Chicago State Cougars at Texas Longhorns: Model Line and Edge

Mon, Nov 2, 9:00 PM ETMoody Center · at Texas

#11TEXTexas AP #7

LineTEX -39.5moved 1 toward CHST

Total149.5no move

Season records: Chicago St and Texas
CHST	This season	TEX
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects TEX 96–53 · win probability TEX 100%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Spread

Total

Winner

Line

TEX -39.5

moved 1 toward CHST

Total

149.5

model 149.1

Model edge

TEX by 4

model vs market

Public on the spread

87% CHST

80% of the money

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: TEX has more of the edges

CHST 1, TEX 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

TEXBig

CHST offense vs TEX defense

Offense 361st of 366 against a defense 17th, on the model’s ratings

TEXBig

TEX offense vs CHST defense

Offense 7th of 366 against a defense 339th, on the model’s ratings

TEXBig

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: CHST 28.3%, TEX 35.4%. Defensive: CHST 65.0%, TEX 73.1%

TEXBig

Shooting

Effective FG%: CHST 45.3 and allows 56.7; TEX 54.1 and allows 50.8

Context

Schedule so far

CHST has played the 259th-hardest schedule, TEX the 27th. A record against a soft schedule means less

CHSTBig

Turnovers

Turnover rate: CHST 15.7%, TEX 15.0%. Forced: CHST 20.1%, TEX 13.0%

TEXBig

Free throws

Free throw rate: CHST 30.0, TEX 44.2. Allowed: CHST 38.0, TEX 39.6

TEXBig

Three-pointers

CHST hits 32.1% and allows 35.6%; TEX hits 35.1% and allows 34.7%. Threes are 30.9% and 35.8% of their shots

Context

Tempo

About 67 possessions: CHST plays 66.0 a game (314th fastest), TEX 68.7 (199th). Faster games mean more points

TEXSmall

Home court

TEX at home. This season: TEX 0-0 at home, CHST 0-0 away

Even

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: CHST 8%, TEX 14%. Transfers in: CHST 6, TEX 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

How games like this went

Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines

Situation	Games	Favorite won	Favorite covered	Went over
Home favorites of 20 or more	1165	99%	50%	52%
Non-conference games at this spread	1090	99%	50%	52%
Lines that moved 1+ toward the underdog	4513	74%	51%	50%
Games with a total of 145 to 149.5	3547	74%	49%	50%

A bet at standard prices needs 52.4% to break even, and most situations sit near 50%. Past rates, not a prediction.

Market

Open → current

Spread

OpenTEX -40.5

1 → CHST

NowTEX -39.5

1 pt toward CHST

Total

Open149.5

no move

Now149.5

No change since the open

Moneyline

—

Line movement

Median of 5 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot

Opened TEX -40.5 · unchangedmodel TEX -43.5

model TEX -43.5

Openline modelNow

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Public betting

Share of bets and of money

CHST +39.5Spread

TEX -39.5

Bets

87%13%

Money

80%20%

Over 149.5TotalUnder 149.5

Bets

67%33%

Money

70%30%

Sports Betting Dime, an average of sportsbooks. Read Mon, Nov 2, 4:41 AM ET. ⓘ

Books

5 sportsbooks · current prices

SpreadTotalMoneyline

Book	Spread		Total		Moneyline
Book	CHST	TEX	Over	Under	CHST	TEX
BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag	-40.5-110	+40.5-110	149.5-110	149.5-110	—	—
BetRiversBetRivers	-39.5-114	+39.5-112	149.5-112	149.5-114	—	—
BovadaBovada	-40.5-110	+40.5-110	149.5-110	149.5-110	—	—
DraftKingsDK	-39.5-105	+39.5-115	149.5-110	149.5-110	—	—
LowVig.agLowVig.ag	-40.5-106	+40.5-106	149.5-108	149.5-108	—	—

Prices from The Odds API, updated Nov 1, 8:00 PM ET. Green = best price in the column.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	TEX -39.5	TEX -43.6	TEX +4.1
Total	149.5	149.1	Under 0.4
Projected score	—	CHST 52.7 · TEX 96.4

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	TEX -25.8	—
1H total	69.7	—
1H projected score	CHST 21.9 · TEX 47.8	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
CHST WWLLW	15-16	48%	9-12	14-15
TEX LWWWW	20-15	57%	8-9	8-10

Venue/role: CHST away, as underdog; TEX home, as favorite. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
CHST UUUOO	15-16	48%	6-25
TEX UUUUO	20-15	57%	20-15

