State Farm Center · at Illinois
Line
ILL -37.5moved 2 toward FDU
Total153.5up 1 from 152.5
| This season | ILL | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ILL 97–50 · win probability ILL 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Spread
Total
Winner
Line
ILL -37.5
moved 2 toward FDU
Total
153.5
model 147.1 · Under by 6.5
Model edge
ILL by 9
a gap this big often means news the model can’t see
Public on the spread
85% FDU
81% of the money
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ILL has more of the edges
FDU 0, ILL 9 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
FDU offense vs ILL defense
Offense 356th of 366 against a defense 8th, on the model’s ratings
ILL offense vs FDU defense
Offense 3rd of 366 against a defense 320th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: FDU 47.1 and allows 55.2; ILL 54.7 and allows 47.3
Context
Schedule so far
FDU has played the 308th-hardest schedule, ILL the 18th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
FDU hits 30.3% and allows 37.8%; ILL hits 34.5% and allows 31.3%. Threes are 45.2% and 49.7% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: FDU 32.8, ILL 33.2. Allowed: FDU 36.3, ILL 19.7
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: FDU 32.0%, ILL 39.2%. Defensive: FDU 72.7%, ILL 73.3%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: FDU 27%, ILL 63%. Transfers in: FDU 3, ILL 1. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Turnovers
Turnover rate: FDU 18.2%, ILL 13.1%. Forced: FDU 16.1%, ILL 11.6%
Home court
ILL at home. This season: ILL 0-0 at home, FDU 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 65 possessions: FDU plays 64.4 a game (356th fastest), ILL 66.5 (292nd). Faster games mean more points
How games like this went
Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines
| Situation | Games | Favorite won | Favorite covered | Went over |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home favorites of 20 or more | 1165 | 99% | 50% | 52% |
| Non-conference games at this spread | 1090 | 99% | 50% | 52% |
| Lines that moved 1+ toward the underdog | 4513 | 74% | 51% | 50% |
| Games with a total of 150 to 154.5 | 2755 | 75% | 51% | 50% |
Market
Open → current
Spread
OpenILL -39.5
2 → FDU
NowILL -37.5
2 pts toward FDU
Total
Open152.5
▲ 1
Now153.5
Up 1 since the open
Moneyline
FDU +8000 · ILL -100000
Line movement
Median of 6 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot
Opened ILL -39.5 · now ILL -37.5 · moved 2.5 toward FDUmodel ILL -46.5
model ILL -46.5
Opened 152.5 · now 153.5 · moved 1 upmodel 147
model 147
Openline modelNow
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Public betting
Share of bets and of money
Bets
Money
Over 153.5TotalUnder 153.5
Bets
Money
Money leans Over 153.5 · 67 pts more of the money than of the bets
Books
6 sportsbooks · current prices
| Book | Spread | Total | Moneyline | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDU | ILL | Over | Under | FDU | ILL | |
| BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag | -37-115 | +37-105 | 153.5-115 | 153.5-105 | — | — |
| BetRiversBetRivers | -38.5-113 | +38.5-113 | 152.5-112 | 152.5-114 | — | — |
| BovadaBovada | -37-115 | +37-105 | 153.5-115 | 153.5-105 | — | — |
| DraftKingsDK | -37.5-108 | +37.5-112 | 153.5-110 | 153.5-110 | — | — |
| FanDuelFD | -38.5-110 | +38.5-110 | 152.5-115 | 152.5-105 | +8000 | -100000 |
| LowVig.agLowVig.ag | -37-111 | +37-101 | 153.5-113 | 153.5-103 | — | — |
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | ILL -37.5 | ILL -46.4 | ILL +8.9 |
| Total | 153.5 | 147.1 | Under 6.4 |
| Projected score | — | FDU 50.4 · ILL 96.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ILL -27.5 | — |
| 1H total | 68.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | FDU 20.7 · ILL 48.1 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 2-8 20% | 3-7 30% | |
| 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
FDU 0–1 ILLILL leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · FDU 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2023-24 | FDU 71 @ ILL 104 | ILL -25.5 | ILL W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
FDU
29 games played
Straight up
8-21
28% wins
Against the spread
10-19
