Fordham Rams at Kansas Jayhawks: Model Line and Edge

Mon, Nov 2, 8:00 PM ETAllen Fieldhouse · at Kansas

#16KUKansas AP #17

LineKU -23.5moved 1 toward KU

Total144.5down 2 from 146.5

Season records: Fordham and Kansas
FOR	This season	KU
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects KU 83–63 · win probability KU 95%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Spread

Total

Winner

Line

KU -23.5

moved 1 toward KU

Total

144.5

model 145.9 · Over by 1.5

Model edge

FOR by 4.5

model vs market

Public on the spread

92% FOR

38% of the money

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: KU has more of the edges

FOR 3, KU 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

KUBig

Three-pointers

FOR hits 28.9% and allows 33.4%; KU hits 34.6% and allows 30.6%. Threes are 38.3% and 35.2% of their shots

FORBig

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: FOR 34.1%, KU 29.3%. Defensive: FOR 73.2%, KU 70.1%

Context

Schedule so far

FOR has played the 136th-hardest schedule, KU the 2nd. A record against a soft schedule means less

KUSmall

FOR offense vs KU defense

Offense 119th of 366 against a defense 15th, on the model’s ratings

KUSmall

Shooting

Effective FG%: FOR 48.6 and allows 49.9; KU 51.2 and allows 45.0

FORSmall

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: FOR 63%, KU 9%. Transfers in: FOR 4, KU 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Context

Tempo

About 67 possessions: FOR plays 64.8 a game (349th fastest), KU 68.8 (193rd). Faster games mean more points

KUSmall

Free throws

Free throw rate: FOR 26.4, KU 32.2. Allowed: FOR 30.3, KU 27.4

KUSmall

KU offense vs FOR defense

Offense 17th of 366 against a defense 71st, on the model’s ratings

KUSmall

Home court

KU at home. This season: KU 0-0 at home, FOR 0-0 away

FORSmall

Turnovers

Turnover rate: FOR 17.2%, KU 15.6%. Forced: FOR 17.2%, KU 13.8%

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

How games like this went

Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines

Situation	Games	Favorite won	Favorite covered	Went over
Home favorites of 20 or more	1165	99%	50%	52%
Non-conference games at this spread	1090	99%	50%	52%
Lines that moved 1+ toward the favorite	6763	75%	50%	51%
Games with a total of 140 to 144.5	3570	72%	50%	50%

A bet at standard prices needs 52.4% to break even, and most situations sit near 50%. Past rates, not a prediction.

Market

Open → current

Spread

OpenKU -22.5

1 → KU

NowKU -23.5

1 pt toward KU

Total

Open146.5

▼ 2

Now144.5

Down 2 since the open

Moneyline

FOR +2200 · KU -10000

Line movement

Median of 8 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot

Opened KU -22.5 · now KU -23.5 · moved 1 toward KUmodel KU -19

model KU -19

Openline modelNow

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Public betting

Share of bets and of money

FOR +23.5Spread

KU -23.5

Bets

92%8%

Money

38%62%

Money leans KU -23.5 · 54 pts more of the money than of the bets

Over 144.5TotalUnder 144.5

Bets

77%23%

Money

77%23%

FORWinner

Bets

98%

Money

98%

Sports Betting Dime, an average of sportsbooks. Read Mon, Nov 2, 4:41 AM ET. ⓘ

Books

8 sportsbooks · current prices

SpreadTotalMoneyline

Book	Spread		Total		Moneyline
Book	FOR	KU	Over	Under	FOR	KU
BetMGMMGM	-23.5-115	+23.5-105	143.5-115	143.5-105	+2200	-10000
BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag	-23-110	+23-110	143.5-110	143.5-110	—	—
BetRiversBetRivers	-23.5-117	+23.5-107	143.5-113	143.5-110	—	—
BetUSBetUS	-23-110	+23-110	143.5-110	143.5-110	—	—
BovadaBovada	-23.5-115	+23.5-105	144-110	144-110	—	—
DraftKingsDK	-23.5-115	+23.5-105	144.5-105	144.5-115	+2200	-8000
FanDuelFD	-23.5-110	+23.5-110	143.5-110	143.5-110	+2800	-10000
LowVig.agLowVig.ag	-23-106	+23-106	143.5-108	143.5-108	—	—

Prices from The Odds API, updated 5:30 AM ET. Green = best price in the column.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	KU -23.5	KU -19.2	FOR +4.3
Total	144.5	145.9	Over 1.4
Projected score	—	FOR 63.3 · KU 82.6

