Frost Bank Center · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | TEX | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects TEX 84–75 · win probability TEX 78%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 159.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: TEX has more of the edges
BAY 0, TEX 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BAY 36.9%, TEX 35.4%. Defensive: BAY 68.7%, TEX 73.1%
Shooting
Effective FG%: BAY 53.4 and allows 52.4; TEX 54.1 and allows 50.8
Even
Three-pointers
BAY hits 33.9% and allows 34.8%; TEX hits 35.1% and allows 34.7%. Threes are 39.6% and 35.8% of their shots
Even
TEX offense vs BAY defense
Offense 7th of 366 against a defense 45th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BAY 16.2%, TEX 15.0%. Forced: BAY 15.9%, TEX 13.0%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BAY 26%, TEX 14%. Transfers in: BAY 4, TEX 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: BAY 34.1, TEX 44.2. Allowed: BAY 30.1, TEX 39.6
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: BAY plays 69.3 a game (161st fastest), TEX 68.7 (199th). Faster games mean more points
Even
BAY offense vs TEX defense
Offense 29th of 366 against a defense 17th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
BAY has played the 19th-hardest schedule, TEX the 27th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | TEX -8.7 | — |
| Total | — | 159.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | BAY 75.3 · TEX 84 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | TEX -5.0 | — |
| 1H total | 74.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | BAY 34.7 · TEX 39.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | |
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 6 since 2021-22
BAY 4–2 TEXBAY leads · 6 games since 2021-22 · BAY 5-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2023-24 | TEX 85 @ BAY 93 | BAY -7.5 | BAY W |
| Jan 20, 2023-24 | BAY 73 @ TEX 75 | TEX -2.5 | BAY W |
| Feb 25, 2022-23 | TEX 72 @ BAY 81 | BAY -4.5 | BAY W |
| Jan 30, 2022-23 | BAY 71 @ TEX 76 | TEX -3.5 | TEX W |
| Feb 28, 2021-22 | BAY 68 @ TEX 61 | TEX +1.5 | BAY W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Baylor
33 games played
Straight up
16-17
48% wins
Against the spread
14-19
42% covers · avg −1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-15
55% overs · avg +3.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 96-81 | -24.5 | L −9.5 | 154.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 78-69 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 156.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 94-81 | -23.5 | L −10.5 | 149.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 81-74 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 81-96 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 159.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 91-81 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 110-88 | -29.5 | L −7.5 | 158.5 | O 198 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 71-78 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 158.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 97-67 | -26.5 | W +3.5 | 148.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 113-56 | -35.5 | W +21.5 | 160.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 111-67 | -26.5 | W +17.5 | 169.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 63-69 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 60-70 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 155.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 55-77 | +2.5 | L −19.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 94-79 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 165.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 16 | @ | L 62-80 | +7.5 | L −10.5 | 156.