Leede Arena · at Dartmouth
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | DART | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects DART 75–67 · win probability DART 75%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 142.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: DART has more of the edges
CCSU 2, DART 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
CCSU has played the 358th-hardest schedule, DART the 145th. A record against a soft schedule means less
CCSU offense vs DART defense
Offense 353rd of 366 against a defense 229th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: CCSU plays 65.5 a game (329th fastest), DART 69.6 (143rd). Faster games mean more points
Shooting
Effective FG%: CCSU 51.6 and allows 50.2; DART 51.8 and allows 52.7
Free throws
Free throw rate: CCSU 31.2, DART 38.0. Allowed: CCSU 26.9, DART 30.7
Home court
DART at home. This season: DART 0-0 at home, CCSU 0-0 away
Turnovers
Turnover rate: CCSU 16.3%, DART 17.6%. Forced: CCSU 14.0%, DART 13.8%
Even
Three-pointers
CCSU hits 35.8% and allows 33.4%; DART hits 36.1% and allows 34.6%. Threes are 34.9% and 48.7% of their shots
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: CCSU 55%, DART 40%. Transfers in: CCSU 0, DART 1. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: CCSU 27.5%, DART 23.7%. Defensive: CCSU 69.6%, DART 70.3%
Even
DART offense vs CCSU defense
Offense 261st of 366 against a defense 247th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | DART -7.8 | — |
| Total | — | 142.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | CCSU 67.2 · DART 75 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | DART -4.5 | — |
| 1H total | 66.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | CCSU 31 · DART 35.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | |
| 2-8 20% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
CCSU 1–0 DARTCCSU leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · CCSU 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2022-23 | DART 50 @ CCSU 59 | CCSU +1.5 | CCSU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
C Connecticut
28 games played
Straight up
16-12
57% wins
Against the spread
14-14
50% covers · avg −1.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-13
54% overs · avg +2.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ | L 49-71 | +9.5 | L −12.5 | 150.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 60-59 | +17.5 | W +18.5 | 136.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 77-84 | +12.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 67-54 | +15.5 | W +28.5 | 137.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 108-106 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | O 214 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 61-77 | +18.5 | W +2.5 | 128.5 | O 138 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 56-73 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 138.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 84-67 | -7.5 | W +9.5 | 133.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 18 | vs | L 70-84 | -6.5 | L −20.5 | 143.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 78-84 | +6.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 72-61 | -7.5 | W +3.5 | 130.5 | O 133 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 76-69 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 69-59 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 146.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 98-90 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 188 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 61-79 | +1.5 | L −16.5 | 132.5 | O 140 |
| Jan 23 | vs | L 66-76 | -7.5 | L −17.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 26 | @ | L 59-61 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 135.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 62-55 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 59-80 | +2.5 | L −18.5 | 142.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 78-67 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 138.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 84-67 | -5.5 | W +11.5 | 136.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 81-76 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 128.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 63-57 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 133.5 | U 120 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 78-77 | -8.5 | L −7.5 | 165.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 51-70 | -3.5 | L −22.5 | 138.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 80-78 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 69-64 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 60-70 | -3.5 | L −13.5 | 139.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@
