Sojka Pavilion · at Bucknell
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | BUCK | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects AKR 81–69 · win probability AKR 86%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 149.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: AKR has more of the edges
AKR 7, BUCK 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: AKR 58.1 and allows 51.2; BUCK 48.5 and allows 54.7
Three-pointers
AKR hits 38.2% and allows 35.5%; BUCK hits 30.6% and allows 37.0%. Threes are 44.8% and 42.8% of their shots
BUCK offense vs AKR defense
Offense 317th of 366 against a defense 168th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: AKR 33.4%, BUCK 27.0%. Defensive: AKR 70.1%, BUCK 68.7%
AKR offense vs BUCK defense
Offense 101st of 366 against a defense 237th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: AKR 15.5%, BUCK 18.9%. Forced: AKR 18.3%, BUCK 17.9%
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: AKR plays 71.1 a game (70th fastest), BUCK 67.7 (242nd). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
AKR has played the 159th-hardest schedule, BUCK the 227th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: AKR 29.2, BUCK 29.8. Allowed: AKR 30.4, BUCK 35.3
Home court
BUCK at home. This season: BUCK 0-0 at home, AKR 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: AKR 28%, BUCK 39%. Transfers in: AKR 5, BUCK 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | AKR -12.1 | — |
| Total | — | 149.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | AKR 80.9 · BUCK 68.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | AKR -7.3 | — |
| 1H total | 70.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | AKR 38.7 · BUCK 31.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9-1 90% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | |
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
AKR 1–0 BUCKAKR leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · AKR 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2025-26 | BUCK 77 @ AKR 97 | AKR -23.5 | BUCK W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Akron
33 games played
Straight up
27-6
82% wins
Against the spread
17-16
52% covers · avg +1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-18
45% overs · avg +0.2 pts vs the total
Against the spread
17-1652%
2 straight misses ATS1 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 85-71 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 104-69 | -13.5 | W +21.5 | 156.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 79-97 | +18.5 | W +0.5 | 163.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 96-75 | -11.5 | W +9.5 | 173.5 | U 171 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 97-59 | -11.5 | W +26.5 | 156.5 | U 156 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 94-97 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 156.5 | O 191 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 105-81 | -12.5 | W +11.5 | 166.5 | O 186 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 97-77 | -23.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | O 174 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 88-71 | -6.5 | W +10.5 | 162.5 | U 159 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 100-115 | -4.5 | L −19.5 | 168.5 | O 215 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 93-72 | -15.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 73-76 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 177.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 82-69 | -23.5 | L −10.5 | 164.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 9 | @ | W 77-67 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 163.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 87-77 | -20.5 | L −10.5 | 152.