Charles Koch Arena · at Wichita St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | WICH | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects WICH 85–70 · win probability WICH 91%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 154.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: WICH has more of the edges
CSUN 0, WICH 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
WICH offense vs CSUN defense
Offense 78th of 366 against a defense 271st, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
CSUN hits 32.4% and allows 34.4%; WICH hits 33.5% and allows 31.5%. Threes are 33.6% and 33.9% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
CSUN has played the 219th-hardest schedule, WICH the 106th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 72 possessions: CSUN plays 75.6 a game (2nd fastest), WICH 69.3 (164th). Faster games mean more points
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: CSUN 18%, WICH 55%. Transfers in: CSUN 7, WICH 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Turnovers
Turnover rate: CSUN 17.5%, WICH 15.0%. Forced: CSUN 16.5%, WICH 15.7%
CSUN offense vs WICH defense
Offense 140th of 366 against a defense 82nd, on the model’s ratings
Home court
WICH at home. This season: WICH 0-0 at home, CSUN 0-0 away
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: CSUN 51.3 and allows 51.6; WICH 49.4 and allows 47.2
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: CSUN 34.2, WICH 36.0. Allowed: CSUN 34.3, WICH 34.3
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: CSUN 31.9%, WICH 38.0%. Defensive: CSUN 73.4%, WICH 71.2%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | WICH -15.1 | — |
| Total | — | 154.7 | — |
| Projected score | — | CSUN 69.8 · WICH 84.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | WICH -8.8 | — |
| 1H total | 72.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | CSUN 31.7 · WICH 40.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | |
| 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
CSU Northridge
32 games played
Straight up
18-14
56% wins
Against the spread
14-18
44% covers · avg −0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-13
59% overs · avg +2.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ | L 57-86 | +9.5 | L −19.5 | 153.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 9 | @ | W 93-85 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 68-90 | +4.5 | L −17.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 94-85 | +4.5 | W +13.5 | 157.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 64-78 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 159.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 50-82 | +1.5 | L −30.5 | 148.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 4 | vs | W 87-66 | -5.5 | W +15.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 71-85 | +7.5 | L −6.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 89-87 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 161.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 88-66 | +1.5 | W +23.5 | 144.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 100-88 | -8.5 | W +3.5 | 164.5 | O 188 |
| Dec 27 | @ | L 80-88 | +15.5 | W +7.5 | 160.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 80-89 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 162.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 74-65 | -2.5 | W +6.5 | 156.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 95-90 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 175.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 79-86 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 173.5 | U 165 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 84-79 | +7.5 | W +12.5 | 159.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 80-87 | -7.5 | L −14.5 | 158.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 68-89 | +10.5 | L −10.5 | 158.5 | U 157 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 94-78 | -3.5 | W +12.5 | 163.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 81-64 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 160.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 97-96 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 177.5 | O 193 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 88-74 | -10.5 | W +3.5 | 160.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 84-60 | +2.5 | W +26.5 | 162.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 85-83 | +5.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 78-76 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 157.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 67-68 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 84-95 | -4.5 | L −15.5 | 158.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 86-84 | -8.5 | L −6.5 | 163.5 | O 170 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 77-90 | -5.5 | L −18.5 | 170.5 | U 167 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 80-70 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 153.5 | U 150 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 78-93 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 152.5 | O 171 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@
