Yuengling Center · at South Florida
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | USF | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects USF 89–67 · win probability USF 97%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 156.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: USF has more of the edges
STET 2, USF 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
USF offense vs STET defense
Offense 59th of 366 against a defense 328th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: STET 18.2%, USF 15.1%. Forced: STET 15.1%, USF 19.1%
STET offense vs USF defense
Offense 273rd of 366 against a defense 121st, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: STET 26.6%, USF 38.1%. Defensive: STET 68.2%, USF 68.1%
Context
Schedule so far
STET has played the 220th-hardest schedule, USF the 89th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: STET plays 68.2 a game (221st fastest), USF 74.4 (9th). Faster games mean more points
Three-pointers
STET hits 36.0% and allows 34.5%; USF hits 32.5% and allows 34.5%. Threes are 44.8% and 43.8% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: STET 53.1 and allows 55.2; USF 50.6 and allows 48.8
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: STET 51%, USF 14%. Transfers in: STET 3, USF 10. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
USF at home. This season: USF 0-0 at home, STET 0-0 away
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: STET 32.5, USF 40.4. Allowed: STET 30.4, USF 39.0
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | USF -21.7 | — |
| Total | — | 156.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | STET 67.3 · USF 89 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | USF -12.8 | — |
| 1H total | 73.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | STET 30.1 · USF 42.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% | |
| 9-1 90% | 7-3 70% | 2-8 20% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
STET 1–1 USFSeries tied · 2 games since 2021-22 · STET 2-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2024-25 | STET 72 @ USF 74 | USF -13.5 | STET W |
| Nov 14, 2022-23 | STET 68 @ USF 67 | USF -7.5 | STET W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Stetson
31 games played
Straight up
10-21
32% wins
Against the spread
18-13
58% covers · avg +2.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-17
45% overs · avg +1.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 62-93 | +18.5 | L −12.5 | 152.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 61-102 | +34.5 | L −6.5 | 161.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 65-76 | +12.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 64-60 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 149.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 99-80 | +2.5 | W +21.5 | 148.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 62-79 | +9.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 68-70 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 30 | @ | L 62-80 | +11.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 45-67 | +24.5 | W +2.5 | 141.5 | U 112 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 51-82 | +22.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 54-107 | +31.5 | L −21.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 1 | @ | W 70-67 | +9.5 | W +12.5 | 142.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 73-93 | +11.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 91-83 | +11.5 | W +19.5 | 150.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 69-81 | +9.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 95-86 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 151.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 81-87 | +10.5 | W +4.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 74-79 | +15.5 | W +10.5 | 157.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 23 | @ | L 65-73 | +16.5 | W +8.5 | 148.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 84-77 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 165.5 | U 161 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 66-68 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 71-92 | +4.5 | L −16.5 | 148.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 88-100 | +9.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 67-62 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 138.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 76-78 | +11.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 76-88 | +9.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 76-71 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 161.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 85-89 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 78-63 | +5.5 | W +20.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 92-76 | +5.5 | W +21.5 | 155.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 60-69 | +11.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | U 129 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
