Foster Pavilion · at Baylor
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | BAY | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects BAY 93–64 · win probability BAY 99%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 157.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: BAY has more of the edges
JKST 1, BAY 8 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
BAY offense vs JKST defense
Offense 29th of 366 against a defense 325th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
JKST has played the 239th-hardest schedule, BAY the 19th. A record against a soft schedule means less
JKST offense vs BAY defense
Offense 229th of 366 against a defense 45th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: JKST 29.7%, BAY 36.9%. Defensive: JKST 62.8%, BAY 68.7%
Shooting
Effective FG%: JKST 45.7 and allows 53.0; BAY 53.4 and allows 52.4
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: JKST 76%, BAY 26%. Transfers in: JKST 2, BAY 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Free throws
Free throw rate: JKST 37.4, BAY 34.1. Allowed: JKST 41.9, BAY 30.1
Turnovers
Turnover rate: JKST 19.4%, BAY 16.2%. Forced: JKST 16.5%, BAY 15.9%
Three-pointers
JKST hits 31.4% and allows 34.8%; BAY hits 33.9% and allows 34.8%. Threes are 43.3% and 39.6% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: JKST plays 71.6 a game (50th fastest), BAY 69.3 (161st). Faster games mean more points
Home court
BAY at home. This season: BAY 0-0 at home, JKST 0-0 away
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | BAY -29.0 | — |
| Total | — | 157.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | JKST 64.1 · BAY 93 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | BAY -17.1 | — |
| 1H total | 73.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | JKST 28.2 · BAY 45.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% | |
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Jackson St
33 games played
Straight up
12-21
36% wins
Against the spread
14-19
42% covers · avg −3.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-17
48% overs · avg +4.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 55-113 | +28.5 | L −29.5 | 157.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 70-106 | +38.5 | W +2.5 | 165.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 51-68 | +8.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 66-112 | +30.5 | L −15.5 | 156.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 61-115 | +29.5 | L −24.5 | 159.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 62-80 | +10.5 | L −7.5 | 163.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 28 | @ | W 51-45 | +5.5 | W +11.5 | 136.5 | U 96 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 73-88 | +15.5 | W +0.5 | 157.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 38-80 | +40.5 | L −1.5 | 137.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 53-93 | +30.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 18 | vs | L 77-84 | +8.5 | W +1.5 | 135.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 19 | vs | L 72-82 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 140.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 64-115 | +30.5 | L −20.5 | 143.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 89-86 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 75-64 | +7.5 | W +18.5 | 153.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 12 | @ | L 91-100 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 140.5 | O 191 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 82-78 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 160.5 | U 160 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 94-89 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | O 183 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 48-85 | +8.5 | L −28.5 | 156.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 26 | @ | W 66-65 | +7.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 66-69 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 2 | vs | L 91-96 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 152.5 | O 187 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 97-81 | -8.5 | W +7.5 | 143.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 63-84 | +7.5 | L −13.5 | 155.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 80-60 | +2.5 | W +22.5 | 144.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 91-86 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 150.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 65-83 | -1.5 | L −19.5 | 149.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 76-85 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 161.5 | U 161 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 57-82 | +6.5 | L −18.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 81-78 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 85-77 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 68-65 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 139.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 60-70 | +6.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
