Gardner-Webb Runnin' Bulldogs at UConn Huskies: Model Line and Edge

Mon, Nov 2, 9:00 PM ETPeoplesBank Arena · at UConn

#6CONNUConn AP #4

LineCONN -38.5no move

Total147.5no move

Season records: Gardner-Webb and UConn
GWEB	This season	CONN
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects CONN 94–51 · win probability CONN 100%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Spread

Total

Winner

Line

CONN -38.5

no move since the open

Total

147.5

model 144.7 · Under by 3

Model edge

CONN by 5

model vs market

Public on the spread

99% GWEB

94% of the money

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: CONN has more of the edges

GWEB 1, CONN 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

CONNBig

CONN offense vs GWEB defense

Offense 25th of 366 against a defense 357th, on the model’s ratings

CONNBig

GWEB offense vs CONN defense

Offense 318th of 366 against a defense 2nd, on the model’s ratings

CONNBig

Shooting

Effective FG%: GWEB 47.8 and allows 57.0; CONN 54.3 and allows 45.7

CONNBig

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: GWEB 23.2%, CONN 35.7%. Defensive: GWEB 63.4%, CONN 71.2%

CONNBig

Three-pointers

GWEB hits 31.0% and allows 36.0%; CONN hits 34.4% and allows 30.1%. Threes are 39.8% and 40.9% of their shots

CONNBig

Turnovers

Turnover rate: GWEB 19.8%, CONN 16.4%. Forced: GWEB 15.3%, CONN 17.8%

Context

Schedule so far

GWEB has played the 154th-hardest schedule, CONN the 4th. A record against a soft schedule means less

Context

Tempo

About 68 possessions: GWEB plays 70.8 a game (84th fastest), CONN 66.1 (307th). Faster games mean more points

GWEBSmall

Free throws

Free throw rate: GWEB 30.3, CONN 29.9. Allowed: GWEB 35.3, CONN 40.7

CONNSmall

Home court

CONN at home. This season: CONN 0-0 at home, GWEB 0-0 away

Even

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: GWEB 35%, CONN 51%. Transfers in: GWEB 3, CONN 7. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

How games like this went

Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines

Situation	Games	Favorite won	Favorite covered	Went over
Home favorites of 20 or more	1165	99%	50%	52%
Non-conference games at this spread	1090	99%	50%	52%
Games with a total of 145 to 149.5	3547	74%	49%	50%

A bet at standard prices needs 52.4% to break even, and most situations sit near 50%. Past rates, not a prediction.

Market

Open → current

Spread

OpenCONN -38.5

no move

NowCONN -38.5

No change since the open

Total

Open147.5

no move

Now147.5

No change since the open

Moneyline

GWEB +8000 · CONN -100000

Line movement

Median of 6 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot

Opened CONN -38.5 · now CONN -39 · moved 0.5 toward CONNmodel CONN -43.5

model CONN -43.5

Openline modelNow

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Public betting

Share of bets and of money

GWEB +38.5Spread

CONN -38.5

Bets

99%

Money

94%

Over 147.5TotalUnder 147.5

Bets

66%34%

Money

64%36%

Sports Betting Dime, an average of sportsbooks. Read Mon, Nov 2, 4:41 AM ET. ⓘ

Books

6 sportsbooks · current prices

SpreadTotalMoneyline

Book	Spread		Total		Moneyline
Book	GWEB	CONN	Over	Under	GWEB	CONN
BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag	-39-110	+39-110	147-110	147-110	—	—
BetRiversBetRivers	-38.5-113	+38.5-113	147.5-113	147.5-113	—	—
BovadaBovada	-39-110	+39-110	147-110	147-110	—	—
DraftKingsDK	-38.5-110	+38.5-110	147.5-110	147.5-110	—	—
FanDuelFD	-37.5-102	+37.5-120	147.5-110	147.5-110	+8000	-100000
LowVig.agLowVig.ag	-39-106	+39-106	147-108	147-108	—	—

