Broadview Center · at UAlbany
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UALB | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UALB 72–72 · win probability UALB 50%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 144.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: DART has more of the edges
DART 3, UALB 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: DART 38.0, UALB 24.9. Allowed: DART 30.7, UALB 35.7
Three-pointers
DART hits 36.1% and allows 34.6%; UALB hits 32.6% and allows 36.0%. Threes are 48.7% and 37.6% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
DART has played the 145th-hardest schedule, UALB the 260th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: DART plays 69.6 a game (143rd fastest), UALB 65.6 (324th). Faster games mean more points
UALB offense vs DART defense
Offense 313th of 366 against a defense 229th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: DART 23.7%, UALB 32.7%. Defensive: DART 70.3%, UALB 67.6%
Home court
UALB at home. This season: UALB 0-0 at home, DART 0-0 away
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: DART 17.6%, UALB 18.5%. Forced: DART 13.8%, UALB 15.8%
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: DART 51.8 and allows 52.7; UALB 51.4 and allows 53.2
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: DART 40%, UALB 38%. Transfers in: DART 1, UALB 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
DART offense vs UALB defense
Offense 261st of 366 against a defense 259th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UALB -0.1 | — |
| Total | — | 144.7 | — |
| Projected score | — | DART 72.3 · UALB 72.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | DART -0.1 | — |
| 1H total | 67.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | DART 33.9 · UALB 33.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | |
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
DART 0–2 UALBUALB leads · 2 games since 2021-22 · UALB has won the last 2 meetings · DART 0-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2024-25 | UALB 87 @ DART 73 | DART -4.5 | UALB W |
| Dec 2, 2023-24 | DART 68 @ UALB 73 | UALB -3.5 | UALB W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Dartmouth
25 games played
Straight up
9-16
36% wins
Against the spread
11-14
44% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-13
48% overs · avg +0.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9 | vs | L 56-75 | -1.5 | L −20.5 | 138.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 75-82 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 77-85 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 29 | @ | W 87-61 | +3.5 | W +29.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 69-68 | -8.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 80-93 | +14.5 | W +1.5 | 156.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 55-76 | +20.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 77-64 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 16 | @ | W 89-64 | -1.5 | W +23.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 63-85 | -1.5 | L −23.5 | 155.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 72-94 | +35.5 | W +13.5 | 160.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 5 | @ | W 76-68 | +7.5 | W +15.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 102-91 | +9.5 | W +20.5 | 175.5 | O 193 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 74-84 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 163.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 71-69 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 69-79 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 156.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 68-83 | +15.5 | W +0.5 | 155.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 77-70 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 58-71 | +1.5 | L −11.5 | 140.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 13 | vs | L 70-83 | +9.5 | L −3.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 76-79 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 139.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 64-63 | +6.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 71-80 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 61-82 | +1.5 | L −19.5 | 142.5 | O 143 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 90-111 | +4.5 | L −16.5 | 166.5 | O 201 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
