Stabler Arena · at Lehigh
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | LEH | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects LEH 70–68 · win probability LEH 59%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 137.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: LEH has more of the edges
MRST 3, LEH 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
MRST offense vs LEH defense
Offense 322nd of 366 against a defense 179th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MRST 29.1%, LEH 23.2%. Defensive: MRST 71.7%, LEH 68.5%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MRST 31%, LEH 100%. Transfers in: MRST 1, LEH 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
LEH offense vs MRST defense
Offense 257th of 366 against a defense 135th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
MRST has played the 339th-hardest schedule, LEH the 218th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: MRST 25.7, LEH 31.8. Allowed: MRST 37.6, LEH 32.5
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MRST 17.0%, LEH 17.7%. Forced: MRST 19.4%, LEH 16.2%
Three-pointers
MRST hits 32.2% and allows 28.6%; LEH hits 36.1% and allows 32.9%. Threes are 34.6% and 38.3% of their shots
Home court
LEH at home. This season: LEH 0-0 at home, MRST 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: MRST plays 66.8 a game (286th fastest), LEH 68.7 (197th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: MRST 49.3 and allows 45.6; LEH 52.9 and allows 50.6
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | LEH -2.6 | — |
| Total | — | 137.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | MRST 67.6 · LEH 70.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | LEH -1.4 | — |
| 1H total | 64.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | MRST 31.5 · LEH 33 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | |
| 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
MRST 1–3 LEHLEH leads · 4 games since 2021-22 · MRST 1-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2025-26 | LEH 55 @ MRST 78 | MRST -7.5 | MRST W |
| Nov 30, 2024-25 | MRST 69 @ LEH 74 | LEH -1.5 | LEH W |
| Dec 30, 2023-24 | LEH 65 @ MRST 58 | MRST -5.5 | LEH W |
| Nov 16, 2022-23 | MRST 54 @ LEH 64 | LEH -3.5 | LEH W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Marist
30 games played
Straight up
18-12
60% wins
Against the spread
15-15
50% covers · avg +1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-19
37% overs · avg −3.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 62-66 | +12.5 | W +8.5 | 139.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 9 | @ | W 75-56 | +1.5 | W +20.5 | 138.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 54-56 | -6.5 | L −8.5 | 130.5 | U 110 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 76-65 | -12.5 | L −1.5 | 132.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 78-55 | -7.5 | W +15.5 | 132.5 | O 133 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 64-56 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 136.5 | U 120 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 80-68 | -7.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 82-74 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 131.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 76-87 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 141.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 70-51 | -6.5 | W +12.5 | 137.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 58-64 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 59-69 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 133.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 83-38 | -4.5 | W +40.5 | 148.5 | U 121 |
| Jan 9 | @ | W 76-72 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 11 | @ | W 71-49 | -10.5 | W +11.5 | 131.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 82-67 | -8.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 55-68 | -6.5 | L −19.5 | 133.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 50-69 | +1.5 | L −17.5 | 133.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 71-64 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 30 | @ | W 88-86 | -9.5 | L −7.5 | 129.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 58-46 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 128.5 | U 104 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 81-52 | -14.5 | W +14.5 | 135.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 60-63 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 138.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 56-81 | +2.5 | L −22.5 | 128.5 | O 137 |