Prices from The Odds API, updated Nov 1, 11:00 PM ET. Green = best price in the column.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	CONN -38.5	CONN -43.7	CONN +5.2
Total	147.5	144.7	Under 2.8
Projected score	—	GWEB 50.5 · CONN 94.2

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	CONN -25.9	—
1H total	67.7	—
1H projected score	GWEB 20.9 · CONN 46.8	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
GWEB WWWWW	17-13	57%	8-8	17-13
CONN WWWWW	17-23	43%	4-13	14-23

Venue/role: GWEB away, as underdog; CONN home, as favorite. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
GWEB UOUUU	15-15	50%	2-28
CONN UUOUU	19-21	48%	34-6

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
GWEB	1-9 10%	9-1 90%	4-6 40%
CONN	7-3 70%	7-3 70%	3-7 30%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

Gardner-Webb

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 5	@ TEX	No recent meeting
Nov 14	@ SC	No recent meeting
Nov 18	vs UNCG	No recent meeting

UConn

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 6	vs MICH	L63–69WU
Nov 9	vs WAG	No recent meeting
Nov 13	vs OSU	No recent meeting

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

Gardner-Webb

30 games played

Straight up

2-28

7% wins

Against the spread

17-13

57% covers · avg −2.9 pts vs the line

Over / Under

15-15

50% overs · avg −1.1 pts vs the total

Straight up

2-287%

L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L W L L L L L L L L L W L

1 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

17-1357%

W L W L L L L L L W L W W W L W L L W L L W W W W W W W W W

9 straight covers4 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

15-1550%

U O O U O U O O O O U U O O U O O U U U O U O O U U O U U U

3 straight unders1 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	@MINN	L 60-87	+28.5	W +1.5	148.5	U 147
Nov 7	@CLEM	L 59-97	+29.5	L −8.5	145.5	O 156
Nov 15	@ELON	L 84-95	+13.5	W +2.5	154.5	O 179
Nov 18	@DEP	L 62-93	+21.5	L −9.5	155.5	U 155
Nov 22	@RICH	L 67-102	+19.5	L −15.5	154.5	O 169
Nov 26	vsNAVY	L 51-84	+10.5	L −22.5	153.5	U 135
Nov 28	vsSELA	L 68-76	+6.5	L −1.5	141.5	O 144
Nov 29	@UNCW	L 62-88	+18.5	L −7.5	147.5	O 150
Dec 3	@QUC	L 74-107	+14.5	L −18.5	161.5	O 181
Dec 6	vsGASO	L 84-88	+10.5	W +6.5	162.5	O 172
Dec 15	vsWOF	L 57-83	+10.5	L −15.5	155.5	U 140
Dec 21	@TENN	L 52-94	+42.5	W +0.5	152.5	U 146
Dec 31	vsCHSO	L 79-89	+12.5	W +2.5	163.5	O 168
Jan 3	@WIN	L 77-88	+23.5	W +12.5	164.5	O 165
Jan 7	@HPU	L 49-104	+26.5	L −28.5	162.5	U 153
Jan 14	vsRAD	L 80-89	+13.5	W +4.5	165.5	O 169
Jan 17	vsPRES	L 55-92	+8.5	L −28.5	145.5	O 147
Jan 21	@LONG	L 56-91	+16.5	L −18.5	155.5	U 147
Jan 23	vsUPST	W 67-65	+9.5	W +11.5	153.5	U 132
Jan 29	@UNCA	L 50-69	+17.5	L −1.5	149.5	U 119
Feb 4	vsLONG	L 66-86	+12.5	L −7.5	147.5	O 152
Feb 7	@PRES	L 62-68	+17.5	W +11.5	145.5	U 130
Feb 12	vsWIN	L 85-103	+20.5	W +2.5	156.5	O 188
Feb 14	vsHPU	L 87-112	+25.5	W +0.5	161.5	O 199
Feb 17	@CHSO	L 66-75	+16.5	W +7.5	161.5	U 141
Feb 19	@RAD	L 70-82	+18.5	W +6.5	162.5	U 152
Feb 26	vsUNCA	L 71-77	+12.5	W +6.5	145.5	O 148
Feb 28	@UPST	L 61-71	+11.5	W +1.5	146.5	U 132
Mar 4	vsUPST	W 65-64	+10.5	W +11.5	143.5	U 129
Mar 6	vsHPU	L 59-81	+27.5	W +5.5	155.5	U 140

