Hinkle Fieldhouse · at Butler
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | BTLR | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects BTLR 88–61 · win probability BTLR 99%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 148.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: BTLR has more of the edges
FDU 0, BTLR 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
BTLR offense vs FDU defense
Offense 56th of 366 against a defense 320th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
FDU has played the 308th-hardest schedule, BTLR the 56th. A record against a soft schedule means less
FDU offense vs BTLR defense
Offense 356th of 366 against a defense 107th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: FDU 32.8, BTLR 42.1. Allowed: FDU 36.3, BTLR 24.9
Three-pointers
FDU hits 30.3% and allows 37.8%; BTLR hits 32.7% and allows 33.3%. Threes are 45.2% and 35.0% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: FDU plays 64.4 a game (356th fastest), BTLR 71.1 (69th). Faster games mean more points
Shooting
Effective FG%: FDU 47.1 and allows 55.2; BTLR 50.9 and allows 51.9
Home court
BTLR at home. This season: BTLR 0-0 at home, FDU 0-0 away
Turnovers
Turnover rate: FDU 18.2%, BTLR 15.9%. Forced: FDU 16.1%, BTLR 15.1%
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: FDU 32.0%, BTLR 34.5%. Defensive: FDU 72.7%, BTLR 70.0%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: FDU 27%, BTLR 22%. Transfers in: FDU 3, BTLR 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | BTLR -26.4 | — |
| Total | — | 148.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | FDU 61.1 · BTLR 87.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | BTLR -15.6 | — |
| 1H total | 69.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | FDU 27 · BTLR 42.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 2-8 20% | 3-7 30% | |
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
FDU
29 games played
Straight up
8-21
28% wins
Against the spread
10-19
34% covers · avg −1.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
10-19
34% overs · avg −2.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 50-88 | +37.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 83-93 | +6.5 | L −3.5 | 137.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 58-93 | +31.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 81-93 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 65-70 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 73-81 | -4.5 | L −12.5 | 152.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 64-94 | +26.5 | L −3.5 | 162.5 | U 158 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 54-75 | +11.5 | L −9.5 | 141.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 61-72 | +16.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 43-60 | +25.5 | W +8.5 | 139.5 | U 103 |
| Jan 2 | @ | W 74-67 | +5.5 | W +12.5 | 133.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 82-85 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 70-63 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 55-65 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 130.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 59-66 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 68-61 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 137.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 23 | @ | W 76-66 | +7.5 | W +17.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 26 | vs | L 74-87 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 57-58 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 131.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 72-75 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 133.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 74-58 | -1.5 | W +14.5 | 130.5 | O 132 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 55-52 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 131.5 | U 107 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 66-59 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 57-63 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 133.5 | U 120 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 60-59 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 131.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 77-84 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 123.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 59-76 | +4.5 | L −12.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 60-74 | +9.5 | L −4.5 | 137.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 4 | @ | L 61-70 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 131.5 | U 131 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