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
CHST	4-6 40%	6-4 60%	4-6 40%
TEX	4-6 40%	5-5 50%	4-6 40%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

Chicago St

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 5	@ UIW	No recent meeting
Nov 9	vs SCST	L55–78LU
Nov 11	@ CBU	L62–74LO

Texas

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 5	vs GWEB	No recent meeting
Nov 9	vs GRAM	No recent meeting
Nov 15	vs BAY	L85–93LO

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

Recent meetings

Since 2021-22

CHST 0–1 TEXTEX leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · CHST 0-1 ATS

Date	Result	Line	Covered
Nov 12, 2024-25	CHST 58 @ TEX 105	TEX -30.5	TEX W

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

Chicago St

31 games played

Straight up

6-25

19% wins

Against the spread

15-16

48% covers · avg +0.3 pts vs the line

Over / Under

15-16

48% overs · avg −0.6 pts vs the total

Straight up

6-2519%

L L L L L L L L L W L L L L L L L L L L W L W W W L L W L L L

3 straight losses1 of last 4 won

Against the spread

15-1648%

L W L W W L L L L W W W L L L W L L L W W L W W W L W W L L W

2 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

15-1648%

O O O U U O O O O O U U O U U O U U U U O O U O U U U U U O O

2 straight overs2 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	@DEP	L 62-92	+24.5	L −5.5	143.5	O 154
Nov 6	@SLU	L 86-108	+30.5	W +8.5	155.5	O 194
Nov 11	@BTLR	L 66-98	+26.5	L −5.5	158.5	O 164
Nov 15	vsUIC	L 63-67	+9.5	W +5.5	156.5	U 130
Nov 18	@MINN	L 54-66	+27.5	W +15.5	144.5	U 120
Nov 20	@IOWA	L 54-93	+31.5	L −7.5	142.5	O 147
Nov 25	@PFW	L 77-90	+12.5	L −0.5	149.5	O 167
Nov 28	@YSU	L 64-87	+14.5	L −8.5	146.5	O 151
Dec 6	@ILST	L 53-95	+20.5	L −21.5	144.5	O 148
Dec 14	@LUC	W 84-75	+15.5	W +24.5	140.5	O 159
Dec 16	@BGSU	L 55-76	+21.5	W +0.5	148.5	U 131
Dec 20	@IU	L 58-78	+38.5	W +18.5	152.5	U 136
Jan 2	vsWAG	L 72-79	+1.5	L −5.5	146.5	O 151
Jan 4	vsLIU	L 55-74	+7.5	L −11.5	151.5	U 129
Jan 8	@FDU	L 63-70	+4.5	L −2.5	143.5	U 133
Jan 10	@STO	L 82-85	+4.5	W +1.5	135.5	O 167
Jan 17	vsLEM	L 57-72	+6.5	L −8.5	146.5	U 129
Jan 19	vsNHVN	L 56-62	-1.5	L −7.5	129.5	U 118
Jan 23	@SFPA	L 60-81	+3.5	L −17.5	143.5	U 141
Jan 25	@MERC	L 59-61	+9.5	W +7.5	131.5	U 120
Jan 31	vsMERC	W 78-74	+2.5	W +6.5	129.5	O 152
Feb 5	@CCSU	L 67-78	+8.5	L −2.5	138.5	O 145
Feb 7	@NHVN	W 63-57	+5.5	W +11.5	127.5	U 120
Feb 9	vsSFPA	W 80-75	-3.5	W +1.5	144.5	O 155
Feb 12	vsSTO	W 68-55	+2.5	W +15.5	131.5	U 123
Feb 14	@LEM	L 63-81	+6.5	L −11.5	144.5	U 144
Feb 19	vsFDU	L 59-60	+1.5	W +0.5	131.5	U 119
Feb 21	vsCCSU	W 70-51	+3.5	W +22.5	138.5	U 121
Feb 26	@LIU	L 56-73	+11.5	L −5.5	141.5	U 129
Feb 28	@WAG	L 61-80	+4.5	L −14.5	134.5	O 141
Mar 4	@LIU	L 75-79	+10.5	W +6.5	137.5	O 154

