Finneran Pavilion · at Villanova
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | VILL | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-1 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-1 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 1-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects VILL 82–64 · win probability VILL 94%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: VILL has more of the edges
LAS 1, VILL 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
LAS hits 30.0% and allows 36.5%; VILL hits 35.7% and allows 33.4%. Threes are 31.5% and 45.7% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: LAS 45.4 and allows 55.0; VILL 53.8 and allows 51.4
Turnovers
Turnover rate: LAS 18.2%, VILL 15.0%. Forced: LAS 17.2%, VILL 18.6%
LAS offense vs VILL defense
Offense 157th of 366 against a defense 30th, on the model’s ratings
VILL offense vs LAS defense
Offense 39th of 366 against a defense 111th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: LAS 37.5, VILL 30.9. Allowed: LAS 31.5, VILL 30.0
Context
Schedule so far
LAS has played the 92nd-hardest schedule, VILL the 35th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Home court
VILL at home. This season: VILL 0-0 at home, LAS 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: LAS 56%, VILL 33%. Transfers in: LAS 5, VILL 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: LAS plays 66.4 a game (300th fastest), VILL 67.3 (270th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: LAS 33.7%, VILL 32.2%. Defensive: LAS 67.7%, VILL 68.2%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | VILL -17.5 | — |
| Total | — | 146.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | LAS 64.3 · VILL 81.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | VILL -10.3 | — |
| 1H total | 68.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | LAS 29 · VILL 39.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | |
| 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | 7-3 70% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
LAS 0–3 VILLVILL leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · VILL has won the last 3 meetings · LAS 1-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2025-26 | VILL 70 @ LAS 55 | LAS +12.5 | VILL W |
| Nov 7, 2022-23 | LAS 68 @ VILL 81 | VILL -14.5 | LAS W |
| Nov 28, 2021-22 | VILL 72 vs LAS 46 | LAS +18.5 | VILL W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
La Salle
31 games played
Straight up
8-23
26% wins
Against the spread
14-17
45% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-17
45% overs · avg −0.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | W 87-59 | -17.5 | W +10.5 | 139.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 73-60 | -4.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 63-90 | +6.5 | L −20.5 | 148.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 69-83 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 19 | vs | L 55-70 | +12.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 58-63 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 71-73 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 60-66 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 132.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 69-64 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 129.5 | O 133 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 60-70 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 72-84 | +13.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 50-102 | +40.5 | L −11.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 75-80 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 134.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 55-77 | +16.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 79-72 | +11.5 | W +18.5 | 135.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 72-84 | +17.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 53-74 | +8.5 | L −12.5 | 147.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 78-74 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 67-64 | +9.5 | W +12.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 58-64 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 136.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 58-67 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 61-71 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 140.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 58-82 | +22.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 68-77 | +12.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 61-62 | +11.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 59-46 | +3.5 | W +16.5 | 135.5 | U 105 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 77-104 | +8.5 | L −18.5 | 146.5 | O 181 |
