Denver Pioneers at Wisconsin Badgers: Model Line and Edge

Mon, Nov 2, 7:30 PM ETKohl Center · at Wisconsin

LineWIS -23.5moved 1 toward WIS

Total159.5no move

Season records: Denver and Wisconsin
DEN	This season	WIS
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects WIS 91–67 · win probability WIS 99%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Spread

Total

Winner

Line

WIS -23.5

moved 1 toward WIS

Total

159.5

model 157.9 · Under by 1.5

Model edge

WIS by 1.5

model vs market

Public

—

No split yet for this game

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: WIS has more of the edges

DEN 0, WIS 8 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

WISBig

WIS offense vs DEN defense

Offense 44th of 366 against a defense 337th, on the model’s ratings

Context

Schedule so far

DEN has played the 249th-hardest schedule, WIS the 24th. A record against a soft schedule means less

WISBig

DEN offense vs WIS defense

Offense 184th of 366 against a defense 40th, on the model’s ratings

WISSmall

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: DEN 29.8%, WIS 29.1%. Defensive: DEN 67.2%, WIS 71.8%

WISSmall

Shooting

Effective FG%: DEN 53.6 and allows 56.0; WIS 54.5 and allows 51.4

WISSmall

Three-pointers

DEN hits 36.8% and allows 36.7%; WIS hits 36.2% and allows 33.5%. Threes are 38.6% and 52.1% of their shots

WISSmall

Free throws

Free throw rate: DEN 34.1, WIS 31.5. Allowed: DEN 36.8, WIS 29.9

WISSmall

Home court

WIS at home. This season: WIS 0-0 at home, DEN 0-0 away

WISSmall

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: DEN 27%, WIS 54%. Transfers in: DEN 6, WIS 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Even

Turnovers

Turnover rate: DEN 14.2%, WIS 12.8%. Forced: DEN 13.0%, WIS 14.3%

Context

Tempo

About 70 possessions: DEN plays 69.4 a game (151st fastest), WIS 70.0 (119th). Faster games mean more points

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

How games like this went

Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines

Situation	Games	Favorite won	Favorite covered	Went over
Home favorites of 20 or more	1165	99%	50%	52%
Non-conference games at this spread	1090	99%	50%	52%
Lines that moved 1+ toward the favorite	6763	75%	50%	51%
Games with a total of 155 to 159.5	1555	74%	51%	49%

A bet at standard prices needs 52.4% to break even, and most situations sit near 50%. Past rates, not a prediction.

Market

Open → current

Spread

OpenWIS -22.5

1 → WIS

NowWIS -23.5

1 pt toward WIS

Total

Open159.5

no move

Now159.5

No change since the open

Moneyline

DEN +2200 · WIS -10000

Line movement

Median of 8 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot

Opened WIS -22.5 · now WIS -23.5 · moved 1 toward WISmodel WIS -25

model WIS -25

Openline modelNow

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Public betting

Share of bets and of money

Over 159.5TotalUnder 159.5

Bets

40%60%

Money

40%60%

DENWinner

WIS

Bets

98%

Money

99%

Sports Betting Dime, an average of sportsbooks. Read Mon, Nov 2, 4:41 AM ET. ⓘ

Books

8 sportsbooks · current prices

SpreadTotalMoneyline

Book	Spread		Total		Moneyline
Book	DEN	WIS	Over	Under	DEN	WIS
BetMGMMGM	-23.5-105	+23.5-115	159.5-110	159.5-110	+2200	-10000
BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag	-23-102	+23-118	159.5-115	159.5-105	—	—
BetRiversBetRivers	-23.5-112	+23.5-112	159.5-113	159.5-110	—	—
BetUSBetUS	-23+100	+23-120	159.5-115	159.5-105	—	—
BovadaBovada	-22.5-105	+22.5-115	159.5-110	159.5-110	+1600	-10000
DraftKingsDK	-23.5-115	+23.5-105	159.5-112	159.5-108	+2200	-8000
FanDuelFD	-24.5-114	+24.5-106	159.5-110	159.5-110	+3000	-10000
LowVig.agLowVig.ag	-23+102	+23-114	159.5-113	159.5-103	—	—

Prices from The Odds API, updated 5:30 AM ET. Green = best price in the column.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	WIS -23.5	WIS -25.0	WIS +1.5
Total	159.5	157.9	Under 1.6
Projected score	—	DEN 66.5 · WIS 91.4