34% covers · avg −1.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
10-19
34% overs · avg −2.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 50-88 | +37.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 83-93 | +6.5 | L −3.5 | 137.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 58-93 | +31.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 81-93 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 65-70 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 73-81 | -4.5 | L −12.5 | 152.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 64-94 | +26.5 | L −3.5 | 162.5 | U 158 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 54-75 | +11.5 | L −9.5 | 141.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 61-72 | +16.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 43-60 | +25.5 | W +8.5 | 139.5 | U 103 |
| Jan 2 | @ | W 74-67 | +5.5 | W +12.5 | 133.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 82-85 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 70-63 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 55-65 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 130.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 59-66 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 68-61 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 137.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 23 | @ | W 76-66 | +7.5 | W +17.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 26 | vs | L 74-87 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 57-58 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 131.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 72-75 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 133.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 74-58 | -1.5 | W +14.5 | 130.5 | O 132 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 55-52 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 131.5 | U 107 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 66-59 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 57-63 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 133.5 | U 120 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 60-59 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 131.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 77-84 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 123.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 59-76 | +4.5 | L −12.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 60-74 | +9.5 | L −4.5 | 137.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 4 | @ | L 61-70 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 131.5 | U 131 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
ISU
L 50-88
−0.5
8
@
SPU
L 83-93
−3.5
12
@
TEX
L 58-93
−3.5
15
@
NJIT
L 81-93
−9.5
24
vs
ETAM
L 65-70
−1.5
26
vs
ARMY
L 73-81
−12.5
2
@
PROV
L 64-94
−3.5
10
@
FOR
L 54-75
−9.5
22
@
BC
L 61-72
+5.5
29
@
MINN
L 43-60
+8.5
2
@
MERC
W 74-67
+12.5
4
@
SFPA
L 82-85
−5.5
8
vs
CHST
W 70-63
+2.5
10
@
NHVN
L 55-65
−8.5
17
vs
LIU
L 59-66
+0.5
19
vs
WAG
W 68-61
+4.5
23
@
CCSU
W 76-66
+17.5
26
vs
LEM
L 74-87
−14.5
29
@
STO
L 57-58
+1.5
31
@
WAG
L 72-75
−1.5
5
vs
STO
W 74-58
+14.5
7
vs
MERC
W 55-52
+0.5
12
vs
SFPA
W 66-59
−0.5
14
vs
CCSU
L 57-63
−7.5
19
@
CHST
W 60-59
−0.5
21
vs
NHVN
L 77-84
−9.5
26
@
LEM
L 59-76
−12.5
28
@
LIU
L 60-74
−4.5
4
@
MERC
L 61-70
−5.5
covered 10didn’t cover 19avg −1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
ISU
L 50-88
−9.5
8
@
SPU
L 83-93
+38.5
12
@
TEX
L 58-93
−7.5
15
@
NJIT
L 81-93
+27.5
24
vs
ETAM
L 65-70
−14.5
26
vs
ARMY
L 73-81
+1.5
2
@
PROV
L 64-94
−4.5
10
@
FOR
L 54-75
−12.5
22
@
BC
L 61-72
−8.5
29
@
MINN
L 43-60
−36.5
2
@
MERC
W 74-67
+7.5
4
@
SFPA
L 82-85
+23.5
8
vs
CHST
W 70-63
−10.5
10
@
NHVN
L 55-65
−10.5
17
vs
LIU
L 59-66
−18.5
19
vs
WAG
W 68-61
−8.5
23
@
CCSU
W 76-66
+1.5
26
vs
LEM
L 74-87
+21.5
29
@
STO
L 57-58
−16.5
31
@
WAG
L 72-75
+13.5
5
vs
STO
W 74-58
+1.5
7
vs
MERC
W 55-52
−24.5
12
vs
SFPA
W 66-59
−16.5
14
vs
CCSU
L 57-63
−13.5
19
@
CHST
W 60-59
−12.5
21
vs
NHVN
L 77-84
+37.5
26
@
LEM
L 59-76
−4.5
28
@
LIU
L 60-74
−3.5
4
@
MERC
L 61-70
−0.5
over 10under 19avg −2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Illinois
37 games played
Straight up
28-9
76% wins
Against the spread
22-15
