Allen Fieldhouse · at Kansas
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | KU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects KU 88–63 · win probability KU 99%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 150.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: KU has more of the edges
MTSU 1, KU 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
KU offense vs MTSU defense
Offense 17th of 366 against a defense 167th, on the model’s ratings
MTSU offense vs KU defense
Offense 158th of 366 against a defense 15th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
MTSU has played the 132nd-hardest schedule, KU the 2nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
MTSU hits 33.8% and allows 34.0%; KU hits 34.6% and allows 30.6%. Threes are 45.3% and 35.2% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: MTSU 32.7, KU 32.2. Allowed: MTSU 35.7, KU 27.4
Shooting
Effective FG%: MTSU 51.6 and allows 51.0; KU 51.2 and allows 45.0
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MTSU 30.7%, KU 29.3%. Defensive: MTSU 71.5%, KU 70.1%
Home court
KU at home. This season: KU 0-0 at home, MTSU 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MTSU 30%, KU 9%. Transfers in: MTSU 3, KU 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MTSU 17.1%, KU 15.6%. Forced: MTSU 14.9%, KU 13.8%
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: MTSU plays 68.3 a game (216th fastest), KU 68.8 (193rd). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | KU -25.6 | — |
| Total | — | 150.9 | — |
| Projected score | — | MTSU 62.6 · KU 88.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | KU -15.1 | — |
| 1H total | 70.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | MTSU 27.7 · KU 42.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | |
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
MTSU
29 games played
Straight up
14-15
48% wins
Against the spread
13-16
45% covers · avg +0 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-14
52% overs · avg +2.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12 | @ | W 77-72 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 140.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 61-86 | +27.5 | W +2.5 | 159.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 90-87 | +6.5 | W +9.5 | 161.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 79-92 | +9.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 62-72 | +9.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 1 | vs | W 76-61 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 153.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 62-83 | +3.5 | L −17.5 | 153.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 68-67 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 160.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 60-69 | +25.5 | W +16.5 | 138.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 88-51 | -6.5 | W +30.5 | 134.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 68-67 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 156.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 80-83 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 137.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 59-55 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | U 114 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 58-59 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 131.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 90-87 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 137.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 23 | @ | L 58-75 | -1.5 | L −18.5 | 133.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 65-81 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 136.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 60-65 | -6.5 | L −11.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 84-88 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 154.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 88-89 | -5.5 | L −6.5 | 133.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 90-87 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 80-82 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 70-78 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 151.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 78-66 | -10.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 77-67 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 86-85 | -5.5 | L −4.5 | 148.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 73-67 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 153.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 75-63 | +2.5 | W +14.5 | 145.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 69-80 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 134.5 | O 149 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
