Humphrey Coliseum · at Mississippi St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MSST | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MSST 87–63 · win probability MSST 98%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 149.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MSST has more of the edges
NWST 1, MSST 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
NWST has played the 292nd-hardest schedule, MSST the 26th. A record against a soft schedule means less
NWST offense vs MSST defense
Offense 340th of 366 against a defense 88th, on the model’s ratings
MSST offense vs NWST defense
Offense 34th of 366 against a defense 236th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: NWST plays 65.4 a game (334th fastest), MSST 72.3 (29th). Faster games mean more points
Shooting
Effective FG%: NWST 48.6 and allows 53.0; MSST 51.5 and allows 50.9
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: NWST 26.1%, MSST 29.8%. Defensive: NWST 67.4%, MSST 69.3%
Free throws
Free throw rate: NWST 40.1, MSST 30.6. Allowed: NWST 36.3, MSST 32.3
Home court
MSST at home. This season: MSST 0-0 at home, NWST 0-0 away
Even
Three-pointers
NWST hits 33.2% and allows 35.5%; MSST hits 32.4% and allows 33.9%. Threes are 33.9% and 40.1% of their shots
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: NWST 18.3%, MSST 16.0%. Forced: NWST 16.9%, MSST 12.8%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: NWST 28%, MSST 23%. Transfers in: NWST 2, MSST 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | MSST -24.2 | — |
| Total | — | 149.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | NWST 62.7 · MSST 86.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | MSST -14.3 | — |
| 1H total | 69.9 | — |
| 1H projected score | NWST 27.8 · MSST 42.1 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | |
| 2-8 20% | 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
N'Western St
30 games played
Straight up
8-22
27% wins
Against the spread
17-13
57% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg −2.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 68-98 | +21.5 | L −8.5 | 153.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 53-80 | +11.5 | L −15.5 | 137.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 83-87 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 64-84 | +16.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 72-85 | +18.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 73-75 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 5 | @ | L 54-92 | +19.5 | L −18.5 | 139.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 7 | @ | W 76-68 | +7.5 | W +15.5 | 133.5 | O 144 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 70-79 | +19.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 61-76 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 64-74 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 74-68 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 5 | @ | L 72-74 | +8.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 79-78 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 138.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 12 | vs | W 64-63 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 74-76 | +8.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 80-82 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 67-69 | +14.5 | W +12.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 64-75 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 153.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 2 | vs | L 58-61 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 68-74 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 48-52 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 140.5 | U 100 |
| Feb 9 | @ | W 70-68 | +6.5 | W +8.5 | 135.5 | O 138 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 69-66 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 131.5 | O 135 |
| Feb 16 | vs | L 64-75 | +14.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | O 139 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 71-53 | -2.5 | W +15.5 | 134.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 23 | vs | W 54-49 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | U 103 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 59-71 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 134.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 2 | @ | L 62-74 | +9.5 | L −2.5 | 139.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 47-61 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 138.5 | U 108 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
TA&M
L 68-98
−8.5
6
@
UNT
L 53-80
−15.5
11
@
UNA