59% covers · avg +2.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-22
41% overs · avg −1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 113-55 | -28.5 | W +29.5 | 157.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 113-70 | -29.5 | W +13.5 | 160.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 81-77 | -3.5 | W +0.5 | 168.5 | U 158 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 84-65 | -30.5 | L −11.5 | 164.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 19 | vs | L 86-90 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 180.5 | U 176 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 98-58 | -34.5 | W +5.5 | 160.5 | U 156 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 87-73 | -33.5 | L −19.5 | 164.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 61-74 | +4.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 75-62 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 149.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 9 | @ | W 88-80 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 80-83 | -9.5 | L −12.5 | 156.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 91-48 | -8.5 | W +34.5 | 153.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 90-55 | -33.5 | W +1.5 | 163.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 73-65 | -14.5 | L −6.5 | 156.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 81-55 | -22.5 | W +3.5 | 149.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 11 | @ | W 75-69 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 79-68 | -9.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 77-67 | -15.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 89-70 | -18.5 | W +0.5 | 152.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 88-82 | +5.5 | W +11.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 75-66 | -12.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 78-69 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 154.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 84-44 | -16.5 | W +23.5 | 149.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 82-85 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 142.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 10 | vs | L 90-92 | -9.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | O 182 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 71-51 | -8.5 | W +11.5 | 153.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 101-65 | -8.5 | W +27.5 | 151.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 94-95 | -6.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | O 189 |
| Feb 27 | vs | L 70-84 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 159.5 | U 154 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 80-54 | -17.5 | W +8.5 | 147.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 8 | @ | W 78-72 | -14.5 | L −8.5 | 145.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 88-91 | -8.5 | L −11.5 | 158.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 19 | vs | W 105-70 | -25.5 | W +9.5 | 150.5 | O 175 |
| Mar 21 | vs | W 76-55 | -12.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 26 | vs | W 65-55 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 141.5 | U 120 |
| Mar 28 | vs | W 71-59 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 138.5 | U 130 |
| Apr 4 | vs | L 62-71 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | U 133 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
JKST
W 113-55
+29.5
7
vs
FGCU
W 113-70
+13.5
11
vs
TTU
W 81-77
+0.5
14
vs
COLG
W 84-65
−11.5
19
vs
ALA
L 86-90
−6.5
22
vs
LIU
W 98-58
+5.5
24
vs
RGV
W 87-73
−19.5
28
vs
CONN
L 61-74
−8.5
6
vs
TENN
W 75-62
+14.5
9
@
OSU
W 88-80
+4.5
13
vs
NEB
L 80-83
−12.5
22
vs
MIZ
W 91-48
+34.5
29
vs
SOU
W 90-55
+1.5
3
@
PSU
W 73-65
−6.5
8
vs
RUTG
W 81-55
+3.5
11
@
IOWA
W 75-69
+4.5
14
@
NU
W 79-68
+1.5
17
vs
MINN
W 77-67
−5.5
21
vs
MD
W 89-70
+0.5
24
@
PUR
W 88-82
+11.5
29
vs
WASH
W 75-66
−3.5
1
@
NEB
W 78-69
+10.5
4
vs
NU
W 84-44
+23.5
7
@
MSU
L 82-85
−1.5
10
vs
WIS
L 90-92
−11.5
15
vs
IU
W 71-51
+11.5
18
@
USC
W 101-65
+27.5
21
@
UCLA
L 94-95
−7.5
27
vs
MICH
L 70-84
−12.5
3
vs
ORE
W 80-54
+8.5
8
@
MD
W 78-72
−8.5
13
vs
WIS
L 88-91
−11.5
19
vs
PENN
W 105-70
+9.5
21
vs
VCU
W 76-55
+8.5
26
vs
HOU
W 65-55