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

DEP

L 62-92

−5.5

SLU

L 86-108

+8.5

BTLR

L 66-98

−5.5

UIC

L 63-67

+5.5

MINN

L 54-66

+15.5

IOWA

L 54-93

−7.5

PFW

L 77-90

−0.5

YSU

L 64-87

−8.5

ILST

L 53-95

−21.5

LUC

W 84-75

+24.5

BGSU

L 55-76

+0.5

L 58-78

+18.5

WAG

L 72-79

−5.5

LIU

L 55-74

−11.5

FDU

L 63-70

−2.5

STO

L 82-85

+1.5

LEM

L 57-72

−8.5

NHVN

L 56-62

−7.5

SFPA

L 60-81

−17.5

MERC

L 59-61

+7.5

MERC

W 78-74

+6.5

CCSU

L 67-78

−2.5

NHVN

W 63-57

+11.5

SFPA

W 80-75

+1.5

STO

W 68-55

+15.5

LEM

L 63-81

−11.5

FDU

L 59-60

+0.5

CCSU

W 70-51

+22.5

LIU

L 56-73

−5.5

WAG

L 61-80

−14.5

LIU

L 75-79

+6.5

covered 15didn’t cover 16avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

DEP

L 62-92

+10.5

SLU

L 86-108

+38.5

BTLR

L 66-98

+5.5

UIC

L 63-67

−26.5

MINN

L 54-66

−24.5

IOWA

L 54-93

+4.5

PFW

L 77-90

+17.5

YSU

L 64-87

+4.5

ILST

L 53-95

+3.5

LUC

W 84-75

+18.5

BGSU

L 55-76

−17.5

L 58-78

−16.5

WAG

L 72-79

+4.5

LIU

L 55-74

−22.5

FDU

L 63-70

−10.5

STO

L 82-85

+31.5

LEM

L 57-72

−17.5

NHVN

L 56-62

−11.5

SFPA

L 60-81

−2.5

MERC

L 59-61

−11.5

MERC

W 78-74

+22.5

CCSU

L 67-78

+6.5

NHVN

W 63-57

−7.5

SFPA

W 80-75

+10.5

STO

W 68-55

−8.5

LEM

L 63-81

−0.5

FDU

L 59-60

−12.5

CCSU

W 70-51

−17.5

LIU

L 56-73

−12.5

WAG

L 61-80

+6.5

LIU

L 75-79

+16.5

over 15under 16avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin

Texas

35 games played

Straight up

20-15

57% wins

Against the spread

20-15

57% covers · avg +0.6 pts vs the line

Over / Under

20-15

57% overs · avg +2.7 pts vs the total

Straight up

20-1557%

L W W W W L W L W L W W L L W W L L W L W W W W W L L W L L L W W W L

3 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

20-1557%

L W W L W L W L W W W L L L W W L W W W W L W W L L L W L L L W W W W

4 straight covers4 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

20-1557%

U O U U O O O O O U U O O O O U U O U O U O O O O O U U O O U U U U O

1 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 4	vsDUKE	L 60-75	+10.5	L −4.5	153.5	U 135
Nov 8	vsLAF	W 97-60	-25.5	W +11.5	153.5	O 157
Nov 12	vsFDU	W 93-58	-31.5	W +3.5	158.5	U 151
Nov 15	vsKC	W 71-55	-31.5	L −15.5	159.5	U 126
Nov 18	vsRID	W 99-65	-30.5	W +3.5	143.5	O 164
Nov 24	vsASU	L 86-87	-6.5	L −7.5	153.5	O 173
Nov 26	vsNCSU	W 102-97	+1.5	W +6.5	161.5	O 199
Dec 3	vsUVA	L 69-88	-3.5	L −22.5	154.5	O 157
Dec 8	vsSOU	W 95-69	-22.5	W +3.5	158.5	O 164
Dec 12	@CONN	L 63-71	+11.5	W +3.5	145.5	U 134
Dec 16	vsLEM	W 95-53	-29.5	W +12.5	152.5	U 148
Dec 22	vsUMES	W 94-71	-33.5	L −10.5	138.5	O 165
Jan 3	vsMSST	L 98-101	-9.5	L −12.5	157.5	O 199
Jan 6	@TENN	L 71-85	+12.5	L −1.5	153.5	O 156
Jan 10	@ALA	W 92-88	+11.5	W +15.5	177.5	O 180
Jan 14	vsVAN	W 80-64	+3.5	W +19.5	163.5	U 144
Jan 17	vsTA&M	L 70-74	-4.5	L −8.5	166.5	U 144
Jan 21	@UK	L 80-85	+7.5	W +2.5	152.5	O 165
Jan 24	vsUGA	W 87-67	-3.5	W +16.5	168.5	U 154
Jan 28	@AUB	L 82-88	+6.5	W +0.5	154.5	O 170
Jan 31	@OU	W 79-69	-1.5	W +8.5	155.5	U 148
Feb 3	vsSC	W 84-75	-13.5	L −4.5	149.5	O 159
Feb 7	vsMISS	W 79-68	-9.5	W +1.5	145.5	O 147
Feb 14	@MIZ	W 85-68	+2.5	W +19.5	150.5	O 153
Feb 17	vsLSU	W 88-85	-10.5	L −7.5	150.5	O 173
Feb 21	@UGA	L 80-91	+2.5	L −8.5	162.5	O 171
Feb 25	vsFLA	L 71-84	+6.5	L −6.5	157.5	U 155
Feb 28	@TA&M	W 76-70	+2.5	W +8.5	159.5	U 146
Mar 4	@ARK	L 85-105	+6.5	L −13.5	163.5	O 190
Mar 7	vsOU	L 85-88	-6.5	L −9.5	154.5	O 173
Mar 11	vsMISS	L 66-76	-5.5	L −15.5	147.5	U 142
Mar 17	vsNCSU	W 68-66	+1.5	W +3.5	157.5	U 134
Mar 19	vsBYU	W 79-71	+2.5	W +10.5	156.5	U 150
Mar 21	vsGONZ	W 74-68	+5.5	W +11.5	146.5	U 142
Mar 26	vsPUR	L 77-79	+8.5	W +6.5	146.5	O 156

