State Farm Field House · Neutral site
#180WRSTWright St
vs
#142SBUSt Bonaventure
LineNo line yet 
Total— 
Season records: Wright St and St Bonaventure
WRSTThis seasonSBU
0-0Record0-0
0-0ATS0-0
0-0O/U0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects SBU 75–74 · win probability SBU 56%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 148.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: WRST has more of the edges

WRST 2, SBU 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
WRST has played the 264th-hardest schedule, SBU the 109th. A record against a soft schedule means less
WRSTSmall
Free throws
Free throw rate: WRST 37.4, SBU 30.0. Allowed: WRST 33.3, SBU 33.9
WRSTSmall
Shooting
Effective FG%: WRST 54.3 and allows 52.4; SBU 52.4 and allows 53.3
SBUSmall
SBU offense vs WRST defense
Offense 169th of 366 against a defense 215th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Three-pointers
WRST hits 36.4% and allows 34.3%; SBU hits 37.4% and allows 36.0%. Threes are 34.2% and 31.3% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: WRST plays 69.1 a game (171st fastest), SBU 68.0 (228th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: WRST 32%, SBU 18%. Transfers in: WRST 4, SBU 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
WRST offense vs SBU defense
Offense 148th of 366 against a defense 131st, on the model’s ratings
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: WRST 32.8%, SBU 34.5%. Defensive: WRST 70.6%, SBU 70.2%
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: WRST 16.1%, SBU 16.8%. Forced: WRST 16.6%, SBU 17.1%

Market

Open → current
Spread
Opening line not available
Total
 
Moneyline
—

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Model vs market

MarketModelModel edge
Spread—SBU -1.6—
Total—148.8—
Projected score—WRST 73.6 · SBU 75.2

1st-half model

ModelActual
1H spreadSBU -0.8—
1H total69.6—
1H projected scoreWRST 34.4 · SBU 35.2—

Wright St has the better starters

Position by position: Wright St 2, St Bonaventure 1, even 2
Wright StBetterSt Bonaventure
G C. O'Hara TR14.2 pts · 4.4 reb · 1.2 ast Score 66
Even
G A. Fulton TR10.7 pts · 6.3 reb · 1.2 ast Score 62
G D. Pangonis8.9 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.2 ast Score 30
No call
G I. Ermakov2.6 pts · 1.1 reb · 0.9 ast Not ranked
G C. Traylor TR3.8 pts · 1.1 reb · 2 ast Score 21
SBUSmall
F R. Kalambay TR4.4 pts · 5.6 reb · 0.6 ast Score 40
G A. Holden5.8 pts · 3.8 reb · 0.5 ast Score 78
WRSTBig
F J. Grahovac4.2 pts · 2.8 reb · 0.8 ast Score 33
F K. Pickett8.5 pts · 5.5 reb · 1 ast Score 67
WRSTBig
F M. Blackwood TR2.6 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.2 ast Score 22
Wright StBetterSt Bonaventure
WRST offense148th of 366 · -4.5
Even
SBU defense131st of 366 · -2.4
WRST defense215th of 366 · -5.6
Even
SBU offense169th of 366 · -5.2
Backcourt-2.5 · 4 players
SBUSmall
Backcourt-0.4 · 2 players
Frontcourt+0.6 · 1 player
WRSTBig
Frontcourt-2.4 · 3 players
Bench-0.7 · 2 players
Even
Bench-0.6 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestWRST betterSBU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Wright St
Guards
C. O'Hara33 min · TRD. Pangonis27 minC. Traylor17 min · TRA. Holden14 minI. Milijasevic8 min · TRP. DouglasNew
Forwards
K. Pickett23 minS. JohnsonNewN. LewisNew
Centers
N. Djapa10 min · TR
St Bonaventure
Guards
A. Fulton29 min · TRI. Ermakov10 minA. Lonati8 minJ. DeRose1 minR. HeathNewZ. PhilipkoskiNew
Forwards
R. Kalambay21 min · TRJ. Grahovac18 minM. Blackwood12 min · TRJ. IkpotokinNewC. BlankenbergNew
Centers
B. BillNewC. DialloNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Shooting
Possessions
Defense
WRSTSBU
Scoring
79.8 #72Points per game76.2 #138
1.16 #54Points per possession1.12 #104
69.1 #171Pace (possessions)68.0 #228
Shooting
54.3 #56Effective FG%52.4 #129
36.4 #443-point %37.4 #22
34.2 #2903-point attempt rate31.3 #335
37.4 #120Free throw rate30.0 #310
Possessions
16.1 #149Turnover rate16.8 #189
32.8 #91Offensive rebound rate34.5 #60
13.2 #199Assists per game15.4 #73
Defense
75.6 #206Points allowed75.4 #201
1.09 #201Points allowed per possession1.11 #245
52.4 #238Opponent effective FG%53.3 #278
34.3 #203Opponent 3-point %36.0 #299
16.6 #179Turnovers forced17.1 #144
70.6 #129Defensive rebound rate70.2 #150
7.1 #114Steals per game7.5 #80
4.4 #47Blocks per game4.4 #41

Wright St

21-12 in 2025-26 overall · 18-5 in conference · Horizon League

Last five, 2025-26
  • Lvs Virginia73–82
  • Wvs Detroit Mercy66–63
  • Wvs N Kentucky103–90
  • Wvs Cleveland St90–61
  • W@ N Kentucky92–91

A week or more of rest.

St Bonaventure

16-17 in 2025-26 overall · 6-15 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference

Last five, 2025-26
  • Lvs Dayton63–68
  • Wvs George Mason63–57
  • Wvs La Salle99–80
  • Lvs Davidson63–68
  • L@ G Washington82–91

A week or more of rest.