ExtraMile Arena · at Boise St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | BOIS | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects BOIS 78–76 · win probability BOIS 58%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 154.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
BTLR 2, BOIS 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: BTLR plays 71.1 a game (69th fastest), BOIS 68.3 (215th). Faster games mean more points
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BTLR 34.5%, BOIS 33.2%. Defensive: BTLR 70.0%, BOIS 76.4%
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BTLR 15.9%, BOIS 16.9%. Forced: BTLR 15.1%, BOIS 14.6%
Home court
BOIS at home. This season: BOIS 0-0 at home, BTLR 0-0 away
Free throws
Free throw rate: BTLR 42.1, BOIS 42.7. Allowed: BTLR 24.9, BOIS 32.1
Context
Schedule so far
BTLR has played the 56th-hardest schedule, BOIS the 82nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BTLR 22%, BOIS 34%. Transfers in: BTLR 5, BOIS 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
BTLR offense vs BOIS defense
Offense 56th of 366 against a defense 74th, on the model’s ratings
Even
BOIS offense vs BTLR defense
Offense 94th of 366 against a defense 107th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Three-pointers
BTLR hits 32.7% and allows 33.3%; BOIS hits 34.3% and allows 34.4%. Threes are 35.0% and 43.1% of their shots
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: BTLR 50.9 and allows 51.9; BOIS 52.2 and allows 52.6
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | BOIS -2.4 | — |
| Total | — | 154.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | BTLR 75.9 · BOIS 78.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | BOIS -1.3 | — |
| 1H total | 72.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | BTLR 35.4 · BOIS 36.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | |
| 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
BTLR 1–2 BOISBOIS leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · BOIS has won the last 2 meetings · BTLR 2-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2025-26 | BOIS 77 @ BTLR 68 | BTLR -2.5 | BOIS W |
| Apr 2, 2024-25 | BTLR 93 vs BOIS 100 | BOIS -8.5 | BTLR W |
| Nov 26, 2023-24 | BTLR 70 vs BOIS 56 | BOIS -1.5 | BTLR W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Butler
32 games played
Straight up
16-16
50% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg −0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-14
56% overs · avg +2.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | W 88-58 | -22.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 112-80 | -20.5 | W +11.5 | 192.5 | U 192 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 98-66 | -26.5 | W +5.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 85-87 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 163.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 79-72 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 80-73 | +6.5 | W +13.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 94-69 | -14.5 | W +10.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 84-68 | -17.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 68-77 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 113-110 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 164.5 | O 223 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 60-79 | +15.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 61-58 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 101-52 | -32.5 | W +16.5 | 149.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 85-89 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 156.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 67-85 | -2.5 | L −20.5 | 149.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 6 | vs | L 70-84 | +4.5 | L −9.5 | 162.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 75-89 | -1.5 | L −15.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 77-66 | +6.5 | W +17.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 87-80 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 87-76 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 161.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 70-92 | +12.5 | L −9.5 | 158.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 64-77 | -5.5 | L −18.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 87-97 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 168.5 | O 184 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 55-70 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 155.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 70-80 | +11.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 15 | vs | L 56-63 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 93-89 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | O 182 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 80-75 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 159.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 73-82 | +10.5 | W +1.5 | 147.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 59-76 | -2.5 | L −19.5 | 155.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 81-71 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 81-91 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