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

DUKE

L 60-75

−4.5

LAF

W 97-60

+11.5

FDU

W 93-58

+3.5

W 71-55

−15.5

RID

W 99-65

+3.5

ASU

L 86-87

−7.5

NCSU

W 102-97

+6.5

UVA

L 69-88

−22.5

SOU

W 95-69

+3.5

CONN

L 63-71

+3.5

LEM

W 95-53

+12.5

UMES

W 94-71

−10.5

MSST

L 98-101

−12.5

TENN

L 71-85

−1.5

ALA

W 92-88

+15.5

VAN

W 80-64

+19.5

TA&M

L 70-74

−8.5

L 80-85

+2.5

UGA

W 87-67

+16.5

AUB

L 82-88

+0.5

W 79-69

+8.5

W 84-75

−4.5

MISS

W 79-68

+1.5

MIZ

W 85-68

+19.5

LSU

W 88-85

−7.5

UGA

L 80-91

−8.5

FLA

L 71-84

−6.5

TA&M

W 76-70

+8.5

ARK

L 85-105

−13.5

L 85-88

−9.5

MISS

L 66-76

−15.5

NCSU

W 68-66

+3.5

BYU

W 79-71

+10.5

GONZ

W 74-68

+11.5

PUR

L 77-79

+6.5

covered 20didn’t cover 15avg +0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

