Moody Center · at Texas
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | TEX | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects TEX 99–56 · win probability TEX 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 155.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: TEX has more of the edges
GWEB 0, TEX 8 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
TEX offense vs GWEB defense
Offense 7th of 366 against a defense 357th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: GWEB 23.2%, TEX 35.4%. Defensive: GWEB 63.4%, TEX 73.1%
GWEB offense vs TEX defense
Offense 318th of 366 against a defense 17th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: GWEB 47.8 and allows 57.0; TEX 54.1 and allows 50.8
Three-pointers
GWEB hits 31.0% and allows 36.0%; TEX hits 35.1% and allows 34.7%. Threes are 39.8% and 35.8% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
GWEB has played the 154th-hardest schedule, TEX the 27th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: GWEB 19.8%, TEX 15.0%. Forced: GWEB 15.3%, TEX 13.0%
Free throws
Free throw rate: GWEB 30.3, TEX 44.2. Allowed: GWEB 35.3, TEX 39.6
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: GWEB plays 70.8 a game (84th fastest), TEX 68.7 (199th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
TEX at home. This season: TEX 0-0 at home, GWEB 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: GWEB 35%, TEX 14%. Transfers in: GWEB 3, TEX 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | TEX -42.4 | — |
| Total | — | 155.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | GWEB 56.3 · TEX 98.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | TEX -25.1 | — |
| 1H total | 72.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | GWEB 23.7 · TEX 48.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-9 10% | 9-1 90% | 4-6 40% | |
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Gardner-Webb
30 games played
Straight up
2-28
7% wins
Against the spread
17-13
57% covers · avg −2.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg −1.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 60-87 | +28.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 59-97 | +29.5 | L −8.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 84-95 | +13.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 62-93 | +21.5 | L −9.5 | 155.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 67-102 | +19.5 | L −15.5 | 154.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 51-84 | +10.5 | L −22.5 | 153.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 68-76 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 62-88 | +18.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 74-107 | +14.5 | L −18.5 | 161.5 | O 181 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 84-88 | +10.5 | W +6.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 15 | vs | L 57-83 | +10.5 | L −15.5 | 155.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 52-94 | +42.5 | W +0.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 79-89 | +12.5 | W +2.5 | 163.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 77-88 | +23.5 | W +12.5 | 164.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 49-104 | +26.5 | L −28.5 | 162.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 80-89 | +13.5 | W +4.5 | 165.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 55-92 | +8.5 | L −28.5 | 145.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 56-91 | +16.5 | L −18.5 | 155.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 67-65 | +9.5 | W +11.5 | 153.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 50-69 | +17.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 66-86 | +12.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 62-68 | +17.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 85-103 | +20.5 | W +2.5 | 156.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 87-112 | +25.5 | W +0.5 | 161.5 | O 199 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 66-75 | +16.5 | W +7.5 | 161.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 70-82 | +18.5 | W +6.5 | 162.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 71-77 | +12.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 61-71 | +11.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 65-64 | +10.5 | W +11.5 | 143.5 | U 129 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 59-81 | +27.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | U 140 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
MINN
L 60-87
+1.5
7
@
CLEM
L 59-97
−8.5
15
@
ELON
L 84-95
+2.5
18
@
DEP
L 62-93
−9.5
22
@
RICH
L 67-102
−15.5
26
vs
NAVY
L 51-84
−22.5
28
vs
SELA
L 68-76
−1.5
29
@
UNCW
L 62-88
−7.5
3
@
QUC
L 74-107
