Daskalakis Athletic Center · at Drexel
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | DREX | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects AMER 70–68 · win probability AMER 57%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 138.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: DREX has more of the edges
AMER 3, DREX 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
AMER hits 33.0% and allows 35.5%; DREX hits 35.5% and allows 30.3%. Threes are 46.5% and 40.0% of their shots
DREX offense vs AMER defense
Offense 323rd of 366 against a defense 122nd, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: AMER 15.6%, DREX 19.1%. Forced: AMER 19.2%, DREX 16.4%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: AMER 96%, DREX 24%. Transfers in: AMER 0, DREX 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Shooting
Effective FG%: AMER 51.5 and allows 54.4; DREX 50.6 and allows 47.1
Free throws
Free throw rate: AMER 28.7, DREX 31.6. Allowed: AMER 42.1, DREX 35.4
Context
Schedule so far
AMER has played the 263rd-hardest schedule, DREX the 199th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Home court
DREX at home. This season: DREX 0-0 at home, AMER 0-0 away
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: AMER 26.9%, DREX 31.2%. Defensive: AMER 70.6%, DREX 69.0%
Context
Tempo
About 66 possessions: AMER plays 66.7 a game (289th fastest), DREX 65.2 (341st). Faster games mean more points
Even
AMER offense vs DREX defense
Offense 201st of 366 against a defense 175th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | AMER -2.0 | — |
| Total | — | 138.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | AMER 70.2 · DREX 68.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | AMER -1.3 | — |
| 1H total | 64.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | AMER 33.1 · DREX 31.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | |
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
AMER 1–0 DREXAMER leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · AMER 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2025-26 | DREX 73 @ AMER 75 | AMER -4.5 | DREX W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
American
30 games played
Straight up
14-16
47% wins
Against the spread
16-14
53% covers · avg −0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg +1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 74-88 | +19.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 84-78 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 67-107 | +17.5 | L −22.5 | 151.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 71-80 | +16.5 | W +7.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 74-61 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 133.5 | O 135 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 55-59 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 137.5 | U 114 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 92-66 | -5.5 | W +20.5 | 148.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 75-73 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 137.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 78-60 | -10.5 | W +7.5 | 130.5 | O 138 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 83-105 | +19.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | O 188 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 51-95 | +27.5 | L −16.5 | 153.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 84-69 | -8.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 64-62 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 62-64 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 148.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 73-84 | -8.5 | L −19.5 | 137.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 12 | vs | W 65-51 | +2.5 | W +16.5 | 139.5 | U 116 |
| Jan 18 | @ | W 78-67 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 70-66 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 76-67 | -4.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 68-77 | -4.5 | L −13.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 65-67 | -5.5 | L −7.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 59-60 | -7.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 73-82 | +4.5 | L −4.5 | 134.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 82-90 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 140.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 75-63 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 75-57 | -3.5 | W +14.5 | 140.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 22 | @ | W 75-61 | -3.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 73-78 | -7.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 65-68 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 73-75 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