URI
L 62-93
−12.5
10
@
MIA
L 61-102
−6.5
16
@
WCU
L 65-76
+1.5
19
vs
HOW
W 64-60
+5.5
22
vs
VMI
W 99-80
+21.5
25
vs
WRST
L 62-79
−7.5
29
vs
SUU
L 68-70
−0.5
30
@
RMU
L 62-80
−6.5
2
@
GCU
L 45-67
+2.5
6
@
SC
L 51-82
−8.5
22
@
OU
L 54-107
−21.5
1
@
UNA
W 70-67
+12.5
3
@
CARK
L 73-93
−8.5
8
vs
LIP
W 91-83
+19.5
10
vs
APSU
L 69-81
−2.5
15
vs
WGA
W 95-86
+10.5
17
vs
QUC
L 81-87
+4.5
22
@
LIP
L 74-79
+10.5
23
@
APSU
L 65-73
+8.5
29
@
UNF
W 84-77
+5.5
31
vs
UNA
L 66-68
−3.5
5
@
BELL
L 71-92
−16.5
7
@
EKU
L 88-100
−2.5
11
vs
JAX
W 67-62
+7.5
14
@
FGCU
L 76-78
+9.5
19
vs
CARK
L 76-88
−2.5
21
vs
UNF
W 76-71
+3.5
26
@
JAX
L 85-89
+3.5
28
vs
FGCU
W 78-63
+20.5
4
vs
EKU
W 92-76
+21.5
6
vs
APSU
L 60-69
+2.5
covered 18didn’t cover 13avg +2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
URI
L 62-93
+2.5
10
@
MIA
L 61-102
+1.5
16
@
WCU
L 65-76
−14.5
19
vs
HOW
W 64-60
−25.5
22
vs
VMI
W 99-80
+30.5
25
vs
WRST
L 62-79
−6.5
29
vs
SUU
L 68-70
−10.5
30
@
RMU
L 62-80
−0.5
2
@
GCU
L 45-67
−29.5
6
@
SC
L 51-82
−9.5
22
@
OU
L 54-107
+12.5
1
@
UNA
W 70-67
−5.5
3
@
CARK
L 73-93
+18.5
8
vs
LIP
W 91-83
+23.5
10
vs
APSU
L 69-81
−0.5
15
vs
WGA
W 95-86
+29.5
17
vs
QUC
L 81-87
+5.5
22
@
LIP
L 74-79
−4.5
23
@
APSU
L 65-73
−10.5
29
@
UNF
W 84-77
−4.5
31
vs
UNA
L 66-68
−10.5
5
@
BELL
L 71-92
+14.5
7
@
EKU
L 88-100
+36.5
11
vs
JAX
W 67-62
−9.5
14
@
FGCU
L 76-78
+5.5
19
vs
CARK
L 76-88
+14.5
21
vs
UNF
W 76-71
−14.5
26
@
JAX
L 85-89
+35.5
28
vs
FGCU
W 78-63
−9.5
4
vs
EKU
W 92-76
+12.5
6
vs
APSU
L 60-69
−24.5
over 14under 17avg +1.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
South Florida
33 games played
Straight up
24-9
73% wins
Against the spread
18-15
55% covers · avg +1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-18
45% overs · avg +1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 102-67 | -25.5 | W +9.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 95-99 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | O 194 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 100-50 | -34.5 | W +15.5 | 167.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 16 | @ | W 108-89 | -7.5 | W +11.5 | 177.5 | O 197 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 95-103 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 177.5 | O 198 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 66-78 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 172.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 97-91 | -7.5 | L −1.5 | 167.5 | O 188 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 68-83 | -2.5 | L −17.5 | 155.5 | U 151 |
| Dec 4 | vs | W 74-61 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 162.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 81-75 | -13.5 | L −7.5 | 160.5 | U 156 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 93-104 | +14.5 | W +3.5 | 178.5 | O 197 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 94-69 | -22.5 | W +2.5 | 160.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 4 | vs | L 106-109 | -8.5 | L −11.5 | 163.5 | O 215 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 74-70 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 93-78 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 163.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 82-71 | -18.5 | L −7.5 | 158.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 18 | vs | L 85-86 | -7.5 | L −8.5 | 158.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 82-69 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 168.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 25 | vs | W 89-75 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 166.5 | U 164 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 97-83 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 158.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 78-79 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 109-88 | -23.5 | L −2.5 | 164.5 | O 197 |
| Feb 8 | vs | W 80-74 | -4.5 | W +1.5 | 170.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 66-58 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 160.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 83-81 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 165.5 | U 164 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 87-66 | -9.5 | W +11.5 | 163.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 75-56 | -11.5 | W +7.5 | 157.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 90-62 | -15.5 | W +12.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 96-89 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 163.5 | O 185 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 83-60 | -17.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 86-64 | -15.5 | W +6.5 | 153.5 | U 150 |
| Mar 15 | vs | W 70-55 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 79-83 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 160.5 | O 162 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
FAMU
W 102-67
+9.5
8
vs
GW
L 95-99
−5.5
12
vs
COPP