+12.5
28
vs
IOWA
W 71-59
+5.5
4
vs
CONN
L 62-71
−10.5
covered 22didn’t cover 15avg +2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
JKST
W 113-55
+10.5
7
vs
FGCU
W 113-70
+22.5
11
vs
TTU
W 81-77
−10.5
14
vs
COLG
W 84-65
−15.5
19
vs
ALA
L 86-90
−4.5
22
vs
LIU
W 98-58
−4.5
24
vs
RGV
W 87-73
−4.5
28
vs
CONN
L 61-74
−15.5
6
vs
TENN
W 75-62
−12.5
9
@
OSU
W 88-80
+5.5
13
vs
NEB
L 80-83
+6.5
22
vs
MIZ
W 91-48
−14.5
29
vs
SOU
W 90-55
−18.5
3
@
PSU
W 73-65
−18.5
8
vs
RUTG
W 81-55
−13.5
11
@
IOWA
W 75-69
+1.5
14
@
NU
W 79-68
−4.5
17
vs
MINN
W 77-67
+1.5
21
vs
MD
W 89-70
+6.5
24
@
PUR
W 88-82
+17.5
29
vs
WASH
W 75-66
−12.5
1
@
NEB
W 78-69
−7.5
4
vs
NU
W 84-44
−21.5
7
@
MSU
L 82-85
+24.5
10
vs
WIS
L 90-92
+28.5
15
vs
IU
W 71-51
−31.5
18
@
USC
W 101-65
+14.5
21
@
UCLA
L 94-95
+42.5
27
vs
MICH
L 70-84
−5.5
3
vs
ORE
W 80-54
−13.5
8
@
MD
W 78-72
+4.5
13
vs
WIS
L 88-91
+20.5
19
vs
PENN
W 105-70
+24.5
21
vs
VCU
W 76-55
−20.5
26
vs
HOU
W 65-55
−21.5
28
vs
IOWA
W 71-59
−8.5
4
vs
CONN
L 62-71
−6.5
over 15under 22avg −1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Illinois has the better starters
Position by position: FDU 0, Illinois 4, even 1
FDUBetterIllinois
G D. Jevtic6.6 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 25
→ILLBig
G S. Vaaks TR15.8 pts · 2.5 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 86
G R. Johnson4.3 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 10
→ILLBig
G A. Stojakovic13.5 pts · 4.5 reb · 1 ast
Score 95
G R. Elijah Godbolt1 pts · 0.7 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 1
→ILLBig
F D. Mirkovic13.3 pts · 8 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 94
F P. Stosic TR3.3 pts · 3.7 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 16
→ILLBig
F J. Davis5.4 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 58
F B. Agu TR2.7 pts · 2 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
=No call
C T. Ivisic10.4 pts · 5.6 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 79
FDUBetterIllinois
FDU offense356th of 366 · -13.3
→ILLBig
ILL defense8th of 366 · +8.4
FDU defense320th of 366 · -8.3
→ILLBig
ILL offense3rd of 366 · +11.7
Backcourt-5.8 · 3 players
→ILLBig
Backcourt+5.7 · 2 players
Frontcourt-1.6 · 2 players
→ILLBig
Frontcourt+6.7 · 3 players
Bench-1.3 · 3 players
→ILLBig
Bench+2.9 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestFDU betterILL betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Jevtic21 minR. Johnson17 minR. Elijah Godbolt12 minT. McQuaid2 minJ. JacobsNewA. CandaNew
Forwards
P. Stosic16 min · TRB. Agu10 min · TRT. Torain9 min · TRA. RatliffNew
Centers
S. Haubro3 min
Guards
S. Vaaks32 min · TRA. Stojakovic26 minB. Fagbemi4 minQ. McCoyNewQ. ColemanNewL. WilliamsNew
Forwards
D. Mirkovic30 minJ. Davis20 minZ. Ivisic17 minL. DavisNewZ. ZensNew
Centers
T. Ivisic25 minJ. Jakstys5 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65.1 #349 | Points per game | 83.2 #24 |
| 1.01 #314 | Points per possession | 1.25 #1 |
| 64.4 #356 | Pace (possessions) | 66.5 #292 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.1 #333 | Effective FG% | 54.7 #46 |
| 30.3 #339 | 3-point % | 34.5 #142 |
| 45.2 #63 | 3-point attempt rate | 49.7 #15 |
| 32.8 #240 | Free throw rate | 33.2 #232 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.2 #280 | Turnover rate | 13.1 #9 |
| 32.0 #125 | Offensive rebound rate | 39.2 #3 |
| 11.4 #316 | Assists per game | 14.2 #133 |
| Defense | ||
| 72.7 #123 | Points allowed | 68.8 #45 |
| 1.13 #280 | Points allowed per possession | 1.03 #61 |
| 55.2 #336 | Opponent effective FG% | 47.3 #26 |
| 37.8 #354 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.3 #38 |
| 16.1 #218 | Turnovers forced | 11.6 #365 |
| 72.7 #46 | Defensive rebound rate | 73.3 #28 |
| 4.8 #344 | Steals per game | 3.7 #365 |
| 1.5 #362 | Blocks per game | 4.6 #28 |
FDU
8-21 in 2025-26 overall · 8-11 in conference · Northeast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Mercyhurst61–70
- L@ Long Island60–74
- L@ Le Moyne59–76
- Lvs New Haven77–84
- W@ Chicago St60–59
A week or more of rest.
Illinois
28-9 in 2025-26 overall · 15-6 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UConn62–71
- Wvs Iowa71–59
- Wvs Houston65–55
- Wvs VCU76–55
- Wvs Penn105–70
A week or more of rest.