Fertitta Center · at Houston
Line
HOU -29.5moved 2 toward HOU
Total137.5down 3 from 140.5
| This season | HOU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects HOU 87–55 · win probability HOU 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Spread
Total
Winner
Line
HOU -29.5
moved 2 toward HOU
Total
137.5
model 141.7 · Over by 4
Model edge
HOU by 2.5
model vs market
Public on the spread
95% LAS
82% of the money
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: HOU has more of the edges
LAS 2, HOU 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: LAS 45.4 and allows 55.0; HOU 51.9 and allows 46.2
Three-pointers
LAS hits 30.0% and allows 36.5%; HOU hits 34.7% and allows 31.6%. Threes are 31.5% and 40.7% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: LAS 37.5, HOU 26.3. Allowed: LAS 31.5, HOU 38.7
Turnovers
Turnover rate: LAS 18.2%, HOU 12.8%. Forced: LAS 17.2%, HOU 20.7%
LAS offense vs HOU defense
Offense 157th of 366 against a defense 1st, on the model’s ratings
HOU offense vs LAS defense
Offense 10th of 366 against a defense 111th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
LAS has played the 92nd-hardest schedule, HOU the 17th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: LAS 33.7%, HOU 35.7%. Defensive: LAS 67.7%, HOU 69.7%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: LAS 56%, HOU 26%. Transfers in: LAS 5, HOU 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
HOU at home. This season: HOU 0-0 at home, LAS 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 66 possessions: LAS plays 66.4 a game (300th fastest), HOU 65.0 (346th). Faster games mean more points
How games like this went
Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines
| Situation | Games | Favorite won | Favorite covered | Went over |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home favorites of 20 or more | 1165 | 99% | 50% | 52% |
| Non-conference games at this spread | 1090 | 99% | 50% | 52% |
| Lines that moved 1+ toward the favorite | 6763 | 75% | 50% | 51% |
| Games with a total of 135 to 139.5 | 2607 | 71% | 49% | 50% |
Market
Open → current
Spread
OpenHOU -27.5
2 → HOU
NowHOU -29.5
2 pts toward HOU
Total
Open140.5
▼ 3
Now137.5
Down 3 since the open
Moneyline
LAS +5000 · HOU -100000
Line movement
Median of 8 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot
Opened HOU -27.5 · now HOU -29.5 · moved 2 toward HOUmodel HOU -32
model HOU -32
Opened 140.5 · now 137.5 · moved 3 downmodel 141.5
model 141.5
Openline modelNow
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Public betting
Share of bets and of money
Bets
Money
Money is 13 pts ahead of bets on HOU -29.5
Over 137.5TotalUnder 137.5
Bets
Money
Money is 18 pts ahead of bets on Under 137.5
Books
8 sportsbooks · current prices
| Book | Spread | Total | Moneyline | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAS | HOU | Over | Under | LAS | HOU | |
| BetMGMMGM | -29.5-105 | +29.5-115 | 137.5-115 | 137.5-105 | +3300 | -10000 |
| BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag | -29.5-110 | +29.5-110 | 137-110 | 137-110 | — | — |
| BetRiversBetRivers | -29.5-112 | +29.5-112 | 138.5-112 | 138.5-112 | — | — |
| BetUSBetUS | -29.5-110 | +29.5-110 | 137-110 | 137-110 | — | — |
| BovadaBovada | -30-115 | +30-105 | 137.5-120 | 137.5+100 | — | — |
| DraftKingsDK | -29.5-105 | +29.5-115 | 137.5-112 | 137.5-108 | +5000 | -100000 |
| FanDuelFD | -28.5-104 | +28.5-118 | 138.5-110 | 138.5-110 | +6500 | -100000 |
| LowVig.agLowVig.ag | -29.5-106 | +29.5-106 | 137-108 | 137-108 | — | — |
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | HOU -29.5 | HOU -32.1 | HOU +2.6 |
| Total | 137.5 | 141.7 | Over 4.2 |
| Projected score | — | LAS 54.8 · HOU 86.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | HOU -18.9 | — |
| 1H total | 66.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | LAS 23.7 · HOU 42.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | |
| 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
La Salle
31 games played
Straight up
8-23
26% wins
Against the spread
14-17
45% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-17
