Stabler Arena · at Lehigh
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | LEH | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects BRWN 71–70 · win probability BRWN 51%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 140.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: LEH has more of the edges
BRWN 2, LEH 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
BRWN hits 30.3% and allows 33.5%; LEH hits 36.1% and allows 32.9%. Threes are 36.3% and 38.3% of their shots
LEH offense vs BRWN defense
Offense 257th of 366 against a defense 124th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: BRWN 48.6 and allows 51.3; LEH 52.9 and allows 50.6
Free throws
Free throw rate: BRWN 28.1, LEH 31.8. Allowed: BRWN 37.6, LEH 32.5
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BRWN 29.0%, LEH 23.2%. Defensive: BRWN 70.0%, LEH 68.5%
Home court
LEH at home. This season: LEH 0-0 at home, BRWN 0-0 away
Context
Schedule so far
BRWN has played the 176th-hardest schedule, LEH the 218th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
BRWN offense vs LEH defense
Offense 220th of 366 against a defense 179th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BRWN 19.4%, LEH 17.7%. Forced: BRWN 18.8%, LEH 16.2%
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: BRWN plays 68.0 a game (229th fastest), LEH 68.7 (197th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BRWN 100%, LEH 100%. Transfers in: BRWN 0, LEH 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | BRWN -0.4 | — |
| Total | — | 140.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | BRWN 70.5 · LEH 70.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | BRWN -0.4 | — |
| 1H total | 65.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | BRWN 33.1 · LEH 32.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | |
| 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Brown
25 games played
Straight up
7-18
28% wins
Against the spread
13-12
52% covers · avg −1.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-12
52% overs · avg +0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | vs | L 46-62 | +3.5 | L −12.5 | 142.5 | U 108 |
| Nov 9 | vs | L 84-89 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 131.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 77-90 | +3.5 | L −9.5 | 129.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 63-72 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 68-49 | -2.5 | W +16.5 | 141.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 70-80 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 23 | @ | W 58-53 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 127.5 | U 111 |
| Nov 26 | @ | W 59-47 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 136.5 | U 106 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 56-66 | +13.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 75-56 | -6.5 | W +12.5 | 130.5 | O 131 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 79-86 | +19.5 | W +12.5 | 145.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 5 | vs | L 53-70 | +8.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 73-81 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 86-80 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 67-89 | +2.5 | L −19.5 | 163.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 53-63 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 134.5 | U 116 |
| Jan 30 | vs | L 59-69 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 132.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 70-77 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 6 | @ | L 69-81 | +15.5 | W +3.5 | 140.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 13 | @ | L 53-56 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 131.5 | U 109 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 79-76 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 20 | vs | W 80-71 | -2.5 | W +6.5 | 129.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 62-80 | +5.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 80-86 | +9.5 | W +3.5 | 156.5 | O 166 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 61-82 | -1.5 | L −22.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
vs
SIE
L 46-62
−12.5
9
vs
UVM
L 84-89
+0.5
12
@
BU
L 77-90
−9.5
14
vs
HAMP
L 63-72
−10.5
18
vs
HC
W 68-49
+16.5
20
@
STBK
L 70-80
−6.5
23
@
ME
W 58-53
+3.5
26
@
UNH
W 59-47
+6.5
2
@
URI
L 56-66
+3.5
5
vs