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 104-89 | -21.5 | L −6.5 | 163.5 | O 193 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 82-63 | -8.5 | W +10.5 | 166.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 23 | @ | W 86-65 | -6.5 | W +14.5 | 167.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 91-81 | -12.5 | L −2.5 | 168.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 69-52 | -10.5 | W +6.5 | 166.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 3 | @ | W 66-64 | -12.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 69-79 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 157.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 13 | vs | W 99-92 | -12.5 | L −5.5 | 163.5 | O 191 |
| Feb 17 | @ | W 90-73 | -14.5 | W +2.5 | 160.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 20 | @ | W 78-65 | -13.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 99-85 | -15.5 | L −1.5 | 160.5 | O 184 |
| Feb 27 | @ | W 92-70 | -3.5 | W +18.5 | 166.5 | U 162 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 77-64 | -11.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 94-55 | -23.5 | W +15.5 | 155.5 | U 149 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 73-70 | -12.5 | L −9.5 | 158.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 75-68 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 163.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 79-76 | -7.5 | L −4.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
| Mar 20 | vs | L 71-91 | +6.5 | L −13.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
JMU
W 85-71
+5.5
8
vs
PRIN
W 104-69
+21.5
16
@
PUR
L 79-97
+0.5
21
vs
IONA
W 96-75
+9.5
23
vs
EVAN
W 97-59
+26.5
24
vs
YALE
L 94-97
−4.5
29
vs
MILW
W 105-81
+11.5
3
vs
BUCK
W 97-77
−3.5
6
@
TULN
W 88-71
+10.5
13
vs
MUR
L 100-115
−19.5
19
vs
EMU
W 93-72
+5.5
3
@
M-OH
L 73-76
−7.5
6
vs
CMU
W 82-69
−10.5
9
@
BGSU
W 77-67
+5.5
13
vs
BALL
W 87-77
−10.5
17
vs
WMU
W 104-89
−6.5
20
@
BUF
W 82-63
+10.5
23
@
OHIO
W 86-65
+14.5
27
vs
TOL
W 91-81
−2.5
30
vs
KENT
W 69-52
+6.5
3
@
EMU
W 66-64
−10.5
7
@
TROY
L 69-79
−12.5
13
vs
MASS
W 99-92
−5.5
17
@
WMU
W 90-73
+2.5
20
@
BALL
W 78-65
−0.5
24
vs
BUF
W 99-85
−1.5
27
@
KENT
W 92-70
+18.5
3
@
CMU
W 77-64
+1.5
6
vs
NIU
W 94-55
+15.5
12
vs
BUF
W 73-70
−9.5
13
vs
KENT
W 75-68
+0.5
14
vs
TOL
W 79-76
−4.5
20
vs
TTU
L 71-91
−13.5
covered 17didn’t cover 16avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
JMU
W 85-71
+2.5
8
vs
PRIN
W 104-69
+16.5
16
@
PUR
L 79-97
+12.5
21
vs
IONA
W 96-75
−2.5
23
vs
EVAN
W 97-59
−0.5
24
vs
YALE
L 94-97
+34.5
29
vs
MILW
W 105-81
+19.5
3
vs
BUCK
W 97-77
+16.5
6
@
TULN
W 88-71
−3.5
13
vs
MUR
L 100-115
+46.5
19
vs
EMU
W 93-72
+9.5
3
@
M-OH
L 73-76
−28.5
6
vs
CMU
W 82-69
−13.5
9
@
BGSU
W 77-67
−19.5
13
vs
BALL
W 87-77
+11.5
17
vs
WMU
W 104-89
+29.5
20
@
BUF
W 82-63
−21.5
23
@
OHIO
W 86-65
−16.5
27
vs
TOL
W 91-81
+3.5
30
vs
KENT
W 69-52
−45.5
3
@
EMU
W 66-64
−23.5
7
@
TROY
L 69-79
−9.5
13
vs
MASS
W 99-92
+27.5
17
@
WMU
W 90-73
+2.5
20
@
BALL
W 78-65
−4.5
24
vs
BUF
W 99-85
+23.5
27
@
KENT
W 92-70
−4.5
3
@
CMU
W 77-64
−17.5
6
vs
NIU
W 94-55
−6.5
12
vs
BUF
W 73-70
−15.5
13
vs
KENT
W 75-68
−20.5
14
vs
TOL
W 79-76
−2.5
20
vs
TTU
L 71-91
+7.5
over 15under 18avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Bucknell
33 games played
Straight up
10-23
30% wins
Against the spread
14-19
42% covers · avg −3.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-20