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

MINN

L 60-87

+1.5

CLEM

L 59-97

−8.5

ELON

L 84-95

+2.5

DEP

L 62-93

−9.5

RICH

L 67-102

−15.5

NAVY

L 51-84

−22.5

SELA

L 68-76

−1.5

UNCW

L 62-88

−7.5

QUC

L 74-107

−18.5

GASO

L 84-88

+6.5

WOF

L 57-83

−15.5

TENN

L 52-94

+0.5

CHSO

L 79-89

+2.5

WIN

L 77-88

+12.5

HPU

L 49-104

−28.5

RAD

L 80-89

+4.5

PRES

L 55-92

−28.5

LONG

L 56-91

−18.5

UPST

W 67-65

+11.5

UNCA

L 50-69

−1.5

LONG

L 66-86

−7.5

PRES

L 62-68

+11.5

WIN

L 85-103

+2.5

HPU

L 87-112

+0.5

CHSO

L 66-75

+7.5

RAD

L 70-82

+6.5

UNCA

L 71-77

+6.5

UPST

L 61-71

+1.5

UPST

W 65-64

+11.5

HPU

L 59-81

+5.5

covered 17didn’t cover 13avg −2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

MINN

L 60-87

−1.5

CLEM

L 59-97

+10.5

ELON

L 84-95

+24.5

DEP

L 62-93

−0.5

RICH

L 67-102

+14.5

NAVY

L 51-84

−18.5

SELA

L 68-76

+2.5

UNCW

L 62-88

+2.5

QUC

L 74-107

+19.5

GASO

L 84-88

+9.5

WOF

L 57-83

−15.5

TENN

L 52-94

−6.5

CHSO

L 79-89

+4.5

WIN

L 77-88

+0.5

HPU

L 49-104

−9.5

RAD

L 80-89

+3.5

PRES

L 55-92

+1.5

LONG

L 56-91

−8.5

UPST

W 67-65

−21.5

UNCA

L 50-69

−30.5

LONG

L 66-86

+4.5

PRES

L 62-68

−15.5

WIN

L 85-103

+31.5

HPU

L 87-112

+37.5

CHSO

L 66-75

−20.5

RAD

L 70-82

−10.5

UNCA

L 71-77

+2.5

UPST

L 61-71

−14.5

UPST

W 65-64

−14.5

HPU

L 59-81

−15.5

over 15under 15avg −1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin

UConn

40 games played

Straight up

34-6

85% wins

Against the spread

17-23

43% covers · avg −1.1 pts vs the line

Over / Under

19-21

48% overs · avg −1.6 pts vs the total

Straight up

34-685%

W W W W L W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W L W W L W W W L W W L W W W W W L