9
vs
MRST
L 56-75
−20.5
12
@
BRY
L 75-82
−5.5
16
vs
APP
L 77-85
−6.5
29
@
SPU
W 87-61
+29.5
3
vs
UNH
W 69-68
−7.5
6
@
WYO
L 80-93
+1.5
9
@
CSU
L 55-76
−0.5
13
vs
BU
W 77-64
+10.5
16
@
HC
W 89-64
+23.5
19
@
SHU
L 63-85
−23.5
29
@
FLA
L 72-94
+13.5
5
@
HARV
W 76-68
+15.5
10
@
COR
W 102-91
+20.5
17
vs
PENN
L 74-84
−12.5
19
vs
PRIN
W 71-69
+3.5
24
vs
COLU
L 69-79
−7.5
30
@
YALE
L 68-83
+0.5
31
@
BRWN
W 77-70
+8.5
7
vs
HARV
L 58-71
−11.5
13
vs
YALE
L 70-83
−3.5
14
vs
BRWN
L 76-79
−5.5
21
@
COLU
W 64-63
+7.5
27
@
PENN
L 71-80
−2.5
28
@
PRIN
L 61-82
−19.5
7
vs
COR
L 90-111
−16.5
covered 11didn’t cover 14avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
9
vs
MRST
L 56-75
−7.5
12
@
BRY
L 75-82
+5.5
16
vs
APP
L 77-85
+21.5
29
@
SPU
W 87-61
+3.5
3
vs
UNH
W 69-68
−10.5
6
@
WYO
L 80-93
+16.5
9
@
CSU
L 55-76
−22.5
13
vs
BU
W 77-64
−3.5
16
@
HC
W 89-64
+5.5
19
@
SHU
L 63-85
−7.5
29
@
FLA
L 72-94
+5.5
5
@
HARV
W 76-68
−4.5
10
@
COR
W 102-91
+17.5
17
vs
PENN
L 74-84
−5.5
19
vs
PRIN
W 71-69
−7.5
24
vs
COLU
L 69-79
−8.5
30
@
YALE
L 68-83
−4.5
31
@
BRWN
W 77-70
+4.5
7
vs
HARV
L 58-71
−11.5
13
vs
YALE
L 70-83
+1.5
14
vs
BRWN
L 76-79
+15.5
21
@
COLU
W 64-63
−23.5
27
@
PENN
L 71-80
−3.5
28
@
PRIN
L 61-82
+0.5
7
vs
COR
L 90-111
+34.5
over 12under 13avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
UAlbany
29 games played
Straight up
8-21
28% wins
Against the spread
11-18
38% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-15
48% overs · avg +0.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 53-80 | +24.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 62-83 | +9.5 | L −11.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 61-80 | +15.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 63-73 | +10.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 67-69 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 68-88 | +10.5 | L −9.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 65-93 | +13.5 | L −14.5 | 144.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 82-93 | +17.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 79-105 | +18.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | O 184 |
| Dec 17 | @ | W 71-55 | +10.5 | W +26.5 | 146.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 75-83 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 167.5 | U 158 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 67-96 | +19.5 | L −9.5 | 148.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 71-83 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 71-46 | -3.5 | W +21.5 | 136.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 69-53 | -8.5 | W +7.5 | 138.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 75-68 | +5.5 | W +12.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 49-52 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 131.5 | U 101 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 72-80 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 68-77 | -5.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 65-68 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 65-63 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 133.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 79-89 | -4.5 | L −14.5 | 143.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 77-74 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 136.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 81-63 | +3.5 | W +21.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 62-66 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 59-70 | -4.5 | L −15.5 | 130.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 84-61 | -3.5 | W +19.5 | 138.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 56-69 | +9.5 | L −3.5 | 136.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 76-81 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | O 157 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
MARQ
L 53-80
−2.5
8
@
MASS
L 62-83
−11.5
14
@
URI
L 61-80
−3.5
21
@
SIE
L 63-73
+0.5
28
vs
COLG
L 67-69
+5.5
29
vs
FOR
L 68-88
−9.5
6
@
COLU
L 65-93
−14.5
10
vs
YALE
L 82-93
+6.5
13
@
FAU
L 79-105
−7.5
17
@
STBK
W 71-55
+26.5
21
vs
COR
L 75-83
−1.5
30
@
SC
L 67-96
−9.5
3
@
UML
L 71-83
−9.5
10
vs
BRY
W 71-46
+21.5
15
vs
BING
W 69-53
+7.5
19
vs
UVM
W 75-68
+12.5
22
@
ME
L 49-52
−5.5
24
@
UNH
L 72-80
−5.5
29
