John M. Belk Arena · at Davidson
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | DAV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects DAV 76–68 · win probability DAV 76%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 144.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: DAV has more of the edges
BRAD 2, DAV 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: BRAD plays 69.9 a game (125th fastest), DAV 65.0 (347th). Faster games mean more points
Three-pointers
BRAD hits 36.1% and allows 36.6%; DAV hits 35.4% and allows 32.6%. Threes are 40.5% and 44.5% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: BRAD 51.1 and allows 52.8; DAV 52.6 and allows 50.6
BRAD offense vs DAV defense
Offense 175th of 366 against a defense 84th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BRAD 13.9%, DAV 15.8%. Forced: BRAD 18.9%, DAV 17.5%
Context
Schedule so far
BRAD has played the 155th-hardest schedule, DAV the 91st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BRAD 16%, DAV 49%. Transfers in: BRAD 3, DAV 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
DAV at home. This season: DAV 0-0 at home, BRAD 0-0 away
Free throws
Free throw rate: BRAD 35.9, DAV 31.0. Allowed: BRAD 38.2, DAV 37.1
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BRAD 27.4%, DAV 28.1%. Defensive: BRAD 72.2%, DAV 70.0%
Even
DAV offense vs BRAD defense
Offense 149th of 366 against a defense 185th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | DAV -8.1 | — |
| Total | — | 144.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | BRAD 68.3 · DAV 76.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | DAV -4.7 | — |
| 1H total | 67.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | BRAD 31.5 · DAV 36.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | |
| 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Bradley
33 games played
Straight up
20-13
61% wins
Against the spread
14-19
42% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-14
58% overs · avg +5.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 63-69 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 85-54 | -9.5 | W +21.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 12 | vs | L 67-78 | -15.5 | L −26.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 64-75 | +9.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 87-77 | -21.5 | L −11.5 | 149.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 88-64 | -9.5 | W +14.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 77-87 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 74-64 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 64-60 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 84-55 | -18.5 | W +10.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 18 | @ | W 108-99 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | O 207 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 73-69 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 76-68 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 78-88 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 153.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 66-86 | +5.5 | L −14.5 | 162.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 93-66 | -6.5 | W +20.5 | 144.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 75-69 | -4.5 | W +1.5 | 131.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 94-90 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 62-88 | +5.5 | L −20.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 75-68 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 70-85 | -7.5 | L −22.5 | 144.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 87-73 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 72-65 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 6 | @ | L 49-61 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 134.5 | U 110 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 95-84 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 152.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 70-60 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 72-79 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 74-60 | -3.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 86-93 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 87-78 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | O 165 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 90-84 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | O 174 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 69-73 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 127.5 | O 142 |
| Mar 18 | vs | L 66-80 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 141.5 | O 146 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
SBU
L 63-69
−4.5
8
vs
CMU
W 85-54
+21.5
