Pete Hanna Center · at Samford
#180WRSTWright St
@
#184SAMSamford
LineNo line yet 
Total— 
Season records: Wright St and Samford
WRSTThis seasonSAM
0-0Record0-0
0-0ATS0-0
0-0O/U0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects SAM 77–75 · win probability SAM 56%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 151.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it

WRST 3, SAM 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
WRSTSmall
Three-pointers
WRST hits 36.4% and allows 34.3%; SAM hits 35.6% and allows 36.5%. Threes are 34.2% and 45.7% of their shots
WRSTSmall
WRST offense vs SAM defense
Offense 148th of 366 against a defense 224th, on the model’s ratings
SAMSmall
SAM offense vs WRST defense
Offense 147th of 366 against a defense 215th, on the model’s ratings
WRSTSmall
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: WRST 32.8%, SAM 25.3%. Defensive: WRST 70.6%, SAM 74.3%
SAMSmall
Home court
SAM at home. This season: SAM 0-0 at home, WRST 0-0 away
SAMSmall
Free throws
Free throw rate: WRST 37.4, SAM 41.9. Allowed: WRST 33.3, SAM 32.9
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: WRST 16.1%, SAM 13.4%. Forced: WRST 16.6%, SAM 13.0%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: WRST 32%, SAM 41%. Transfers in: WRST 4, SAM 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Schedule so far
WRST has played the 264th-hardest schedule, SAM the 251st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: WRST 54.3 and allows 52.4; SAM 53.1 and allows 51.9
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: WRST plays 69.1 a game (171st fastest), SAM 69.3 (163rd). Faster games mean more points

Market

Open → current
Spread
Opening line not available
Total
 
Moneyline
—

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Model vs market

MarketModelModel edge
Spread—SAM -1.6—
Total—151.9—
Projected score—WRST 75.2 · SAM 76.8

1st-half model

ModelActual
1H spreadSAM -0.8—
1H total71.0—
1H projected scoreWRST 35.1 · SAM 35.9—

Wright St has the better starters

Position by position: Wright St 3, Samford 1, even 1
Wright StBetterSamford
G C. O'Hara TR14.2 pts · 4.4 reb · 1.2 ast Score 66
WRSTBig
G N. George TR11.4 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.6 ast Score 25
G D. Pangonis8.9 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.2 ast Score 30
Even
G C. Norris8.9 pts · 4.4 reb · 2 ast Score 34
G C. Traylor TR3.8 pts · 1.1 reb · 2 ast Score 21
SAMBig
G C. Noard TR19 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.9 ast Score 94
G A. Holden5.8 pts · 3.8 reb · 0.5 ast Score 78
WRSTBig
G I. Campbell-Finch7.5 pts · 1.6 reb · 1.3 ast Score 13
F K. Pickett8.5 pts · 5.5 reb · 1 ast Score 67
WRSTBig
G T. Davis TR1.2 pts · 1.6 reb · 1.2 ast Score 22
Wright StBetterSamford
WRST offense148th of 366 · -4.5
WRSTSmall
SAM defense224th of 366 · -5.9
WRST defense215th of 366 · -5.6
SAMSmall
SAM offense147th of 366 · -4.5
Backcourt-2.5 · 4 players
WRSTSmall
Backcourt-4.7 · 5 players
Frontcourt+0.6 · 1 player
No call
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
Bench-0.7 · 2 players
WRSTSmall
Bench-3.6 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestWRST betterSAM betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Wright St
Guards
C. O'Hara33 min · TRD. Pangonis27 minC. Traylor17 min · TRA. Holden14 minI. Milijasevic8 min · TRP. DouglasNew
Forwards
K. Pickett23 minS. JohnsonNewN. LewisNew
Centers
N. Djapa10 min · TR
Samford
Guards
N. George35 min · TRC. Norris31 minC. Noard29 min · TRI. Campbell-Finch24 minT. Davis11 min · TRW. Miller9 min · TR
Forwards
J. Bjornstad8 minB. MacVicar7 min · TRC. Harrison3 minJ. HughesNewB. KempNew
Centers
W. Shaver9 minL. LeeNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Shooting
Possessions
Defense
WRSTSAM
Scoring
79.8 #72Points per game77.8 #98
1.16 #54Points per possession1.12 #99
69.1 #171Pace (possessions)69.3 #163
Shooting
54.3 #56Effective FG%53.1 #101
36.4 #443-point %35.6 #84
34.2 #2903-point attempt rate45.7 #54
37.4 #120Free throw rate41.9 #32
Possessions
16.1 #149Turnover rate13.4 #11
32.8 #91Offensive rebound rate25.3 #333
13.2 #199Assists per game14.3 #128
Defense
75.6 #206Points allowed77.0 #240
1.09 #201Points allowed per possession1.11 #251
52.4 #238Opponent effective FG%51.9 #206
34.3 #203Opponent 3-point %36.5 #326
16.6 #179Turnovers forced13.0 #354
70.6 #129Defensive rebound rate74.3 #17
7.1 #114Steals per game4.4 #358
4.4 #47Blocks per game2.7 #277

Wright St

21-12 in 2025-26 overall · 18-5 in conference · Horizon League

Last five, 2025-26
  • Lvs Virginia73–82
  • Wvs Detroit Mercy66–63
  • Wvs N Kentucky103–90
  • Wvs Cleveland St90–61
  • W@ N Kentucky92–91

A week or more of rest.

Samford

16-14 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · Southern Conference

Last five, 2025-26
  • Lvs Furman81–86
  • Wvs UNC Greensboro87–78
  • Wvs VMI80–61
  • L@ Mercer86–89
  • W@ The Citadel78–75

A week or more of rest.