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 73-92 | +1.5 | L −17.5 | 154.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 90-97 | -4.5 | L −11.5 | 147.5 | O 187 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 57-67 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 63-53 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 139.5 | U 116 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 86-67 | -7.5 | W +11.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 69-72 | +14.5 | W +11.5 | 151.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 10 | vs | L 94-99 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | O 193 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 71-82 | +7.5 | L −3.5 | 162.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 74-90 | -3.5 | L −19.5 | 159.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 73-68 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 80-87 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 155.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 87-86 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 159.5 | O 173 |
| Mar 4 | @ | L 64-77 | +12.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 101-75 | -13.5 | W +12.5 | 148.5 | O 176 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 79-83 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 152.5 | O 162 |
| Apr 1 | vs | W 67-48 | -3.5 | W +15.5 | 146.5 | U 115 |
| Apr 4 | vs | L 69-82 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 159.5 | U 151 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
RGV
W 96-81
−9.5
9
vs
WASH
W 78-69
+2.5
14
vs
TAR
W 94-81
−10.5
24
vs
CREI
W 81-74
+3.5
25
vs
SJU
L 81-96
−9.5
26
vs
SDSU
W 91-81
+7.5
2
vs
SAC
W 110-88
−7.5
6
@
MEM
L 71-78
−10.5
10
vs
NORF
W 97-67
+3.5
19
vs
ALCN
W 113-56
+21.5
21
vs
SOU
W 111-67
+17.5
3
@
TCU
L 63-69
−3.5
7
vs
ISU
L 60-70
−6.5
10
vs
HOU
L 55-77
−19.5
13
@
OKST
W 94-79
+13.5
16
@
KU
L 62-80
−10.5
20
vs
TTU
L 73-92
−17.5
24
vs
TCU
L 90-97
−11.5
28
@
CIN
L 57-67
−6.5
31
@
WVU
W 63-53
+12.5
4
vs
COLO
W 86-67
+11.5
7
@
ISU
L 69-72
+11.5
10
vs
BYU
L 94-99
−1.5
14
vs
LOU
L 71-82
−3.5
17
@
KSU
L 74-90
−19.5
21
vs
ASU
W 73-68
−3.5
24
vs
ARIZ
L 80-87
+0.5
28
@
UCF
W 87-86
+2.5
4
@
HOU
L 64-77
−0.5
7
vs
UTAH
W 101-75
+12.5
10
vs
ASU
L 79-83
−9.5
1
vs
MINN
W 67-48
+15.5
4
vs
OU
L 69-82
−14.5
covered 14didn’t cover 19avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
RGV
W 96-81
+22.5
9
vs
WASH
W 78-69
−9.5
14
vs
TAR
W 94-81
+25.5
24
vs
CREI
W 81-74
+0.5
25
vs
SJU
L 81-96
+17.5
26
vs
SDSU
W 91-81
+23.5
2
vs
SAC
W 110-88
+39.5
6
@
MEM
L 71-78
−9.5
10
vs
NORF
W 97-67
+15.5
19
vs
ALCN
W 113-56
+8.5
21
vs
SOU
W 111-67
+8.5
3
@
TCU
L 63-69
−22.5
7
vs
ISU
L 60-70
−25.5
10
vs
HOU
L 55-77
−10.5
13
@
OKST
W 94-79
+7.5
16
@
KU
L 62-80
−14.5
20
vs
TTU
L 73-92
+10.5
24
vs
TCU
L 90-97
+39.5
28
@
CIN
L 57-67
−21.5
31
@
WVU
W 63-53
−23.5
4
vs
COLO
W 86-67
−2.5
7
@
ISU
L 69-72
−10.5
10
vs
BYU
L 94-99
+34.5
14
vs
LOU
L 71-82
−9.5
17
@
KSU
L 74-90
+4.5
21
vs
ASU
W 73-68
−16.5
24
vs
ARIZ
L 80-87
+11.5
28
@
UCF
W 87-86
+13.5
4
@
HOU
L 64-77
−2.5
7
vs
UTAH
W 101-75
+27.5
10
vs
ASU
L 79-83
+9.5
1
vs
MINN
W 67-48
−31.5
4
vs
OU
L 69-82
−8.5
over 18under 15avg +3.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Texas
35 games played
Straight up
20-15
57% wins
Against the spread
20-15
57% covers · avg +0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-15