W 100-50
+15.5
16
@
KENN
W 108-89
+11.5
19
@
OKST
L 95-103
−4.5
26
vs
VCU
L 66-78
−10.5
27
vs
WKU
W 97-91
−1.5
28
vs
CSU
L 68-83
−17.5
4
vs
USU
W 74-61
+10.5
10
vs
COFC
W 81-75
−7.5
17
@
ALA
L 93-104
+3.5
21
vs
UMBC
W 94-69
+2.5
4
vs
UAB
L 106-109
−11.5
7
@
UNT
W 74-70
−0.5
10
@
TLSA
W 93-78
+16.5
14
vs
ECU
W 82-71
−7.5
18
vs
WICH
L 85-86
−8.5
22
@
UAB
W 82-69
+10.5
25
vs
FAU
W 89-75
+8.5
28
@
TULN
W 97-83
+5.5
31
@
TEM
L 78-79
−10.5
4
vs
UTSA
W 109-88
−2.5
8
vs
TLSA
W 80-74
+1.5
11
@
WICH
W 66-58
+5.5
15
@
FAU
W 83-81
−2.5
19
vs
MEM
W 87-66
+11.5
25
@
RICE
W 75-56
+7.5
1
vs
TULN
W 90-62
+12.5
5
@
MEM
W 96-89
−0.5
8
vs
CLT
W 83-60
+5.5
14
vs
CLT
W 86-64
+6.5
15
vs
WICH
W 70-55
+8.5
19
vs
LOU
L 79-83
−0.5
covered 18didn’t cover 15avg +1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
FAMU
W 102-67
+15.5
8
vs
GW
L 95-99
+34.5
12
vs
COPP
W 100-50
−17.5
16
@
KENN
W 108-89
+19.5
19
@
OKST
L 95-103
+20.5
26
vs
VCU
L 66-78
−28.5
27
vs
WKU
W 97-91
+20.5
28
vs
CSU
L 68-83
−4.5
4
vs
USU
W 74-61
−27.5
10
vs
COFC
W 81-75
−4.5
17
@
ALA
L 93-104
+18.5
21
vs
UMBC
W 94-69
+2.5
4
vs
UAB
L 106-109
+51.5
7
@
UNT
W 74-70
−3.5
10
@
TLSA
W 93-78
+7.5
14
vs
ECU
W 82-71
−5.5
18
vs
WICH
L 85-86
+12.5
22
@
UAB
W 82-69
−17.5
25
vs
FAU
W 89-75
−2.5
28
@
TULN
W 97-83
+21.5
31
@
TEM
L 78-79
+2.5
4
vs
UTSA
W 109-88
+32.5
8
vs
TLSA
W 80-74
−16.5
11
@
WICH
W 66-58
−36.5
15
@
FAU
W 83-81
−1.5
19
vs
MEM
W 87-66
−10.5
25
@
RICE
W 75-56
−26.5
1
vs
TULN
W 90-62
−3.5
5
@
MEM
W 96-89
+21.5
8
vs
CLT
W 83-60
−13.5
14
vs
CLT
W 86-64
−3.5
15
vs
WICH
W 70-55
−26.5
19
vs
LOU
L 79-83
+1.5
over 15under 18avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
South Florida has the better starters
Position by position: Stetson 1, South Florida 3, even 1
StetsonBetterSouth Florida
G D. Macgregor4.8 pts · 2 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 26
→USFBig
G S. Wilson TR17.2 pts · 3.8 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 79
F C. Kuhl13.2 pts · 6 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 87
←STETSmall
G A. Dancler TR15.6 pts · 5.3 reb · 2 ast
Score 72
F F. Sheridan7.5 pts · 4.2 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 21
→USFBig
G J. Omojafo11 pts · 5.4 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 80
F M. Myles TR7.7 pts · 3.5 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 66
=Even
G A. Shoshkikj TR10.4 pts · 2.6 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 73
F A. Doyle5.1 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 9
→USFSmall
F R. Goods TR7.8 pts · 5.9 reb · 2 ast
Score 41
StetsonBetterSouth Florida
STET offense273rd of 366 · -8.3
→USFBig
USF defense121st of 366 · -2.1
STET defense328th of 366 · -8.5
→USFBig
USF offense59th of 366 · +2.7
Backcourt-1.4 · 1 player
→USFBig
Backcourt+4.4 · 4 players
Frontcourt-0.9 · 4 players
=Even
Frontcourt-0.8 · 1 player
Bench-5.1 · 5 players
→USFBig
Bench-0.3 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestSTET betterUSF betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Macgregor19 minS. Morgan14 minT. Sucatzky13 min · TRM. McGowan2 minI. Jones2 minB. Gladieux2 min
Forwards
C. Kuhl24 minF. Sheridan23 minM. Myles21 min · TRA. Doyle17 minM. Entenmann12 min · TRJ. Boyomo KeediNew
Guards
S. Wilson37 min · TRA. Dancler34 min · TRJ. Omojafo28 minA. Shoshkikj26 min · TRC. Davis18 min · TRM. James11 min · TR
Forwards
R. Goods25 min · TRG. Johnson23 min · TRJ. Lewis23 min · TRZ. High9 min · TRR. StevensonNewJ. FeldhausNew
Centers
T. Diawara3 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.9 #246 | Points per game | 86.8 #6 |
| 1.06 #231 | Points per possession | 1.17 #42 |
| 68.2 #221 | Pace (possessions) | 74.4 #9 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.1 #96 | Effective FG% | 50.6 #209 |
| 36.0 #59 | 3-point % | 32.5 #255 |
| 44.8 #75 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.8 #93 |
| 32.5 #250 | Free throw rate | 40.4 #55 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.2 #284 | Turnover rate | 15.1 #73 |
| 26.6 #308 | Offensive rebound rate | 38.1 #7 |
| 14.7 #105 | Assists per game | 16.8 #28 |
| Defense | ||
| 79.9 #315 | Points allowed | 76.5 #230 |
| 1.17 #339 | Points allowed per possession | 1.03 #54 |
| 55.2 #338 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.8 #58 |
| 34.5 #223 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.5 #218 |
| 15.1 #278 | Turnovers forced | 19.1 #42 |
| 68.2 #250 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.1 #252 |
| 6.2 #213 | Steals per game | 9.0 #8 |
| 2.0 #344 | Blocks per game | 4.0 #72 |
Stetson
10-21 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Atlantic Sun Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Austin Peay60–69
- Wvs E Kentucky92–76
- Wvs FGCU78–63
- L@ Jacksonville85–89
- Wvs North Florida76–71
A week or more of rest.
South Florida
24-9 in 2025-26 overall · 17-3 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Louisville79–83
- Wvs Wichita St70–55
- Wvs Charlotte86–64
- Wvs Charlotte83–60
- W@ Memphis96–89
A week or more of rest.