Imperial Arena · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | XAV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects TA&M 84–81 · win probability TA&M 61%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 165.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: TA&M has more of the edges
TA&M 5, XAV 0 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: TA&M 53.8 and allows 50.7; XAV 51.8 and allows 54.1
Three-pointers
TA&M hits 35.9% and allows 31.8%; XAV hits 36.5% and allows 34.8%. Threes are 46.2% and 40.6% of their shots
Turnovers
Turnover rate: TA&M 14.7%, XAV 14.0%. Forced: TA&M 18.4%, XAV 15.5%
Free throws
Free throw rate: TA&M 37.1, XAV 28.1. Allowed: TA&M 35.4, XAV 32.6
TA&M offense vs XAV defense
Offense 20th of 366 against a defense 89th, on the model’s ratings
Even
XAV offense vs TA&M defense
Offense 31st of 366 against a defense 62nd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
TA&M has played the 57th-hardest schedule, XAV the 34th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: TA&M 25%, XAV 14%. Transfers in: TA&M 7, XAV 7. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 73 possessions: TA&M plays 73.5 a game (15th fastest), XAV 71.8 (44th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: TA&M 32.0%, XAV 26.5%. Defensive: TA&M 67.0%, XAV 70.5%
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | TA&M -3.0 | — |
| Total | — | 165.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | TA&M 84.1 · XAV 81.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | TA&M -1.9 | — |
| 1H total | 77.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | TA&M 39.5 · XAV 37.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | |
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 9-1 90% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
TA&M 0–1 XAVXAV leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · TA&M 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2021-22 | XAV 73 vs TA&M 72 | TA&M -5 | XAV W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Texas A&M
34 games played
Straight up
22-12
65% wins
Against the spread
19-15
56% covers · avg +0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-15
56% overs · avg +1.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 98-68 | -21.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 104-70 | -29.5 | W +4.5 | 161.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 63-87 | -2.5 | L −26.5 | 174.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 74-86 | -10.5 | L −22.5 | 172.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 86-81 | -17.5 | L −12.5 | 164.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 109-68 | -23.5 | W +17.5 | 162.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 120-84 | -42.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | O 204 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 95-59 | +1.5 | W +37.5 | 174.5 | U 154 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 81-73 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 80-93 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 164.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 112-75 | -26.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | O 187 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 118-77 | -28.5 | W +12.5 | 166.5 | O 195 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 111-82 | -29.5 | L −0.5 | 177.5 | O 193 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 75-72 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 168.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 90-88 | +6.5 | W +8.5 | 168.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 83-76 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 165.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 82-87 | +11.5 | W +6.5 | 159.