ILL
L 55-113
−29.5
6
@
LOU
L 70-106
+2.5
15
@
LT
L 51-68
−8.5
19
@
AUB
L 66-112
−15.5
21
@
ARK
L 61-115
−24.5
23
vs
WIN
L 62-80
−7.5
28
@
UL
W 51-45
+11.5
2
@
KENN
L 73-88
+0.5
10
@
HOU
L 38-80
−1.5
13
@
NU
L 53-93
−9.5
18
vs
HAMP
L 77-84
+1.5
19
vs
NORF
L 72-82
−4.5
29
@
TCU
L 64-115
−20.5
3
vs
ALCN
W 89-86
−2.5
10
@
ALST
W 75-64
+18.5
12
@
AAMU
L 91-100
−2.5
17
vs
PV
W 82-78
+2.5
19
vs
TXSO
W 94-89
+2.5
24
@
BCU
L 48-85
−28.5
26
@
FAMU
W 66-65
+8.5
31
vs
GRAM
L 66-69
−0.5
2
vs
SOU
L 91-96
+0.5
7
@
MVSU
W 97-81
+7.5
9
@
UAPB
L 63-84
−13.5
14
vs
FAMU
W 80-60
+22.5
16
vs
BCU
W 91-86
+9.5
21
@
ALCN
L 65-83
−19.5
26
@
PV
L 76-85
−5.5
28
@
TXSO
L 57-82
−18.5
3
vs
UAPB
W 81-78
+4.5
5
vs
MVSU
W 85-77
−3.5
10
vs
GRAM
W 68-65
+10.5
11
vs
FAMU
L 60-70
−3.5
covered 14didn’t cover 19avg −3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
ILL
L 55-113
+10.5
6
@
LOU
L 70-106
+10.5
15
@
LT
L 51-68
−27.5
19
@
AUB
L 66-112
+21.5
21
@
ARK
L 61-115
+16.5
23
vs
WIN
L 62-80
−21.5
28
@
UL
W 51-45
−40.5
2
@
KENN
L 73-88
+3.5
10
@
HOU
L 38-80
−19.5
13
@
NU
L 53-93
−0.5
18
vs
HAMP
L 77-84
+25.5
19
vs
NORF
L 72-82
+13.5
29
@
TCU
L 64-115
+35.5
3
vs
ALCN
W 89-86
+29.5
10
@
ALST
W 75-64
−14.5
12
@
AAMU
L 91-100
+50.5
17
vs
PV
W 82-78
−0.5
19
vs
TXSO
W 94-89
+29.5
24
@
BCU
L 48-85
−23.5
26
@
FAMU
W 66-65
−19.5
31
vs
GRAM
L 66-69
−13.5
2
vs
SOU
L 91-96
+34.5
7
@
MVSU
W 97-81
+34.5
9
@
UAPB
L 63-84
−8.5
14
vs
FAMU
W 80-60
−4.5
16
vs
BCU
W 91-86
+26.5
21
@
ALCN
L 65-83
−1.5
26
@
PV
L 76-85
−0.5
28
@
TXSO
L 57-82
−13.5
3
vs
UAPB
W 81-78
+5.5
5
vs
MVSU
W 85-77
+17.5
10
vs
GRAM
W 68-65
−6.5
11
vs
FAMU
L 60-70
−11.5
over 16under 17avg +4.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Baylor
33 games played
Straight up
16-17
48% wins
Against the spread
14-19
42% covers · avg −1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-15
55% overs · avg +3.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 96-81 | -24.5 | L −9.5 | 154.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 78-69 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 156.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 94-81 | -23.5 | L −10.5 | 149.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 81-74 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 81-96 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 159.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 91-81 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 110-88 | -29.5 | L −7.5 | 158.5 | O 198 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 71-78 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 158.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 97-67 | -26.5 | W +3.5 | 148.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 113-56 | -35.5 | W +21.5 | 160.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 111-67 | -26.5 | W +17.5 | 169.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 63-69 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 60-70 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 155.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 55-77 | +2.5 | L −19.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 94-79 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 165.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 16 | @ | L 62-80 | +7.5 | L −10.5 | 156.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 73-92 | +1.5 | L −17.5 | 154.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 90-97 | -4.5 | L −11.5 | 147.5 | O 187 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 57-67 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 63-53 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 139.5 | U 116 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 86-67 | -7.5 | W +11.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 69-72 | +14.5 | W +11.5 | 151.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 10 | vs | L 94-99 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | O 193 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 71-82 | +7.5 | L −3.5 | 162.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 74-90 | -3.5 | L −19.5 | 159.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 73-68 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 80-87 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 155.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 87-86 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 159.5 | O 173 |
| Mar 4 | @ | L 64-77 | +12.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 101-75 | -13.5 | W +12.5 | 148.5 | O 176 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 79-83 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 152.5 | O 162 |
| Apr 1 | vs | W 67-48 | -3.5 | W +15.5 | 146.5 | U 115 |
| Apr 4 | vs | L 69-82 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 159.5 | U 151 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