| Feb 15 | vs | L 63-67 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 133.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 20 | @ | W 84-70 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 65-63 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 56-63 | -4.5 | L −11.5 | 132.5 | U 119 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 77-75 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 135.5 | O 152 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 57-58 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 128.5 | U 115 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
XAV
L 62-66
+8.5
9
@
DART
W 75-56
+20.5
16
vs
HARV
L 54-56
−8.5
21
vs
ARMY
W 76-65
−1.5
25
vs
LEH
W 78-55
+15.5
5
vs
MSM
W 64-56
−0.5
7
vs
MAN
W 80-68
+4.5
13
@
BRY
W 82-74
+6.5
16
@
GT
L 76-87
−4.5
21
vs
STBK
W 70-51
+12.5
29
@
QUIN
L 58-64
−3.5
2
@
SPU
L 59-69
−12.5
4
vs
IONA
W 83-38
+40.5
9
@
SHU
W 76-72
−1.5
11
@
RID
W 71-49
+11.5
17
vs
FAIR
W 82-67
+6.5
19
vs
MRMK
L 55-68
−19.5
22
@
SIE
L 50-69
−17.5
24
vs
QUIN
W 71-64
+3.5
30
@
CAN
W 88-86
−7.5
1
@
NIA
W 58-46
+2.5
5
vs
RID
W 81-52
+14.5
7
@
FAIR
L 60-63
−4.5
12
@
MRMK
L 56-81
−22.5
15
vs
SIE
L 63-67
−6.5
20
@
MAN
W 84-70
+8.5
22
vs
SHU
W 65-63
−5.5
1
vs
SPU
L 56-63
−11.5
7
vs
QUIN
W 77-75
+3.5
8
vs
MRMK
L 57-58
+1.5
covered 15didn’t cover 15avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
XAV
L 62-66
−11.5
9
@
DART
W 75-56
−7.5
16
vs
HARV
L 54-56
−20.5
21
vs
ARMY
W 76-65
+8.5
25
vs
LEH
W 78-55
+0.5
5
vs
MSM
W 64-56
−16.5
7
vs
MAN
W 80-68
+7.5
13
@
BRY
W 82-74
+24.5
16
@
GT
L 76-87
+21.5
21
vs
STBK
W 70-51
−16.5
29
@
QUIN
L 58-64
−23.5
2
@
SPU
L 59-69
−5.5
4
vs
IONA
W 83-38
−27.5
9
@
SHU
W 76-72
+4.5
11
@
RID
W 71-49
−11.5
17
vs
FAIR
W 82-67
+7.5
19
vs
MRMK
L 55-68
−10.5
22
@
SIE
L 50-69
−14.5
24
vs
QUIN
W 71-64
−4.5
30
@
CAN
W 88-86
+44.5
1
@
NIA
W 58-46
−24.5
5
vs
RID
W 81-52
−2.5
7
@
FAIR
L 60-63
−15.5
12
@
MRMK
L 56-81
+8.5
15
vs
SIE
L 63-67
−3.5
20
@
MAN
W 84-70
+11.5
22
vs
SHU
W 65-63
−18.5
1
vs
SPU
L 56-63
−13.5
7
vs
QUIN
W 77-75
+16.5
8
vs
MRMK
L 57-58
−13.5
over 11under 19avg −3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Lehigh
33 games played
Straight up
16-17
48% wins
Against the spread
19-14
58% covers · avg +1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-15
55% overs · avg +4.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 57-75 | +36.5 | W +18.5 | 136.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 47-69 | +17.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | U 116 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 72-84 | +18.5 | W +6.5 | 136.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 79-62 | -10.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 67-82 | +2.5 | L −12.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 55-78 | +7.5 | L −15.5 | 132.5 | O 133 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 70-72 | +10.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 78-74 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 135.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 71-80 | -3.5 | L −12.5 | 139.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 82-87 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 62-76 | +9.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 78-85 | -5.5 | L −12.5 | 146.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 65-72 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 66-58 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 78-77 | +11.5 | W +12.5 | 142.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 93-91 | +4.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 79-82 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 137.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 88-81 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 149.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 64-59 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 64-67 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 77-76 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 84-89 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 67-76 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 137.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 90-82 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 78-69 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 140.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 49-72 | +9.5 | L −13.5 | 139.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 70-67 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 78-73 | +7.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 89-79 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 138.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 69-66 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 76-69 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 74-60 | +2.5 | W +16.5 | 138.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 18 | vs | L 55-67 | -3.5 | L −15.5 | 140.5 | U 122 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
HOU
L 57-75
+18.5
9
@
WVU
L 47-69
−4.5
14
@
RUTG
L 72-84
+6.5
18
vs
SFPA
W 79-62
+6.5
21
vs
COLU
L 67-82