L 83-87
+2.5
18
@
SF
L 64-84
−3.5
21
@
GCU
L 72-85
+5.5
29
vs
SOU
L 73-75
+1.5
5
@
MCN
L 54-92
−18.5
7
@
SELA
W 76-68
+15.5
13
@
CAL
L 70-79
+10.5
29
vs
LAM
L 61-76
−11.5
31
vs
SFA
L 64-74
−1.5
3
vs
NOLA
W 74-68
+7.5
5
@
NICH
L 72-74
+6.5
10
vs
AMCC
W 79-78
+6.5
12
vs
RGV
W 64-63
+3.5
17
@
UIW
L 74-76
+6.5
19
@
HCU
L 80-82
+0.5
27
@
SFA
L 67-69
+12.5
31
@
NOLA
L 64-75
−6.5
2
vs
NICH
L 58-61
−1.5
4
vs
ETAM
L 68-74
−9.5
7
@
ETAM
L 48-52
−2.5
9
@
LAM
W 70-68
+8.5
14
vs
SELA
W 69-66
+1.5
16
vs
MCN
L 64-75
+3.5
21
vs
HCU
W 71-53
+15.5
23
vs
UIW
W 54-49
+3.5
28
@
AMCC
L 59-71
−6.5
2
@
RGV
L 62-74
−2.5
8
vs
NICH
L 47-61
−12.5
covered 17didn’t cover 13avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
TA&M
L 68-98
+12.5
6
@
UNT
L 53-80
−4.5
11
@
UNA
L 83-87
+27.5
18
@
SF
L 64-84
+4.5
21
@
GCU
L 72-85
+9.5
29
vs
SOU
L 73-75
+3.5
5
@
MCN
L 54-92
+6.5
7
@
SELA
W 76-68
+10.5
13
@
CAL
L 70-79
+3.5
29
vs
LAM
L 61-76
−1.5
31
vs
SFA
L 64-74
−0.5
3
vs
NOLA
W 74-68
−7.5
5
@
NICH
L 72-74
+1.5
10
vs
AMCC
W 79-78
+18.5
12
vs
RGV
W 64-63
−16.5
17
@
UIW
L 74-76
+8.5
19
@
HCU
L 80-82
+22.5
27
@
SFA
L 67-69
−5.5
31
@
NOLA
L 64-75
−14.5
2
vs
NICH
L 58-61
−28.5
4
vs
ETAM
L 68-74
−1.5
7
@
ETAM
L 48-52
−40.5
9
@
LAM
W 70-68
+2.5
14
vs
SELA
W 69-66
+3.5
16
vs
MCN
L 64-75
+0.5
21
vs
HCU
W 71-53
−10.5
23
vs
UIW
W 54-49
−35.5
28
@
AMCC
L 59-71
−4.5
2
@
RGV
L 62-74
−3.5
8
vs
NICH
L 47-61
−30.5
over 15under 15avg −2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Mississippi St
32 games played
Straight up
13-19
41% wins
Against the spread
10-22
31% covers · avg −4.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-16
50% overs · avg +3.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | W 86-62 | -24.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 10 | vs | L 80-96 | +5.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 75-68 | -27.5 | L −20.5 | 150.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 20 | vs | L 77-98 | -2.5 | L −23.5 | 164.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 78-80 | -6.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 81-78 | -23.5 | L −20.5 | 160.5 | U 159 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 81-87 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 85-73 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 150.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 62-65 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 82-74 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 153.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 87-83 | -16.5 | L −12.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 71-66 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 94-56 | -17.5 | W +20.5 | 154.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 101-98 | +9.5 | W +12.5 | 157.5 | O 199 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 72-53 | -1.5 | W +17.5 | 158.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 68-92 | +10.5 | L −13.5 | 152.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 82-97 | +4.5 | L −10.5 | 171.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 67-68 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 68-88 | +8.5 | L −11.5 | 163.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 56-88 | +7.5 | L −24.5 | 159.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 80-66 | +7.5 | W +21.5 | 154.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 79-84 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 68-88 | +5.5 | L −14.5 | 163.5 | U 156 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 64-73 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 90-78 | +3.5 | W +15.5 | 146.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 91-85 | +5.5 | W +11.5 | 155.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 89-97 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | O 186 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 75-100 | +12.5 | L −12.5 | 176.5 | U 175 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 64-88 | +1.5 | L −22.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 74-108 | +20.5 | L −13.5 | 161.5 | O 182 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 96-102 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 167.5 | O 198 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 61-79 | +8.5 | L −9.5 | 160.5 | U 140 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
UNA
W 86-62
−0.5
10
vs
ISU
L 80-96
−10.5
15
vs
SELA
W 75-68
−20.5
20
vs
KSU
L 77-98
−23.5
21
vs
UNM
L 78-80
−8.5
24
vs
NOLA
W 81-78
−20.5
28
vs
SMU
L 81-87
−7.5
3
@
GT
W 85-73
+10.5
7
vs
SF
L 62-65
−7.5
13
vs
UTAH
W 82-74
+6.5
16
vs
LIU
W 87-83
−12.5
20
vs
MEM
W 71-66
+1.5
29
vs
ALST
W 94-56
+20.5
3
@