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	KU -11.3	—
1H total	68.3	—
1H projected score	FOR 28.5 · KU 39.8	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
FOR WLLWW	16-13	55%	6-4	9-8
KU WWLLW	21-14	60%	10-5	14-8

Venue/role: FOR away, as underdog; KU home, as favorite. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
FOR UOOUU	7-22	24%	14-15
KU OOUUU	11-24	31%	24-11

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
FOR	5-5 50%	6-4 60%	3-7 30%
KU	5-5 50%	5-5 50%	3-7 30%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

Fordham

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 5	vs STO	W71–60LU
Nov 10	vs IONA	L71–76WU
Nov 13	vs LIU	W69–53WU

Kansas

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 6	vs MTSU	No recent meeting
Nov 10	vs UK	W89–84LO
Nov 17	vs UNLV	No recent meeting

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

Fordham

29 games played

Straight up

14-15

48% wins

Against the spread

16-13

55% covers · avg +1.5 pts vs the line

Over / Under

7-22

24% overs · avg −7.3 pts vs the total

Straight up

14-1548%

L W L W W L L W W W L L L W L L L W W L L W W W W L L W L

1 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

16-1355%

L L W W W L L W W W W L L W L L L W W W L W W L W L L W W

2 straight covers2 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

7-2224%

U U U U O U O U U U U O U O U U U U U U U U O U U O O U U

2 straight unders2 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 4	vsNJIT	L 61-72	-14.5	L −25.5	147.5	U 133
Nov 11	vsWAG	W 63-61	-12.5	L −10.5	139.5	U 124
Nov 14	@IONA	L 71-76	+5.5	W +0.5	157.5	U 147
Nov 20	vsLIU	W 69-53	-4.5	W +11.5	145.5	U 122
Nov 29	vsUALB	W 88-68	-10.5	W +9.5	143.5	O 156
Nov 30	vsCOLG	L 62-72	+1.5	L −8.5	142.5	U 134
Dec 6	vsHC	L 69-70	-10.5	L −11.5	138.5	O 139
Dec 10	vsFDU	W 75-54	-11.5	W +9.5	141.5	U 129
Dec 13	vsMAN	W 82-53	-8.5	W +20.5	147.5	U 135
Dec 22	vsNHVN	W 65-47	-13.5	W +4.5	127.5	U 112
Dec 31	@DAY	L 56-63	+16.5	W +9.5	139.5	U 119
Jan 4	vsRICH	L 75-83	+2.5	L −5.5	142.5	O 158
Jan 7	vsGMU	L 58-67	+5.5	L −3.5	134.5	U 125
Jan 10	@SBU	W 81-77	+8.5	W +12.5	142.5	O 158
Jan 14	@SLU	L 56-78	+17.5	L −4.5	154.5	U 134
Jan 17	vsDUQ	L 63-74	+1.5	L −9.5	145.5	U 137
Jan 21	@DAV	L 63-68	+4.5	L −0.5	135.5	U 131
Jan 28	vsLAS	W 64-58	-5.5	W +0.5	136.5	U 122
Jan 31	@GW	W 79-65	+11.5	W +25.5	150.5	U 144
Feb 3	vsVCU	L 59-63	+7.5	W +3.5	146.5	U 122
Feb 7	vsSBU	L 67-70	+1.5	L −1.5	141.5	U 137
Feb 10	@JOES	W 68-64	+3.5	W +7.5	135.5	U 132
Feb 14	@URI	W 70-66	+4.5	W +8.5	134.5	O 136
Feb 18	vsLUC	W 62-59	-8.5	L −5.5	135.5	U 121
Feb 21	vsDAV	W 63-59	+1.5	W +5.5	131.5	U 122
Feb 28	@VCU	L 63-82	+12.5	L −6.5	144.5	O 145
Mar 4	@LAS	L 84-87	-3.5	L −6.5	131.5	O 171
Mar 7	vsURI	W 61-49	-1.5	W +10.5	136.5	U 110
Mar 12	vsGW	L 62-66	+7.5	W +3.5	144.5	U 128

