsNewM. MuurinenNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.2 #356 | Points per game | 90.2 #2 |
| 0.90 #364 | Points per possession | 1.23 #3 |
| 70.2 #111 | Pace (possessions) | 73.8 #12 |
| Shooting | ||
| 45.2 #359 | Effective FG% | 56.4 #16 |
| 29.5 #346 | 3-point % | 38.2 #16 |
| 30.2 #351 | 3-point attempt rate | 33.0 #315 |
| 33.9 #215 | Free throw rate | 35.9 #155 |
| Possessions | ||
| 21.9 #361 | Turnover rate | 12.2 #1 |
| 26.4 #313 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.0 #121 |
| 11.9 #296 | Assists per game | 17.2 #20 |
| Defense | ||
| 83.7 #353 | Points allowed | 81.0 #333 |
| 1.20 #355 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #213 |
| 55.5 #341 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.8 #201 |
| 37.2 #346 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.8 #54 |
| 17.1 #142 | Turnovers forced | 15.5 #246 |
| 64.5 #346 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.1 #197 |
| 7.1 #119 | Steals per game | 7.3 #96 |
| 2.6 #300 | Blocks per game | 5.2 #12 |
Miss Valley St
2-30 in 2025-26 overall · 2-17 in conference · Southwestern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Grambling52–77
- L@ Jackson St77–85
- L@ Alcorn St64–67
- W@ AR-Pine Bluff70–69
- L@ Grambling62–83
A week or more of rest.
Arkansas
28-9 in 2025-26 overall · 16-5 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Arizona88–109
- Wvs High Point94–88
- Wvs Hawai'i97–78
- Wvs Vanderbilt86–75
- Wvs Ole Miss93–90
A week or more of rest.