QUIN
L 49-71
−12.5
11
@
BC
W 60-59
+18.5
16
@
MASS
L 77-84
+5.5
21
@
RUTG
W 67-54
+28.5
24
vs
SHU
W 108-106
−1.5
3
@
HALL
L 61-77
+2.5
7
@
NE
L 56-73
−15.5
13
@
BING
W 84-67
+9.5
18
vs
FAIR
L 70-84
−20.5
2
@
LIU
L 78-84
+0.5
4
vs
NHVN
W 72-61
+3.5
8
vs
STO
W 76-69
−0.5
10
@
LEM
W 69-59
+11.5
17
@
SFPA
W 98-90
+1.5
19
@
MERC
L 61-79
−16.5
23
vs
FDU
L 66-76
−17.5
26
@
STO
L 59-61
−3.5
29
@
WAG
W 62-55
+4.5
31
vs
LIU
L 59-80
−18.5
5
vs
CHST
W 78-67
+2.5
7
vs
WAG
W 84-67
+11.5
12
@
NHVN
W 81-76
+1.5
14
@
FDU
W 63-57
+7.5
19
vs
LEM
W 78-77
−7.5
21
@
CHST
L 51-70
−22.5
26
vs
MERC
W 80-78
−1.5
28
vs
SFPA
W 69-64
−3.5
4
vs
WAG
L 60-70
−13.5
covered 14didn’t cover 14avg −1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@
QUIN
L 49-71
−30.5
11
@
BC
W 60-59
−17.5
16
@
MASS
L 77-84
+16.5
21
@
RUTG
W 67-54
−16.5
24
vs
SHU
W 108-106
+70.5
3
@
HALL
L 61-77
+9.5
7
@
NE
L 56-73
−9.5
13
@
BING
W 84-67
+17.5
18
vs
FAIR
L 70-84
+10.5
2
@
LIU
L 78-84
+15.5
4
vs
NHVN
W 72-61
+2.5
8
vs
STO
W 76-69
+10.5
10
@
LEM
W 69-59
−18.5
17
@
SFPA
W 98-90
+43.5
19
@
MERC
L 61-79
+7.5
23
vs
FDU
L 66-76
+1.5
26
@
STO
L 59-61
−15.5
29
@
WAG
W 62-55
−19.5
31
vs
LIU
L 59-80
−3.5
5
vs
CHST
W 78-67
+6.5
7
vs
WAG
W 84-67
+14.5
12
@
NHVN
W 81-76
+28.5
14
@
FDU
W 63-57
−13.5
19
vs
LEM
W 78-77
−10.5
21
@
CHST
L 51-70
−17.5
26
vs
MERC
W 80-78
+16.5
28
vs
SFPA
W 69-64
−19.5
4
vs
WAG
L 60-70
−9.5
over 15under 13avg +2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Dartmouth
25 games played
Straight up
9-16
36% wins
Against the spread
11-14
44% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-13
48% overs · avg +0.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9 | vs | L 56-75 | -1.5 | L −20.5 | 138.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 75-82 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 77-85 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 29 | @ | W 87-61 | +3.5 | W +29.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 69-68 | -8.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 80-93 | +14.5 | W +1.5 | 156.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 55-76 | +20.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 77-64 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 16 | @ | W 89-64 | -1.5 | W +23.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 63-85 | -1.5 | L −23.5 | 155.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 72-94 | +35.5 | W +13.5 | 160.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 5 | @ | W 76-68 | +7.5 | W +15.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 102-91 | +9.5 | W +20.5 | 175.5 | O 193 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 74-84 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 163.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 71-69 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 69-79 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 156.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 68-83 | +15.5 | W +0.5 | 155.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 77-70 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 58-71 | +1.5 | L −11.5 | 140.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 13 | vs | L 70-83 | +9.5 | L −3.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 76-79 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 139.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 64-63 | +6.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 71-80 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 61-82 | +1.5 | L −19.5 | 142.5 | O 143 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 90-111 | +4.5 | L −16.5 | 166.5 | O 201 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
9
vs
MRST
L 56-75
−20.5
12
@
BRY
L 75-82
−5.5
16
vs
APP
L 77-85
−6.5
29
@
SPU
W 87-61
+29.5
3
vs
UNH
W 69-68
−7.5
6
@
WYO
L 80-93
+1.5
9
@
CSU
L 55-76
−0.5
13
vs
BU
W 77-64
+10.5
16
@
HC
W 89-64
+23.5
19
@
SHU
L 63-85
−23.5
29