UNI
L 57-86
−19.5
9
@
UND
W 93-85
+1.5
11
@
NDSU
L 68-90
−17.5
16
vs
TROY
W 94-85
+13.5
26
vs
IDHO
L 64-78
−12.5
28
vs
IDST
L 50-82
−30.5
4
vs
CSUB
W 87-66
+15.5
6
@
UCI
L 71-85
−6.5
10
vs
FRES
W 89-87
−1.5
13
@
DEL
W 88-66
+23.5
22
vs
SAC
W 100-88
+3.5
27
@
STAN
L 80-88
+7.5
1
@
UCD
L 80-89
−5.5
3
vs
UCSB
W 74-65
+6.5
8
vs
CP
W 95-90
−1.5
10
@
CSUF
L 79-86
−5.5
15
@
UCSD
W 84-79
+12.5
17
vs
LBSU
L 80-87
−14.5
24
@
HAW
L 68-89
−10.5
29
vs
UCD
W 94-78
+12.5
31
vs
UCSD
W 81-64
+18.5
5
@
CP
W 97-96
−1.5
7
vs
UCR
W 88-74
+3.5
14
vs
HAW
W 84-60
+26.5
19
@
UCSB
W 85-83
+7.5
21
@
LBSU
W 78-76
−0.5
26
vs
UCI
L 67-68
−2.5
28
@
UCR
L 84-95
−15.5
5
@
CSUB
W 86-84
−6.5
7
vs
CSUF
L 77-90
−18.5
12
vs
UCSD
W 80-70
+11.5
13
vs
UCI
L 78-93
−11.5
covered 14didn’t cover 18avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@
UNI
L 57-86
−10.5
9
@
UND
W 93-85
+19.5
11
@
NDSU
L 68-90
+1.5
16
vs
TROY
W 94-85
+21.5
26
vs
IDHO
L 64-78
−17.5
28
vs
IDST
L 50-82
−16.5
4
vs
CSUB
W 87-66
−2.5
6
@
UCI
L 71-85
+3.5
10
vs
FRES
W 89-87
+14.5
13
@
DEL
W 88-66
+9.5
22
vs
SAC
W 100-88
+23.5
27
@
STAN
L 80-88
+7.5
1
@
UCD
L 80-89
+6.5
3
vs
UCSB
W 74-65
−17.5
8
vs
CP
W 95-90
+9.5
10
@
CSUF
L 79-86
−8.5
15
@
UCSD
W 84-79
+3.5
17
vs
LBSU
L 80-87
+8.5
24
@
HAW
L 68-89
−1.5
29
vs
UCD
W 94-78
+8.5
31
vs
UCSD
W 81-64
−15.5
5
@
CP
W 97-96
+15.5
7
vs
UCR
W 88-74
+1.5
14
vs
HAW
W 84-60
−18.5
19
@
UCSB
W 85-83
+11.5
21
@
LBSU
W 78-76
−3.5
26
vs
UCI
L 67-68
−18.5
28
@
UCR
L 84-95
+20.5
5
@
CSUB
W 86-84
+6.5
7
vs
CSUF
L 77-90
−3.5
12
vs
UCSD
W 80-70
−3.5
13
vs
UCI
L 78-93
+18.5
over 19under 13avg +2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Wichita St
35 games played
Straight up
23-12
66% wins
Against the spread
23-12
66% covers · avg +3.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-20
43% overs · avg −1.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 75-58 | -6.5 | W +10.5 | 157.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 105-62 | -20.5 | W +22.5 | 156.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 95-74 | -5.5 | W +15.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 59-62 | +9.5 | W +6.5 | 150.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 75-58 | -10.5 | W +6.5 | 158.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 65-70 | +9.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 70-76 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 70-75 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 74-69 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 135.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 58-61 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 84-73 | -12.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 88-57 | -14.5 | W +16.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 75-70 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 149.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 100-104 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 140.5 | O 204 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 64-66 | -13.5 | L −15.5 | 145.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 11 | vs | W 78-67 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 67-85 | +3.5 | L −14.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 18 | @ | W 86-85 | +7.5 | W +8.5 | 158.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 77-60 | -12.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 74-59 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 1 | @ | L 83-93 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 154.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 74-64 | -9.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 8 | @ | W 75-61 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 148.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 58-66 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 160.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 81-77 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 152.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 92-89 | -7.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 69-57 | -8.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 88-82 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | O 170 |
| Mar 1 | @ | W 84-67 | -15.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 88-70 | -8.5 | W +9.5 | 150.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 81-68 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 152.5 | U 149 |
| Mar 15 | vs | L 55-70 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 17 | vs | W 74-70 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 22 | @ | W 96-70 | +2.5 | W +28.5 | 164.5 | O 166 |
| Mar 24 | @ | L 79-83 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
UNCA
W 75-58
+10.5