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	WIS -14.7	—
1H total	73.8	—
1H projected score	DEN 29.5 · WIS 44.3	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
DEN LWWLL	18-11	62%	12-5	13-4
WIS WLWWL	21-14	60%	11-6	14-10

Venue/role: DEN away, as underdog; WIS home, as favorite. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
DEN UUUOU	20-9	69%	12-17
WIS OOOUO	22-13	63%	24-11

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
DEN	6-4 60%	6-4 60%	3-7 30%
WIS	6-4 60%	6-4 60%	7-3 70%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

Denver

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 7	@ UCR	No recent meeting
Nov 14	vs WYO	L59–101LO
Nov 21	@ EMU	No recent meeting

Wisconsin

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 6	vs DEL	No recent meeting
Nov 10	vs FAIR	No recent meeting
Nov 15	vs CCU	No recent meeting

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

Denver

29 games played

Straight up

12-17

41% wins

Against the spread

18-11

62% covers · avg +1.2 pts vs the line

Over / Under

20-9

69% overs · avg +6.9 pts vs the total

Straight up

12-1741%

L L W L W L L W L L W L W L L L W L L W L W W W L W W L L

2 straight losses2 of last 4 won

Against the spread

18-1162%

W W W L W W L W L L W W W W W L W L L W L W W W L W W L L

2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

20-969%

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U O U O U O U O U U U U O U

1 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	@SEA	L 73-84	+13.5	W +2.5	136.5	O 157
Nov 6	@WASH	L 70-84	+27.5	W +13.5	153.5	O 154
Nov 9	@MTST	W 75-73	+7.5	W +9.5	146.5	O 148
Nov 15	vsUTSA	L 79-84	-4.5	L −9.5	148.5	O 163
Nov 21	@CSU	W 83-81	+18.5	W +20.5	149.5	O 164
Nov 24	@ARIZ	L 73-103	+32.5	W +2.5	154.5	O 176
Nov 26	@WYO	L 59-101	+9.5	L −32.5	153.5	O 160
Dec 3	vsEWU	W 93-89	-1.5	W +2.5	155.5	O 182
Dec 6	@IDST	L 79-93	+8.5	L −5.5	142.5	O 172
Dec 13	vsCSUF	L 86-105	-3.5	L −22.5	165.5	O 191
Dec 20	@UNCO	W 86-79	+8.5	W +15.5	159.5	O 165
Dec 22	@TLSA	L 85-90	+16.5	W +11.5	160.5	O 175
Dec 31	vsKC	W 87-74	-9.5	W +3.5	156.5	O 161
Jan 4	@STMN	L 88-92	+11.5	W +7.5	163.5	O 180
Jan 8	@SDST	L 79-87	+8.5	W +0.5	162.5	O 166
Jan 10	@SDAK	L 72-82	-1.5	L −11.5	169.5	U 154
Jan 14	vsORU	W 98-87	-6.5	W +4.5	156.5	O 185
Jan 22	vsNDSU	L 77-82	+4.5	L −0.5	160.5	U 159
Jan 24	vsUND	L 86-93	-5.5	L −12.5	162.5	O 179
Jan 28	@KC	W 69-61	-3.5	W +4.5	161.5	U 130
Jan 31	vsOMA	L 82-84	-1.5	L −3.5	158.5	O 166
Feb 5	@NDSU	W 78-71	+12.5	W +19.5	156.5	U 149
Feb 7	@UND	W 98-79	+3.5	W +22.5	161.5	O 177
Feb 12	vsSDST	W 79-61	+2.5	W +20.5	160.5	U 140
Feb 15	@OMA	L 76-83	+2.5	L −4.5	160.5	U 159
Feb 19	vsSDAK	W 90-70	-5.5	W +14.5	163.5	U 160
Feb 21	vsSTMN	W 82-80	+3.5	W +5.5	168.5	U 162
Feb 26	@ORU	L 80-102	-2.5	L −24.5	156.5	O 182
Mar 6	vsUND	L 67-83	-2.5	L −18.5	160.5	U 150