12
vs
UTM
L 67-78
−26.5
15
@
SF
L 64-75
−1.5
19
vs
UML
W 87-77
−11.5
24
vs
PRIN
W 88-64
+14.5
25
vs
UCSD
L 77-87
−11.5
26
vs
LIB
W 74-64
+14.5
2
vs
WSU
W 64-60
−1.5
6
vs
NIU
W 84-55
+10.5
18
@
INST
W 108-99
+3.5
21
vs
SIU
W 73-69
−2.5
29
vs
EVAN
W 76-68
−3.5
1
@
BEL
L 78-88
−6.5
4
@
MUR
L 66-86
−14.5
7
vs
DRKE
W 93-66
+20.5
10
vs
UNI
W 75-69
+1.5
13
@
EVAN
W 94-90
−3.5
17
@
ILST
L 62-88
−20.5
21
vs
INST
W 75-68
−1.5
24
vs
UIC
L 70-85
−22.5
31
@
DRKE
W 87-73
+11.5
3
vs
VAL
W 72-65
−0.5
6
@
UNI
L 49-61
−8.5
9
vs
BEL
W 95-84
+12.5
15
@
SIU
W 70-60
+12.5
18
@
VAL
L 72-79
−9.5
21
vs
ILST
W 74-60
+10.5
24
@
UIC
L 86-93
−5.5
1
vs
MUR
W 87-78
+5.5
6
vs
VAL
W 90-84
+0.5
7
vs
UNI
L 69-73
+0.5
18
vs
DAY
L 66-80
−11.5
covered 14didn’t cover 19avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
SBU
L 63-69
−7.5
8
vs
CMU
W 85-54
−8.5
12
vs
UTM
L 67-78
+0.5
15
@
SF
L 64-75
−7.5
19
vs
UML
W 87-77
+14.5
24
vs
PRIN
W 88-64
+10.5
25
vs
UCSD
L 77-87
+18.5
26
vs
LIB
W 74-64
−6.5
2
vs
WSU
W 64-60
−24.5
6
vs
NIU
W 84-55
−7.5
18
@
INST
W 108-99
+56.5
21
vs
SIU
W 73-69
−10.5
29
vs
EVAN
W 76-68
−0.5
1
@
BEL
L 78-88
+12.5
4
@
MUR
L 66-86
−10.5
7
vs
DRKE
W 93-66
+14.5
10
vs
UNI
W 75-69
+12.5
13
@
EVAN
W 94-90
+41.5
17
@
ILST
L 62-88
+2.5
21
vs
INST
W 75-68
−12.5
24
vs
UIC
L 70-85
+10.5
31
@
DRKE
W 87-73
+9.5
3
vs
VAL
W 72-65
−7.5
6
@
UNI
L 49-61
−24.5
9
vs
BEL
W 95-84
+26.5
15
@
SIU
W 70-60
−16.5
18
@
VAL
L 72-79
+8.5
21
vs
ILST
W 74-60
−11.5
24
@
UIC
L 86-93
+37.5
1
vs
MUR
W 87-78
+7.5
6
vs
VAL
W 90-84
+34.5
7
vs
UNI
L 69-73
+14.5
18
vs
DAY
L 66-80
+4.5
over 19under 14avg +5.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Davidson
32 games played
Straight up
18-14
56% wins
Against the spread
14-18
44% covers · avg +0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg −2.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | vs | W 85-69 | -4.5 | W +11.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 62-55 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 91-87 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 59-49 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 140.5 | U 108 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 60-94 | +9.5 | L −24.5 | 147.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 90-74 | -13.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 4 | vs | W 79-63 | -18.5 | L −2.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 61-70 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 80-47 | -11.5 | W +21.5 | 132.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 18 | vs | L 63-68 | -5.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 61-90 | +14.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 83-89 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 62-56 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 79-64 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 136.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 45-70 | -2.5 | L −27.5 | 134.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 84-79 | +9.5 | W +14.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 68-63 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 135.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 69-75 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 52-60 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 134.5 | U 112 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 79-54 | +1.5 | W +26.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 3 | vs | L 82-91 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 6 | vs | W 84-64 | -9.5 | W +10.5 | 140.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 59-70 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 140.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 65-63 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 59-63 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 131.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 67-56 | +3.5 | W +14.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 71-64 | -10.5 | L −3.5 | 133.5 | O 135 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 67-70 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | O 137 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 68-63 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 64-59 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 132.5 | U 123 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 58-70 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 133.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 17 | @ | L 80-84 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
vs
WSU
W 85-69
+11.5
11
@
CLT
W 62-55
+8.5
15
vs
BGSU
W 91-87
−0.5
21
vs
BC
W 59-49
+11.5
23
vs
USU
L 60-94
−24.5
28
vs
NCAT
W 90-74
+2.5
4
vs
CIT
W 79-63
−2.5
7
vs
SMC
L 61-70
−0.5
13
vs
MERC