45% overs · avg −0.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | W 87-59 | -17.5 | W +10.5 | 139.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 73-60 | -4.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 63-90 | +6.5 | L −20.5 | 148.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 69-83 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 19 | vs | L 55-70 | +12.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 58-63 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 71-73 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 60-66 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 132.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 69-64 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 129.5 | O 133 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 60-70 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 72-84 | +13.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 50-102 | +40.5 | L −11.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 75-80 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 134.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 55-77 | +16.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 79-72 | +11.5 | W +18.5 | 135.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 72-84 | +17.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 53-74 | +8.5 | L −12.5 | 147.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 78-74 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 67-64 | +9.5 | W +12.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 58-64 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 136.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 58-67 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 61-71 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 140.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 58-82 | +22.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 68-77 | +12.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 61-62 | +11.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 59-46 | +3.5 | W +16.5 | 135.5 | U 105 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 77-104 | +8.5 | L −18.5 | 146.5 | O 181 |
| Mar 1 | @ | L 64-71 | +10.5 | W +3.5 | 133.5 | O 135 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 87-84 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 131.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 76-88 | +11.5 | L −0.5 | 142.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 80-99 | +7.5 | L −11.5 | 146.5 | O 179 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
COPP
W 87-59
+10.5
8
vs
MONM
W 73-60
+8.5
11
@
TEM
L 63-90
−20.5
15
vs
PSU
L 69-83
−5.5
19
vs
VILL
L 55-70
−2.5
28
vs
HOF
L 58-63
−1.5
29
@
PENN
L 71-73
−0.5
30
vs
MRMK
L 60-66
−8.5
6
vs
DREX
W 69-64
+6.5
13
@
LIU
L 60-70
−7.5
19
@
HPU
L 72-84
+1.5
21
@
MICH
L 50-102
−11.5
31
vs
GMU
L 75-80
+3.5
3
@
GW
L 55-77
−5.5
7
@
URI
W 79-72
+18.5
10
vs
SLU
L 72-84
+5.5
14
@
RICH
L 53-74
−12.5
17
vs
SBU
W 78-74
+9.5
21
vs
DAY
W 67-64
+12.5
28
@
FOR
L 58-64
−0.5
31
vs
JOES
L 58-67
−6.5
3
@
LUC
L 61-71
−7.5
7
@
SLU
L 58-82
−1.5
11
vs
VCU
L 68-77
+3.5
18
@
DUQ
L 61-62
+10.5
21
vs
URI
W 59-46
+16.5
24
vs
GW
L 77-104
−18.5
1
@
DAV
L 64-71
+3.5
4
vs
FOR
W 87-84
+6.5
7
@
JOES
L 76-88
−0.5
11
vs
SBU
L 80-99
−11.5
covered 14didn’t cover 17avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
COPP
W 87-59
+6.5
8
vs
MONM
W 73-60
−10.5
11
@
TEM
L 63-90
+4.5
15
vs
PSU
L 69-83
+6.5
19
vs
VILL
L 55-70
−19.5
28
vs
HOF
L 58-63
−17.5
29
@
PENN
L 71-73
−5.5
30
vs
MRMK
L 60-66
−6.5
6
vs
DREX
W 69-64
+3.5
13
@
LIU
L 60-70
−13.5
19
@
HPU
L 72-84
+6.5
21
@
MICH
L 50-102
−3.5
31
vs
GMU
L 75-80
+20.5
3
@
GW
L 55-77
−18.5
7
@
URI
W 79-72
+15.5
10
vs
SLU
L 72-84
+3.5
14
@
RICH
L 53-74
−20.5
17
vs
SBU
W 78-74
+10.5
21
vs
DAY
W 67-64
−6.5
28
@
FOR
L 58-64
−14.5
31
vs
JOES
L 58-67
−17.5
3
@
LUC
L 61-71
−8.5
7
@
SLU
L 58-82
−13.5
11
vs
VCU
L 68-77
−2.5
18
@
DUQ
L 61-62
−22.5
21
vs
URI
W 59-46
−30.5
24
vs
GW
L 77-104
+34.5
1
@
DAV
L 64-71
+1.5
4
vs
FOR
W 87-84
+39.5
7
@
JOES
L 76-88
+21.5
11
vs
SBU
L 80-99
+32.5
over 14under 17avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Houston
37 games played