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

NJIT

L 61-72

−25.5

WAG

W 63-61

−10.5

IONA

L 71-76

+0.5

LIU

W 69-53

+11.5

UALB

W 88-68

+9.5

COLG

L 62-72

−8.5

L 69-70

−11.5

FDU

W 75-54

+9.5

MAN

W 82-53

+20.5

NHVN

W 65-47

+4.5

DAY

L 56-63

+9.5

RICH

L 75-83

−5.5

GMU

L 58-67

−3.5

SBU

W 81-77

+12.5

SLU

L 56-78

−4.5

DUQ

L 63-74

−9.5

DAV

L 63-68

−0.5

LAS

W 64-58

+0.5

W 79-65

+25.5

VCU

L 59-63

+3.5

SBU

L 67-70

−1.5

JOES

W 68-64

+7.5

URI

W 70-66

+8.5

LUC

W 62-59

−5.5

DAV

W 63-59

+5.5

VCU

L 63-82

−6.5

LAS

L 84-87

−6.5

URI

W 61-49

+10.5

L 62-66

+3.5

covered 16didn’t cover 13avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

NJIT

L 61-72

−14.5

WAG

W 63-61

−15.5

IONA

L 71-76

−10.5

LIU

W 69-53

−23.5

UALB

W 88-68

+12.5

COLG

L 62-72

−8.5

L 69-70

+0.5

FDU

W 75-54

−12.5

MAN

W 82-53

−12.5

NHVN

W 65-47

−15.5

DAY

L 56-63

−20.5

RICH

L 75-83

+15.5

GMU

L 58-67

−9.5

SBU

W 81-77

+15.5

SLU

L 56-78

−20.5

DUQ

L 63-74

−8.5

DAV

L 63-68

−4.5

LAS

W 64-58

−14.5

W 79-65

−6.5

VCU

L 59-63

−24.5

SBU

L 67-70

−4.5

JOES

W 68-64

−3.5

URI

W 70-66

+1.5

LUC

W 62-59

−14.5

DAV

W 63-59

−9.5

VCU

L 63-82

+0.5

LAS

L 84-87

+39.5

URI

W 61-49

−26.5

L 62-66

−16.5

over 7under 22avg −7.3 ptslonger = bigger margin

Kansas

35 games played

Straight up

24-11

69% wins

Against the spread

21-14

60% covers · avg +1.3 pts vs the line

Over / Under

11-24

31% overs · avg −4.3 pts vs the total

Straight up

24-1169%

W L W W L W W W L W W W W L W L W W W W W W W W L W L W L L W W L W L

2 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

21-1460%

W L W L L W W W L W W W W L L L W W W W W W L W L W L W L L W W L L W

2 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

11-2431%

U O U U U U U O U U O U O U O O U U U U O U U O U U O U U U O O U U U

3 straight unders1 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	vsGB	W 94-51	-30.5	W +12.5	152.5	U 145
Nov 7	@UNC	L 74-87	+2.5	L −10.5	159.5	O 161
Nov 11	vsAMCC	W 77-46	-25.5	W +5.5	145.5	U 123
Nov 15	vsPRIN	W 76-57	-22.5	L −3.5	144.5	U 133
Nov 18	vsDUKE	L 66-78	+10.5	L −1.5	149.5	U 144
Nov 24	vsND	W 71-61	-5.5	W +4.5	143.5	U 132
Nov 25	vsSYR	W 71-60	-4.5	W +6.5	144.5	U 131
Nov 26	vsTENN	W 81-76	+7.5	W +12.5	140.5	O 157
Dec 2	vsCONN	L 56-61	+3.5	L −1.5	141.5	U 117
Dec 7	vsMIZ	W 80-60	-5.5	W +14.5	150.5	U 140
Dec 13	@NCSU	W 77-76	+1.5	W +2.5	148.5	O 153
Dec 16	vsTOW	W 73-49	-14.5	W +9.5	137.5	U 122
Dec 22	vsDAV	W 90-61	-14.5	W +14.5	139.5	O 151
Jan 3	@UCF	L 75-81	-4.5	L −10.5	157.5	U 156
Jan 6	vsTCU	W 104-100	-6.5	L −2.5	143.5	O 204
Jan 10	@WVU	L 75-86	-2.5	L −13.5	139.5	O 161
Jan 13	vsISU	W 84-63	+3.5	W +24.5	152.5	U 147
Jan 16	vsBAY	W 80-62	-7.5	W +10.5	156.5	U 142
Jan 20	@COLO	W 75-69	-4.5	W +1.5	155.5	U 144
Jan 24	@KSU	W 86-62	-4.5	W +19.5	158.5	U 148
Jan 31	vsBYU	W 90-82	-2.5	W +5.5	159.5	O 172
Feb 2	@TTU	W 64-61	+3.5	W +6.5	155.5	U 125
Feb 7	vsUTAH	W 71-59	-18.5	L −6.5	150.5	U 130
Feb 9	vsARIZ	W 82-78	+5.5	W +9.5	152.5	O 160
Feb 14	@ISU	L 56-74	+7.5	L −10.5	147.5	U 130
Feb 18	@OKST	W 81-69	-7.5	W +4.5	158.5	U 150
Feb 21	vsCIN	L 68-84	-8.5	L −24.5	139.5	O 152
Feb 23	vsHOU	W 69-56	+2.5	W +15.5	138.5	U 125
Feb 28	@ARIZ	L 61-84	+9.5	L −13.5	151.5	U 145
Mar 3	@ASU	L 60-70	-5.5	L −15.5	151.5	U 130
Mar 7	vsKSU	W 104-85	-17.5	W +1.5	157.5	O 189
Mar 12	vsTCU	W 78-73	-4.5	W +0.5	146.5	O 151
Mar 13	vsHOU	L 47-69	+5.5	L −16.5	139.5	U 116
Mar 20	vsCBU	W 68-60	-14.5	L −6.5	142.5	U 128
Mar 22	vsSJU	L 65-67	+3.5	W +1.5	144.5	U 132