USI
W 88-58
+7.5
8
vs
IUIN
W 112-80
+11.5
11
vs
CHST
W 98-66
+5.5
15
@
SMU
L 85-87
+5.5
21
vs
SC
W 79-72
+3.5
23
vs
UVA
W 80-73
+13.5
28
vs
WRST
W 94-69
+10.5
2
vs
EMU
W 84-68
−1.5
6
vs
BOIS
L 68-77
−11.5
13
vs
PROV
W 113-110
−0.5
16
@
CONN
L 60-79
−3.5
20
vs
NU
W 61-58
−0.5
22
vs
NJIT
W 101-52
+16.5
30
@
CREI
L 85-89
+1.5
3
vs
VILL
L 67-85
−20.5
6
vs
SJU
L 70-84
−9.5
14
@
XAV
L 75-89
−15.5
17
@
HALL
W 77-66
+17.5
20
vs
DEP
W 87-80
−0.5
23
vs
MARQ
W 87-76
+5.5
28
@
SJU
L 70-92
−9.5
31
vs
GTWN
L 64-77
−18.5
4
@
PROV
L 87-97
−7.5
7
@
MARQ
L 55-70
−11.5
11
vs
CONN
L 70-80
+1.5
15
vs
HALL
L 56-63
−1.5
18
@
GTWN
W 93-89
+10.5
21
vs
XAV
W 80-75
+0.5
25
@
VILL
L 73-82
+1.5
4
vs
CREI
L 59-76
−19.5
7
@
DEP
W 81-71
+14.5
11
vs
PROV
L 81-91
−8.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
USI
W 88-58
−10.5
8
vs
IUIN
W 112-80
−0.5
11
vs
CHST
W 98-66
+5.5
15
@
SMU
L 85-87
+8.5
21
vs
SC
W 79-72
+0.5
23
vs
UVA
W 80-73
−2.5
28
vs
WRST
W 94-69
+12.5
2
vs
EMU
W 84-68
−1.5
6
vs
BOIS
L 68-77
−3.5
13
vs
PROV
W 113-110
+58.5
16
@
CONN
L 60-79
−5.5
20
vs
NU
W 61-58
−35.5
22
vs
NJIT
W 101-52
+3.5
30
@
CREI
L 85-89
+17.5
3
vs
VILL
L 67-85
+2.5
6
vs
SJU
L 70-84
−8.5
14
@
XAV
L 75-89
+2.5
17
@
HALL
W 77-66
−1.5
20
vs
DEP
W 87-80
+19.5
23
vs
MARQ
W 87-76
+1.5
28
@
SJU
L 70-92
+3.5
31
vs
GTWN
L 64-77
−8.5
4
@
PROV
L 87-97
+15.5
7
@
MARQ
L 55-70
−30.5
11
vs
CONN
L 70-80
+6.5
15
vs
HALL
L 56-63
−19.5
18
@
GTWN
W 93-89
+34.5
21
vs
XAV
W 80-75
−4.5
25
@
VILL
L 73-82
+7.5
4
vs
CREI
L 59-76
−20.5
7
@
DEP
W 81-71
+9.5
11
vs
PROV
L 81-91
+9.5
over 18under 14avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Boise St
30 games played
Straight up
19-11
63% wins
Against the spread
17-13
57% covers · avg −1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-13
57% overs · avg +3.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | vs | W 101-77 | -12.5 | W +11.5 | 151.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 85-65 | -16.5 | W +3.5 | 161.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 62-58 | -16.5 | L −12.5 | 147.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 62-59 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 150.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 67-70 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 155.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 70-81 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 77-68 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 86-64 | -14.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 68-67 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 66-81 | -3.5 | L −18.5 | 141.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 62-53 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 107-110 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 138.5 | O 217 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 58-75 | -8.5 | L −25.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 68-93 | +1.5 | L −23.5 | 149.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 85-89 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 16 | vs | W 79-73 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 81-65 | -1.5 | W +14.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 96-54 | -23.5 | W +18.5 | 137.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 27 | @ | W 89-58 | -12.5 | W +18.5 | 141.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 69-86 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 141.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 91-87 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 141.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 91-90 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 13 | vs | L 83-86 | -10.5 | L −13.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 56-75 | +9.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 84-69 | -18.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 72-62 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 69-53 | -7.5 | W +8.5 | 149.5 | U 122 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 86-77 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 143.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 78-67 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 143.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 74-84 | -14.5 | L −24.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
vs
UVU
W 101-77
+11.5
11
vs
RGV
W 85-65
+3.5
15
vs
MTST
W 62-58
−12.5
18