12
@
EVAN
W 77-72
+7.5
19
@
MICH
L 61-86
+2.5
23
vs
MUR
W 90-87
+9.5
24
vs
GW
L 79-92
−3.5
25
vs
MCN
L 62-72
−0.5
1
vs
UAB
W 76-61
+16.5
7
vs
BEL
L 62-83
−17.5
17
vs
KENN
W 68-67
−2.5
29
@
HOU
L 60-69
+16.5
2
vs
LT
W 88-51
+30.5
4
vs
SHSU
W 68-67
−3.5
8
@
UTEP
L 80-83
−6.5
10
@
NMSU
W 59-55
+7.5
14
@
LT
L 58-59
−4.5
17
vs
MOST
W 90-87
−2.5
23
@
JXST
L 58-75
−18.5
29
vs
LIB
L 65-81
−14.5
31
vs
WKU
L 60-65
−11.5
4
vs
FIU
L 84-88
−9.5
7
@
DEL
L 88-89
−6.5
12
@
KENN
W 90-87
+6.5
14
@
WKU
L 80-82
+1.5
18
@
SHSU
L 70-78
−4.5
21
vs
DEL
W 78-66
+1.5
26
vs
UTEP
W 77-67
+1.5
28
vs
NMSU
W 86-85
−4.5
5
@
FIU
W 73-67
+7.5
7
@
MOST
W 75-63
+14.5
12
vs
LT
L 69-80
−12.5
covered 13didn’t cover 16avg +0 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
12
@
EVAN
W 77-72
+8.5
19
@
MICH
L 61-86
−12.5
23
vs
MUR
W 90-87
+15.5
24
vs
GW
L 79-92
+12.5
25
vs
MCN
L 62-72
−13.5
1
vs
UAB
W 76-61
−16.5
7
vs
BEL
L 62-83
−8.5
17
vs
KENN
W 68-67
−25.5
29
@
HOU
L 60-69
−9.5
2
vs
LT
W 88-51
+4.5
4
vs
SHSU
W 68-67
−21.5
8
@
UTEP
L 80-83
+25.5
10
@
NMSU
W 59-55
−30.5
14
@
LT
L 58-59
−14.5
17
vs
MOST
W 90-87
+39.5
23
@
JXST
L 58-75
−0.5
29
vs
LIB
L 65-81
+9.5
31
vs
WKU
L 60-65
−15.5
4
vs
FIU
L 84-88
+17.5
7
@
DEL
L 88-89
+43.5
12
@
KENN
W 90-87
+28.5
14
@
WKU
L 80-82
+16.5
18
@
SHSU
L 70-78
−3.5
21
vs
DEL
W 78-66
+6.5
26
vs
UTEP
W 77-67
+4.5
28
vs
NMSU
W 86-85
+22.5
5
@
FIU
W 73-67
−13.5
7
@
MOST
W 75-63
−7.5
12
vs
LT
L 69-80
+14.5
over 15under 14avg +2.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Kansas
35 games played
Straight up
24-11
69% wins
Against the spread
21-14
60% covers · avg +1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-24
31% overs · avg −4.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 94-51 | -30.5 | W +12.5 | 152.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 74-87 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 77-46 | -25.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 76-57 | -22.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 18 | vs | L 66-78 | +10.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 71-61 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 71-60 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 81-76 | +7.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 56-61 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | U 117 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 80-60 | -5.5 | W +14.5 | 150.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 77-76 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 73-49 | -14.5 | W +9.5 | 137.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 90-61 | -14.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 75-81 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 104-100 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 143.5 | O 204 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 75-86 | -2.5 | L −13.5 | 139.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 84-63 | +3.5 | W +24.5 | 152.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 16 | vs | W 80-62 | -7.5 | W +10.5 | 156.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 75-69 | -4.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 86-62 | -4.5 | W +19.5 | 158.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 90-82 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 159.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 2 | @ | W 64-61 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 155.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 71-59 | -18.5 | L −6.5 | 150.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 82-78 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 56-74 | +7.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 81-69 | -7.5 | W +4.5 | 158.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 68-84 | -8.5 | L −24.5 | 139.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 23 | vs | W 69-56 | +2.5 | W +15.5 | 138.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 61-84 | +9.5 | L −13.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 60-70 | -5.5 | L −15.5 | 151.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 104-85 | -17.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | O 189 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 78-73 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 47-69 | +5.5 | L −16.5 | 139.5 | U 116 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 68-60 | -14.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 22 | vs | L 65-67 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
GB
W 94-51
+12.5
7
@
UNC
L 74-87
−10.5
11
vs
AMCC
W 77-46
+5.5
15
vs
PRIN
W 76-57
−3.5
18
vs
DUKE
L 66-78
−1.5
24
vs
ND
W 71-61
+4.5
25
vs
SYR
W 71-60
+6.5
26
vs
TENN
W 81-76
+12.5
2
vs
CONN
L 56-61
−1.5
7
vs
MIZ
W 80-60
+14.5
13
@
NCSU
W 77-76
+2.5
16
vs
TOW
W 73-49
+9.5
22