WAKE
L 74-88
+5.5
9
vs
PENN
W 84-78
+7.5
12
@
GW
L 67-107
−22.5
18
@
RUTG
L 71-80
+7.5
28
vs
ME
W 74-61
+5.5
29
vs
SIE
L 55-59
−1.5
30
vs
LONG
W 92-66
+20.5
3
vs
DREX
W 75-73
−2.5
6
vs
UMES
W 78-60
+7.5
18
@
VCU
L 83-105
−2.5
22
@
UVA
L 51-95
−16.5
31
vs
L-MD
W 84-69
+6.5
3
@
BU
W 64-62
+3.5
7
@
COLG
L 62-64
+3.5
10
vs
HC
L 73-84
−19.5
12
vs
NAVY
W 65-51
+16.5
18
@
ARMY
W 78-67
+6.5
21
vs
COLG
W 70-66
+2.5
24
@
HC
W 76-67
+4.5
28
@
L-MD
L 68-77
−13.5
31
vs
LAF
L 65-67
−7.5
4
vs
BUCK
L 59-60
−8.5
7
@
NAVY
L 73-82
−4.5
11
@
LEH
L 82-90
−9.5
14
vs
ARMY
W 75-63
+2.5
18
@
BUCK
W 75-57
+14.5
22
@
LAF
W 75-61
+10.5
25
vs
LEH
L 73-78
−12.5
28
vs
BU
L 65-68
−6.5
5
@
BU
L 73-75
−0.5
covered 16didn’t cover 14avg −0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
WAKE
L 74-88
+22.5
9
vs
PENN
W 84-78
+7.5
12
@
GW
L 67-107
+22.5
18
@
RUTG
L 71-80
+7.5
28
vs
ME
W 74-61
+1.5
29
vs
SIE
L 55-59
−23.5
30
vs
LONG
W 92-66
+9.5
3
vs
DREX
W 75-73
+10.5
6
vs
UMES
W 78-60
+7.5
18
@
VCU
L 83-105
+33.5
22
@
UVA
L 51-95
−7.5
31
vs
L-MD
W 84-69
−1.5
3
@
BU
W 64-62
−16.5
7
@
COLG
L 62-64
−22.5
10
vs
HC
L 73-84
+19.5
12
vs
NAVY
W 65-51
−23.5
18
@
ARMY
W 78-67
−2.5
21
vs
COLG
W 70-66
−10.5
24
@
HC
W 76-67
+3.5
28
@
L-MD
L 68-77
−2.5
31
vs
LAF
L 65-67
−10.5
4
vs
BUCK
L 59-60
−22.5
7
@
NAVY
L 73-82
+20.5
11
@
LEH
L 82-90
+31.5
14
vs
ARMY
W 75-63
−6.5
18
@
BUCK
W 75-57
−8.5
22
@
LAF
W 75-61
−5.5
25
vs
LEH
L 73-78
+10.5
28
vs
BU
L 65-68
−7.5
5
@
BU
L 73-75
+6.5
over 15under 15avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Drexel
32 games played
Straight up
16-16
50% wins
Against the spread
19-13
59% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg −2.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 65-76 | +9.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 83-90 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 50-80 | +11.5 | L −18.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 75-43 | -13.5 | W +18.5 | 138.5 | U 118 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 68-84 | -4.5 | L −20.5 | 152.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 75-71 | -3.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 25 | @ | W 71-66 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 73-75 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 64-69 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 129.5 | O 133 |
| Dec 16 | vs | L 66-74 | -6.5 | L −14.5 | 138.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 75-67 | -4.5 | W +3.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 74-56 | -10.5 | W +7.5 | 129.5 | O 130 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 63-72 | +9.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 53-65 | +12.5 | W +0.5 | 137.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 67-70 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 131.5 | O 137 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 56-37 | -5.5 | W +13.5 | 132.5 | U 93 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 64-58 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 150.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 73-51 | +5.5 | W +27.5 | 127.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 58-59 | +7.5 | W +6.5 | 124.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 83-78 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 58-51 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 127.5 | U 109 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 61-60 | -7.5 | L −6.5 | 138.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 60-81 | +4.5 | L −16.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 82-77 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 73-93 | -1.5 | L −21.5 | 133.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 69-72 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 135.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 70-61 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 143.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 68-62 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 130.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 65-60 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 51-62 | +8.5 | L −2.5 | 133.5 | U 113 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 84-77 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 138.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 57-65 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | U 122 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
JOES
L 65-76
−1.5
11
@
COLG
L 83-90
−3.5
15
vs
SYR
L 50-80
−18.5
18
vs
NJIT
W 75-43
+18.5
21
vs
PENN
L 68-84
−20.5
23
vs
ODU
W 75-71
+0.5