3 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

17-2343%

L W L L L L W W L L L W W W L L L L L L L W W L L L L W W L L W W L L W W W W W

5 straight covers4 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

19-2148%

U O U O U U U U O O U U U O U O U O U O O O O O O O O U U O U O U U O U U O U U

2 straight unders1 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	vsNHVN	W 79-55	-42.5	L −18.5	145.5	U 134
Nov 7	vsUML	W 110-47	-36.5	W +26.5	151.5	O 157
Nov 10	vsCOLU	W 89-62	-32.5	L −5.5	155.5	U 151
Nov 15	vsBYU	W 86-84	-6.5	L −4.5	156.5	O 170
Nov 19	vsARIZ	L 67-71	-4.5	L −8.5	156.5	U 138
Nov 23	vsBRY	W 72-49	-36.5	L −13.5	147.5	U 121
Nov 28	vsILL	W 74-61	-4.5	W +8.5	150.5	U 135
Dec 2	@KU	W 61-56	-3.5	W +1.5	141.5	U 117
Dec 5	vsETAM	W 83-59	-36.5	L −12.5	141.5	O 142
Dec 9	vsFLA	W 77-73	-4.5	L −0.5	145.5	O 150
Dec 12	vsTEX	W 71-63	-11.5	L −3.5	145.5	U 134
Dec 16	vsBTLR	W 79-60	-15.5	W +3.5	144.5	U 139
Dec 21	@DEP	W 72-54	-12.5	W +5.5	133.5	U 126
Dec 31	@XAV	W 90-67	-11.5	W +11.5	144.5	O 157
Jan 4	vsMARQ	W 73-57	-17.5	L −1.5	144.5	U 130
Jan 7	@PROV	W 103-98	-9.5	L −4.5	152.5	O 201
Jan 10	vsDEP	W 72-60	-19.5	L −7.5	137.5	U 132
Jan 13	@HALL	W 69-64	-6.5	L −1.5	132.5	O 133
Jan 17	@GTWN	W 64-62	-11.5	L −9.5	141.5	U 126
Jan 24	vsVILL	W 75-67	-11.5	L −3.5	137.5	O 142
Jan 27	vsPROV	W 87-81	-15.5	L −9.5	152.5	O 168
Jan 31	@CREI	W 85-58	-6.5	W +20.5	142.5	O 143
Feb 3	vsXAV	W 92-60	-16.5	W +15.5	147.5	O 152
Feb 6	@SJU	L 72-81	-1.5	L −10.5	143.5	O 153
Feb 11	@BTLR	W 80-70	-11.5	L −1.5	143.5	O 150
Feb 14	vsGTWN	W 79-75	-16.5	L −12.5	138.5	O 154
Feb 18	vsCREI	L 84-91	-15.5	L −22.5	143.5	O 175
Feb 21	@VILL	W 73-63	-3.5	W +6.5	141.5	U 136
Feb 25	vsSJU	W 72-40	-5.5	W +26.5	145.5	U 112
Feb 28	vsHALL	W 71-67	-12.5	L −8.5	130.5	O 138
Mar 7	@MARQ	L 62-68	-9.5	L −15.5	143.5	U 130
Mar 12	vsXAV	W 93-68	-17.5	W +7.5	150.5	O 161
Mar 13	vsGTWN	W 67-51	-14.5	W +1.5	138.5	U 118
Mar 14	@SJU	L 52-72	-2.5	L −22.5	139.5	U 124
Mar 20	vsFUR	W 82-71	-20.5	L −9.5	133.5	O 153
Mar 22	vsUCLA	W 73-57	-5.5	W +10.5	135.5	U 130
Mar 27	vsMSU	W 67-63	-2.5	W +1.5	136.5	U 130
Mar 29	vsDUKE	W 73-72	+4.5	W +5.5	135.5	O 145
Apr 4	vsILL	W 71-62	+1.5	W +10.5	139.5	U 133
Apr 6	vsMICH	L 63-69	+6.5	W +0.5	146.5	U 132