vs
DAV
W 90-61
+14.5
3
@
UCF
L 75-81
−10.5
6
vs
TCU
W 104-100
−2.5
10
@
WVU
L 75-86
−13.5
13
vs
ISU
W 84-63
+24.5
16
vs
BAY
W 80-62
+10.5
20
@
COLO
W 75-69
+1.5
24
@
KSU
W 86-62
+19.5
31
vs
BYU
W 90-82
+5.5
2
@
TTU
W 64-61
+6.5
7
vs
UTAH
W 71-59
−6.5
9
vs
ARIZ
W 82-78
+9.5
14
@
ISU
L 56-74
−10.5
18
@
OKST
W 81-69
+4.5
21
vs
CIN
L 68-84
−24.5
23
vs
HOU
W 69-56
+15.5
28
@
ARIZ
L 61-84
−13.5
3
@
ASU
L 60-70
−15.5
7
vs
KSU
W 104-85
+1.5
12
vs
TCU
W 78-73
+0.5
13
vs
HOU
L 47-69
−16.5
20
vs
CBU
W 68-60
−6.5
22
vs
SJU
L 65-67
+1.5
covered 21didn’t cover 14avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
GB
W 94-51
−7.5
7
@
UNC
L 74-87
+1.5
11
vs
AMCC
W 77-46
−22.5
15
vs
PRIN
W 76-57
−11.5
18
vs
DUKE
L 66-78
−5.5
24
vs
ND
W 71-61
−11.5
25
vs
SYR
W 71-60
−13.5
26
vs
TENN
W 81-76
+16.5
2
vs
CONN
L 56-61
−24.5
7
vs
MIZ
W 80-60
−10.5
13
@
NCSU
W 77-76
+4.5
16
vs
TOW
W 73-49
−15.5
22
vs
DAV
W 90-61
+11.5
3
@
UCF
L 75-81
−1.5
6
vs
TCU
W 104-100
+60.5
10
@
WVU
L 75-86
+21.5
13
vs
ISU
W 84-63
−5.5
16
vs
BAY
W 80-62
−14.5
20
@
COLO
W 75-69
−11.5
24
@
KSU
W 86-62
−10.5
31
vs
BYU
W 90-82
+12.5
2
@
TTU
W 64-61
−30.5
7
vs
UTAH
W 71-59
−20.5
9
vs
ARIZ
W 82-78
+7.5
14
@
ISU
L 56-74
−17.5
18
@
OKST
W 81-69
−8.5
21
vs
CIN
L 68-84
+12.5
23
vs
HOU
W 69-56
−13.5
28
@
ARIZ
L 61-84
−6.5
3
@
ASU
L 60-70
−21.5
7
vs
KSU
W 104-85
+31.5
12
vs
TCU
W 78-73
+4.5
13
vs
HOU
L 47-69
−23.5
20
vs
CBU
W 68-60
−14.5
22
vs
SJU
L 65-67
−12.5
over 11under 24avg −4.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Kansas has the better starters
Position by position: MTSU 0, Kansas 5, even 0
MTSUBetterKansas
G K. de Kovachich TR11.6 pts · 2.2 reb · 2 ast
Score 40
→KUBig
G L. Blyden TR16.5 pts · 4.1 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 85
G J. Carter10.3 pts · 3.2 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 63
→KUSmall
G D. Parker TR18.6 pts · 5.9 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 94
G E. Rice TR6.7 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.2 ast
Score 43
→KUBig
F K. Dawes TR12.5 pts · 8.8 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 91
F O. Naveh TR11 pts · 5.9 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 52
→KUBig
F T. Kaufman-Renn TR14.2 pts · 8.3 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 98
C L. Jovanovic2.1 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 26
→KUBig
C C. Reeves TR11 pts · 7.8 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 94
MTSUBetterKansas
MTSU offense158th of 366 · -4.7
→KUBig
KU defense15th of 366 · +6.3
MTSU defense167th of 366 · -3.7
→KUBig
KU offense17th of 366 · +8.6
Backcourt-2.0 · 3 players
→KUBig
Backcourt+5.7 · 2 players
Frontcourt-1.1 · 2 players
→KUBig
Frontcourt+13.0 · 3 players
Bench-0.1 · 2 players
=Even
Bench+0.1 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestMTSU betterKU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. de Kovachich31 min · TRJ. Carter27 minE. Rice20 min · TRM. Whitlock11 minQ. BarnettNewJ. HowardNew
Forwards
O. Naveh29 min · TRJ. Hall7 minA. BoldenNew
Centers
L. Jovanovic14 minK. SilerNew
Guards
L. Blyden34 min · TRD. Parker30 min · TRK. Rosario12 minW. Thengvall2 minT. StokesNewT. PerryNew
Forwards
K. Dawes31 min · TRT. Kaufman-Renn28 min · TRD. AdkinsNewA. RichmondNewG. MordiniNew
Centers
C. Reeves21 min · TRP. Mbiya5 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 73.5 #216 | Points per game | 75.1 #161 |
| 1.08 #195 | Points per possession | 1.09 #152 |
| 68.3 #216 | Pace (possessions) | 68.8 #193 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.6 #167 | Effective FG% | 51.2 #186 |
| 33.8 #183 | 3-point % | 34.6 #139 |
| 45.3 #61 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.2 #268 |
| 32.7 #245 | Free throw rate | 32.2 #255 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.1 #214 | Turnover rate | 15.6 #111 |
| 30.7 #171 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.3 #227 |
| 13.7 #168 | Assists per game | 13.9 #150 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.6 #180 | Points allowed | 69.1 #47 |
| 1.09 #205 | Points allowed per possession | 1.00 #28 |
| 51.0 #155 | Opponent effective FG% | 45.0 #2 |
| 34.0 #180 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.6 #24 |
| 14.9 #293 | Turnovers forced | 13.8 #340 |
| 71.5 #83 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.1 #152 |
| 5.8 #265 | Steals per game | 5.4 #310 |
| 4.0 #76 | Blocks per game | 5.8 #6 |
MTSU
14-15 in 2025-26 overall · 11-10 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Louisiana Tech69–80
- W@ Missouri St75–63
- W@ FIU73–67
- Wvs New Mexico St86–85
- Wvs UTEP77–67
A week or more of rest.
Kansas
24-11 in 2025-26 overall · 13-7 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs St John's65–67
- Wvs CA Baptist68–60
- Lvs Houston47–69
- Wvs TCU78–73
- Wvs Kansas St104–85
A week or more of rest.