57% overs · avg +2.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | L 60-75 | +10.5 | L −4.5 | 153.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 97-60 | -25.5 | W +11.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 93-58 | -31.5 | W +3.5 | 158.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 71-55 | -31.5 | L −15.5 | 159.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 99-65 | -30.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 86-87 | -6.5 | L −7.5 | 153.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 102-97 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 161.5 | O 199 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 69-88 | -3.5 | L −22.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 8 | vs | W 95-69 | -22.5 | W +3.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 12 | @ | L 63-71 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 95-53 | -29.5 | W +12.5 | 152.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 94-71 | -33.5 | L −10.5 | 138.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 98-101 | -9.5 | L −12.5 | 157.5 | O 199 |
| Jan 6 | @ | L 71-85 | +12.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 92-88 | +11.5 | W +15.5 | 177.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 80-64 | +3.5 | W +19.5 | 163.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 70-74 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 166.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 80-85 | +7.5 | W +2.5 | 152.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 87-67 | -3.5 | W +16.5 | 168.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 82-88 | +6.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 79-69 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 155.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 84-75 | -13.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 79-68 | -9.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 85-68 | +2.5 | W +19.5 | 150.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 88-85 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 80-91 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 162.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 71-84 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 76-70 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 159.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 4 | @ | L 85-105 | +6.5 | L −13.5 | 163.5 | O 190 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 85-88 | -6.5 | L −9.5 | 154.5 | O 173 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 66-76 | -5.5 | L −15.5 | 147.5 | U 142 |
| Mar 17 | vs | W 68-66 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 19 | vs | W 79-71 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Mar 21 | vs | W 74-68 | +5.5 | W +11.5 | 146.5 | U 142 |
| Mar 26 | vs | L 77-79 | +8.5 | W +6.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
DUKE
L 60-75
−4.5
8
vs
LAF
W 97-60
+11.5
12
vs
FDU
W 93-58
+3.5
15
vs
KC
W 71-55
−15.5
18
vs
RID
W 99-65
+3.5
24
vs
ASU
L 86-87
−7.5
26
vs
NCSU
W 102-97
+6.5
3
vs
UVA
L 69-88
−22.5
8
vs
SOU
W 95-69
+3.5
12
@
CONN
L 63-71
+3.5
16
vs
LEM
W 95-53
+12.5
22
vs
UMES
W 94-71
−10.5
3
vs
MSST
L 98-101
−12.5
6
@
TENN
L 71-85
−1.5
10
@
ALA
W 92-88
+15.5
14
vs
VAN
W 80-64
+19.5
17
vs
TA&M
L 70-74
−8.5
21
@
UK
L 80-85
+2.5
24
vs
UGA
W 87-67
+16.5
28
@
AUB
L 82-88
+0.5
31
@
OU
W 79-69
+8.5
3
vs
SC
W 84-75
−4.5
7
vs
MISS
W 79-68
+1.5
14
@
MIZ
W 85-68
+19.5
17
vs
LSU
W 88-85
−7.5
21
@
UGA
L 80-91
−8.5
25
vs
FLA
L 71-84
−6.5
28
@
TA&M
W 76-70
+8.5
4
@
ARK
L 85-105
−13.5
7
vs
OU
L 85-88
−9.5
11
vs
MISS
L 66-76
−15.5
17
vs
NCSU
W 68-66
+3.5
19
vs
BYU
W 79-71
+10.5
21
vs
GONZ
W 74-68
+11.5
26
vs
PUR
L 77-79
+6.5
covered 20didn’t cover 15avg +0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
DUKE
L 60-75
−18.5
8
vs
LAF
W 97-60
+3.5
12
vs
FDU
W 93-58
−7.5
15
vs
KC
W 71-55
−33.5
18
vs
RID
W 99-65
+20.5
24
vs
ASU
L 86-87
+19.5
26
vs
NCSU
W 102-97
+37.5
3
vs
UVA
L 69-88
+2.5
8
vs
SOU
W 95-69
+5.5
12
@
CONN
L 63-71
−11.5
16
vs
LEM
W 95-53
−4.5
22
vs
UMES
W 94-71
+26.5