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

W 94-51

+12.5

UNC

L 74-87

−10.5

AMCC

W 77-46

+5.5

PRIN

W 76-57

−3.5

DUKE

L 66-78

−1.5

W 71-61

+4.5

SYR

W 71-60

+6.5

TENN

W 81-76

+12.5

CONN

L 56-61

−1.5

MIZ

W 80-60

+14.5

NCSU

W 77-76

+2.5

TOW

W 73-49

+9.5

DAV

W 90-61

+14.5

UCF

L 75-81

−10.5

TCU

W 104-100

−2.5

WVU

L 75-86

−13.5

ISU

W 84-63

+24.5

BAY

W 80-62

+10.5

COLO

W 75-69

+1.5

KSU

W 86-62

+19.5

BYU

W 90-82

+5.5

TTU

W 64-61

+6.5

UTAH

W 71-59

−6.5

ARIZ

W 82-78

+9.5

ISU

L 56-74

−10.5

OKST

W 81-69

+4.5

CIN

L 68-84

−24.5

HOU

W 69-56

+15.5

ARIZ

L 61-84

−13.5

ASU

L 60-70

−15.5

KSU

W 104-85

+1.5

TCU

W 78-73

+0.5

HOU

L 47-69

−16.5

CBU

W 68-60

−6.5

SJU

L 65-67

+1.5

covered 21didn’t cover 14avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

W 94-51

−7.5

UNC

L 74-87

+1.5

AMCC

W 77-46

−22.5

PRIN

W 76-57

−11.5

DUKE

L 66-78

−5.5

W 71-61

−11.5

SYR

W 71-60

−13.5

TENN

W 81-76

+16.5

CONN

L 56-61

−24.5

MIZ

W 80-60

−10.5

NCSU

W 77-76

+4.5

TOW

W 73-49

−15.5

DAV

W 90-61

+11.5

UCF

L 75-81

−1.5

TCU

W 104-100

+60.5

WVU

L 75-86

+21.5

ISU

W 84-63

−5.5

BAY

W 80-62

−14.5

COLO

W 75-69

−11.5

KSU

W 86-62

−10.5

BYU

W 90-82

+12.5

TTU

W 64-61

−30.5

UTAH

W 71-59

−20.5

ARIZ

W 82-78

+7.5

ISU

L 56-74

−17.5

OKST

W 81-69

−8.5

CIN

L 68-84

+12.5

HOU

W 69-56

−13.5

ARIZ

L 61-84

−6.5

ASU

L 60-70

−21.5

KSU

W 104-85

+31.5

TCU

W 78-73

+4.5

HOU

L 47-69

−23.5

CBU

W 68-60

−14.5

SJU

L 65-67

−12.5

over 11under 24avg −4.3 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

Kansas has the better starters

Position by position: Fordham 0, Kansas 3, even 2

FordhamBetterKansas

G A. Lindsey TR17.9 pts · 3.3 reb · 4.9 ast Score 79

Even

G L. Blyden TR16.5 pts · 4.1 reb · 4.5 ast Score 85

G L. Patrick TR15 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.8 ast Score 68