TEX
W 101-98
+12.5
7
vs
OU
W 72-53
+17.5
10
@
UK
L 68-92
−13.5
13
vs
ALA
L 82-97
−10.5
17
vs
MISS
L 67-68
−4.5
21
@
TA&M
L 68-88
−11.5
24
vs
VAN
L 56-88
−24.5
28
@
LSU
W 80-66
+21.5
31
@
MIZ
L 79-84
+1.5
7
vs
ARK
L 68-88
−14.5
11
vs
TENN
L 64-73
−0.5
14
@
MISS
W 90-78
+15.5
18
vs
AUB
W 91-85
+11.5
21
@
SC
L 89-97
−9.5
25
@
ALA
L 75-100
−12.5
28
vs
MIZ
L 64-88
−22.5
3
@
FLA
L 74-108
−13.5
7
vs
UGA
L 96-102
−0.5
11
vs
AUB
L 61-79
−9.5
covered 10didn’t cover 22avg −4.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
UNA
W 86-62
−3.5
10
vs
ISU
L 80-96
+25.5
15
vs
SELA
W 75-68
−7.5
20
vs
KSU
L 77-98
+10.5
21
vs
UNM
L 78-80
+6.5
24
vs
NOLA
W 81-78
−1.5
28
vs
SMU
L 81-87
+5.5
3
@
GT
W 85-73
+7.5
7
vs
SF
L 62-65
−23.5
13
vs
UTAH
W 82-74
+2.5
16
vs
LIU
W 87-83
+17.5
20
vs
MEM
W 71-66
−16.5
29
vs
ALST
W 94-56
−4.5
3
@
TEX
W 101-98
+41.5
7
vs
OU
W 72-53
−33.5
10
@
UK
L 68-92
+7.5
13
vs
ALA
L 82-97
+7.5
17
vs
MISS
L 67-68
−12.5
21
@
TA&M
L 68-88
−7.5
24
vs
VAN
L 56-88
−15.5
28
@
LSU
W 80-66
−8.5
31
@
MIZ
L 79-84
+16.5
7
vs
ARK
L 68-88
−7.5
11
vs
TENN
L 64-73
−10.5
14
@
MISS
W 90-78
+21.5
18
vs
AUB
W 91-85
+20.5
21
@
SC
L 89-97
+34.5
25
@
ALA
L 75-100
−1.5
28
vs
MIZ
L 64-88
−2.5
3
@
FLA
L 74-108
+20.5
7
vs
UGA
L 96-102
+30.5
11
vs
AUB
L 61-79
−20.5
over 16under 16avg +3.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Mississippi St has the better starters
Position by position: N'Western St 0, Mississippi St 4, even 1
N'Western StBetterMississippi St
G I. Miles10.7 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 57
→MSSTBig
G J. Hubbard22.1 pts · 2.5 reb · 3.6 ast
Score 99
G C. Larry2.6 pts · 1.4 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 1
→MSSTBig
G R. Johnson TR14.8 pts · 3 reb · 3.9 ast
Score 86
F D. Thomas TR5.1 pts · 5.3 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 20
→MSSTBig
G T. Simpkins TR9.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 83
F A. Osojnik TR5.6 pts · 2.5 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 22
=Even
F K. Sanders TR5.2 pts · 3.1 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 31
F K. Turner3.8 pts · 2.5 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 34
→MSSTBig
C N. Okafor TR11.2 pts · 5.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 71
N'Western StBetterMississippi St
NWST offense340th of 366 · -11.5
→MSSTBig
MSST defense88th of 366 · -0.1
NWST defense236th of 366 · -6.2
→MSSTBig
MSST offense34th of 366 · +5.5
Backcourt-3.7 · 2 players
→MSSTBig
Backcourt+9.6 · 3 players
Frontcourt-3.2 · 3 players
→MSSTBig
Frontcourt+0.6 · 2 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-2.0 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestNWST betterMSST betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
I. Miles25 minC. Larry18 minK. SimpsonNewD. BrownNewA. AlmuttarNewB. RemoNew
Forwards
D. Thomas18 min · TRA. Osojnik16 min · TRK. Turner13 minN. OjukwuNewC. KellyNewJ. NesbittNew
Guards
J. Hubbard33 minR. Johnson29 min · TRT. Simpkins25 min · TRK. Grace12 minA. Magee11 min · TRC. PaulNew
Forwards
K. Sanders20 min · TRT. Bassong19 min · TRT. ReedNew
Centers
N. Okafor23 min · TRG. CholNewT. BartlettNewT. ReedNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.1 #346 | Points per game | 77.6 #103 |
| 1.01 #315 | Points per possession | 1.07 #205 |
| 65.4 #334 | Pace (possessions) | 72.3 #29 |
| Shooting | ||
| 48.6 #301 | Effective FG% | 51.5 #172 |
| 33.2 #218 | 3-point % | 32.4 #262 |
| 33.9 #298 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.1 #169 |
| 40.1 #58 | Free throw rate | 30.6 #288 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.3 #286 | Turnover rate | 16.0 #143 |
| 26.1 #321 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.8 #210 |
| 11.3 #322 | Assists per game | 12.8 #231 |
| Defense | ||
| 72.9 #129 | Points allowed | 81.8 #338 |
| 1.12 #262 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #299 |
| 53.0 #270 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.9 #154 |
| 35.5 #278 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.9 #179 |
| 16.9 #160 | Turnovers forced | 12.8 #358 |
| 67.4 #286 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.3 #190 |
| 6.2 #215 | Steals per game | 5.8 #260 |
| 2.3 #321 | Blocks per game | 4.4 #44 |
N'Western St
8-22 in 2025-26 overall · 8-15 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Nicholls47–61
- L@ UT Rio Grande62–74
- L@ Texas A&M-CC59–71
- Wvs Incarnate Word54–49
- Wvs Hou Christian71–53
A week or more of rest.
Mississippi St
13-19 in 2025-26 overall · 5-14 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Auburn61–79
- Lvs Georgia96–102
- L@ Florida74–108
- Lvs Missouri64–88
- L@ Alabama75–100
A week or more of rest.