−12.5
25
@
MRST
L 55-78
−15.5
28
vs
UCSB
L 70-72
+8.5
29
vs
TXST
W 78-74
+10.5
2
@
BING
L 71-80
−12.5
6
vs
LIU
L 82-87
−3.5
21
@
MONM
L 62-76
−4.5
31
vs
ARMY
L 78-85
−12.5
3
@
BUCK
L 65-72
−2.5
7
vs
HC
W 66-58
+5.5
10
@
COLG
W 78-77
+12.5
14
@
BU
W 93-91
+6.5
17
vs
NAVY
L 79-82
+0.5
19
vs
L-MD
W 88-81
+3.5
24
vs
LAF
W 64-59
+2.5
28
@
ARMY
L 64-67
−4.5
31
vs
COLG
W 77-76
+4.5
4
@
L-MD
L 84-89
−2.5
7
@
HC
L 67-76
−10.5
11
vs
AMER
W 90-82
+9.5
14
@
LAF
W 78-69
+11.5
18
@
NAVY
L 49-72
−13.5
22
vs
BU
W 70-67
+5.5
25
@
AMER
W 78-73
+12.5
28
vs
BUCK
W 89-79
+4.5
5
vs
HC
W 69-66
−2.5
8
vs
COLG
W 76-69
+9.5
11
vs
BU
W 74-60
+16.5
18
vs
PV
L 55-67
−15.5
covered 19didn’t cover 14avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
HOU
L 57-75
−4.5
9
@
WVU
L 47-69
−23.5
14
@
RUTG
L 72-84
+19.5
18
vs
SFPA
W 79-62
−10.5
21
vs
COLU
L 67-82
+5.5
25
@
MRST
L 55-78
+0.5
28
vs
UCSB
L 70-72
−4.5
29
vs
TXST
W 78-74
+16.5
2
@
BING
L 71-80
+11.5
6
vs
LIU
L 82-87
+26.5
21
@
MONM
L 62-76
−5.5
31
vs
ARMY
L 78-85
+16.5
3
@
BUCK
L 65-72
−0.5
7
vs
HC
W 66-58
−13.5
10
@
COLG
W 78-77
+12.5
14
@
BU
W 93-91
+39.5
17
vs
NAVY
L 79-82
+23.5
19
vs
L-MD
W 88-81
+19.5
24
vs
LAF
W 64-59
−20.5
28
@
ARMY
L 64-67
−16.5
31
vs
COLG
W 77-76
+6.5
4
@
L-MD
L 84-89
+23.5
7
@
HC
L 67-76
+5.5
11
vs
AMER
W 90-82
+31.5
14
@
LAF
W 78-69
+6.5
18
@
NAVY
L 49-72
−18.5
22
vs
BU
W 70-67
−4.5
25
@
AMER
W 78-73
+10.5
28
vs
BUCK
W 89-79
+29.5
5
vs
HC
W 69-66
−7.5
8
vs
COLG
W 76-69
−1.5
11
vs
BU
W 74-60
−4.5
18
vs
PV
L 55-67
−18.5
over 18under 15avg +4.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Marist has the better starters
Position by position: Marist 2, Lehigh 1, even 2
MaristBetterLehigh
G J. Collins-Roberts7.3 pts · 4.6 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 27
→LEHSmall
G J. Ingram10.7 pts · 5.1 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 54
G J. Graham TR11.1 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 43
←MRSTBig
G C. Thomas5.3 pts · 1.3 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 2
F M. Parker5 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 59
←MRSTBig
G J. Vazquez4 pts · 2.6 reb · 2 ast
Score 11
C T. Watson6.1 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F E. Benoit10.2 pts · 6 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 24
C J. Gabriel2 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
C H. Alvey15.4 pts · 7 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 86
MaristBetterLehigh
MRST offense322nd of 366 · -10.5
→LEHBig
LEH defense179th of 366 · -4.1
MRST defense135th of 366 · -2.6
←MRSTSmall
LEH offense257th of 366 · -7.9
Backcourt-3.3 · 2 players
←MRSTBig
Backcourt-6.9 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.0 · 3 players
→LEHSmall
Frontcourt+2.3 · 2 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-7.6 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestMRST betterLEH betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Collins-Roberts31 minJ. Graham28 min · TRJ. WilliamsNewC. SweeneyNewB. ArnoldNewD. ChessNew
Forwards
M. Parker15 minE. OnyiaNewL. RodriguezNew
Centers
T. Watson11 minJ. Gabriel7 minL. FranzNew
Guards
J. Ingram36 minC. Thomas23 minJ. Vazquez22 minP. Kramer19 minA. Urosevic19 minC. BurrowsNew
Forwards
E. Benoit29 minJ. Pike12 minA. Addesa8 minR. RudusansNewN. DjanoglyNew
Centers
H. Alvey31 minC. CohenNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68.9 #301 | Points per game | 71.8 #249 |
| 1.04 #276 | Points per possession | 1.05 #257 |
| 66.8 #286 | Pace (possessions) | 68.7 #197 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.3 #276 | Effective FG% | 52.9 #107 |
| 32.2 #272 | 3-point % | 36.1 #56 |
| 34.6 #285 | 3-point attempt rate | 38.3 #206 |
| 25.7 #360 | Free throw rate | 31.8 #258 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.0 #202 | Turnover rate | 17.7 #250 |
| 29.1 #233 | Offensive rebound rate | 23.2 #349 |
| 15.0 #89 | Assists per game | 13.9 #153 |
| Defense | ||
| 63.9 #4 | Points allowed | 74.4 #171 |
| 0.95 #3 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #175 |
| 45.6 #5 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.6 #133 |
| 28.6 #2 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.9 #109 |
| 19.4 #35 | Turnovers forced | 16.2 #212 |
| 71.7 #77 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.5 #226 |
| 7.1 #116 | Steals per game | 6.6 #163 |
| 3.1 #200 | Blocks per game | 3.1 #209 |
Marist
18-12 in 2025-26 overall · 13-9 in conference · Metro Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Merrimack57–58
- Wvs Quinnipiac77–75
- Lvs Saint Peter's56–63
- Wvs Sacred Heart65–63
- W@ Manhattan84–70
A week or more of rest.
Lehigh
16-17 in 2025-26 overall · 14-7 in conference · Patriot League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Prairie View55–67
- Wvs Boston U74–60
- Wvs Colgate76–69
- Wvs Holy Cross69–66
- Wvs Bucknell89–79
A week or more of rest.