RGV
W 96-81
−9.5
9
vs
WASH
W 78-69
+2.5
14
vs
TAR
W 94-81
−10.5
24
vs
CREI
W 81-74
+3.5
25
vs
SJU
L 81-96
−9.5
26
vs
SDSU
W 91-81
+7.5
2
vs
SAC
W 110-88
−7.5
6
@
MEM
L 71-78
−10.5
10
vs
NORF
W 97-67
+3.5
19
vs
ALCN
W 113-56
+21.5
21
vs
SOU
W 111-67
+17.5
3
@
TCU
L 63-69
−3.5
7
vs
ISU
L 60-70
−6.5
10
vs
HOU
L 55-77
−19.5
13
@
OKST
W 94-79
+13.5
16
@
KU
L 62-80
−10.5
20
vs
TTU
L 73-92
−17.5
24
vs
TCU
L 90-97
−11.5
28
@
CIN
L 57-67
−6.5
31
@
WVU
W 63-53
+12.5
4
vs
COLO
W 86-67
+11.5
7
@
ISU
L 69-72
+11.5
10
vs
BYU
L 94-99
−1.5
14
vs
LOU
L 71-82
−3.5
17
@
KSU
L 74-90
−19.5
21
vs
ASU
W 73-68
−3.5
24
vs
ARIZ
L 80-87
+0.5
28
@
UCF
W 87-86
+2.5
4
@
HOU
L 64-77
−0.5
7
vs
UTAH
W 101-75
+12.5
10
vs
ASU
L 79-83
−9.5
1
vs
MINN
W 67-48
+15.5
4
vs
OU
L 69-82
−14.5
covered 14didn’t cover 19avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
RGV
W 96-81
+22.5
9
vs
WASH
W 78-69
−9.5
14
vs
TAR
W 94-81
+25.5
24
vs
CREI
W 81-74
+0.5
25
vs
SJU
L 81-96
+17.5
26
vs
SDSU
W 91-81
+23.5
2
vs
SAC
W 110-88
+39.5
6
@
MEM
L 71-78
−9.5
10
vs
NORF
W 97-67
+15.5
19
vs
ALCN
W 113-56
+8.5
21
vs
SOU
W 111-67
+8.5
3
@
TCU
L 63-69
−22.5
7
vs
ISU
L 60-70
−25.5
10
vs
HOU
L 55-77
−10.5
13
@
OKST
W 94-79
+7.5
16
@
KU
L 62-80
−14.5
20
vs
TTU
L 73-92
+10.5
24
vs
TCU
L 90-97
+39.5
28
@
CIN
L 57-67
−21.5
31
@
WVU
W 63-53
−23.5
4
vs
COLO
W 86-67
−2.5
7
@
ISU
L 69-72
−10.5
10
vs
BYU
L 94-99
+34.5
14
vs
LOU
L 71-82
−9.5
17
@
KSU
L 74-90
+4.5
21
vs
ASU
W 73-68
−16.5
24
vs
ARIZ
L 80-87
+11.5
28
@
UCF
W 87-86
+13.5
4
@
HOU
L 64-77
−2.5
7
vs
UTAH
W 101-75
+27.5
10
vs
ASU
L 79-83
+9.5
1
vs
MINN
W 67-48
−31.5
4
vs
OU
L 69-82
−8.5
over 18under 15avg +3.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Baylor has the better starters
Position by position: Jackson St 1, Baylor 3, even 1
Jackson StBetterBaylor
G D. Ruffin23.3 pts · 2.8 reb · 5.3 ast
Score 98
←JKSTSmall
G B. Decker TR16.9 pts · 2.5 reb · 1 ast
Score 76
G D. McMillian11.9 pts · 4.4 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 37
→BAYBig
G K. Mingo TR13.7 pts · 3.5 reb · 4.3 ast
Score 92
G M. Williams5.5 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G I. Williams10.1 pts · 2.2 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 89
G T. Hoover5.9 pts · 3.1 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 23
→BAYBig
F I. Celiscar TR13.1 pts · 6.4 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 88
G D. Williams2.9 pts · 2.4 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 5
→BAYBig
F E. Chatman TR8.9 pts · 8.8 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 71
Jackson StBetterBaylor
JKST offense229th of 366 · -7.0
→BAYBig
BAY defense45th of 366 · +2.4
JKST defense325th of 366 · -8.4
→BAYBig
BAY offense29th of 366 · +6.5
Backcourt-2.6 · 5 players
→BAYBig
Backcourt+6.4 · 3 players
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
=No call
Frontcourt+4.0 · 2 players
Bench-5.7 · 5 players
→BAYBig
Bench+1.5 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestJKST betterBAY betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Ruffin34 minD. McMillian30 minM. Williams20 minT. Hoover20 minD. Williams17 minC. Brunt11 min · TR
Forwards
K. Butler10 minD. Kolev8 minN. WilliamsNewT. LawsonNew
Centers
E. Wilson11 minJ. Williams8 min · TR
Guards
B. Decker34 min · TRK. Mingo32 min · TRI. Williams25 minD. Perry2 minJ. Goodis1 minA. IguodalaNew
Forwards
I. Celiscar32 min · TRE. Chatman29 min · TRM. PerezNewE. WilliamsNew
Centers
C. Powell24 minJ. Bodo BodoNewM. SoyoyeNewT. MakabuNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 70.2 #281 | Points per game | 80.4 #59 |
| 0.98 #341 | Points per possession | 1.16 #51 |
| 71.6 #50 | Pace (possessions) | 69.3 #161 |
| Shooting | ||
| 45.7 #354 | Effective FG% | 53.4 #84 |
| 31.4 #311 | 3-point % | 33.9 #179 |
| 43.3 #105 | 3-point attempt rate | 39.6 #181 |
| 37.4 #117 | Free throw rate | 34.1 #202 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.4 #337 | Turnover rate | 16.2 #153 |
| 29.7 #215 | Offensive rebound rate | 36.9 #18 |
| 10.4 #352 | Assists per game | 14.8 #96 |
| Defense | ||
| 83.8 #354 | Points allowed | 76.9 #238 |
| 1.17 #344 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #248 |
| 53.0 #267 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.4 #237 |
| 34.8 #236 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.8 #240 |
| 16.5 #189 | Turnovers forced | 15.9 #226 |
| 62.8 #359 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.7 #219 |
| 6.3 #205 | Steals per game | 6.3 #198 |
| 3.0 #226 | Blocks per game | 3.9 #85 |
Jackson St
12-21 in 2025-26 overall · 11-9 in conference · Southwestern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Florida A&M60–70
- Wvs Grambling68–65
- Wvs Miss Valley St85–77
- Wvs AR-Pine Bluff81–78
- L@ Texas Southern57–82
A week or more of rest.
Baylor
16-17 in 2025-26 overall · 6-13 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Oklahoma69–82
- Wvs Minnesota67–48
- Lvs Arizona St79–83
- Wvs Utah101–75
- L@ Houston64–77
A week or more of rest.