| Mar 1 | @ | L 64-71 | +10.5 | W +3.5 | 133.5 | O 135 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 87-84 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 131.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 76-88 | +11.5 | L −0.5 | 142.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 80-99 | +7.5 | L −11.5 | 146.5 | O 179 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
COPP
W 87-59
+10.5
8
vs
MONM
W 73-60
+8.5
11
@
TEM
L 63-90
−20.5
15
vs
PSU
L 69-83
−5.5
19
vs
VILL
L 55-70
−2.5
28
vs
HOF
L 58-63
−1.5
29
@
PENN
L 71-73
−0.5
30
vs
MRMK
L 60-66
−8.5
6
vs
DREX
W 69-64
+6.5
13
@
LIU
L 60-70
−7.5
19
@
HPU
L 72-84
+1.5
21
@
MICH
L 50-102
−11.5
31
vs
GMU
L 75-80
+3.5
3
@
GW
L 55-77
−5.5
7
@
URI
W 79-72
+18.5
10
vs
SLU
L 72-84
+5.5
14
@
RICH
L 53-74
−12.5
17
vs
SBU
W 78-74
+9.5
21
vs
DAY
W 67-64
+12.5
28
@
FOR
L 58-64
−0.5
31
vs
JOES
L 58-67
−6.5
3
@
LUC
L 61-71
−7.5
7
@
SLU
L 58-82
−1.5
11
vs
VCU
L 68-77
+3.5
18
@
DUQ
L 61-62
+10.5
21
vs
URI
W 59-46
+16.5
24
vs
GW
L 77-104
−18.5
1
@
DAV
L 64-71
+3.5
4
vs
FOR
W 87-84
+6.5
7
@
JOES
L 76-88
−0.5
11
vs
SBU
L 80-99
−11.5
covered 14didn’t cover 17avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
COPP
W 87-59
+6.5
8
vs
MONM
W 73-60
−10.5
11
@
TEM
L 63-90
+4.5
15
vs
PSU
L 69-83
+6.5
19
vs
VILL
L 55-70
−19.5
28
vs
HOF
L 58-63
−17.5
29
@
PENN
L 71-73
−5.5
30
vs
MRMK
L 60-66
−6.5
6
vs
DREX
W 69-64
+3.5
13
@
LIU
L 60-70
−13.5
19
@
HPU
L 72-84
+6.5
21
@
MICH
L 50-102
−3.5
31
vs
GMU
L 75-80
+20.5
3
@
GW
L 55-77
−18.5
7
@
URI
W 79-72
+15.5
10
vs
SLU
L 72-84
+3.5
14
@
RICH
L 53-74
−20.5
17
vs
SBU
W 78-74
+10.5
21
vs
DAY
W 67-64
−6.5
28
@
FOR
L 58-64
−14.5
31
vs
JOES
L 58-67
−17.5
3
@
LUC
L 61-71
−8.5
7
@
SLU
L 58-82
−13.5
11
vs
VCU
L 68-77
−2.5
18
@
DUQ
L 61-62
−22.5
21
vs
URI
W 59-46
−30.5
24
vs
GW
L 77-104
+34.5
1
@
DAV
L 64-71
+1.5
4
vs
FOR
W 87-84
+39.5
7
@
JOES
L 76-88
+21.5
11
vs
SBU
L 80-99
+32.5
over 14under 17avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Villanova
33 games played
Straight up
24-9
73% wins
Against the spread
19-14
58% covers · avg +1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-13
61% overs · avg +1.8 pts vs the total
Against the spread
19-1458%
2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 66-71 | +9.5 | W +4.5 | 153.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 94-74 | -17.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 94-60 | -19.5 | W +14.5 | 160.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 87-77 | -10.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 19 | @ | W 70-55 | -12.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 89-75 | -22.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 1 | vs | W 74-56 | -14.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 90-63 | -18.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 61-89 | +17.5 | L −10.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 79-61 | -10.5 | W +7.5 | 138.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 76-66 | +3.5 | W +13.5 | 152.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 23 | @ | W 64-56 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 135.5 | U 120 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 71-66 | -12.5 | L −7.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 85-67 | +2.5 | W +20.5 | 149.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 72-76 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 76-73 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 88-82 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 156.