−18.5
6
vs
GASO
L 84-88
+6.5
15
vs
WOF
L 57-83
−15.5
21
@
TENN
L 52-94
+0.5
31
vs
CHSO
L 79-89
+2.5
3
@
WIN
L 77-88
+12.5
7
@
HPU
L 49-104
−28.5
14
vs
RAD
L 80-89
+4.5
17
vs
PRES
L 55-92
−28.5
21
@
LONG
L 56-91
−18.5
23
vs
UPST
W 67-65
+11.5
29
@
UNCA
L 50-69
−1.5
4
vs
LONG
L 66-86
−7.5
7
@
PRES
L 62-68
+11.5
12
vs
WIN
L 85-103
+2.5
14
vs
HPU
L 87-112
+0.5
17
@
CHSO
L 66-75
+7.5
19
@
RAD
L 70-82
+6.5
26
vs
UNCA
L 71-77
+6.5
28
@
UPST
L 61-71
+1.5
4
vs
UPST
W 65-64
+11.5
6
vs
HPU
L 59-81
+5.5
covered 17didn’t cover 13avg −2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
MINN
L 60-87
−1.5
7
@
CLEM
L 59-97
+10.5
15
@
ELON
L 84-95
+24.5
18
@
DEP
L 62-93
−0.5
22
@
RICH
L 67-102
+14.5
26
vs
NAVY
L 51-84
−18.5
28
vs
SELA
L 68-76
+2.5
29
@
UNCW
L 62-88
+2.5
3
@
QUC
L 74-107
+19.5
6
vs
GASO
L 84-88
+9.5
15
vs
WOF
L 57-83
−15.5
21
@
TENN
L 52-94
−6.5
31
vs
CHSO
L 79-89
+4.5
3
@
WIN
L 77-88
+0.5
7
@
HPU
L 49-104
−9.5
14
vs
RAD
L 80-89
+3.5
17
vs
PRES
L 55-92
+1.5
21
@
LONG
L 56-91
−8.5
23
vs
UPST
W 67-65
−21.5
29
@
UNCA
L 50-69
−30.5
4
vs
LONG
L 66-86
+4.5
7
@
PRES
L 62-68
−15.5
12
vs
WIN
L 85-103
+31.5
14
vs
HPU
L 87-112
+37.5
17
@
CHSO
L 66-75
−20.5
19
@
RAD
L 70-82
−10.5
26
vs
UNCA
L 71-77
+2.5
28
@
UPST
L 61-71
−14.5
4
vs
UPST
W 65-64
−14.5
6
vs
HPU
L 59-81
−15.5
over 15under 15avg −1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Texas
35 games played
Straight up
20-15
57% wins
Against the spread
20-15
57% covers · avg +0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-15
57% overs · avg +2.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | L 60-75 | +10.5 | L −4.5 | 153.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 97-60 | -25.5 | W +11.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 93-58 | -31.5 | W +3.5 | 158.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 71-55 | -31.5 | L −15.5 | 159.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 99-65 | -30.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 86-87 | -6.5 | L −7.5 | 153.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 102-97 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 161.5 | O 199 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 69-88 | -3.5 | L −22.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 8 | vs | W 95-69 | -22.5 | W +3.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 12 | @ | L 63-71 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 95-53 | -29.5 | W +12.5 | 152.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 94-71 | -33.5 | L −10.5 | 138.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 98-101 | -9.5 | L −12.5 | 157.5 | O 199 |
| Jan 6 | @ | L 71-85 | +12.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 92-88 | +11.5 | W +15.5 | 177.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 80-64 | +3.5 | W +19.5 | 163.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 70-74 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 166.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 80-85 | +7.5 | W +2.5 | 152.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 87-67 | -3.5 | W +16.5 | 168.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 82-88 | +6.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 79-69 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 155.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 84-75 | -13.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 79-68 | -9.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 85-68 | +2.5 | W +19.5 | 150.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 88-85 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 80-91 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 162.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 71-84 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 76-70 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 159.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 4 | @ | L 85-105 | +6.5 | L −13.5 | 163.5 | O 190 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 85-88 | -6.5 | L −9.5 | 154.5 | O 173 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 66-76 | -5.5 | L −15.5 | 147.5 | U 142 |
| Mar 17 | vs | W 68-66 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 19 | vs | W 79-71 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Mar 21 | vs | W 74-68 | +5.5 | W +11.5 | 146.5 | U 142 |
| Mar 26 | vs | L 77-79 | +8.5 | W +6.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
DUKE
L 60-75
−4.5
8
vs
LAF
W 97-60
+11.5
12
vs
FDU
W 93-58
+3.5
15
vs
KC
W 71-55
−15.5
18
vs
RID
W 99-65
+3.5
24
vs
ASU
L 86-87
−7.5
26
vs
NCSU
W 102-97
+6.5
3
vs
UVA
L 69-88
−22.5
8
vs
SOU
W 95-69
+3.5
12
@
CONN
L 63-71
+3.5
16
vs
LEM
W 95-53
+12.5
22
vs
UMES
W 94-71
−10.5
3