ISU
L 50-88
−0.5
8
@
SPU
L 83-93
−3.5
12
@
TEX
L 58-93
−3.5
15
@
NJIT
L 81-93
−9.5
24
vs
ETAM
L 65-70
−1.5
26
vs
ARMY
L 73-81
−12.5
2
@
PROV
L 64-94
−3.5
10
@
FOR
L 54-75
−9.5
22
@
BC
L 61-72
+5.5
29
@
MINN
L 43-60
+8.5
2
@
MERC
W 74-67
+12.5
4
@
SFPA
L 82-85
−5.5
8
vs
CHST
W 70-63
+2.5
10
@
NHVN
L 55-65
−8.5
17
vs
LIU
L 59-66
+0.5
19
vs
WAG
W 68-61
+4.5
23
@
CCSU
W 76-66
+17.5
26
vs
LEM
L 74-87
−14.5
29
@
STO
L 57-58
+1.5
31
@
WAG
L 72-75
−1.5
5
vs
STO
W 74-58
+14.5
7
vs
MERC
W 55-52
+0.5
12
vs
SFPA
W 66-59
−0.5
14
vs
CCSU
L 57-63
−7.5
19
@
CHST
W 60-59
−0.5
21
vs
NHVN
L 77-84
−9.5
26
@
LEM
L 59-76
−12.5
28
@
LIU
L 60-74
−4.5
4
@
MERC
L 61-70
−5.5
covered 10didn’t cover 19avg −1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
ISU
L 50-88
−9.5
8
@
SPU
L 83-93
+38.5
12
@
TEX
L 58-93
−7.5
15
@
NJIT
L 81-93
+27.5
24
vs
ETAM
L 65-70
−14.5
26
vs
ARMY
L 73-81
+1.5
2
@
PROV
L 64-94
−4.5
10
@
FOR
L 54-75
−12.5
22
@
BC
L 61-72
−8.5
29
@
MINN
L 43-60
−36.5
2
@
MERC
W 74-67
+7.5
4
@
SFPA
L 82-85
+23.5
8
vs
CHST
W 70-63
−10.5
10
@
NHVN
L 55-65
−10.5
17
vs
LIU
L 59-66
−18.5
19
vs
WAG
W 68-61
−8.5
23
@
CCSU
W 76-66
+1.5
26
vs
LEM
L 74-87
+21.5
29
@
STO
L 57-58
−16.5
31
@
WAG
L 72-75
+13.5
5
vs
STO
W 74-58
+1.5
7
vs
MERC
W 55-52
−24.5
12
vs
SFPA
W 66-59
−16.5
14
vs
CCSU
L 57-63
−13.5
19
@
CHST
W 60-59
−12.5
21
vs
NHVN
L 77-84
+37.5
26
@
LEM
L 59-76
−4.5
28
@
LIU
L 60-74
−3.5
4
@
MERC
L 61-70
−0.5
over 10under 19avg −2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Butler
32 games played
Straight up
16-16
50% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg −0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-14
56% overs · avg +2.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | W 88-58 | -22.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 112-80 | -20.5 | W +11.5 | 192.5 | U 192 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 98-66 | -26.5 | W +5.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 85-87 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 163.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 79-72 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 80-73 | +6.5 | W +13.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 94-69 | -14.5 | W +10.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 84-68 | -17.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 68-77 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 113-110 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 164.5 | O 223 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 60-79 | +15.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 61-58 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 101-52 | -32.5 | W +16.5 | 149.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 85-89 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 156.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 67-85 | -2.5 | L −20.5 | 149.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 6 | vs | L 70-84 | +4.5 | L −9.5 | 162.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 75-89 | -1.5 | L −15.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 77-66 | +6.5 | W +17.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 87-80 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 87-76 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 161.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 70-92 | +12.5 | L −9.5 | 158.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 64-77 | -5.5 | L −18.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 87-97 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 168.5 | O 184 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 55-70 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 155.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 70-80 | +11.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 15 | vs | L 56-63 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 93-89 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | O 182 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 80-75 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 159.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 73-82 | +10.5 | W +1.5 | 147.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 59-76 | -2.5 | L −19.5 | 155.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 81-71 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 81-91 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
USI
W 88-58
+7.5
8
vs
IUIN
W 112-80
+11.5
11
vs
CHST
W 98-66
+5.5
15
@
SMU
L 85-87
+5.5
21
vs
SC
W 79-72
+3.5
23
vs
UVA
W 80-73
+13.5
28
vs
WRST
W 94-69
+10.5
2
vs
EMU
W 84-68
−1.5
6
vs
BOIS
L 68-77
−11.5
13
vs
PROV
W 113-110
−0.5
16
@
CONN