vs
WICH
W 62-59
−6.5
24
vs
USC
L 67-70
+0.5
25
vs
NCSU
L 70-81
−4.5
6
@
BTLR
W 77-68
+11.5
10
vs
DUQ
W 86-64
+7.5
14
vs
SMC
W 68-67
+3.5
20
@
NEV
L 66-81
−18.5
30
vs
UNM
W 62-53
+3.5
3
@
SDSU
L 107-110
+1.5
7
vs
GCU
L 58-75
−25.5
10
vs
USU
L 68-93
−23.5
13
@
UNLV
L 85-89
−5.5
16
vs
CSU
W 79-73
+0.5
20
@
WYO
W 81-65
+14.5
24
vs
AF
W 96-54
+18.5
27
@
SJSU
W 89-58
+18.5
30
@
GCU
L 69-86
−15.5
3
vs
NEV
W 91-87
−2.5
7
@
UNM
W 91-90
+5.5
13
vs
UNLV
L 83-86
−13.5
18
@
USU
L 56-75
−9.5
21
vs
SJSU
W 84-69
−3.5
24
vs
WYO
W 72-62
+1.5
28
@
FRES
W 69-53
+8.5
3
vs
SDSU
W 86-77
+7.5
7
@
CSU
W 78-67
+12.5
11
vs
SJSU
L 74-84
−24.5
covered 17didn’t cover 13avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
vs
UVU
W 101-77
+26.5
11
vs
RGV
W 85-65
−11.5
15
vs
MTST
W 62-58
−27.5
18
vs
WICH
W 62-59
−29.5
24
vs
USC
L 67-70
−18.5
25
vs
NCSU
L 70-81
−1.5
6
@
BTLR
W 77-68
−3.5
10
vs
DUQ
W 86-64
−0.5
14
vs
SMC
W 68-67
−4.5
20
@
NEV
L 66-81
+5.5
30
vs
UNM
W 62-53
−31.5
3
@
SDSU
L 107-110
+78.5
7
vs
GCU
L 58-75
−7.5
10
vs
USU
L 68-93
+11.5
13
@
UNLV
L 85-89
+23.5
16
vs
CSU
W 79-73
+11.5
20
@
WYO
W 81-65
+0.5
24
vs
AF
W 96-54
+12.5
27
@
SJSU
W 89-58
+5.5
30
@
GCU
L 69-86
+13.5
3
vs
NEV
W 91-87
+36.5
7
@
UNM
W 91-90
+28.5
13
vs
UNLV
L 83-86
+15.5
18
@
USU
L 56-75
−20.5
21
vs
SJSU
W 84-69
+6.5
24
vs
WYO
W 72-62
−12.5
28
@
FRES
W 69-53
−27.5
3
vs
SDSU
W 86-77
+19.5
7
@
CSU
W 78-67
+1.5
11
vs
SJSU
L 74-84
+11.5
over 17under 13avg +3.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Butler has the better starters
Position by position: Butler 2, Boise St 1, even 2
ButlerBetterBoise St
G J. Ellerbee TR13.6 pts · 3.4 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 66
=Even
G D. Wheeler-Thomas TR14.9 pts · 3.6 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 67
G J. Jackson9.5 pts · 3.5 reb · 3.8 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G L. Washington TR9.6 pts · 4.7 reb · 5.1 ast
Score 76
F C. Moore TR11.6 pts · 3.2 reb · 1 ast
Score 46
→BOISSmall
F D. Butka TR13.7 pts · 8.2 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 66
F T. Anderson TR10.8 pts · 5.5 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 92
←BTLRSmall
F J. Stanback TR8.7 pts · 5.9 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 62
C D. Jones6.3 pts · 4.6 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 76
←BTLRSmall
F P. Carmichael7.8 pts · 3.1 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 59
ButlerBetterBoise St
BTLR offense56th of 366 · +3.1
=Even
BOIS defense74th of 366 · +0.7
BTLR defense107th of 366 · -1.1
=Even
BOIS offense94th of 366 · -0.5
Backcourt+1.3 · 2 players
=Even
Backcourt+1.4 · 2 players
Frontcourt+3.5 · 3 players
←BTLRSmall
Frontcourt+1.3 · 3 players
Bench+0.9 · 3 players
←BTLRSmall
Bench-2.0 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestBTLR betterBOIS betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Ellerbee28 min · TRJ. Jackson23 minE. Klafke15 min · TRE. McComb1 minB. WalkerNewS. AdlerNew
Forwards
C. Moore26 min · TRT. Anderson19 min · TRS. Calderon4 min · TRH. BrutusNewB. CardinalNewM. MaricNew
Centers
D. Jones20 minK. NdzieNew
Guards
D. Wheeler-Thomas31 min · TRL. Washington29 min · TRA. Neto19 minJ. Bowie5 minR. Bergersen2 minB. Ramirez2 min
Forwards
D. Butka34 min · TRJ. Stanback25 min · TRP. Carmichael19 minS. Ahrens13 minB. Buom5 minE. Lathan2 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 79.4 #75 | Points per game | 77.4 #108 |
| 1.12 #106 | Points per possession | 1.13 #82 |
| 71.1 #69 | Pace (possessions) | 68.3 #215 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.9 #199 | Effective FG% | 52.2 #138 |
| 32.7 #242 | 3-point % | 34.3 #151 |
| 35.0 #276 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.1 #114 |
| 42.1 #29 | Free throw rate | 42.7 #23 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.9 #131 | Turnover rate | 16.9 #195 |
| 34.5 #58 | Offensive rebound rate | 33.2 #85 |
| 15.5 #64 | Assists per game | 12.4 #258 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.5 #252 | Points allowed | 73.2 #137 |
| 1.09 #195 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #145 |
| 51.9 #208 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.6 #250 |
| 33.3 #142 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.4 #213 |
| 15.1 #272 | Turnovers forced | 14.6 #317 |
| 70.0 #163 | Defensive rebound rate | 76.4 #3 |
| 6.5 #178 | Steals per game | 4.6 #350 |
| 3.2 #191 | Blocks per game | 2.1 #339 |
Butler
16-16 in 2025-26 overall · 7-14 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Providence81–91
- W@ DePaul81–71
- Lvs Creighton59–76
- L@ Villanova73–82
- Wvs Xavier80–75
A week or more of rest.
Boise St
19-11 in 2025-26 overall · 12-9 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs San José St74–84
- W@ Colorado St78–67
- Wvs San Diego St86–77
- W@ Fresno St69–53
- Wvs Wyoming72–62
A week or more of rest.