Straight up
30-7
81% wins
Against the spread
19-18
51% covers · avg +0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-22
41% overs · avg −1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 75-57 | -36.5 | L −18.5 | 136.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 65-48 | -26.5 | L −9.5 | 130.5 | U 113 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 78-45 | -30.5 | W +2.5 | 138.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 73-72 | -7.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 91-45 | -40.5 | W +5.5 | 134.5 | O 136 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 78-74 | -14.5 | L −10.5 | 140.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 73-76 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 136.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 66-56 | -11.5 | L −1.5 | 132.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 82-67 | -12.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 80-38 | -40.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 99-57 | -32.5 | W +9.5 | 138.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 94-85 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 69-60 | -25.5 | L −16.5 | 138.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 67-60 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 69-65 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 77-55 | -2.5 | W +19.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 77-48 | -13.5 | W +15.5 | 127.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 18 | vs | W 103-73 | -18.5 | W +11.5 | 142.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 86-90 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 79-70 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 76-54 | -13.5 | W +8.5 | 135.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 79-55 | -15.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 77-66 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 10 | @ | W 66-52 | -16.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | U 118 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 78-64 | -22.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 67-70 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | O 137 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 66-73 | -6.5 | L −13.5 | 142.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 23 | @ | L 56-69 | -2.5 | L −15.5 | 138.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 102-62 | -20.5 | W +19.5 | 139.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 77-64 | -12.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 82-75 | -13.5 | L −6.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 73-66 | -9.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 69-47 | -5.5 | W +16.5 | 139.5 | U 116 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 74-79 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 19 | vs | W 78-47 | -24.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 21 | vs | W 88-57 | -10.5 | W +20.5 | 142.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 26 | vs | L 55-65 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 141.5 | U 120 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
LEH
W 75-57
−18.5
8
vs
TOW
W 65-48
−9.5
12
vs
OAK
W 78-45
+2.5
16
vs
AUB
W 73-72
−6.5
20
vs
RID
W 91-45
+5.5
24
vs
SYR
W 78-74
−10.5
25
vs
TENN
L 73-76
−5.5
26
vs
ND
W 66-56
−1.5
6
vs
FSU
W 82-67
+2.5
10
vs
JKST
W 80-38
+1.5
13
vs
NOLA
W 99-57
+9.5
20
vs
ARK
W 94-85
+3.5
29
vs
MTSU
W 69-60
−16.5
3
@
CIN
W 67-60
+2.5
6
vs
TTU
W 69-65
−3.5
10
@
BAY
W 77-55
+19.5
13
vs
WVU
W 77-48
+15.5
18
vs
ASU
W 103-73
+11.5
24
@
TTU
L 86-90
−5.5
28
@
TCU
W 79-70
+0.5
31
vs
CIN
W 76-54
+8.5
4
vs
UCF
W 79-55
+8.5
7
@
BYU
W 77-66
+9.5
10
@
UTAH
W 66-52
−2.5
14
vs
KSU
W 78-64
−8.5
16
@
ISU
L 67-70
−0.5
21
vs
ARIZ
L 66-73
−13.5
23
@
KU
L 56-69
−15.5
28
vs
COLO
W 102-62
+19.5
4
vs
BAY
W 77-64
+0.5
7
@
OKST
W 82-75
−6.5
12
vs
BYU
W 73-66
−2.5
13
vs
KU
W 69-47
+16.5
14
vs
ARIZ
L 74-79
−3.5
19
vs
IDHO
W 78-47
+6.5
21
vs
TA&M
W 88-57
+20.5
26
vs
ILL
L 55-65
−12.5
covered 19didn’t cover 18avg +0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