vs
NJIT
L 68-77
−14.5
31
vs
UMBC
L 65-68
−1.5
5
@
BRY
W 65-63
+3.5
7
vs
UML
L 79-89
−14.5
14
@
BING
W 77-74
−1.5
19
@
NJIT
W 81-63
+21.5
21
@
UMBC
L 62-66
+3.5
26
vs
ME
L 59-70
−15.5
28
vs
UNH
W 84-61
+19.5
3
@
UVM
L 56-69
−3.5
7
@
UML
L 76-81
−2.5
covered 11didn’t cover 18avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
MARQ
L 53-80
−16.5
8
@
MASS
L 62-83
−10.5
14
@
URI
L 61-80
−9.5
21
@
SIE
L 63-73
−4.5
28
vs
COLG
L 67-69
−5.5
29
vs
FOR
L 68-88
+12.5
6
@
COLU
L 65-93
+13.5
10
vs
YALE
L 82-93
+29.5
13
@
FAU
L 79-105
+36.5
17
@
STBK
W 71-55
−20.5
21
vs
COR
L 75-83
−9.5
30
@
SC
L 67-96
+14.5
3
@
UML
L 71-83
+3.5
10
vs
BRY
W 71-46
−19.5
15
vs
BING
W 69-53
−16.5
19
vs
UVM
W 75-68
+3.5
22
@
ME
L 49-52
−30.5
24
@
UNH
L 72-80
+14.5
29
vs
NJIT
L 68-77
+5.5
31
vs
UMBC
L 65-68
−8.5
5
@
BRY
W 65-63
−5.5
7
vs
UML
L 79-89
+24.5
14
@
BING
W 77-74
+14.5
19
@
NJIT
W 81-63
+1.5
21
@
UMBC
L 62-66
−16.5
26
vs
ME
L 59-70
−1.5
28
vs
UNH
W 84-61
+6.5
3
@
UVM
L 56-69
−11.5
7
@
UML
L 76-81
+10.5
over 14under 15avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
UAlbany has the better starters
Position by position: Dartmouth 0, UAlbany 1, even 4
DartmouthBetterUAlbany
G C. McNamee5.7 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 34
=Even
G A. Fall9.6 pts · 3.4 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 27
G L. Williams TR4.8 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 16
→UALBSmall
G Z. Matulu9.7 pts · 5.8 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 48
G N. Abusara5 pts · 2.3 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 47
=Even
G P. Santos TR6.9 pts · 3.8 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 51
G C. Hiatt3.4 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 8
=Even
G M. Rose2.8 pts · 1.5 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 1
G B. Brown1.5 pts · 0.3 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F B. Michaels TR1.9 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 3
DartmouthBetterUAlbany
DART offense261st of 366 · -8.0
=Even
UALB defense259th of 366 · -6.7
DART defense229th of 366 · -6.1
←DARTSmall
UALB offense313th of 366 · -10.0
Backcourt-7.2 · 5 players
→UALBSmall
Backcourt-6.0 · 4 players
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
=No call
Frontcourt-1.8 · 1 player
Bench-0.4 · 4 players
=Even
Bench-0.2 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestDART betterUALB betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. McNamee20 minL. Williams20 min · TRN. Abusara17 minC. Hiatt17 minB. Brown9 minC. AldrichNew
Forwards
P. Tivnan6 minS. Simango3 minT. Garrett3 minJ. PollackNew
Centers
A. Strelnikov6 minD. CivelloNew
Guards
A. Fall31 minZ. Matulu30 minP. Santos19 min · TRM. Rose15 minP. KountaNewO. EngenNew
Forwards
B. Michaels13 min · TRE. BussingNewP. MiovicNewU. GrahamNew
Centers
K. Webb3 min · TRC. SmithNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 73.1 #222 | Points per game | 68.7 #302 |
| 1.05 #253 | Points per possession | 1.05 #259 |
| 69.6 #143 | Pace (possessions) | 65.6 #324 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.8 #156 | Effective FG% | 51.4 #182 |
| 36.1 #51 | 3-point % | 32.6 #248 |
| 48.7 #22 | 3-point attempt rate | 37.6 #220 |
| 38.0 #103 | Free throw rate | 24.9 #364 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.6 #248 | Turnover rate | 18.5 #299 |
| 23.7 #346 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.7 #99 |
| 12.8 #227 | Assists per game | 12.8 #232 |
| Defense | ||
| 78.4 #276 | Points allowed | 74.5 #176 |
| 1.13 #287 | Points allowed per possession | 1.14 #302 |
| 52.7 #254 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.2 #275 |
| 34.6 #227 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.0 #302 |
| 13.8 #339 | Turnovers forced | 15.8 #228 |
| 70.3 #148 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.6 #277 |
| 5.0 #337 | Steals per game | 6.7 #153 |
| 3.5 #147 | Blocks per game | 3.9 #82 |
Dartmouth
9-16 in 2025-26 overall · 5-9 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Cornell90–111
- L@ Princeton61–82
- L@ Penn71–80
- W@ Columbia64–63
- Lvs Brown76–79
A week or more of rest.
UAlbany
8-21 in 2025-26 overall · 7-10 in conference · America East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ UMass Lowell76–81
- L@ Vermont56–69
- Wvs New Hampshire84–61
- Lvs Maine59–70
- L@ UMBC62–66
A week or more of rest.