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

SEA

L 73-84

+2.5

WASH

L 70-84

+13.5

MTST

W 75-73

+9.5

UTSA

L 79-84

−9.5

CSU

W 83-81

+20.5

ARIZ

L 73-103

+2.5

WYO

L 59-101

−32.5

EWU

W 93-89

+2.5

IDST

L 79-93

−5.5

CSUF

L 86-105

−22.5

UNCO

W 86-79

+15.5

TLSA

L 85-90

+11.5

W 87-74

+3.5

STMN

L 88-92

+7.5

SDST

L 79-87

+0.5

SDAK

L 72-82

−11.5

ORU

W 98-87

+4.5

NDSU

L 77-82

−0.5

UND

L 86-93

−12.5

W 69-61

+4.5

OMA

L 82-84

−3.5

NDSU

W 78-71

+19.5

UND

W 98-79

+22.5

SDST

W 79-61

+20.5

OMA

L 76-83

−4.5

SDAK

W 90-70

+14.5

STMN

W 82-80

+5.5

ORU

L 80-102

−24.5

UND

L 67-83

−18.5

covered 18didn’t cover 11avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

SEA

L 73-84

+20.5

WASH

L 70-84

+0.5

MTST

W 75-73

+1.5

UTSA

L 79-84

+14.5

CSU

W 83-81

+14.5

ARIZ

L 73-103

+21.5

WYO

L 59-101

+6.5

EWU

W 93-89

+26.5

IDST

L 79-93

+29.5

CSUF

L 86-105

+25.5

UNCO

W 86-79

+5.5

TLSA

L 85-90

+14.5

W 87-74

+4.5

STMN

L 88-92

+16.5

SDST

L 79-87

+3.5

SDAK

L 72-82

−15.5

ORU

W 98-87

+28.5

NDSU

L 77-82

−1.5

UND

L 86-93

+16.5

W 69-61

−31.5

OMA

L 82-84

+7.5

NDSU

W 78-71

−7.5

UND

W 98-79

+15.5

SDST

W 79-61

−20.5

OMA

L 76-83

−1.5

SDAK

W 90-70

−3.5

STMN

W 82-80

−6.5

ORU

L 80-102

+25.5

UND

L 67-83

−10.5

over 20under 9avg +6.9 ptslonger = bigger margin

Wisconsin

35 games played

Straight up

24-11

69% wins

Against the spread

21-14

60% covers · avg +1.3 pts vs the line

Over / Under

22-13

63% overs · avg +3.5 pts vs the total

Straight up

24-1169%

W W W W L W L W W L L W W L W W W W W L W W L W W L W L W W W W W L L

2 straight losses2 of last 4 won

Against the spread

21-1460%

W L W L L W L W W L L W W L W W W L W L L W W W W L W L W W W L W W L

2 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

22-1363%

O O U O O O U O O U U U U O U O O O O U U O U O O U O O O U O O O U O

3 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	vsCAM	W 96-64	-20.5	W +11.5	151.5	O 160
Nov 7	vsNIU	W 97-72	-28.5	L −3.5	157.5	O 169
Nov 11	vsBALL	W 86-55	-26.5	W +4.5	156.5	U 141
Nov 17	vsSIUE	W 94-69	-25.5	L −0.5	146.5	O 163
Nov 21	@BYU	L 70-98	+4.5	L −23.5	165.5	O 168
Nov 27	vsPROV	W 104-83	-6.5	W +14.5	166.5	O 187
Nov 28	vsTCU	L 63-74	-5.5	L −16.5	157.5	U 137
Dec 3	vsNU	W 85-73	-10.5	W +1.5	155.5	O 158
Dec 6	vsMARQ	W 96-76	-11.5	W +8.5	160.5	O 172
Dec 10	@NEB	L 60-90	+1.5	L −28.5	158.5	U 150
Dec 19	vsVILL	L 66-76	-3.5	L −13.5	152.5	U 142
Dec 22	vsCMU	W 88-61	-26.5	W +0.5	152.5	U 149
Dec 30	vsMILW	W 80-60	-19.5	W +0.5	157.5	U 140
Jan 3	vsPUR	L 73-89	+5.5	L −10.5	153.5	O 162
Jan 6	vsUCLA	W 80-72	-3.5	W +4.5	152.5	U 152
Jan 10	@MICH	W 91-88	+19.5	W +22.5	169.5	O 179
Jan 13	@MINN	W 78-75	-1.5	W +1.5	146.5	O 153
Jan 17	vsRUTG	W 96-87	-15.5	L −6.5	149.5	O 183
Jan 22	@PSU	W 98-71	-5.5	W +21.5	157.5	O 169
Jan 25	vsUSC	L 71-73	-7.5	L −9.5	158.5	U 144
Jan 28	vsMINN	W 67-63	-9.5	L −5.5	146.5	U 130
Jan 31	vsOSU	W 92-82	-4.5	W +5.5	155.5	O 174
Feb 7	@IU	L 77-78	+3.5	W +2.5	157.5	U 155
Feb 10	@ILL	W 92-90	+9.5	W +11.5	153.5	O 182
Feb 13	vsMSU	W 92-71	+1.5	W +22.5	149.5	O 163
Feb 17	@OSU	L 69-86	+1.5	L −15.5	157.5	U 155
Feb 22	vsIOWA	W 84-71	-2.5	W +10.5	147.5	O 155
Feb 25	@ORE	L 71-85	-5.5	L −19.5	152.5	O 156
Feb 28	@WASH	W 90-73	-1.5	W +15.5	153.5	O 163
Mar 4	vsMD	W 78-45	-14.5	W +18.5	153.5	U 123
Mar 7	@PUR	W 97-93	+9.5	W +13.5	154.5	O 190
Mar 12	vsWASH	W 85-82	-6.5	L −3.5	157.5	O 167
Mar 13	vsILL	W 91-88	+8.5	W +11.5	158.5	O 179
Mar 14	vsMICH	L 65-68	+12.5	W +9.5	161.5	U 133
Mar 19	vsHPU	L 82-83	-10.5	L −11.5	161.5	O 165