LEH
W 75-57
−4.5
8
vs
TOW
W 65-48
−17.5
12
vs
OAK
W 78-45
−15.5
16
vs
AUB
W 73-72
+4.5
20
vs
RID
W 91-45
+1.5
24
vs
SYR
W 78-74
+11.5
25
vs
TENN
L 73-76
+12.5
26
vs
ND
W 66-56
−10.5
6
vs
FSU
W 82-67
+0.5
10
vs
JKST
W 80-38
−19.5
13
vs
NOLA
W 99-57
+17.5
20
vs
ARK
W 94-85
+32.5
29
vs
MTSU
W 69-60
−9.5
3
@
CIN
W 67-60
−8.5
6
vs
TTU
W 69-65
−8.5
10
@
BAY
W 77-55
−10.5
13
vs
WVU
W 77-48
−2.5
18
vs
ASU
W 103-73
+33.5
24
@
TTU
L 86-90
+34.5
28
@
TCU
W 79-70
+9.5
31
vs
CIN
W 76-54
−5.5
4
vs
UCF
W 79-55
−12.5
7
@
BYU
W 77-66
−8.5
10
@
UTAH
W 66-52
−24.5
14
vs
KSU
W 78-64
−2.5
16
@
ISU
L 67-70
+2.5
21
vs
ARIZ
L 66-73
−3.5
23
@
KU
L 56-69
−13.5
28
vs
COLO
W 102-62
+24.5
4
vs
BAY
W 77-64
−2.5
7
@
OKST
W 82-75
+5.5
12
vs
BYU
W 73-66
−7.5
13
vs
KU
W 69-47
−23.5
14
vs
ARIZ
L 74-79
+14.5
19
vs
IDHO
W 78-47
−12.5
21
vs
TA&M
W 88-57
+2.5
26
vs
ILL
L 55-65
−21.5
over 15under 22avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Houston has the better starters
Position by position: La Salle 0, Houston 4, even 1
La SalleBetterHouston
G J. Johnson6.3 pts · 2.4 reb · 4.1 ast
Score 29
→HOUBig
G C. Hadnot TR20.6 pts · 3.7 reb · 3.6 ast
Score 95
G R. Dockery12.5 pts · 6.2 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 91
=Even
G D. Thomas TR15.3 pts · 2.7 reb · 6.5 ast
Score 99
F J. Brewer11.3 pts · 4.2 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 75
→HOUSmall
F D. Gillespie TR17.9 pts · 11.4 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 94
F V. Zanki TR8.1 pts · 2.4 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 46
→HOUBig
F B. East TR12.8 pts · 9.3 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 92
F A. Finkley TR5.4 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 19
→HOUBig
F J. Tugler8.4 pts · 5.3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 96
La SalleBetterHouston
LAS offense157th of 366 · -4.7
→HOUBig
HOU defense1st of 366 · +13.2
LAS defense111th of 366 · -1.3
→HOUSmall
HOU offense10th of 366 · +10.1
Backcourt+0.4 · 2 players
→HOUBig
Backcourt+10.0 · 2 players
Frontcourt-0.6 · 3 players
→HOUBig
Frontcourt+11.5 · 3 players
Bench-3.6 · 5 players
→HOUBig
Bench+3.6 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestLAS betterHOU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Johnson30 minR. Dockery27 minK. Burton19 min · TRD. Booker8 min · TRA. Masharaliyev1 minT. MossNew
Forwards
J. Brewer27 minV. Zanki21 min · TRA. Finkley19 min · TRN. Collier14 minE. Rink12 min · TRB. Beatty10 min
Guards
C. Hadnot35 min · TRD. Thomas29 min · TRC. Weaver21 min · TRM. Miller12 minK. Jefferson4 minB. JacksonNew
Forwards
D. Gillespie33 min · TRB. East24 min · TRJ. Tugler24 minC. McCarty12 min
Centers
A. DianeNewD. SilimanaNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.8 #336 | Points per game | 76.9 #119 |
| 1.00 #322 | Points per possession | 1.18 #36 |
| 66.4 #300 | Pace (possessions) | 65.0 #346 |
| Shooting | ||
| 45.4 #357 | Effective FG% | 51.9 #150 |
| 30.0 #342 | 3-point % | 34.7 #134 |
| 31.5 #333 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.7 #153 |
| 37.5 #113 | Free throw rate | 26.3 #355 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.2 #281 | Turnover rate | 12.8 #3 |
| 33.7 #75 | Offensive rebound rate | 35.7 #32 |
| 12.9 #221 | Assists per game | 14.6 #111 |
| Defense | ||
| 75.0 #186 | Points allowed | 62.3 #1 |
| 1.13 #293 | Points allowed per possession | 0.96 #5 |
| 55.0 #329 | Opponent effective FG% | 46.2 #12 |
| 36.5 #324 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.6 #49 |
| 17.2 #136 | Turnovers forced | 20.7 #14 |
| 67.7 #274 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.7 #173 |
| 6.7 #155 | Steals per game | 7.5 #75 |
| 2.6 #295 | Blocks per game | 3.8 #96 |
La Salle
8-23 in 2025-26 overall · 5-14 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs St Bonaventure80–99
- L@ Saint Joseph's76–88
- Wvs Fordham87–84
- L@ Davidson64–71
- Lvs G Washington77–104
A week or more of rest.
Houston
30-7 in 2025-26 overall · 16-5 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Illinois55–65
- Wvs Texas A&M88–57
- Wvs Idaho78–47
- Lvs Arizona74–79
- Wvs Kansas69–47
A week or more of rest.