L 60-79
−3.5
20
vs
NU
W 61-58
−0.5
22
vs
NJIT
W 101-52
+16.5
30
@
CREI
L 85-89
+1.5
3
vs
VILL
L 67-85
−20.5
6
vs
SJU
L 70-84
−9.5
14
@
XAV
L 75-89
−15.5
17
@
HALL
W 77-66
+17.5
20
vs
DEP
W 87-80
−0.5
23
vs
MARQ
W 87-76
+5.5
28
@
SJU
L 70-92
−9.5
31
vs
GTWN
L 64-77
−18.5
4
@
PROV
L 87-97
−7.5
7
@
MARQ
L 55-70
−11.5
11
vs
CONN
L 70-80
+1.5
15
vs
HALL
L 56-63
−1.5
18
@
GTWN
W 93-89
+10.5
21
vs
XAV
W 80-75
+0.5
25
@
VILL
L 73-82
+1.5
4
vs
CREI
L 59-76
−19.5
7
@
DEP
W 81-71
+14.5
11
vs
PROV
L 81-91
−8.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
USI
W 88-58
−10.5
8
vs
IUIN
W 112-80
−0.5
11
vs
CHST
W 98-66
+5.5
15
@
SMU
L 85-87
+8.5
21
vs
SC
W 79-72
+0.5
23
vs
UVA
W 80-73
−2.5
28
vs
WRST
W 94-69
+12.5
2
vs
EMU
W 84-68
−1.5
6
vs
BOIS
L 68-77
−3.5
13
vs
PROV
W 113-110
+58.5
16
@
CONN
L 60-79
−5.5
20
vs
NU
W 61-58
−35.5
22
vs
NJIT
W 101-52
+3.5
30
@
CREI
L 85-89
+17.5
3
vs
VILL
L 67-85
+2.5
6
vs
SJU
L 70-84
−8.5
14
@
XAV
L 75-89
+2.5
17
@
HALL
W 77-66
−1.5
20
vs
DEP
W 87-80
+19.5
23
vs
MARQ
W 87-76
+1.5
28
@
SJU
L 70-92
+3.5
31
vs
GTWN
L 64-77
−8.5
4
@
PROV
L 87-97
+15.5
7
@
MARQ
L 55-70
−30.5
11
vs
CONN
L 70-80
+6.5
15
vs
HALL
L 56-63
−19.5
18
@
GTWN
W 93-89
+34.5
21
vs
XAV
W 80-75
−4.5
25
@
VILL
L 73-82
+7.5
4
vs
CREI
L 59-76
−20.5
7
@
DEP
W 81-71
+9.5
11
vs
PROV
L 81-91
+9.5
over 18under 14avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Butler has the better starters
Position by position: FDU 0, Butler 3, even 2
FDUBetterButler
G D. Jevtic6.6 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 25
→BTLRBig
G J. Ellerbee TR13.6 pts · 3.4 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 66
G R. Johnson4.3 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 10
=No call
G J. Jackson9.5 pts · 3.5 reb · 3.8 ast
Not ranked
G R. Elijah Godbolt1 pts · 0.7 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 1
→BTLRBig
F C. Moore TR11.6 pts · 3.2 reb · 1 ast
Score 46
F P. Stosic TR3.3 pts · 3.7 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 16
→BTLRBig
F T. Anderson TR10.8 pts · 5.5 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 92
F B. Agu TR2.7 pts · 2 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
=No call
C D. Jones6.3 pts · 4.6 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 76
FDUBetterButler
FDU offense356th of 366 · -13.3
→BTLRBig
BTLR defense107th of 366 · -1.1
FDU defense320th of 366 · -8.3
→BTLRBig
BTLR offense56th of 366 · +3.1
Backcourt-5.8 · 3 players
→BTLRBig
Backcourt+1.3 · 2 players
Frontcourt-1.6 · 2 players
→BTLRBig
Frontcourt+3.5 · 3 players
Bench-1.3 · 3 players
→BTLRSmall
Bench+0.9 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestFDU betterBTLR betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Jevtic21 minR. Johnson17 minR. Elijah Godbolt12 minT. McQuaid2 minJ. JacobsNewA. CandaNew
Forwards
P. Stosic16 min · TRB. Agu10 min · TRT. Torain9 min · TRA. RatliffNew
Centers
S. Haubro3 min
Guards
J. Ellerbee28 min · TRJ. Jackson23 minE. Klafke15 min · TRE. McComb1 minB. WalkerNewS. AdlerNew
Forwards
C. Moore26 min · TRT. Anderson19 min · TRS. Calderon4 min · TRH. BrutusNewB. CardinalNewM. MaricNew
Centers
D. Jones20 minK. NdzieNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65.1 #349 | Points per game | 79.4 #75 |
| 1.01 #314 | Points per possession | 1.12 #106 |
| 64.4 #356 | Pace (possessions) | 71.1 #69 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.1 #333 | Effective FG% | 50.9 #199 |
| 30.3 #339 | 3-point % | 32.7 #242 |
| 45.2 #63 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.0 #276 |
| 32.8 #240 | Free throw rate | 42.1 #29 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.2 #280 | Turnover rate | 15.9 #131 |
| 32.0 #125 | Offensive rebound rate | 34.5 #58 |
| 11.4 #316 | Assists per game | 15.5 #64 |
| Defense | ||
| 72.7 #123 | Points allowed | 77.5 #252 |
| 1.13 #280 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #195 |
| 55.2 #336 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.9 #208 |
| 37.8 #354 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.3 #142 |
| 16.1 #218 | Turnovers forced | 15.1 #272 |
| 72.7 #46 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.0 #163 |
| 4.8 #344 | Steals per game | 6.5 #178 |
| 1.5 #362 | Blocks per game | 3.2 #191 |
FDU
8-21 in 2025-26 overall · 8-11 in conference · Northeast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Mercyhurst61–70
- L@ Long Island60–74
- L@ Le Moyne59–76
- Lvs New Haven77–84
- W@ Chicago St60–59
A week or more of rest.
Butler
16-16 in 2025-26 overall · 7-14 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Providence81–91
- W@ DePaul81–71
- Lvs Creighton59–76
- L@ Villanova73–82
- Wvs Xavier80–75
A week or more of rest.