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

NHVN

W 79-55

−18.5

UML

W 110-47

+26.5

COLU

W 89-62

−5.5

BYU

W 86-84

−4.5

ARIZ

L 67-71

−8.5

BRY

W 72-49

−13.5

ILL

W 74-61

+8.5

W 61-56

+1.5

ETAM

W 83-59

−12.5

FLA

W 77-73

−0.5

TEX

W 71-63

−3.5

BTLR

W 79-60

+3.5

DEP

W 72-54

+5.5

XAV

W 90-67

+11.5

MARQ

W 73-57

−1.5

PROV

W 103-98

−4.5

DEP

W 72-60

−7.5

HALL

W 69-64

−1.5

GTWN

W 64-62

−9.5

VILL

W 75-67

−3.5

PROV

W 87-81

−9.5

CREI

W 85-58

+20.5

XAV

W 92-60

+15.5

SJU

L 72-81

−10.5

BTLR

W 80-70

−1.5

GTWN

W 79-75

−12.5

CREI

L 84-91

−22.5

VILL

W 73-63

+6.5

SJU

W 72-40

+26.5

HALL

W 71-67

−8.5

MARQ

L 62-68

−15.5

XAV

W 93-68

+7.5

GTWN

W 67-51

+1.5

SJU

L 52-72

−22.5

FUR

W 82-71

−9.5

UCLA

W 73-57

+10.5

MSU

W 67-63

+1.5

DUKE

W 73-72

+5.5

ILL

W 71-62

+10.5

MICH

L 63-69

+0.5

covered 17didn’t cover 23avg −1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

NHVN

W 79-55

−11.5

UML

W 110-47

+5.5

COLU

W 89-62

−4.5

BYU

W 86-84

+13.5

ARIZ

L 67-71

−18.5

BRY

W 72-49

−26.5

ILL

W 74-61

−15.5

W 61-56

−24.5

ETAM

W 83-59

+0.5

FLA

W 77-73

+4.5

TEX

W 71-63

−11.5

BTLR

W 79-60

−5.5

DEP

W 72-54

−7.5

XAV

W 90-67

+12.5

MARQ

W 73-57

−14.5

PROV

W 103-98

+48.5

DEP

W 72-60

−5.5

HALL

W 69-64

+0.5

GTWN

W 64-62

−15.5

VILL

W 75-67

+4.5

PROV

W 87-81

+15.5

CREI

W 85-58

+0.5

XAV

W 92-60

+4.5

SJU

L 72-81

+9.5

BTLR

W 80-70

+6.5

GTWN

W 79-75

+15.5

CREI

L 84-91

+31.5

VILL

W 73-63

−5.5

SJU

W 72-40

−33.5

HALL

W 71-67

+7.5

MARQ

L 62-68

−13.5

XAV

W 93-68

+10.5

GTWN

W 67-51

−20.5

SJU

L 52-72

−15.5

FUR

W 82-71

+19.5

UCLA

W 73-57

−5.5

MSU

W 67-63

−6.5

DUKE

W 73-72

+9.5

ILL

W 71-62

−6.5

MICH

L 63-69

−14.5

over 19under 21avg −1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

UConn has the better starters

Position by position: Gardner-Webb 0, UConn 4, even 1

Gardner-WebbBetterUConn

G J. Hudson10.6 pts · 3.8 reb · 1.5 ast Score 62

CONNSmall

G N. Machowski TR17.8 pts · 5.9 reb · 2.6 ast Score 80

G A. Talbert6.7 pts · 1.9 reb · 1.3 ast Score 10

CONNBig

G S. Demary10.1 pts · 4.5 reb · 5.9 ast Score 98

G J. Ferere6.5 pts · 3 reb · 0.7 ast Score 32

CONNBig

G S. Ball12.8 pts · 3 reb · 1.5 ast Score 87

F M. Pocknett TR3.7 pts · 4 reb · 0.3 ast Score 14

CONNBig

G B. Mullins12 pts · 3.5 reb · 1.4 ast Score 88

C S. Nosakhare TR0.8 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.3 ast Not ranked

No call

G J. Nash TR5.2 pts · 2.9 reb · 4.1 ast Score 26

Gardner-WebbBetterUConn

GWEB offense318th of 366 · -10.4

CONNBig

CONN defense2nd of 366 · +11.5

GWEB defense357th of 366 · -10.2

CONNBig

CONN offense25th of 366 · +7.1

Backcourt-4.1 · 3 players

CONNBig

Backcourt+8.5 · 5 players

Frontcourt-2.0 · 2 players

No call

FrontcourtNo numbers yet

Bench-0.9 · 1 player

CONNBig

Bench+3.4 · 5 players

Score, worst to bestGWEB betterCONN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

