Carver Arena · at Bradley
#163PACPacific
@
#167BRADBradley
LineNo line yet 
Total— 
Season records: Pacific and Bradley
PACThis seasonBRAD
0-0Record0-0
0-0ATS0-0
0-0O/U0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects BRAD 74–72 · win probability BRAD 57%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 145.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it

PAC 3, BRAD 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
BRADBig
Turnovers
Turnover rate: PAC 20.1%, BRAD 13.9%. Forced: PAC 15.1%, BRAD 18.9%
PACBig
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: PAC 35.3%, BRAD 27.4%. Defensive: PAC 75.0%, BRAD 72.2%
PACSmall
Shooting
Effective FG%: PAC 52.2 and allows 50.0; BRAD 51.1 and allows 52.8
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: PAC plays 66.1 a game (312th fastest), BRAD 69.9 (125th). Faster games mean more points
BRADSmall
Home court
BRAD at home. This season: BRAD 0-0 at home, PAC 0-0 away
BRADSmall
Free throws
Free throw rate: PAC 30.5, BRAD 35.9. Allowed: PAC 36.3, BRAD 38.2
PACSmall
Three-pointers
PAC hits 35.8% and allows 34.7%; BRAD hits 36.1% and allows 36.6%. Threes are 35.4% and 40.5% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
PAC has played the 122nd-hardest schedule, BRAD the 155th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
BRAD offense vs PAC defense
Offense 175th of 366 against a defense 147th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: PAC 8%, BRAD 16%. Transfers in: PAC 9, BRAD 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
PAC offense vs BRAD defense
Offense 195th of 366 against a defense 185th, on the model’s ratings

Market

Open → current
Spread
Opening line not available
Total
 
Moneyline
—

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Model vs market

MarketModelModel edge
Spread—BRAD -2.1—
Total—145.9—
Projected score—PAC 71.9 · BRAD 74

1st-half model

ModelActual
1H spreadBRAD -1.1—
1H total68.3—
1H projected scorePAC 33.6 · BRAD 34.7—

The starting fives are even

Position by position: Pacific 1, Bradley 1, even 3
PacificBetterBradley
G J. Winston TR15.5 pts · 3 reb · 3.8 ast Score 74
PACBig
G T. Payton TR9.3 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.7 ast Score 15
G C. Amundsen TR9.4 pts · 2 reb · 3.8 ast Score 34
Even
G T. van der Knaap6.5 pts · 4.8 reb · 0.4 ast Score 30
G C. Jones TR3.6 pts · 1.8 reb · 1.3 ast Score 17
No call
G D. Richardson2.2 pts · 0.7 reb · 0.5 ast Not ranked
F G. Ripp TR3.9 pts · 2.4 reb · 1.4 ast Score 10
BRADBig
F X. Alarie TR10.3 pts · 7.4 reb · 1.5 ast Score 50
F J. Pitt4.4 pts · 3.7 reb · 0.5 ast Score 57
No call
F J. Ibukunoluwa TR2.3 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.2 ast Not ranked
PacificBetterBradley
PAC offense195th of 366 · -6.1
Even
BRAD defense185th of 366 · -4.3
PAC defense147th of 366 · -3.2
Even
BRAD offense175th of 366 · -5.4
Backcourt-2.4 · 3 players
PACBig
Backcourt-5.9 · 3 players
Frontcourt-1.7 · 2 players
BRADSmall
Frontcourt-0.2 · 2 players
Bench-1.2 · 5 players
BRADSmall
Bench-0.0 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestPAC betterBRAD betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Pacific
Guards
J. Winston36 min · TRC. Amundsen30 min · TRC. Jones17 min · TRA. Nyorha10 min · TRD. Harris6 min · TRN. BuduNew
Forwards
G. Ripp17 min · TRJ. Pitt17 minJ. Thompson11 min · TRV. OsazeeNewJ. CarotNew
Centers
J. McFarland3 min · TRI. Matlekovic2 min · TR
Bradley
Guards
T. Payton34 min · TRT. van der Knaap23 minD. Richardson7 minG. Rugaard1 minK. GrillNewG. GerganovNew
Forwards
X. Alarie28 min · TRJ. Ibukunoluwa6 min · TRB. ThornbrueNew
Centers
G. GuimaresNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Shooting
Possessions
Defense
PACBRAD
Scoring
71.3 #262Points per game77.0 #117
1.08 #176Points per possession1.10 #129
66.1 #312Pace (possessions)69.9 #125
Shooting
52.2 #140Effective FG%51.1 #189
35.8 #653-point %36.1 #53
35.4 #2663-point attempt rate40.5 #161
30.5 #297Free throw rate35.9 #156
Possessions
20.1 #350Turnover rate13.9 #19
35.3 #42Offensive rebound rate27.4 #285
14.9 #93Assists per game13.3 #191
Defense
69.8 #60Points allowed74.2 #162
1.05 #93Points allowed per possession1.06 #109
50.0 #101Opponent effective FG%52.8 #259
34.7 #233Opponent 3-point %36.6 #334
15.1 #281Turnovers forced18.9 #53
75.0 #8Defensive rebound rate72.2 #62
5.4 #309Steals per game7.5 #86
2.2 #332Blocks per game3.2 #192

Pacific

16-15 in 2025-26 overall · 9-11 in conference · West Coast Conference

Last five, 2025-26
  • Lvs Santa Clara68–76
  • Wvs Seattle U61–58
  • Lvs San Francisco61–72
  • L@ Gonzaga62–71
  • L@ Washington St70–87

A week or more of rest.

Bradley

20-13 in 2025-26 overall · 14-8 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference

Last five, 2025-26
  • Lvs Dayton66–80
  • Lvs Northern Iowa69–73
  • Wvs Valparaiso90–84
  • Wvs Murray St87–78
  • L@ UIC86–93

A week or more of rest.