W 80-47
+21.5
18
vs
TEM
L 63-68
−10.5
22
@
KU
L 61-90
−14.5
30
vs
DUQ
L 83-89
−8.5
3
@
JOES
W 62-56
+4.5
7
@
LUC
W 79-64
+13.5
10
vs
URI
L 45-70
−27.5
14
@
GW
W 84-79
+14.5
21
vs
FOR
W 68-63
+0.5
24
vs
VCU
L 69-75
−0.5
28
@
GMU
L 52-60
−1.5
31
@
RICH
W 79-54
+26.5
3
vs
SLU
L 82-91
−0.5
6
vs
LUC
W 84-64
+10.5
15
@
DAY
L 59-70
−5.5
18
vs
RICH
W 65-63
−3.5
21
@
FOR
L 59-63
−5.5
25
@
DUQ
W 67-56
+14.5
1
vs
LAS
W 71-64
−3.5
4
vs
JOES
L 67-70
−4.5
7
@
SBU
W 68-63
+9.5
12
vs
LUC
W 64-59
−0.5
13
vs
JOES
L 58-70
−9.5
17
@
OKST
L 80-84
+2.5
covered 14didn’t cover 18avg +0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
vs
WSU
W 85-69
+0.5
11
@
CLT
W 62-55
−26.5
15
vs
BGSU
W 91-87
+33.5
21
vs
BC
W 59-49
−32.5
23
vs
USU
L 60-94
+6.5
28
vs
NCAT
W 90-74
+18.5
4
vs
CIT
W 79-63
+4.5
7
vs
SMC
L 61-70
−6.5
13
vs
MERC
W 80-47
−5.5
18
vs
TEM
L 63-68
−10.5
22
@
KU
L 61-90
+11.5
30
vs
DUQ
L 83-89
+21.5
3
@
JOES
W 62-56
−21.5
7
@
LUC
W 79-64
+6.5
10
vs
URI
L 45-70
−19.5
14
@
GW
W 84-79
+12.5
21
vs
FOR
W 68-63
−4.5
24
vs
VCU
L 69-75
−4.5
28
@
GMU
L 52-60
−22.5
31
@
RICH
W 79-54
−7.5
3
vs
SLU
L 82-91
+21.5
6
vs
LUC
W 84-64
+7.5
15
@
DAY
L 59-70
−11.5
18
vs
RICH
W 65-63
−13.5
21
@
FOR
L 59-63
−9.5
25
@
DUQ
W 67-56
−19.5
1
vs
LAS
W 71-64
+1.5
4
vs
JOES
L 67-70
+0.5
7
@
SBU
W 68-63
−10.5
12
vs
LUC
W 64-59
−9.5
13
vs
JOES
L 58-70
−5.5
17
@
OKST
L 80-84
+9.5
over 14under 18avg −2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Davidson has the better starters
Position by position: Bradley 0, Davidson 2, even 3
BradleyBetterDavidson
G T. Payton TR9.3 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 15
→DAVBig
G N. Janowski TR16.7 pts · 5 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 81
G T. van der Knaap6.5 pts · 4.8 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 30
=Even
G S. Brown7.9 pts · 2 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 33
G D. Richardson2.2 pts · 0.7 reb · 0.5 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G N. Coval6.2 pts · 1.5 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 49
F X. Alarie TR10.3 pts · 7.4 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 50
→DAVBig
F J. Scovens11.1 pts · 4.2 reb · 2 ast
Score 88
F J. Ibukunoluwa TR2.3 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
=No call
C I. Platteeuw3.9 pts · 3.5 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 43
BradleyBetterDavidson
BRAD offense175th of 366 · -5.4
→DAVSmall
DAV defense84th of 366 · +0.0
BRAD defense185th of 366 · -4.3
=Even
DAV offense149th of 366 · -4.5
Backcourt-5.9 · 3 players
→DAVBig
Backcourt-0.2 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.2 · 2 players
→DAVSmall
Frontcourt+2.2 · 2 players
Bench-0.0 · 1 player
=Even
Bench-0.9 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestBRAD betterDAV betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Payton34 min · TRT. van der Knaap23 minD. Richardson7 minG. Rugaard1 minK. GrillNewG. GerganovNew
Forwards
X. Alarie28 min · TRJ. Ibukunoluwa6 min · TRB. ThornbrueNew
Centers
G. GuimaresNew
Guards
N. Janowski32 min · TRS. Brown24 minN. Coval19 minP. Kavu1 minJ. CarterNewE. HeinonenNew
Forwards
J. Scovens25 minJ. Roberts12 minJ. Keith9 min · TRJ. Nowland1 minQ. BashiruNewT. StoiberNew
Centers
I. Platteeuw15 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 77.0 #117 | Points per game | 69.9 #289 |
| 1.10 #129 | Points per possession | 1.08 #189 |
| 69.9 #125 | Pace (possessions) | 65.0 #347 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.1 #189 | Effective FG% | 52.6 #121 |
| 36.1 #53 | 3-point % | 35.4 #92 |
| 40.5 #161 | 3-point attempt rate | 44.5 #79 |
| 35.9 #156 | Free throw rate | 31.0 #283 |
| Possessions | ||
| 13.9 #19 | Turnover rate | 15.8 #124 |
| 27.4 #285 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.1 #265 |
| 13.3 #191 | Assists per game | 13.4 #184 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.2 #162 | Points allowed | 68.5 #40 |
| 1.06 #109 | Points allowed per possession | 1.05 #94 |
| 52.8 #259 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.6 #132 |
| 36.6 #334 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.6 #92 |
| 18.9 #53 | Turnovers forced | 17.5 #121 |
| 72.2 #62 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.0 #157 |
| 7.5 #86 | Steals per game | 6.4 #189 |
| 3.2 #192 | Blocks per game | 4.1 #66 |
Bradley
20-13 in 2025-26 overall · 14-8 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Dayton66–80
- Lvs Northern Iowa69–73
- Wvs Valparaiso90–84
- Wvs Murray St87–78
- L@ UIC86–93
A week or more of rest.
Davidson
18-14 in 2025-26 overall · 11-9 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Oklahoma St80–84
- Lvs Saint Joseph's58–70
- Wvs Loyola Chicago64–59
- W@ St Bonaventure68–63
- Lvs Saint Joseph's67–70
A week or more of rest.