@
FLA
L 72-94
+13.5
5
@
HARV
W 76-68
+15.5
10
@
COR
W 102-91
+20.5
17
vs
PENN
L 74-84
−12.5
19
vs
PRIN
W 71-69
+3.5
24
vs
COLU
L 69-79
−7.5
30
@
YALE
L 68-83
+0.5
31
@
BRWN
W 77-70
+8.5
7
vs
HARV
L 58-71
−11.5
13
vs
YALE
L 70-83
−3.5
14
vs
BRWN
L 76-79
−5.5
21
@
COLU
W 64-63
+7.5
27
@
PENN
L 71-80
−2.5
28
@
PRIN
L 61-82
−19.5
7
vs
COR
L 90-111
−16.5
covered 11didn’t cover 14avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
9
vs
MRST
L 56-75
−7.5
12
@
BRY
L 75-82
+5.5
16
vs
APP
L 77-85
+21.5
29
@
SPU
W 87-61
+3.5
3
vs
UNH
W 69-68
−10.5
6
@
WYO
L 80-93
+16.5
9
@
CSU
L 55-76
−22.5
13
vs
BU
W 77-64
−3.5
16
@
HC
W 89-64
+5.5
19
@
SHU
L 63-85
−7.5
29
@
FLA
L 72-94
+5.5
5
@
HARV
W 76-68
−4.5
10
@
COR
W 102-91
+17.5
17
vs
PENN
L 74-84
−5.5
19
vs
PRIN
W 71-69
−7.5
24
vs
COLU
L 69-79
−8.5
30
@
YALE
L 68-83
−4.5
31
@
BRWN
W 77-70
+4.5
7
vs
HARV
L 58-71
−11.5
13
vs
YALE
L 70-83
+1.5
14
vs
BRWN
L 76-79
+15.5
21
@
COLU
W 64-63
−23.5
27
@
PENN
L 71-80
−3.5
28
@
PRIN
L 61-82
+0.5
7
vs
COR
L 90-111
+34.5
over 12under 13avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Dartmouth has the better starters
Position by position: C Connecticut 0, Dartmouth 2, even 3
C ConnecticutBetterDartmouth
G J. Jones4.1 pts · 5.6 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 4
→DARTSmall
G C. McNamee5.7 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 34
G V. Payne6.5 pts · 3.2 reb · 1 ast
Score 16
=Even
G L. Williams TR4.8 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 16
G E. Parker2 pts · 1.9 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 0
→DARTBig
G N. Abusara5 pts · 2.3 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 47
G R. Jones3.8 pts · 0.4 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 20
=Even
G C. Hiatt3.4 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 8
F D. James3.2 pts · 3 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 13
=No call
G B. Brown1.5 pts · 0.3 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
C ConnecticutBetterDartmouth
CCSU offense353rd of 366 · -13.2
→DARTSmall
DART defense229th of 366 · -6.1
CCSU defense247th of 366 · -6.5
=Even
DART offense261st of 366 · -8.0
Backcourt-10.6 · 4 players
→DARTBig
Backcourt-7.2 · 5 players
Frontcourt-1.2 · 1 player
=No call
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
Bench-2.0 · 2 players
→DARTSmall
Bench-0.4 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestCCSU betterDART betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Jones30 minV. Payne24 minE. Parker14 minR. Jones10 minA. Reynolds10 minR. LaurentNew
Forwards
D. James13 minJ. Mott8 minB. JacksonNewJ. ErvinNewR. TibbyNewC. LangdonNew
Guards
C. McNamee20 minL. Williams20 min · TRN. Abusara17 minC. Hiatt17 minB. Brown9 minC. AldrichNew
Forwards
P. Tivnan6 minS. Simango3 minT. Garrett3 minJ. PollackNew
Centers
A. Strelnikov6 minD. CivelloNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 70.6 #272 | Points per game | 73.1 #222 |
| 1.08 #192 | Points per possession | 1.05 #253 |
| 65.5 #329 | Pace (possessions) | 69.6 #143 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.6 #165 | Effective FG% | 51.8 #156 |
| 35.8 #69 | 3-point % | 36.1 #51 |
| 34.9 #278 | 3-point attempt rate | 48.7 #22 |
| 31.2 #276 | Free throw rate | 38.0 #103 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.3 #154 | Turnover rate | 17.6 #248 |
| 27.5 #281 | Offensive rebound rate | 23.7 #346 |
| 12.8 #229 | Assists per game | 12.8 #227 |
| Defense | ||
| 72.0 #105 | Points allowed | 78.4 #276 |
| 1.10 #218 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #287 |
| 50.2 #113 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.7 #254 |
| 33.4 #146 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.6 #227 |
| 14.0 #338 | Turnovers forced | 13.8 #339 |
| 69.6 #179 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.3 #148 |
| 5.4 #311 | Steals per game | 5.0 #337 |
| 3.9 #83 | Blocks per game | 3.5 #147 |
C Connecticut
16-12 in 2025-26 overall · 12-7 in conference · Northeast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Wagner60–70
- Wvs Saint Francis Red Wolves69–64
- Wvs Mercyhurst80–78
- L@ Chicago St51–70
- Wvs Le Moyne78–77
A week or more of rest.
Dartmouth
9-16 in 2025-26 overall · 5-9 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Cornell90–111
- L@ Princeton61–82
- L@ Penn71–80
- W@ Columbia64–63
- Lvs Brown76–79
A week or more of rest.