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 74-70 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 166.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 88-68 | -8.5 | W +11.5 | 163.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 92-69 | -10.5 | W +12.5 | 155.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 92-77 | +4.5 | W +19.5 | 173.5 | U 169 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 97-100 | +8.5 | W +5.5 | 180.5 | O 197 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 67-86 | +5.5 | L −13.5 | 167.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 85-86 | -7.5 | L −8.5 | 160.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 69-82 | +7.5 | L −5.5 | 165.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 80-77 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 75-71 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 165.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 84-99 | +7.5 | L −7.5 | 170.5 | O 183 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 70-76 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 159.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 96-85 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 162.5 | O 181 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 94-91 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 161.5 | O 185 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 63-83 | -2.5 | L −22.5 | 162.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 19 | vs | W 63-50 | +2.5 | W +15.5 | 149.5 | U 113 |
| Mar 21 | vs | L 57-88 | +10.5 | L −20.5 | 142.5 | O 145 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
NWST
W 98-68
+8.5
6
vs
TXSO
W 104-70
+4.5
9
@
OKST
L 63-87
−26.5
14
vs
UCF
L 74-86
−22.5
18
vs
MONT
W 86-81
−12.5
21
vs
MAN
W 109-68
+17.5
25
vs
MVSU
W 120-84
−6.5
28
vs
FSU
W 95-59
+37.5
2
@
PITT
W 81-73
+4.5
7
vs
SMU
L 80-93
−14.5
14
vs
JAX
W 112-75
+10.5
21
vs
ETAM
W 118-77
+12.5
29
vs
PV
W 111-82
−0.5
3
vs
LSU
W 75-72
−2.5
6
@
AUB
W 90-88
+8.5
10
vs
OU
W 83-76
+2.5
13
@
TENN
L 82-87
+6.5
17
@
TEX
W 74-70
+8.5
21
vs
MSST
W 88-68
+11.5
24
vs
SC
W 92-69
+12.5
31
@
UGA
W 92-77
+19.5
4
@
ALA
L 97-100
+5.5
7
vs
FLA
L 67-86
−13.5
11
vs
MIZ
L 85-86
−8.5
14
@
VAN
L 69-82
−5.5
18
vs
MISS
W 80-77
−6.5
21
@
OU
W 75-71
+2.5
25
@
ARK
L 84-99
−7.5
28
vs
TEX
L 70-76
−8.5
3
vs
UK
W 96-85
+9.5
7
@
LSU
W 94-91
+0.5
12
vs
OU
L 63-83
−22.5
19
vs
SMC
W 63-50
+15.5
21
vs
HOU
L 57-88
−20.5
covered 19didn’t cover 15avg +0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
NWST
W 98-68
+12.5
6
vs
TXSO
W 104-70
+12.5
9
@
OKST
L 63-87
−24.5
14
vs
UCF
L 74-86
−12.5
18
vs
MONT
W 86-81
+2.5
21
vs
MAN
W 109-68
+14.5
25
vs
MVSU
W 120-84
+49.5
28
vs
FSU
W 95-59
−20.5
2
@
PITT
W 81-73
+1.5
7
vs
SMU
L 80-93
+8.5
14
vs
JAX
W 112-75
+39.5
21
vs
ETAM
W 118-77
+28.5
29
vs
PV
W 111-82
+15.5
3
vs
LSU
W 75-72
−21.5
6
@
AUB
W 90-88
+9.5
10
vs
OU
W 83-76
−6.5
13
@
TENN
L 82-87
+9.5
17
@
TEX
W 74-70
−22.5
21
vs
MSST
W 88-68
−7.5
24
vs
SC
W 92-69
+5.5
31
@
UGA
W 92-77
−4.5
4
@
ALA
L 97-100
+16.5
7
vs
FLA
L 67-86
−14.5
11
vs
MIZ
L 85-86
+10.5
14
@
VAN
L 69-82
−14.5
18
vs
MISS
W 80-77
−0.5
21
@
OU
W 75-71
−19.5
25
@
ARK
L 84-99
+12.5
28
vs
TEX
L 70-76
−13.5
3
vs
UK
W 96-85
+18.5
7
@
LSU
W 94-91
+23.5
12
vs
OU
L 63-83
−16.5
19
vs
SMC
W 63-50
−36.5
21
vs
HOU
L 57-88
+2.5
over 19under 15avg +1.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Xavier
33 games played
Straight up
15-18
45% wins
Against the spread
16-17
48% covers · avg −1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
24-9
