Draddy Gymnasium · at Manhattan
#100FORFordham
@
#330MANManhattan
LineNo line yet 
Total— 
Season records: Fordham and Manhattan
FORThis seasonMAN
0-0Record0-0
0-0ATS0-0
0-0O/U0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects FOR 80–65 · win probability FOR 90%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 145.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: FOR has more of the edges

FOR 6, MAN 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
FORBig
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: FOR 34.1%, MAN 28.6%. Defensive: FOR 73.2%, MAN 63.0%
FORBig
MAN offense vs FOR defense
Offense 301st of 366 against a defense 71st, on the model’s ratings
FORBig
FOR offense vs MAN defense
Offense 119th of 366 against a defense 346th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
FOR has played the 136th-hardest schedule, MAN the 336th. A record against a soft schedule means less
FORSmall
Shooting
Effective FG%: FOR 48.6 and allows 49.9; MAN 47.9 and allows 53.9
MANSmall
Free throws
Free throw rate: FOR 26.4, MAN 34.0. Allowed: FOR 30.3, MAN 25.7
FORSmall
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: FOR 63%, MAN 10%. Transfers in: FOR 4, MAN 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: FOR plays 64.8 a game (349th fastest), MAN 69.0 (182nd). Faster games mean more points
FORSmall
Three-pointers
FOR hits 28.9% and allows 33.4%; MAN hits 32.0% and allows 36.6%. Threes are 38.3% and 37.1% of their shots
MANSmall
Home court
MAN at home. This season: MAN 0-0 at home, FOR 0-0 away
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: FOR 17.2%, MAN 15.6%. Forced: FOR 17.2%, MAN 16.6%

Market

Open → current
Spread
Opening line not available
Total
 
Moneyline
—

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Model vs market

MarketModelModel edge
Spread—FOR -14.9—
Total—145.0—
Projected score—FOR 79.9 · MAN 65.1

1st-half model

ModelActual
1H spreadFOR -9.0—
1H total67.8—
1H projected scoreFOR 38.4 · MAN 29.4—

Fordham has the better starters

Position by position: Fordham 3, Manhattan 0, even 2
FordhamBetterManhattan
G A. Lindsey TR17.9 pts · 3.3 reb · 4.9 ast Score 79
FORBig
G B. Tweedy TR9 pts · 3 reb · 2.5 ast Score 29
G L. Patrick TR15 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.8 ast Score 68
FORSmall
G J. Sabino TR7.1 pts · 4.6 reb · 0.9 ast Score 53
F R. Schulte10.4 pts · 9.2 reb · 1.5 ast Score 82
FORBig
G Q. Elliott3.6 pts · 1.2 reb · 0.8 ast Score 17
F A. Jacobs7.2 pts · 4.8 reb · 0.8 ast Score 27
No call
G J. Delaney0.4 pts · 0.6 reb · 0.2 ast Not ranked
C J. Whitbourn8.4 pts · 8.4 reb · 0.7 ast Score 63
No call
F O. Stankovic TR1.7 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.4 ast Not ranked
FordhamBetterManhattan
FOR offense119th of 366 · -2.7
FORBig
MAN defense346th of 366 · -9.3
FOR defense71st of 366 · +0.8
FORBig
MAN offense301st of 366 · -9.4
Backcourt+2.1 · 2 players
FORBig
Backcourt-4.3 · 4 players
Frontcourt+1.3 · 3 players
FORSmall
Frontcourt-0.5 · 1 player
Bench+0.2 · 5 players
Even
Bench-0.5 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestFOR betterMAN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Fordham
Guards
A. Lindsey38 min · TRL. Patrick29 min · TRK. Odih5 min · TRJ. Laboy4 min · TRA. Crotty1 minM. Miller1 min
Forwards
R. Schulte31 minA. Jacobs29 minA. Bodija19 minR. Akhuar19 minF. Siaca BeyNew
Centers
J. Whitbourn24 minO. EssamNew
Manhattan
Guards
B. Tweedy30 min · TRJ. Sabino21 min · TRQ. Elliott12 minJ. Delaney5 minA. Miguel4 minB. PearceNew
Forwards
O. Stankovic6 min · TRK. Kearney4 min · TRL. McChesney3 min · TRI. JohnsonNewD. EricNewN. ManojlovicNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Shooting
Possessions
Defense
FORMAN
Scoring
67.5 #323Points per game72.4 #232
1.04 #262Points per possession1.05 #247
64.8 #349Pace (possessions)69.0 #182
Shooting
48.6 #300Effective FG%47.9 #315
28.9 #3563-point %32.0 #280
38.3 #2053-point attempt rate37.1 #228
26.4 #354Free throw rate34.0 #208
Possessions
17.2 #219Turnover rate15.6 #112
34.1 #64Offensive rebound rate28.6 #247
13.2 #200Assists per game12.3 #268
Defense
66.3 #17Points allowed79.6 #309
1.02 #47Points allowed per possession1.15 #330
49.9 #95Opponent effective FG%53.9 #297
33.4 #149Opponent 3-point %36.6 #332
17.2 #138Turnovers forced16.6 #175
73.2 #29Defensive rebound rate63.0 #358
7.0 #126Steals per game7.8 #54
2.2 #335Blocks per game2.3 #325

Fordham

14-15 in 2025-26 overall · 8-11 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference

Last five, 2025-26
  • Lvs G Washington62–66
  • Wvs Rhode Island61–49
  • L@ La Salle84–87
  • L@ VCU63–82
  • Wvs Davidson63–59

A week or more of rest.

Manhattan

11-20 in 2025-26 overall · 8-13 in conference · Metro Conference

Last five, 2025-26
  • Lvs Fairfield60–71
  • Lvs Iona65–69
  • L@ Saint Peter's65–75
  • Lvs Marist70–84
  • W@ Canisius69–65

A week or more of rest.