vs
MSST
L 98-101
−12.5
6
@
TENN
L 71-85
−1.5
10
@
ALA
W 92-88
+15.5
14
vs
VAN
W 80-64
+19.5
17
vs
TA&M
L 70-74
−8.5
21
@
UK
L 80-85
+2.5
24
vs
UGA
W 87-67
+16.5
28
@
AUB
L 82-88
+0.5
31
@
OU
W 79-69
+8.5
3
vs
SC
W 84-75
−4.5
7
vs
MISS
W 79-68
+1.5
14
@
MIZ
W 85-68
+19.5
17
vs
LSU
W 88-85
−7.5
21
@
UGA
L 80-91
−8.5
25
vs
FLA
L 71-84
−6.5
28
@
TA&M
W 76-70
+8.5
4
@
ARK
L 85-105
−13.5
7
vs
OU
L 85-88
−9.5
11
vs
MISS
L 66-76
−15.5
17
vs
NCSU
W 68-66
+3.5
19
vs
BYU
W 79-71
+10.5
21
vs
GONZ
W 74-68
+11.5
26
vs
PUR
L 77-79
+6.5
covered 20didn’t cover 15avg +0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
DUKE
L 60-75
−18.5
8
vs
LAF
W 97-60
+3.5
12
vs
FDU
W 93-58
−7.5
15
vs
KC
W 71-55
−33.5
18
vs
RID
W 99-65
+20.5
24
vs
ASU
L 86-87
+19.5
26
vs
NCSU
W 102-97
+37.5
3
vs
UVA
L 69-88
+2.5
8
vs
SOU
W 95-69
+5.5
12
@
CONN
L 63-71
−11.5
16
vs
LEM
W 95-53
−4.5
22
vs
UMES
W 94-71
+26.5
3
vs
MSST
L 98-101
+41.5
6
@
TENN
L 71-85
+2.5
10
@
ALA
W 92-88
+2.5
14
vs
VAN
W 80-64
−19.5
17
vs
TA&M
L 70-74
−22.5
21
@
UK
L 80-85
+12.5
24
vs
UGA
W 87-67
−14.5
28
@
AUB
L 82-88
+15.5
31
@
OU
W 79-69
−7.5
3
vs
SC
W 84-75
+9.5
7
vs
MISS
W 79-68
+1.5
14
@
MIZ
W 85-68
+2.5
17
vs
LSU
W 88-85
+22.5
21
@
UGA
L 80-91
+8.5
25
vs
FLA
L 71-84
−2.5
28
@
TA&M
W 76-70
−13.5
4
@
ARK
L 85-105
+26.5
7
vs
OU
L 85-88
+18.5
11
vs
MISS
L 66-76
−5.5
17
vs
NCSU
W 68-66
−23.5
19
vs
BYU
W 79-71
−6.5
21
vs
GONZ
W 74-68
−4.5
26
vs
PUR
L 77-79
+9.5
over 20under 15avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Texas has the better starters
Position by position: Gardner-Webb 0, Texas 4, even 1
Gardner-WebbBetterTexas
G J. Hudson10.6 pts · 3.8 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 62
→TEXBig
G I. Johnson TR16.9 pts · 2.9 reb · 3 ast
Score 98
G A. Talbert6.7 pts · 1.9 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 10
→TEXBig
G E. Freeman TR9.2 pts · 5.2 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 85
G J. Ferere6.5 pts · 3 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 32
→TEXBig
G M. Lewis TR14 pts · 2.6 reb · 2 ast
Score 86
F M. Pocknett TR3.7 pts · 4 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 14
→TEXBig
F D. Punch TR14.1 pts · 6.8 reb · 2 ast
Score 96
C S. Nosakhare TR0.8 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
C M. Vokietaitis15.5 pts · 7 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 95
Gardner-WebbBetterTexas
GWEB offense318th of 366 · -10.4
→TEXBig
TEX defense17th of 366 · +6.2
GWEB defense357th of 366 · -10.2
→TEXBig
TEX offense7th of 366 · +10.5
Backcourt-4.1 · 3 players
→TEXBig
Backcourt+8.6 · 3 players
Frontcourt-2.0 · 2 players
→TEXBig
Frontcourt+9.8 · 2 players
Bench-0.9 · 1 player
→TEXSmall
Bench+0.9 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestGWEB betterTEX betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Hudson27 minA. Talbert25 minJ. Ferere18 minS. BrownNewD. DanielNewB. LutherNew
Forwards
M. Pocknett14 min · TRJ. Skipper8 min · TRC. OkparaNew
Centers
S. Nosakhare9 min · TRG. TropnasNewB. RutsinduraNew
Guards
I. Johnson31 min · TRE. Freeman27 min · TRM. Lewis27 min · TRA. Evans14 min · TRA. McDermott3 minB. OgdenNew
Forwards
D. Punch30 min · TRJ. ClarkNewM. SpearsNewC. ElkinsNew
Centers
M. Vokietaitis26 minL. ObiorahNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.2 #343 | Points per game | 81.7 #34 |
| 0.94 #360 | Points per possession | 1.19 #22 |
| 70.8 #84 | Pace (possessions) | 68.7 #199 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.8 #317 | Effective FG% | 54.1 #65 |
| 31.0 #320 | 3-point % | 35.1 #107 |
| 39.8 #174 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.8 #254 |
| 30.3 #302 | Free throw rate | 44.2 #7 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.8 #347 | Turnover rate | 15.0 #68 |
| 23.2 #350 | Offensive rebound rate | 35.4 #35 |
| 9.7 #362 | Assists per game | 12.1 #278 |
| Defense | ||
| 86.7 #362 | Points allowed | 76.1 #220 |
| 1.22 #361 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #235 |
| 57.0 #356 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.8 #144 |
| 36.0 #300 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.7 #230 |
| 15.3 #265 | Turnovers forced | 13.0 #356 |
| 63.4 #355 | Defensive rebound rate | 73.1 #35 |
| 6.1 #224 | Steals per game | 5.5 #298 |
| 2.4 #309 | Blocks per game | 2.9 #239 |
Gardner-Webb
2-28 in 2025-26 overall · 2-16 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs High Point59–81
- Wvs SC Upstate65–64
- L@ SC Upstate61–71
- Lvs UNC Asheville71–77
- L@ Radford70–82
A week or more of rest.
Texas
20-15 in 2025-26 overall · 9-10 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Purdue77–79
- Wvs Gonzaga74–68
- Wvs BYU79–71
- Wvs NC State68–66
- Lvs Ole Miss66–76
A week or more of rest.