8
vs
PV
W 105-62
+22.5
13
vs
LUC
W 95-74
+15.5
18
@
BOIS
L 59-62
+6.5
22
vs
MILW
W 75-58
+6.5
26
vs
SMC
L 65-70
+4.5
27
vs
CSU
L 70-76
−4.5
28
vs
WKU
L 70-75
−9.5
6
@
UNI
W 74-69
+6.5
13
vs
DEP
L 58-61
−10.5
17
vs
WOF
W 84-73
−1.5
21
vs
EKU
W 88-57
+16.5
31
@
UAB
W 75-70
+8.5
3
@
CLT
L 100-104
−9.5
7
vs
RICE
L 64-66
−15.5
11
vs
UNT
W 78-67
+2.5
15
@
FAU
L 67-85
−14.5
18
@
USF
W 86-85
+8.5
21
vs
ECU
W 77-60
+4.5
24
vs
MEM
W 74-59
+11.5
1
@
TLSA
L 83-93
−4.5
4
vs
CLT
W 74-64
+0.5
8
@
TULN
W 75-61
+8.5
11
vs
USF
L 58-66
−5.5
14
vs
TLSA
W 81-77
+2.5
18
@
ECU
W 92-89
−4.5
21
vs
TEM
W 69-57
+3.5
26
@
MEM
W 88-82
+7.5
1
@
UTSA
W 84-67
+1.5
7
vs
FAU
W 88-70
+9.5
14
vs
TLSA
W 81-68
+14.5
15
vs
USF
L 55-70
−8.5
17
vs
WYO
W 74-70
−1.5
22
@
OKST
W 96-70
+28.5
24
@
TLSA
L 79-83
+0.5
covered 23didn’t cover 12avg +3.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
UNCA
W 75-58
−24.5
8
vs
PV
W 105-62
+10.5
13
vs
LUC
W 95-74
+15.5
18
@
BOIS
L 59-62
−29.5
22
vs
MILW
W 75-58
−25.5
26
vs
SMC
L 65-70
−4.5
27
vs
CSU
L 70-76
+3.5
28
vs
WKU
L 70-75
−10.5
6
@
UNI
W 74-69
+7.5
13
vs
DEP
L 58-61
−26.5
17
vs
WOF
W 84-73
+12.5
21
vs
EKU
W 88-57
−3.5
31
@
UAB
W 75-70
−4.5
3
@
CLT
L 100-104
+63.5
7
vs
RICE
L 64-66
−15.5
11
vs
UNT
W 78-67
+9.5
15
@
FAU
L 67-85
−3.5
18
@
USF
W 86-85
+12.5
21
vs
ECU
W 77-60
−7.5
24
vs
MEM
W 74-59
−12.5
1
@
TLSA
L 83-93
+21.5
4
vs
CLT
W 74-64
−5.5
8
@
TULN
W 75-61
−12.5
11
vs
USF
L 58-66
−36.5
14
vs
TLSA
W 81-77
+5.5
18
@
ECU
W 92-89
+31.5
21
vs
TEM
W 69-57
−18.5
26
@
MEM
W 88-82
+20.5
1
@
UTSA
W 84-67
−0.5
7
vs
FAU
W 88-70
+7.5
14
vs
TLSA
W 81-68
−3.5
15
vs
USF
L 55-70
−26.5
17
vs
WYO
W 74-70
−4.5
22
@
OKST
W 96-70
+1.5
24
@
TLSA
L 79-83
+7.5
over 15under 20avg −1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Wichita St has the better starters
Position by position: CSU Northridge 0, Wichita St 4, even 1
CSU NorthridgeBetterWichita St
G J. Davis16.2 pts · 4.7 reb · 7.5 ast
Score 71
=Even
G J. Long TR11.8 pts · 3.3 reb · 4 ast
Score 72
G C. Smith TR7.1 pts · 7.1 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 36
→WICHBig
G J. Frison TR16.5 pts · 3.4 reb · 4.1 ast
Score 93
G M. Ballew TR8.3 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 19
→WICHSmall
G M. Gray7.9 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 37
G B. Hicks TR8.6 pts · 3.5 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 49
→WICHSmall
G T. Williams8.8 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 80
G K. Ekissi TR4.7 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 29
→WICHBig
C W. Berg8.8 pts · 8 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 85
CSU NorthridgeBetterWichita St
CSUN offense140th of 366 · -4.2
→WICHSmall
WICH defense82nd of 366 · +0.2
CSUN defense271st of 366 · -6.8
→WICHBig
WICH offense78th of 366 · +0.8
Backcourt-4.7 · 5 players
→WICHBig
Backcourt+3.8 · 4 players
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
=No call
Frontcourt+2.8 · 1 player
Bench-2.4 · 4 players
→WICHBig
Bench+0.8 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestCSUN betterWICH betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Davis34 minC. Smith30 min · TRM. Ballew23 min · TRB. Hicks22 min · TRK. Ekissi17 min · TRG. Gazarian2 min
Forwards
J. Martin7 min · TRB. OmotNew
Centers
E. Stephen15 min · TRL. Niang8 min · TR
Guards
J. Long34 min · TRJ. Frison31 min · TRM. Gray27 minT. Williams22 minB. Heard18 min · TRJ. IghovodjaNew
Forwards
D. Battie18 minJ. Valencia13 minN. Hill5 minH. Thengvall2 min
Centers
W. Berg22 minC. Malonga11 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.6 #54 | Points per game | 77.6 #105 |
| 1.06 #219 | Points per possession | 1.12 #98 |
| 75.6 #2 | Pace (possessions) | 69.3 #164 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.3 #183 | Effective FG% | 49.4 #274 |
| 32.4 #260 | 3-point % | 33.5 #195 |
| 33.6 #308 | 3-point attempt rate | 33.9 #300 |
| 34.2 #200 | Free throw rate | 36.0 #149 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.5 #237 | Turnover rate | 15.0 #62 |
| 31.9 #130 | Offensive rebound rate | 38.0 #8 |
| 16.7 #31 | Assists per game | 11.3 #325 |
| Defense | ||
| 81.3 #336 | Points allowed | 70.8 #71 |
| 1.08 #153 | Points allowed per possession | 1.02 #42 |
| 51.6 #191 | Opponent effective FG% | 47.2 #24 |
| 34.4 #210 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.5 #44 |
| 16.5 #187 | Turnovers forced | 15.7 #238 |
| 73.4 #26 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.2 #93 |
| 6.6 #166 | Steals per game | 6.0 #235 |
| 2.8 #259 | Blocks per game | 3.8 #100 |
CSU Northridge
18-14 in 2025-26 overall · 13-9 in conference · Big West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UC Irvine78–93
- Wvs UC San Diego80–70
- Lvs Fullerton77–90
- W@ Bakersfield86–84
- L@ UC Riverside84–95
A week or more of rest.
Wichita St
23-12 in 2025-26 overall · 14-6 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Tulsa79–83
- W@ Oklahoma St96–70
- Wvs Wyoming74–70
- Lvs South Florida55–70
- Wvs Tulsa81–68
A week or more of rest.