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

CAM

W 96-64

+11.5

NIU

W 97-72

−3.5

BALL

W 86-55

+4.5

SIUE

W 94-69

−0.5

BYU

L 70-98

−23.5

PROV

W 104-83

+14.5

TCU

L 63-74

−16.5

W 85-73

+1.5

MARQ

W 96-76

+8.5

NEB

L 60-90

−28.5

VILL

L 66-76

−13.5

CMU

W 88-61

+0.5

MILW

W 80-60

+0.5

PUR

L 73-89

−10.5

UCLA

W 80-72

+4.5

MICH

W 91-88

+22.5

MINN

W 78-75

+1.5

RUTG

W 96-87

−6.5

PSU

W 98-71

+21.5

USC

L 71-73

−9.5

MINN

W 67-63

−5.5

OSU

W 92-82

+5.5

L 77-78

+2.5

ILL

W 92-90

+11.5

MSU

W 92-71

+22.5

OSU

L 69-86

−15.5

IOWA

W 84-71

+10.5

ORE

L 71-85

−19.5

WASH

W 90-73

+15.5

W 78-45

+18.5

PUR

W 97-93

+13.5

WASH

W 85-82

−3.5

ILL

W 91-88

+11.5

MICH

L 65-68

+9.5

HPU

L 82-83

−11.5

covered 21didn’t cover 14avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

CAM

W 96-64

+8.5

NIU

W 97-72

+11.5

BALL

W 86-55

−15.5

SIUE

W 94-69

+16.5

BYU

L 70-98

+2.5

PROV

W 104-83

+20.5

TCU

L 63-74

−20.5

W 85-73

+2.5

MARQ

W 96-76

+11.5

NEB

L 60-90

−8.5

VILL

L 66-76

−10.5

CMU

W 88-61

−3.5

MILW

W 80-60

−17.5

PUR

L 73-89

+8.5

UCLA

W 80-72

−0.5

MICH

W 91-88

+9.5

MINN

W 78-75

+6.5

RUTG

W 96-87

+33.5

PSU

W 98-71

+11.5

USC

L 71-73

−14.5

MINN

W 67-63

−16.5

OSU

W 92-82

+18.5

L 77-78

−2.5

ILL

W 92-90

+28.5

MSU

W 92-71

+13.5

OSU

L 69-86

−2.5

IOWA

W 84-71

+7.5

ORE

L 71-85

+3.5

WASH

W 90-73

+9.5

W 78-45

−30.5

PUR

W 97-93

+35.5

WASH

W 85-82

+9.5

ILL

W 91-88

+20.5

MICH

L 65-68

−28.5

HPU

L 82-83

+3.5

over 22under 13avg +3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

Wisconsin has the better starters

Position by position: Denver 0, Wisconsin 4, even 1

DenverBetterWisconsin

G C. Johnson19.9 pts · 1.9 reb · 2.9 ast Score 73

Even

G E. Elmer TR12.8 pts · 6.1 reb · 1.1 ast Score 68

G K. Martin TR5.3 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.7 ast Score 24

WISBig

G T. Autry TR10.9 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.4 ast Score 61