Gardner-Webb

Guards

J. Hudson27 minA. Talbert25 minJ. Ferere18 minS. BrownNewD. DanielNewB. LutherNew

Forwards

M. Pocknett14 min · TRJ. Skipper8 min · TRC. OkparaNew

Centers

S. Nosakhare9 min · TRG. TropnasNewB. RutsinduraNew

UConn

Guards

N. Machowski35 min · TRS. Demary28 minS. Ball28 minB. Mullins28 minJ. Nash26 min · TRJ. CountyNew

Forwards

N. Khamenia20 min · TRI. Shaw18 min · TRJ. Ross18 minJ. RossNewC. LandrewNewE. AmosovNew

Centers

N. Hines18 min · TRO. Giltay15 min · TRE. Dzafic2 min · TR

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

GWEB66.2 #343

CONN76.6 #129

Points per possession

GWEB0.94 #360

CONN1.16 #52

Pace (possessions)

GWEB70.8 #84

CONN66.1 #307

Shooting

Effective FG%

GWEB47.8 #317

CONN54.3 #59

3-point %

GWEB31.0 #320

CONN34.4 #150

3-point attempt rate

GWEB39.8 #174

CONN40.9 #149

Free throw rate

GWEB30.3 #302

CONN29.9 #313

Possessions

Turnover rate

GWEB19.8 #347

CONN16.4 #163

Offensive rebound rate

GWEB23.2 #350

CONN35.7 #30

Assists per game

GWEB9.7 #362

CONN18.1 #9

Defense

Points allowed

GWEB86.7 #362

CONN65.2 #6

Points allowed per possession

GWEB1.22 #361

CONN0.99 #17

Opponent effective FG%

GWEB57.0 #356

CONN45.7 #7

Opponent 3-point %

GWEB36.0 #300

CONN30.1 #8

Turnovers forced

GWEB15.3 #265

CONN17.8 #107

Defensive rebound rate

GWEB63.4 #355

CONN71.2 #99

Steals per game

GWEB6.1 #224

CONN6.8 #143

Blocks per game

GWEB2.4 #309

CONN5.0 #15

GWEB		CONN
Scoring
66.2 #343	Points per game	76.6 #129
0.94 #360	Points per possession	1.16 #52
70.8 #84	Pace (possessions)	66.1 #307
Shooting
47.8 #317	Effective FG%	54.3 #59
31.0 #320	3-point %	34.4 #150
39.8 #174	3-point attempt rate	40.9 #149
30.3 #302	Free throw rate	29.9 #313
Possessions
19.8 #347	Turnover rate	16.4 #163
23.2 #350	Offensive rebound rate	35.7 #30
9.7 #362	Assists per game	18.1 #9
Defense
86.7 #362	Points allowed	65.2 #6
1.22 #361	Points allowed per possession	0.99 #17
57.0 #356	Opponent effective FG%	45.7 #7
36.0 #300	Opponent 3-point %	30.1 #8
15.3 #265	Turnovers forced	17.8 #107
63.4 #355	Defensive rebound rate	71.2 #99
6.1 #224	Steals per game	6.8 #143
2.4 #309	Blocks per game	5.0 #15

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Gardner-Webb

2-28 in 2025-26 overall · 2-16 in conference · Big South Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs High Point59–81
Wvs SC Upstate65–64
L@ SC Upstate61–71
Lvs UNC Asheville71–77
L@ Radford70–82

A week or more of rest.

UConn

34-6 in 2025-26 overall · 19-4 in conference · Big East Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Michigan63–69
Wvs Illinois71–62
Wvs Duke73–72
Wvs Michigan St67–63
Wvs UCLA73–57

A week or more of rest.