BRY
W 75-56
+12.5
9
@
PROV
L 79-86
+12.5
5
vs
YALE
L 53-70
−8.5
10
@
PENN
L 73-81
−2.5
17
vs
COLU
W 86-80
+8.5
19
vs
COR
L 67-89
−19.5
24
@
PRIN
L 53-63
−5.5
30
vs
HARV
L 59-69
−8.5
31
vs
DART
L 70-77
−8.5
6
@
YALE
L 69-81
+3.5
13
@
HARV
L 53-56
+4.5
14
@
DART
W 79-76
+5.5
20
vs
PRIN
W 80-71
+6.5
27
@
COLU
L 62-80
−12.5
28
@
COR
L 80-86
+3.5
6
vs
PENN
L 61-82
−22.5
covered 13didn’t cover 12avg −1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
vs
SIE
L 46-62
−34.5
9
vs
UVM
L 84-89
+41.5
12
@
BU
L 77-90
+37.5
14
vs
HAMP
L 63-72
−4.5
18
vs
HC
W 68-49
−24.5
20
@
STBK
L 70-80
+13.5
23
@
ME
W 58-53
−16.5
26
@
UNH
W 59-47
−30.5
2
@
URI
L 56-66
−16.5
5
vs
BRY
W 75-56
+0.5
9
@
PROV
L 79-86
+19.5
5
vs
YALE
L 53-70
−19.5
10
@
PENN
L 73-81
+8.5
17
vs
COLU
W 86-80
+22.5
19
vs
COR
L 67-89
−7.5
24
@
PRIN
L 53-63
−18.5
30
vs
HARV
L 59-69
−4.5
31
vs
DART
L 70-77
+4.5
6
@
YALE
L 69-81
+9.5
13
@
HARV
L 53-56
−22.5
14
@
DART
W 79-76
+15.5
20
vs
PRIN
W 80-71
+21.5
27
@
COLU
L 62-80
+1.5
28
@
COR
L 80-86
+9.5
6
vs
PENN
L 61-82
−3.5
over 13under 12avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Lehigh
33 games played
Straight up
16-17
48% wins
Against the spread
19-14
58% covers · avg +1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-15
55% overs · avg +4.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 57-75 | +36.5 | W +18.5 | 136.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 47-69 | +17.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | U 116 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 72-84 | +18.5 | W +6.5 | 136.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 79-62 | -10.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 67-82 | +2.5 | L −12.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 55-78 | +7.5 | L −15.5 | 132.5 | O 133 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 70-72 | +10.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 78-74 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 135.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 71-80 | -3.5 | L −12.5 | 139.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 82-87 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 62-76 | +9.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 78-85 | -5.5 | L −12.5 | 146.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 65-72 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 66-58 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 78-77 | +11.5 | W +12.5 | 142.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 93-91 | +4.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 79-82 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 137.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 88-81 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 149.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 64-59 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 64-67 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 77-76 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 84-89 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 67-76 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 137.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 90-82 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 78-69 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 140.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 49-72 | +9.5 | L −13.5 | 139.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 70-67 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 78-73 | +7.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 89-79 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 138.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 69-66 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 76-69 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 74-60 | +2.5 | W +16.5 | 138.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 18 | vs | L 55-67 | -3.5 | L −15.5 | 140.5 | U 122 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
HOU
L 57-75
+18.5
9
@
WVU
L 47-69
−4.5
14
@
RUTG
L 72-84
+6.5
18
vs
SFPA
W 79-62
+6.5
21
vs
COLU
L 67-82
−12.5
25
@
MRST
L 55-78
−15.5
28
vs
UCSB
L 70-72
+8.5
29
vs
TXST
W 78-74
+10.5
2
@
BING
L 71-80
−12.5
6
vs
LIU
L 82-87
−3.5
21
@
MONM
L 62-76
−4.5
31
vs
ARMY
L 78-85
−12.5
3
@
BUCK
L 65-72
−2.5
7
vs
HC
W 66-58
+5.5
10
@
COLG
W 78-77
+12.5
14
@
BU
W 93-91
+6.5
17
vs
NAVY
L 79-82
+0.5
19
vs
L-MD
W 88-81
+3.5
24
vs
LAF