73% overs · avg +6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 66-62 | -12.5 | L −8.5 | 139.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 74-69 | -24.5 | L −19.5 | 156.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 10 | vs | L 68-87 | -3.5 | L −22.5 | 155.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 62-81 | +15.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 99-69 | -10.5 | W +19.5 | 150.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 77-78 | +10.5 | W +9.5 | 165.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 78-68 | +5.5 | W +15.5 | 140.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 88-67 | -13.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 1 | vs | W 96-74 | -27.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 79-74 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 12 | vs | W 75-57 | -18.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 57-98 | -2.5 | L −43.5 | 151.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 80-77 | +4.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 67-90 | +11.5 | L −11.5 | 144.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 77-86 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 149.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 65-66 | +5.5 | W +4.5 | 157.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 97-84 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 165.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 89-75 | +1.5 | W +15.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 93-94 | +8.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | O 187 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 83-88 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 159.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 68-86 | +5.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 68-66 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 60-92 | +16.5 | L −15.5 | 147.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 82-87 | +16.5 | W +11.5 | 159.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 96-88 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 157.5 | O 184 |
| Feb 17 | vs | L 89-92 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 75-80 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 159.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 84-94 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 170.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 91-84 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | O 175 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 68-77 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 78-91 | +11.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 89-87 | +4.5 | W +6.5 | 157.5 | O 176 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 68-93 | +17.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | O 161 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MRST
W 66-62
−8.5
6
vs
LEM
W 74-69
−19.5
10
vs
SCU
L 68-87
−22.5
14
@
IOWA
L 62-81
−3.5
18
vs
ODU
W 99-69
+19.5
21
vs
UGA
L 77-78
+9.5
23
vs
WVU
W 78-68
+15.5
28
vs
AMCC
W 88-67
+7.5
1
vs
SFPA
W 96-74
−5.5
5
vs
CIN
W 79-74
+6.5
12
vs
MOST
W 75-57
−0.5
17
vs
CREI
L 57-98
−43.5
20
@
GTWN
W 80-77
+7.5
31
vs
CONN
L 67-90
−11.5
3
@
DEP
L 77-86
−6.5
7
@
MARQ
L 65-66
+4.5
10
vs
PROV
W 97-84
+14.5
14
vs
BTLR
W 89-75
+15.5
21
@
CREI
L 93-94
+7.5
24
vs
SJU
L 83-88
+3.5
28
@
HALL
L 68-86
−12.5
31
vs
DEP
W 68-66
−2.5
3
@
CONN
L 60-92
−15.5
9
@
SJU
L 82-87
+11.5
14
vs
MARQ
W 96-88
+6.5
17
vs
VILL
L 89-92
+1.5
21
@
BTLR
L 75-80
−0.5
25
@
PROV
L 84-94
−4.5
28
vs
GTWN
W 91-84
+2.5
3
vs
HALL
L 68-77
−7.5
7
@
VILL
L 78-91
−1.5
11
vs
MARQ
W 89-87
+6.5
12
vs
CONN
L 68-93
−7.5
covered 16didn’t cover 17avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MRST
W 66-62
−11.5
6
vs
LEM
W 74-69
−13.5
10
vs
SCU
L 68-87
−0.5
14
@
IOWA
L 62-81
−0.5
18
vs
ODU
W 99-69
+17.5
21
vs
UGA
L 77-78
−10.5
23
vs
WVU
W 78-68
+5.5
28
vs
AMCC
W 88-67
+8.5
1
vs
SFPA
W 96-74
+17.5
5
vs
CIN
W 79-74
+5.5
12
vs
MOST
W 75-57
−19.5
17
vs
CREI
L 57-98
+3.5
20
@
GTWN
W 80-77
+7.5
31
vs
CONN
L 67-90
+12.5
3
@
DEP
L 77-86