KUSmall

G D. Parker TR18.6 pts · 5.9 reb · 1.3 ast Score 94

F R. Schulte10.4 pts · 9.2 reb · 1.5 ast Score 82

Even

F K. Dawes TR12.5 pts · 8.8 reb · 2.2 ast Score 91

F A. Jacobs7.2 pts · 4.8 reb · 0.8 ast Score 27

KUBig

F T. Kaufman-Renn TR14.2 pts · 8.3 reb · 2.5 ast Score 98

C J. Whitbourn8.4 pts · 8.4 reb · 0.7 ast Score 63

KUSmall

C C. Reeves TR11 pts · 7.8 reb · 0.4 ast Score 94

FordhamBetterKansas

FOR offense119th of 366 · -2.7

KUSmall

KU defense15th of 366 · +6.3

FOR defense71st of 366 · +0.8

KUSmall

KU offense17th of 366 · +8.6

Backcourt+2.1 · 2 players

KUBig

Backcourt+5.7 · 2 players

Frontcourt+1.3 · 3 players

KUBig

Frontcourt+13.0 · 3 players

Bench+0.2 · 5 players

Even

Bench+0.1 · 3 players

Score, worst to bestFOR betterKU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

Fordham

Guards

A. Lindsey38 min · TRL. Patrick29 min · TRK. Odih5 min · TRJ. Laboy4 min · TRA. Crotty1 minM. Miller1 min

Forwards

R. Schulte31 minA. Jacobs29 minA. Bodija19 minR. Akhuar19 minF. Siaca BeyNew

Centers

J. Whitbourn24 minO. EssamNew

Kansas

Guards

L. Blyden34 min · TRD. Parker30 min · TRK. Rosario12 minW. Thengvall2 minT. StokesNewT. PerryNew

Forwards

K. Dawes31 min · TRT. Kaufman-Renn28 min · TRD. AdkinsNewA. RichmondNewG. MordiniNew

Centers

C. Reeves21 min · TRP. Mbiya5 min

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

FOR67.5 #323

KU75.1 #161

Points per possession

FOR1.04 #262

KU1.09 #152

Pace (possessions)

FOR64.8 #349

KU68.8 #193

Shooting

Effective FG%

FOR48.6 #300

KU51.2 #186

3-point %

FOR28.9 #356

KU34.6 #139

3-point attempt rate

FOR38.3 #205

KU35.2 #268

Free throw rate

FOR26.4 #354

KU32.2 #255

Possessions

Turnover rate

FOR17.2 #219

KU15.6 #111

Offensive rebound rate

FOR34.1 #64

KU29.3 #227

Assists per game

FOR13.2 #200

KU13.9 #150

Defense

Points allowed

FOR66.3 #17

KU69.1 #47

Points allowed per possession

FOR1.02 #47

KU1.00 #28

Opponent effective FG%

FOR49.9 #95

KU45.0 #2

Opponent 3-point %

FOR33.4 #149

KU30.6 #24

Turnovers forced

FOR17.2 #138

KU13.8 #340

Defensive rebound rate

FOR73.2 #29

KU70.1 #152

Steals per game

FOR7.0 #126

KU5.4 #310

Blocks per game

FOR2.2 #335

KU5.8 #6

FOR		KU
Scoring
67.5 #323	Points per game	75.1 #161
1.04 #262	Points per possession	1.09 #152
64.8 #349	Pace (possessions)	68.8 #193
Shooting
48.6 #300	Effective FG%	51.2 #186
28.9 #356	3-point %	34.6 #139
38.3 #205	3-point attempt rate	35.2 #268
26.4 #354	Free throw rate	32.2 #255
Possessions
17.2 #219	Turnover rate	15.6 #111
34.1 #64	Offensive rebound rate	29.3 #227
13.2 #200	Assists per game	13.9 #150
Defense
66.3 #17	Points allowed	69.1 #47
1.02 #47	Points allowed per possession	1.00 #28
49.9 #95	Opponent effective FG%	45.0 #2
33.4 #149	Opponent 3-point %	30.6 #24
17.2 #138	Turnovers forced	13.8 #340
73.2 #29	Defensive rebound rate	70.1 #152
7.0 #126	Steals per game	5.4 #310
2.2 #335	Blocks per game	5.8 #6

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Fordham

14-15 in 2025-26 overall · 8-11 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs G Washington62–66
Wvs Rhode Island61–49
L@ La Salle84–87
L@ VCU63–82
Wvs Davidson63–59

A week or more of rest.

Kansas

24-11 in 2025-26 overall · 13-7 in conference · Big 12 Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs St John's65–67
Wvs CA Baptist68–60
Lvs Houston47–69
Wvs TCU78–73
Wvs Kansas St104–85

A week or more of rest.