3
vs
MSST
L 98-101
+41.5
6
@
TENN
L 71-85
+2.5
10
@
ALA
W 92-88
+2.5
14
vs
VAN
W 80-64
−19.5
17
vs
TA&M
L 70-74
−22.5
21
@
UK
L 80-85
+12.5
24
vs
UGA
W 87-67
−14.5
28
@
AUB
L 82-88
+15.5
31
@
OU
W 79-69
−7.5
3
vs
SC
W 84-75
+9.5
7
vs
MISS
W 79-68
+1.5
14
@
MIZ
W 85-68
+2.5
17
vs
LSU
W 88-85
+22.5
21
@
UGA
L 80-91
+8.5
25
vs
FLA
L 71-84
−2.5
28
@
TA&M
W 76-70
−13.5
4
@
ARK
L 85-105
+26.5
7
vs
OU
L 85-88
+18.5
11
vs
MISS
L 66-76
−5.5
17
vs
NCSU
W 68-66
−23.5
19
vs
BYU
W 79-71
−6.5
21
vs
GONZ
W 74-68
−4.5
26
vs
PUR
L 77-79
+9.5
over 20under 15avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Texas has the better starters
Position by position: Baylor 0, Texas 2, even 3
BaylorBetterTexas
G B. Decker TR16.9 pts · 2.5 reb · 1 ast
Score 76
→TEXSmall
G I. Johnson TR16.9 pts · 2.9 reb · 3 ast
Score 98
G K. Mingo TR13.7 pts · 3.5 reb · 4.3 ast
Score 92
=Even
G E. Freeman TR9.2 pts · 5.2 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 85
G I. Williams10.1 pts · 2.2 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 89
=Even
G M. Lewis TR14 pts · 2.6 reb · 2 ast
Score 86
F I. Celiscar TR13.1 pts · 6.4 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 88
=Even
F D. Punch TR14.1 pts · 6.8 reb · 2 ast
Score 96
F E. Chatman TR8.9 pts · 8.8 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 71
→TEXSmall
C M. Vokietaitis15.5 pts · 7 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 95
BaylorBetterTexas
BAY offense29th of 366 · +6.5
=Even
TEX defense17th of 366 · +6.2
BAY defense45th of 366 · +2.4
=Even
TEX offense7th of 366 · +10.5
Backcourt+6.4 · 3 players
→TEXSmall
Backcourt+8.6 · 3 players
Frontcourt+4.0 · 2 players
→TEXBig
Frontcourt+9.8 · 2 players
Bench+1.5 · 3 players
=Even
Bench+0.9 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestBAY betterTEX betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
B. Decker34 min · TRK. Mingo32 min · TRI. Williams25 minD. Perry2 minJ. Goodis1 minA. IguodalaNew
Forwards
I. Celiscar32 min · TRE. Chatman29 min · TRM. PerezNewE. WilliamsNew
Centers
C. Powell24 minJ. Bodo BodoNewM. SoyoyeNewT. MakabuNew
Guards
I. Johnson31 min · TRE. Freeman27 min · TRM. Lewis27 min · TRA. Evans14 min · TRA. McDermott3 minB. OgdenNew
Forwards
D. Punch30 min · TRJ. ClarkNewM. SpearsNewC. ElkinsNew
Centers
M. Vokietaitis26 minL. ObiorahNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.4 #59 | Points per game | 81.7 #34 |
| 1.16 #51 | Points per possession | 1.19 #22 |
| 69.3 #161 | Pace (possessions) | 68.7 #199 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.4 #84 | Effective FG% | 54.1 #65 |
| 33.9 #179 | 3-point % | 35.1 #107 |
| 39.6 #181 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.8 #254 |
| 34.1 #202 | Free throw rate | 44.2 #7 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.2 #153 | Turnover rate | 15.0 #68 |
| 36.9 #18 | Offensive rebound rate | 35.4 #35 |
| 14.8 #96 | Assists per game | 12.1 #278 |
| Defense | ||
| 76.9 #238 | Points allowed | 76.1 #220 |
| 1.11 #248 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #235 |
| 52.4 #237 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.8 #144 |
| 34.8 #240 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.7 #230 |
| 15.9 #226 | Turnovers forced | 13.0 #356 |
| 68.7 #219 | Defensive rebound rate | 73.1 #35 |
| 6.3 #198 | Steals per game | 5.5 #298 |
| 3.9 #85 | Blocks per game | 2.9 #239 |
Baylor
16-17 in 2025-26 overall · 6-13 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Oklahoma69–82
- Wvs Minnesota67–48
- Lvs Arizona St79–83
- Wvs Utah101–75
- L@ Houston64–77
A week or more of rest.
Texas
20-15 in 2025-26 overall · 9-10 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Purdue77–79
- Wvs Gonzaga74–68
- Wvs BYU79–71
- Wvs NC State68–66
- Lvs Ole Miss66–76
A week or more of rest.