Rose Hill Gym · at Fordham
#349STOStonehill
@
#100FORFordham
LineNo line yet 
Total— 
Season records: Stonehill and Fordham
STOThis seasonFOR
0-0Record0-0
0-0ATS0-0
0-0O/U0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects FOR 78–56 · win probability FOR 97%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 134.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: FOR has more of the edges

STO 0, FOR 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
FORBig
STO offense vs FOR defense
Offense 363rd of 366 against a defense 71st, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
STO has played the 352nd-hardest schedule, FOR the 136th. A record against a soft schedule means less
FORBig
Turnovers
Turnover rate: STO 19.4%, FOR 17.2%. Forced: STO 13.4%, FOR 17.2%
FORBig
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: STO 27.5%, FOR 34.1%. Defensive: STO 72.9%, FOR 73.2%
FORSmall
FOR offense vs STO defense
Offense 119th of 366 against a defense 225th, on the model’s ratings
FORSmall
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: STO 28%, FOR 63%. Transfers in: STO 6, FOR 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 66 possessions: STO plays 67.6 a game (244th fastest), FOR 64.8 (349th). Faster games mean more points
FORSmall
Home court
FOR at home. This season: FOR 0-0 at home, STO 0-0 away
Even
Three-pointers
STO hits 31.7% and allows 33.4%; FOR hits 28.9% and allows 33.4%. Threes are 40.5% and 38.3% of their shots
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: STO 46.9 and allows 47.8; FOR 48.6 and allows 49.9
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: STO 27.3, FOR 26.4. Allowed: STO 30.3, FOR 30.3

Market

Open → current
Spread
Opening line not available
Total
 
Moneyline
—

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Model vs market

MarketModelModel edge
Spread—FOR -22.3—
Total—134.1—
Projected score—STO 55.9 · FOR 78.1

1st-half model

ModelActual
1H spreadFOR -13.1—
1H total62.8—
1H projected scoreSTO 24.8 · FOR 38—

Fordham has the better starters

Position by position: Stonehill 0, Fordham 4, even 1
StonehillBetterFordham
G W. Batchelder8 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.5 ast Not ranked
No call
G A. Lindsey TR17.9 pts · 3.3 reb · 4.9 ast Score 79
G A. Boldin TR5.3 pts · 2.8 reb · 1 ast Score 29
FORBig
G L. Patrick TR15 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.8 ast Score 68
G D. Arlington TR2.7 pts · 1.9 reb · 1.3 ast Score 5
FORBig
F R. Schulte10.4 pts · 9.2 reb · 1.5 ast Score 82
G E. Greenberg TR2.3 pts · 1.2 reb · 1.5 ast Score 0
FORSmall
F A. Jacobs7.2 pts · 4.8 reb · 0.8 ast Score 27
G A. Allen TR3.6 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.3 ast Score 15
FORBig
C J. Whitbourn8.4 pts · 8.4 reb · 0.7 ast Score 63
StonehillBetterFordham
STO offense363rd of 366 · -14.8
FORBig
FOR defense71st of 366 · +0.8
STO defense225th of 366 · -5.9
FORSmall
FOR offense119th of 366 · -2.7
Backcourt-10.2 · 5 players
FORBig
Backcourt+2.1 · 2 players
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
No call
Frontcourt+1.3 · 3 players
Bench-3.6 · 5 players
FORBig
Bench+0.2 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestSTO betterFOR betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Stonehill
Guards
W. Batchelder32 minA. Boldin18 min · TRD. Arlington14 min · TRE. Greenberg14 min · TRA. Allen14 min · TRT. Ruth11 min
Forwards
P. McGuinn9 minE. Steele4 min · TRJ. MedalieNewB. LeonsNew
Centers
D. ChengNew
Fordham
Guards
A. Lindsey38 min · TRL. Patrick29 min · TRK. Odih5 min · TRJ. Laboy4 min · TRA. Crotty1 minM. Miller1 min
Forwards
R. Schulte31 minA. Jacobs29 minA. Bodija19 minR. Akhuar19 minF. Siaca BeyNew
Centers
J. Whitbourn24 minO. EssamNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Shooting
Possessions
Defense
STOFOR
Scoring
64.2 #353Points per game67.5 #323
0.95 #357Points per possession1.04 #262
67.6 #244Pace (possessions)64.8 #349
Shooting
46.9 #339Effective FG%48.6 #300
31.7 #2943-point %28.9 #356
40.5 #1583-point attempt rate38.3 #205
27.3 #350Free throw rate26.4 #354
Possessions
19.4 #333Turnover rate17.2 #219
27.5 #282Offensive rebound rate34.1 #64
11.8 #298Assists per game13.2 #200
Defense
69.5 #56Points allowed66.3 #17
1.03 #57Points allowed per possession1.02 #47
47.8 #36Opponent effective FG%49.9 #95
33.4 #150Opponent 3-point %33.4 #149
13.4 #347Turnovers forced17.2 #138
72.9 #40Defensive rebound rate73.2 #29
4.7 #347Steals per game7.0 #126
4.0 #75Blocks per game2.2 #335

Stonehill

10-21 in 2025-26 overall · 9-11 in conference · Northeast Conference

Last five, 2025-26
  • L@ Mercyhurst51–56
  • W@ Le Moyne81–71
  • Lvs Mercyhurst72–75
  • Wvs Saint Francis Red Wolves103–77
  • Wvs Le Moyne77–68

A week or more of rest.

Fordham

14-15 in 2025-26 overall · 8-11 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference

Last five, 2025-26
  • Lvs G Washington62–66
  • Wvs Rhode Island61–49
  • L@ La Salle84–87
  • L@ VCU63–82
  • Wvs Davidson63–59

A week or more of rest.