39% overs · avg +1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 78-70 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 149.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 7 | @ | W 73-62 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 143.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 63-73 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 77-83 | +4.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 50-84 | +16.5 | L −17.5 | 141.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 49-97 | +28.5 | L −19.5 | 158.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 66-71 | +10.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 71-73 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 72-101 | +5.5 | L −23.5 | 159.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 77-97 | +23.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | O 174 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 66-73 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 9 | @ | W 51-38 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 135.5 | U 89 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 39-94 | +25.5 | L −29.5 | 133.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 58-65 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 133.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 72-65 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 55-76 | +8.5 | L −12.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 70-67 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 76-69 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 137.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 76-95 | +8.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 84-87 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 62-67 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 147.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 79-81 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 138.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 103-97 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 138.5 | O 200 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 60-59 | +7.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 59-78 | +5.5 | L −13.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 9 | vs | L 60-76 | +6.5 | L −9.5 | 135.5 | O 136 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 69-82 | +5.5 | L −7.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 57-75 | +3.5 | L −14.5 | 140.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 22 | vs | L 63-72 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 75-73 | +2.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 79-89 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 138.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 65-55 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | U 120 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 69-74 | +15.5 | W +10.5 | 133.5 | O 143 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
DEL
W 78-70
+5.5
7
@
MSM
W 73-62
+12.5
11
@
PRIN
L 63-73
−5.5
14
vs
HOF
L 77-83
−1.5
17
@
PITT
L 50-84
−17.5
20
@
SJU
L 49-97
−19.5
24
vs
BGSU
L 66-71
+5.5
26
vs
BUF
L 71-73
+2.5
30
vs
COR
L 72-101
−23.5
3
@
AKR
L 77-97
+3.5
6
vs
UMBC
L 66-73
−8.5
9
@
RID
W 51-38
+10.5
20
@
IOWA
L 39-94
−29.5
31
@
HC
L 58-65
−8.5
3
vs
LEH
W 72-65
+2.5
7
@
NAVY
L 55-76
−12.5
10
vs
L-MD
W 70-67
−3.5
14
vs
LAF
W 76-69
+4.5
17
@
COLG
L 76-95
−10.5
21
vs
ARMY
L 84-87
−7.5
24
@
L-MD
L 62-67
−2.5
28
@
LAF
L 79-81
+2.5
31
vs
BU
W 103-97
+7.5
4
@
AMER
W 60-59
+8.5
7
vs
COLG
L 59-78
−13.5
9
vs
NAVY
L 60-76
−9.5
14
@
BU
L 69-82
−7.5
18
vs
AMER
L 57-75
−14.5
22
vs
HC
L 63-72
−11.5
25
@
ARMY
W 75-73
+4.5
28
@
LEH
L 79-89
−4.5
3
vs
ARMY
W 65-55
+8.5
5
@
NAVY
L 69-74
+10.5
covered 14didn’t cover 19avg −3.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
DEL
W 78-70
−1.5
7
@
MSM
W 73-62
−8.5
11
@
PRIN
L 63-73
−10.5
14
vs
HOF
L 77-83
+20.5
17
@
PITT
L 50-84
−7.5
20
@
SJU
L 49-97
−12.5
24
vs
BGSU
L 66-71
−7.5
26
vs
BUF
L 71-73
−2.5
30
vs
COR
L 72-101
+13.5
3
@
AKR
L 77-97
+16.5
6
vs
UMBC
L 66-73
−4.5
9