G C. Hyland TR5 pts · 1.3 reb · 1 ast Score 20

WISBig

G B. Carrington8.3 pts · 2.4 reb · 1.1 ast Score 90

F J. Rogers TR5.7 pts · 5.2 reb · 2.2 ast Score 27

WISBig

F N. Winter13.1 pts · 8.5 reb · 1.5 ast Score 96

F S. Wysocki5.8 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.7 ast Score 14

WISBig

F A. Rapp9.7 pts · 4 reb · 1.6 ast Score 83

DenverBetterWisconsin

DEN offense184th of 366 · -5.7

WISBig

WIS defense40th of 366 · +2.9

DEN defense337th of 366 · -8.9

WISBig

WIS offense44th of 366 · +4.5

Backcourt-1.7 · 3 players

WISBig

Backcourt+2.0 · 3 players

Frontcourt-3.3 · 2 players

WISBig

Frontcourt+6.7 · 2 players

Bench-2.4 · 3 players

Even

Bench-2.6 · 5 players

Score, worst to bestDEN betterWIS betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

Denver

Guards

C. Johnson36 minK. Martin16 min · TRC. Hyland15 min · TRT. Cady11 min · TRL. ThreattNewJ. NelsonNew

Forwards

J. Rogers27 min · TRS. Wysocki19 minS. Mahoney5 min · TRH. BatesNewC. DimmockNewO. Wickstrom StumerNew

Centers

B. Mbengue9 min · TR

Wisconsin

Guards

E. Elmer31 min · TRT. Autry29 min · TRB. Carrington18 minJ. Janicki17 minH. Jones7 minZ. Kinziger6 min

Forwards

N. Winter31 minA. Rapp23 minV. Onuetu18 min · TRW. Garlock7 minI. RiddleNew

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

DEN80.3 #61

WIS83.0 #28

Points per possession

DEN1.16 #53

WIS1.18 #27

Pace (possessions)

DEN69.4 #151

WIS70.0 #119

Shooting

Effective FG%

DEN53.6 #79

WIS54.5 #52

3-point %

DEN36.8 #32

WIS36.2 #50

3-point attempt rate

DEN38.6 #199

WIS52.1 #6

Free throw rate

DEN34.1 #203

WIS31.5 #267

Possessions

Turnover rate

DEN14.2 #30

WIS12.8 #4

Offensive rebound rate

DEN29.8 #213

WIS29.1 #232

Assists per game

DEN11.2 #327

WIS16.0 #48

Defense

Points allowed

DEN84.0 #357

WIS76.1 #221

Points allowed per possession

DEN1.21 #360

WIS1.09 #193

Opponent effective FG%

DEN56.0 #344

WIS51.4 #178

Opponent 3-point %

DEN36.7 #338

WIS33.5 #152

Turnovers forced

DEN13.0 #355

WIS14.3 #327

Defensive rebound rate

DEN67.2 #291

WIS71.8 #74

Steals per game

DEN4.5 #356

WIS5.6 #287

Blocks per game

DEN1.9 #348

WIS3.1 #198

DEN		WIS
Scoring
80.3 #61	Points per game	83.0 #28
1.16 #53	Points per possession	1.18 #27
69.4 #151	Pace (possessions)	70.0 #119
Shooting
53.6 #79	Effective FG%	54.5 #52
36.8 #32	3-point %	36.2 #50
38.6 #199	3-point attempt rate	52.1 #6
34.1 #203	Free throw rate	31.5 #267
Possessions
14.2 #30	Turnover rate	12.8 #4
29.8 #213	Offensive rebound rate	29.1 #232
11.2 #327	Assists per game	16.0 #48
Defense
84.0 #357	Points allowed	76.1 #221
1.21 #360	Points allowed per possession	1.09 #193
56.0 #344	Opponent effective FG%	51.4 #178
36.7 #338	Opponent 3-point %	33.5 #152
13.0 #355	Turnovers forced	14.3 #327
67.2 #291	Defensive rebound rate	71.8 #74
4.5 #356	Steals per game	5.6 #287
1.9 #348	Blocks per game	3.1 #198

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Denver

12-17 in 2025-26 overall · 8-9 in conference · West Coast Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs North Dakota67–83
L@ Oral Roberts80–102
Wvs St Thomas82–80
Wvs South Dakota90–70
L@ Omaha76–83

A week or more of rest.

Wisconsin

24-11 in 2025-26 overall · 16-7 in conference · Big Ten Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs High Point82–83
Lvs Michigan65–68
Wvs Illinois91–88
Wvs Washington85–82
W@ Purdue97–93

A week or more of rest.