DUKE

L 60-75

−18.5

LAF

W 97-60

+3.5

FDU

W 93-58

−7.5

W 71-55

−33.5

RID

W 99-65

+20.5

ASU

L 86-87

+19.5

NCSU

W 102-97

+37.5

UVA

L 69-88

+2.5

SOU

W 95-69

+5.5

CONN

L 63-71

−11.5

LEM

W 95-53

−4.5

UMES

W 94-71

+26.5

MSST

L 98-101

+41.5

TENN

L 71-85

+2.5

ALA

W 92-88

+2.5

VAN

W 80-64

−19.5

TA&M

L 70-74

−22.5

L 80-85

+12.5

UGA

W 87-67

−14.5

AUB

L 82-88

+15.5

W 79-69

−7.5

W 84-75

+9.5

MISS

W 79-68

+1.5

MIZ

W 85-68

+2.5

LSU

W 88-85

+22.5

UGA

L 80-91

+8.5

FLA

L 71-84

−2.5

TA&M

W 76-70

−13.5

ARK

L 85-105

+26.5

L 85-88

+18.5

MISS

L 66-76

−5.5

NCSU

W 68-66

−23.5

BYU

W 79-71

−6.5

GONZ

W 74-68

−4.5

PUR

L 77-79

+9.5

over 20under 15avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

Texas has the better starters

Position by position: Chicago St 0, Texas 5, even 0

Chicago StBetterTexas

G M. Price TR6.4 pts · 1 reb · 0.7 ast Score 3

TEXBig

G I. Johnson TR16.9 pts · 2.9 reb · 3 ast Score 98

G A. Carraway TR4.9 pts · 1.1 reb · 1.1 ast Score 3

TEXBig

G E. Freeman TR9.2 pts · 5.2 reb · 1.2 ast Score 85

G M. Olafioye TR3.4 pts · 1.4 reb · 1.2 ast Score 2

TEXBig

G M. Lewis TR14 pts · 2.6 reb · 2 ast Score 86

F B. Akanmu TR5.9 pts · 3.9 reb · 1.5 ast Score 14

TEXBig

F D. Punch TR14.1 pts · 6.8 reb · 2 ast Score 96

F D. Loury TR4.4 pts · 2 reb · 0.8 ast Score 1

TEXBig

C M. Vokietaitis15.5 pts · 7 reb · 0.7 ast Score 95

Chicago StBetterTexas

CHST offense361st of 366 · -14.2

TEXBig

TEX defense17th of 366 · +6.2

CHST defense339th of 366 · -9.0

TEXBig

TEX offense7th of 366 · +10.5

Backcourt-7.9 · 3 players

TEXBig

Backcourt+8.6 · 3 players

Frontcourt-4.6 · 2 players

TEXBig

Frontcourt+9.8 · 2 players

Bench-2.7 · 2 players

TEXBig

Bench+0.9 · 2 players

Score, worst to bestCHST betterTEX betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

Chicago St

Guards

M. Price18 min · TRA. Carraway16 min · TRM. Olafioye16 min · TRM. Robinson15 minJ. Pazon11 min · TRW. Lovings-WattsNew

Forwards

B. Akanmu21 min · TRD. Loury17 min · TRK. FomanNewL. Stephane DjiyaNewF. SheriffNewL. HodgesNew

Centers

B. KalonjiNew

Texas

Guards

I. Johnson31 min · TRE. Freeman27 min · TRM. Lewis27 min · TRA. Evans14 min · TRA. McDermott3 minB. OgdenNew

Forwards

D. Punch30 min · TRJ. ClarkNewM. SpearsNewC. ElkinsNew

Centers

M. Vokietaitis26 minL. ObiorahNew

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

CHST65.2 #348

TEX81.7 #34

Points per possession

CHST0.99 #337

TEX1.19 #22

Pace (possessions)

CHST66.0 #314

TEX68.7 #199

Shooting

Effective FG%

CHST45.3 #358

TEX54.1 #65

3-point %

CHST32.1 #275

TEX35.1 #107

3-point attempt rate

CHST30.9 #341

TEX35.8 #254

Free throw rate

CHST30.0 #311

TEX44.2 #7

Possessions

Turnover rate

CHST15.7 #114

TEX15.0 #68

Offensive rebound rate

CHST28.3 #255

TEX35.4 #35

Assists per game

CHST11.7 #305

TEX12.1 #278

Defense

Points allowed

CHST76.5 #231

TEX76.1 #220

Points allowed per possession

CHST1.16 #332

TEX1.11 #235

Opponent effective FG%

CHST56.7 #354

TEX50.8 #144

Opponent 3-point %

CHST35.6 #290

TEX34.7 #230

Turnovers forced

CHST20.1 #21

TEX13.0 #356

Defensive rebound rate

CHST65.0 #339

TEX73.1 #35

Steals per game

CHST8.2 #33

TEX5.5 #298

Blocks per game

CHST1.3 #365

TEX2.9 #239

CHST		TEX
Scoring
65.2 #348	Points per game	81.7 #34
0.99 #337	Points per possession	1.19 #22
66.0 #314	Pace (possessions)	68.7 #199
Shooting
45.3 #358	Effective FG%	54.1 #65
32.1 #275	3-point %	35.1 #107
30.9 #341	3-point attempt rate	35.8 #254
30.0 #311	Free throw rate	44.2 #7
Possessions
15.7 #114	Turnover rate	15.0 #68
28.3 #255	Offensive rebound rate	35.4 #35
11.7 #305	Assists per game	12.1 #278
Defense
76.5 #231	Points allowed	76.1 #220
1.16 #332	Points allowed per possession	1.11 #235
56.7 #354	Opponent effective FG%	50.8 #144
35.6 #290	Opponent 3-point %	34.7 #230
20.1 #21	Turnovers forced	13.0 #356
65.0 #339	Defensive rebound rate	73.1 #35
8.2 #33	Steals per game	5.5 #298
1.3 #365	Blocks per game	2.9 #239

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Chicago St

6-25 in 2025-26 overall · 5-14 in conference · Northeast Conference

Last five, 2025-26

L@ Long Island75–79
L@ Wagner61–80
L@ Long Island56–73
Wvs C Connecticut70–51
Lvs FDU59–60

A week or more of rest.

Texas

20-15 in 2025-26 overall · 9-10 in conference · Southeastern Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Purdue77–79
Wvs Gonzaga74–68
Wvs BYU79–71
Wvs NC State68–66
Lvs Ole Miss66–76

A week or more of rest.