W 64-59
+2.5
28
@
ARMY
L 64-67
−4.5
31
vs
COLG
W 77-76
+4.5
4
@
L-MD
L 84-89
−2.5
7
@
HC
L 67-76
−10.5
11
vs
AMER
W 90-82
+9.5
14
@
LAF
W 78-69
+11.5
18
@
NAVY
L 49-72
−13.5
22
vs
BU
W 70-67
+5.5
25
@
AMER
W 78-73
+12.5
28
vs
BUCK
W 89-79
+4.5
5
vs
HC
W 69-66
−2.5
8
vs
COLG
W 76-69
+9.5
11
vs
BU
W 74-60
+16.5
18
vs
PV
L 55-67
−15.5
covered 19didn’t cover 14avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
HOU
L 57-75
−4.5
9
@
WVU
L 47-69
−23.5
14
@
RUTG
L 72-84
+19.5
18
vs
SFPA
W 79-62
−10.5
21
vs
COLU
L 67-82
+5.5
25
@
MRST
L 55-78
+0.5
28
vs
UCSB
L 70-72
−4.5
29
vs
TXST
W 78-74
+16.5
2
@
BING
L 71-80
+11.5
6
vs
LIU
L 82-87
+26.5
21
@
MONM
L 62-76
−5.5
31
vs
ARMY
L 78-85
+16.5
3
@
BUCK
L 65-72
−0.5
7
vs
HC
W 66-58
−13.5
10
@
COLG
W 78-77
+12.5
14
@
BU
W 93-91
+39.5
17
vs
NAVY
L 79-82
+23.5
19
vs
L-MD
W 88-81
+19.5
24
vs
LAF
W 64-59
−20.5
28
@
ARMY
L 64-67
−16.5
31
vs
COLG
W 77-76
+6.5
4
@
L-MD
L 84-89
+23.5
7
@
HC
L 67-76
+5.5
11
vs
AMER
W 90-82
+31.5
14
@
LAF
W 78-69
+6.5
18
@
NAVY
L 49-72
−18.5
22
vs
BU
W 70-67
−4.5
25
@
AMER
W 78-73
+10.5
28
vs
BUCK
W 89-79
+29.5
5
vs
HC
W 69-66
−7.5
8
vs
COLG
W 76-69
−1.5
11
vs
BU
W 74-60
−4.5
18
vs
PV
L 55-67
−18.5
over 18under 15avg +4.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Brown has the better starters
Position by position: Brown 1, Lehigh 0, even 4
BrownBetterLehigh
G J. Jenkins8.4 pts · 3.8 reb · 5.3 ast
Score 47
=Even
G J. Ingram10.7 pts · 5.1 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 54
G A. Uchidiuno9.1 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 20
←BRWNSmall
G C. Thomas5.3 pts · 1.3 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 2
G M. Wrisby-Jefferson4.4 pts · 3.6 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 25
=Even
G J. Vazquez4 pts · 2.6 reb · 2 ast
Score 11
G D. Rochester5.6 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 27
=Even
F E. Benoit10.2 pts · 6 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 24
F N. Dabo7.1 pts · 5.7 reb · 1 ast
Score 72
=Even
C H. Alvey15.4 pts · 7 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 86
BrownBetterLehigh
BRWN offense220th of 366 · -6.7
=Even
LEH defense179th of 366 · -4.1
BRWN defense124th of 366 · -2.2
←BRWNBig
LEH offense257th of 366 · -7.9
Backcourt-6.6 · 4 players
=Even
Backcourt-6.9 · 3 players
Frontcourt+1.0 · 1 player
→LEHSmall
Frontcourt+2.3 · 2 players
Bench-2.4 · 5 players
←BRWNBig
Bench-7.6 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestBRWN betterLEH betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Jenkins31 minA. Uchidiuno26 minM. Wrisby-Jefferson23 minD. Rochester22 minI. Langham21 minB. Loughlin18 min
Forwards
N. Dabo24 minC. O'Sullivan11 minW. DeGraaf8 minE. JamgbadiNewL. JonesNew
Guards
J. Ingram36 minC. Thomas23 minJ. Vazquez22 minP. Kramer19 minA. Urosevic19 minC. BurrowsNew
Forwards
E. Benoit29 minJ. Pike12 minA. Addesa8 minR. RudusansNewN. DjanoglyNew
Centers
H. Alvey31 minC. CohenNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.2 #330 | Points per game | 71.8 #249 |
| 0.98 #338 | Points per possession | 1.05 #257 |
| 68.0 #229 | Pace (possessions) | 68.7 #197 |
| Shooting | ||
| 48.6 #299 | Effective FG% | 52.9 #107 |
| 30.3 #338 | 3-point % | 36.1 #56 |
| 36.3 #244 | 3-point attempt rate | 38.3 #206 |
| 28.1 #342 | Free throw rate | 31.8 #258 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.4 #334 | Turnover rate | 17.7 #250 |
| 29.0 #236 | Offensive rebound rate | 23.2 #349 |
| 14.8 #99 | Assists per game | 13.9 #153 |
| Defense | ||
| 72.4 #115 | Points allowed | 74.4 #171 |
| 1.07 #134 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #175 |
| 51.3 #176 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.6 #133 |
| 33.5 #157 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.9 #109 |
| 18.8 #57 | Turnovers forced | 16.2 #212 |
| 70.0 #164 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.5 #226 |
| 7.5 #82 | Steals per game | 6.6 #163 |
| 3.8 #104 | Blocks per game | 3.1 #209 |
Brown
7-18 in 2025-26 overall · 3-11 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Penn61–82
- L@ Cornell80–86
- L@ Columbia62–80
- Wvs Princeton80–71
- W@ Dartmouth79–76
A week or more of rest.
Lehigh
16-17 in 2025-26 overall · 14-7 in conference · Patriot League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Prairie View55–67
- Wvs Boston U74–60
- Wvs Colgate76–69
- Wvs Holy Cross69–66
- Wvs Bucknell89–79
A week or more of rest.