25
@
MORG
W 71-66
−0.5
3
@
AMER
L 73-75
+2.5
6
@
LAS
L 64-69
−6.5
16
vs
HOW
L 66-74
−14.5
19
vs
MSM
W 75-67
+3.5
21
vs
ME
W 74-56
+7.5
29
@
COFC
L 63-72
+0.5
31
@
UNCW
L 53-65
+0.5
3
vs
HOF
L 67-70
+1.5
8
vs
STBK
W 56-37
+13.5
10
vs
W&M
W 64-58
+9.5
15
@
MONM
W 73-51
+27.5
19
@
TOW
L 58-59
+6.5
24
vs
NE
W 83-78
+0.5
29
vs
HAMP
W 58-51
+4.5
31
vs
NCAT
W 61-60
−6.5
5
@
CAM
L 60-81
−16.5
7
@
ELON
W 82-77
+9.5
12
vs
MONM
L 73-93
−21.5
16
@
STBK
L 69-72
−0.5
19
@
NE
W 70-61
+10.5
22
vs
TOW
W 68-62
+8.5
26
vs
CAM
W 65-60
+3.5
3
@
HOF
L 51-62
−2.5
7
vs
NE
W 84-77
+2.5
8
vs
MONM
L 57-65
−4.5
covered 19didn’t cover 13avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
JOES
L 65-76
+1.5
11
@
COLG
L 83-90
+29.5
15
vs
SYR
L 50-80
−13.5
18
vs
NJIT
W 75-43
−20.5
21
vs
PENN
L 68-84
−0.5
23
vs
ODU
W 75-71
+3.5
25
@
MORG
W 71-66
−6.5
3
@
AMER
L 73-75
+10.5
6
@
LAS
L 64-69
+3.5
16
vs
HOW
L 66-74
+1.5
19
vs
MSM
W 75-67
+4.5
21
vs
ME
W 74-56
+0.5
29
@
COFC
L 63-72
−7.5
31
@
UNCW
L 53-65
−19.5
3
vs
HOF
L 67-70
+5.5
8
vs
STBK
W 56-37
−39.5
10
vs
W&M
W 64-58
−28.5
15
@
MONM
W 73-51
−3.5
19
@
TOW
L 58-59
−7.5
24
vs
NE
W 83-78
+21.5
29
vs
HAMP
W 58-51
−18.5
31
vs
NCAT
W 61-60
−17.5
5
@
CAM
L 60-81
−0.5
7
@
ELON
W 82-77
+22.5
12
vs
MONM
L 73-93
+32.5
16
@
STBK
L 69-72
+5.5
19
@
NE
W 70-61
−12.5
22
vs
TOW
W 68-62
−0.5
26
vs
CAM
W 65-60
−18.5
3
@
HOF
L 51-62
−20.5
7
vs
NE
W 84-77
+22.5
8
vs
MONM
L 57-65
−14.5
over 14under 18avg −2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
American has the better starters
Position by position: American 3, Drexel 1, even 1
AmericanBetterDrexel
G W. Nausadis7.5 pts · 1.4 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 25
→DREXSmall
G J. Reed7.7 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 44
G M. Collins13.2 pts · 4.7 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 97
←AMERSmall
G A. Abram TR3.2 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 80
F G. Jones12.4 pts · 4.9 reb · 2 ast
Score 55
=Even
G D. Tingler3.4 pts · 1.9 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 59
F M. Mayock8.4 pts · 3.7 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 36
←AMERSmall
F P. Pagonis TR4.1 pts · 3.1 reb · 1 ast
Score 6
F J. Iturbe10.4 pts · 4.6 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 55
←AMERBig
F M. de LaPorterie2.9 pts · 3 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 12
AmericanBetterDrexel
AMER offense201st of 366 · -6.3
=Even
DREX defense175th of 366 · -3.9
AMER defense122nd of 366 · -2.1
←AMERBig
DREX offense323rd of 366 · -10.5
Backcourt+1.4 · 2 players
←AMERSmall
Backcourt-0.2 · 3 players
Frontcourt-1.4 · 3 players
←AMERSmall
Frontcourt-3.5 · 2 players
Bench-2.4 · 5 players
→DREXSmall
Bench-0.1 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestAMER betterDREX betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
W. Nausadis23 minM. Collins22 minK. Sebastian22 minD. Hogans6 minJ. Anderson2 minM. Casey1 min
Forwards
G. Jones31 minM. Mayock29 minJ. Iturbe26 minC. McDonald18 minC. Eagan11 minN. JonesNew
Guards
J. Reed19 minA. Abram11 min · TRD. Tingler10 minM. Davis2 minL. PittmanNewM. HippsNew
Forwards
P. Pagonis18 min · TRM. de LaPorterie13 minR. Akuta5 minC. EdomwonyinNewD. SimonovicNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 72.0 #242 | Points per game | 67.3 #328 |
| 1.08 #190 | Points per possession | 1.03 #282 |
| 66.7 #289 | Pace (possessions) | 65.2 #341 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.5 #169 | Effective FG% | 50.6 #204 |
| 33.0 #235 | 3-point % | 35.5 #90 |
| 46.5 #39 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.0 #171 |
| 28.7 #335 | Free throw rate | 31.6 #265 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.6 #110 | Turnover rate | 19.1 #322 |
| 26.9 #299 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.2 #156 |
| 12.5 #248 | Assists per game | 12.8 #226 |
| Defense | ||
| 72.7 #124 | Points allowed | 67.6 #26 |
| 1.09 #200 | Points allowed per possession | 1.04 #64 |
| 54.4 #313 | Opponent effective FG% | 47.1 #22 |
| 35.5 #283 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.3 #15 |
| 19.2 #40 | Turnovers forced | 16.4 #195 |
| 70.6 #127 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.0 #202 |
| 7.3 #100 | Steals per game | 5.8 #254 |
| 1.4 #363 | Blocks per game | 3.5 #144 |
American
14-16 in 2025-26 overall · 9-10 in conference · Patriot League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Boston U73–75
- Lvs Boston U65–68
- Lvs Lehigh73–78
- W@ Lafayette75–61
- W@ Bucknell75–57
A week or more of rest.
Drexel
16-16 in 2025-26 overall · 11-9 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Monmouth57–65
- Wvs Northeastern84–77
- L@ Hofstra51–62
- Wvs Campbell65–60
- Wvs Towson68–62
A week or more of rest.