+13.5
7
@
MARQ
L 65-66
−26.5
10
vs
PROV
W 97-84
+15.5
14
vs
BTLR
W 89-75
+2.5
21
@
CREI
L 93-94
+31.5
24
vs
SJU
L 83-88
+11.5
28
@
HALL
L 68-86
+8.5
31
vs
DEP
W 68-66
−16.5
3
@
CONN
L 60-92
+4.5
9
@
SJU
L 82-87
+9.5
14
vs
MARQ
W 96-88
+26.5
17
vs
VILL
L 89-92
+28.5
21
@
BTLR
L 75-80
−4.5
25
@
PROV
L 84-94
+7.5
28
vs
GTWN
W 91-84
+19.5
3
vs
HALL
L 68-77
+0.5
7
@
VILL
L 78-91
+15.5
11
vs
MARQ
W 89-87
+18.5
12
vs
CONN
L 68-93
+10.5
over 24under 9avg +6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Texas A&M 1, Xavier 1, even 3
Texas A&MBetterXavier
G P. Haggerty TR23.4 pts · 5.3 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 98
=Even
G C. Westry TR15.3 pts · 3.7 reb · 5.6 ast
Score 97
G J. Pope TR13.1 pts · 2.1 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 78
=Even
G T. Washington TR11.9 pts · 4 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 82
G T. Archie TR14.2 pts · 1.9 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 91
←TA&MSmall
F N. Chitikoudis TR11.1 pts · 7.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 66
G L. Walls TR7.9 pts · 2.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 37
→XAVBig
F J. Milicevic12.4 pts · 3.9 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 75
F J. Shelley TR13.9 pts · 6.6 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 76
=Even
F R. Aligbe TR9.4 pts · 7.6 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 74
Texas A&MBetterXavier
TA&M offense20th of 366 · +7.7
←TA&MSmall
XAV defense89th of 366 · -0.2
TA&M defense62nd of 366 · +1.2
=Even
XAV offense31st of 366 · +6.0
Backcourt+8.6 · 4 players
←TA&MSmall
Backcourt+6.0 · 2 players
Frontcourt+1.7 · 1 player
→XAVSmall
Frontcourt+3.1 · 3 players
Bench+2.5 · 5 players
→XAVSmall
Bench+5.4 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestTA&M betterXAV betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
P. Haggerty35 min · TRJ. Pope29 min · TRT. Archie26 min · TRL. Walls24 min · TRJ. Reece24 min · TRJ. Green5 min
Forwards
J. Shelley32 min · TRM. Mgbako19 minZ. Clemence17 minC. Phillips17 min · TRJ. Vinson7 minC. McDermott4 min
Guards
C. Westry31 min · TRT. Washington28 min · TRR. Dominguez23 min · TRB. Appelhans13 min · TRM. Wolf2 minK. HouseNew
Forwards
N. Chitikoudis27 min · TRJ. Milicevic26 minR. Aligbe25 min · TRM. Nwoko22 min · TRH. Thole1 minG. PozzatoNew
Centers
K. WestphalNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 86.1 #12 | Points per game | 78.4 #91 |
| 1.17 #43 | Points per possession | 1.09 #149 |
| 73.5 #15 | Pace (possessions) | 71.8 #44 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.8 #71 | Effective FG% | 51.8 #155 |
| 35.9 #63 | 3-point % | 36.5 #39 |
| 46.2 #42 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.6 #156 |
| 37.1 #128 | Free throw rate | 28.1 #341 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.7 #48 | Turnover rate | 14.0 #21 |
| 32.0 #122 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.5 #311 |
| 17.8 #11 | Assists per game | 17.4 #15 |
| Defense | ||
| 78.9 #296 | Points allowed | 80.6 #329 |
| 1.08 #151 | Points allowed per possession | 1.12 #276 |
| 50.7 #141 | Opponent effective FG% | 54.1 #302 |
| 31.8 #53 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.8 #237 |
| 18.4 #81 | Turnovers forced | 15.5 #253 |
| 67.0 #300 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.5 #136 |
| 8.1 #34 | Steals per game | 6.5 #181 |
| 3.1 #210 | Blocks per game | 4.0 #77 |
Texas A&M
22-12 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Houston57–88
- Wvs Saint Mary's63–50
- Lvs Oklahoma63–83
- W@ LSU94–91
- Wvs Kentucky96–85
A week or more of rest.
Xavier
15-18 in 2025-26 overall · 7-15 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UConn68–93
- Wvs Marquette89–87
- L@ Villanova78–91
- Lvs Seton Hall68–77
- Wvs Georgetown91–84
A week or more of rest.