@
RID
W 51-38
−46.5
20
@
IOWA
L 39-94
−0.5
31
@
HC
L 58-65
−10.5
3
vs
LEH
W 72-65
−0.5
7
@
NAVY
L 55-76
−6.5
10
vs
L-MD
W 70-67
−6.5
14
vs
LAF
W 76-69
+7.5
17
@
COLG
L 76-95
+31.5
21
vs
ARMY
L 84-87
+26.5
24
@
L-MD
L 62-67
−18.5
28
@
LAF
L 79-81
+21.5
31
vs
BU
W 103-97
+61.5
4
@
AMER
W 60-59
−22.5
7
vs
COLG
L 59-78
−4.5
9
vs
NAVY
L 60-76
+0.5
14
@
BU
L 69-82
+13.5
18
vs
AMER
L 57-75
−8.5
22
vs
HC
L 63-72
−7.5
25
@
ARMY
W 75-73
+5.5
28
@
LEH
L 79-89
+29.5
3
vs
ARMY
W 65-55
−24.5
5
@
NAVY
L 69-74
+9.5
over 13under 20avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Akron has the better starters
Position by position: Akron 3, Bucknell 0, even 2
AkronBetterBucknell
G T. Staveskie TR17.3 pts · 3.6 reb · 3.9 ast
Score 74
←AKRBig
G J. Williams7.5 pts · 2.9 reb · 4 ast
Score 23
G T. Pence TR9.5 pts · 4.4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 86
←AKRBig
G A. Pachucki5.9 pts · 2.8 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 25
F E. Mahaffey9.8 pts · 5.6 reb · 3.4 ast
Score 69
=No call
G K. Marshall TR3.5 pts · 2.8 reb · 2 ast
Not ranked
F M. Burton TR5.5 pts · 5 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 14
=Even
G J. Meachem1.5 pts · 0.5 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 2
F B. Hammer TR4.1 pts · 2.8 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 55
←AKRBig
F L. Soroa Schaller TR5.6 pts · 3.4 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 13
AkronBetterBucknell
AKR offense101st of 366 · -1.1
←AKRBig
BUCK defense237th of 366 · -6.2
AKR defense168th of 366 · -3.7
←AKRBig
BUCK offense317th of 366 · -10.4
Backcourt+2.7 · 2 players
←AKRBig
Backcourt-6.2 · 4 players
Frontcourt-1.4 · 3 players
=Even
Frontcourt-2.0 · 1 player
Bench-2.6 · 4 players
→BUCKSmall
Bench-0.9 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestAKR betterBUCK betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Staveskie36 min · TRT. Pence24 min · TRC. HeadNewT. PerkinsNewJ. HendersonNewE. WilsonNew
Forwards
E. Mahaffey29 minM. Burton25 min · TRB. Hammer14 min · TRZ. Halligan12 minC. White9 min · TRM. Musiime-Kamali9 min
Guards
J. Williams33 minA. Pachucki21 minK. Marshall17 min · TRJ. Meachem10 minM. Lange3 minR. LamunoNew
Forwards
L. Soroa Schaller21 min · TRP. O'Brien10 minK. Welch2 minE. Marten-ConeyNewL. BergsengNewA. RousseauNew
Centers
D. KennardNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 86.4 #8 | Points per game | 67.4 #327 |
| 1.22 #6 | Points per possession | 0.99 #332 |
| 71.1 #70 | Pace (possessions) | 67.7 #242 |
| Shooting | ||
| 58.1 #9 | Effective FG% | 48.5 #304 |
| 38.2 #15 | 3-point % | 30.6 #328 |
| 44.8 #74 | 3-point attempt rate | 42.8 #123 |
| 29.2 #327 | Free throw rate | 29.8 #314 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.5 #104 | Turnover rate | 18.9 #319 |
| 33.4 #78 | Offensive rebound rate | 27.0 #295 |
| 17.7 #12 | Assists per game | 12.7 #235 |
| Defense | ||
| 75.0 #188 | Points allowed | 76.3 #226 |
| 1.06 #98 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #289 |
| 51.2 #173 | Opponent effective FG% | 54.7 #323 |
| 35.5 #284 | Opponent 3-point % | 37.0 #344 |
| 18.3 #86 | Turnovers forced | 17.9 #100 |
| 70.1 #156 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.7 #216 |
| 7.2 #108 | Steals per game | 7.2 #105 |
| 2.9 #240 | Blocks per game | 1.8 #354 |
Akron
27-6 in 2025-26 overall · 20-1 in conference · Mid-American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Texas Tech71–91
- Wvs Toledo79–76
- Wvs Kent State75–68
- Wvs Buffalo73–70
- Wvs N Illinois94–55
A week or more of rest.
Bucknell
10-23 in 2025-26 overall · 7-13 in conference · Patriot League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Navy69–74
- Wvs Army65–55
- L@ Lehigh79–89
- W@ Army75–73
- Lvs Holy Cross63–72
A week or more of rest.