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 79-86 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 66-51 | -8.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 67-75 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 87-73 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 72-60 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 134.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 80-73 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 10 | vs | W 77-74 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 80-69 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 17 | @ | W 92-89 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 63-73 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 82-73 | -10.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 57-89 | +7.5 | L −24.5 | 147.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 76-57 | -1.5 | W +17.5 | 135.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 91-78 | -11.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 64-78 | -7.5 | L −21.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Mar 20 | vs | L 76-86 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
BYU
L 66-71
+4.5
8
vs
QUC
W 94-74
+2.5
11
vs
SHU
W 94-60
+14.5
15
vs
DUQ
W 87-77
−0.5
19
@
LAS
W 70-55
+2.5
25
vs
ODU
W 89-75
−8.5
1
vs
TEM
W 74-56
+3.5
6
vs
PENN
W 90-63
+8.5
9
@
MICH
L 61-89
−10.5
13
vs
PITT
W 79-61
+7.5
19
vs
WIS
W 76-66
+13.5
23
@
HALL
W 64-56
+9.5
31
vs
DEP
W 71-66
−7.5
3
@
BTLR
W 85-67
+20.5
7
vs
CREI
L 72-76
−8.5
10
@
MARQ
W 76-73
−0.5
13
@
PROV
W 88-82
+3.5
17
vs
SJU
L 79-86
−4.5
21
vs
GTWN
W 66-51
+6.5
24
@
CONN
L 67-75
+3.5
30
vs
PROV
W 87-73
+5.5
4
vs
HALL
W 72-60
+6.5
7
@
GTWN
W 80-73
+4.5
10
vs
MARQ
W 77-74
−6.5
14
@
CREI
W 80-69
+9.5
17
@
XAV
W 92-89
−1.5
21
vs
CONN
L 63-73
−6.5
25
vs
BTLR
W 82-73
−1.5
28
@
SJU
L 57-89
−24.5
4
@
DEP
W 76-57
+17.5
7
vs
XAV
W 91-78
+1.5
12
vs
GTWN
L 64-78
−21.5
20
vs
USU
L 76-86
−8.5
covered 19didn’t cover 14avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
BYU
L 66-71
−16.5
8
vs
QUC
W 94-74
+17.5
11
vs
SHU
W 94-60
−6.5
15
vs
DUQ
W 87-77
+12.5
19
@
LAS
W 70-55
−19.5
25
vs
ODU
W 89-75
+16.5
1
vs
TEM
W 74-56
−16.5
6
vs
PENN
W 90-63
+2.5
9
@
MICH
L 61-89
−6.5
13
vs
PITT
W 79-61
+1.5
19
vs
WIS
W 76-66
−10.5
23
@
HALL
W 64-56
−15.5
31
vs
DEP
W 71-66
−2.5
3
@
BTLR
W 85-67
+2.5
7
vs
CREI
L 72-76
+5.5
10
@
MARQ
W 76-73
+2.5
13
@
PROV
W 88-82
+13.5
17
vs
SJU
L 79-86
+17.5
21
vs
GTWN
W 66-51
−25.5
24
@
CONN
L 67-75
+4.5
30
vs
PROV
W 87-73
+2.5
4
vs
HALL
W 72-60
−2.5
7
@
GTWN
W 80-73
+12.5
10
vs
MARQ
W 77-74
+6.5
14
@
CREI
W 80-69
+3.5
17
@
XAV
W 92-89
+28.5
21
vs
CONN
L 63-73
−5.5
25
vs
BTLR
W 82-73
+7.5
28
@
SJU
L 57-89
−1.5
4
@
DEP
W 76-57
−2.5
7
vs
XAV
W 91-78
+15.5
12
vs
GTWN
L 64-78
+1.5
20
vs
USU
L 76-86
+15.5
over 20under 13avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Villanova has the better starters
Position by position: La Salle 1, Villanova 4, even 0
La SalleBetterVillanova
G J. Johnson6.3 pts · 2.4 reb · 4.1 ast
Score 29
→VILLBig
G J. Fiegen TR11 pts · 5 reb · 1 ast
Score 82
G R. Dockery12.5 pts · 6.2 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 91
←LASSmall
G D. Simmons TR16.3 pts · 1.9 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 63
F J. Brewer11.3 pts · 4.2 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 75
→VILLSmall
G T. Perkins18 pts · 4 reb · 3 ast
Score 100
F V. Zanki TR8.1 pts · 2.4 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 46
→VILLBig
F D. Royal TR5 pts · 8 reb · 0 ast
Score 100
F A. Finkley TR5.4 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 19
→VILLBig
F K. Evans TR13.3 pts · 7.4 reb · 2 ast
Score 95
La SalleBetterVillanova
LAS offense157th of 366 · -4.7
→VILLBig
VILL defense30th of 366 · +3.5
LAS defense111th of 366 · -1.3
→VILLSmall
VILL offense39th of 366 · +5.0
Backcourt+0.4 · 2 players
→VILLBig
Backcourt+7.2 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.6 · 3 players
→VILLBig
Frontcourt+6.1 · 2 players
Bench-3.6 · 5 players
→VILLBig
Bench+3.3 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestLAS betterVILL betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Johnson30 minR. Dockery27 minK. Burton19 min · TRD. Booker8 min · TRA. Masharaliyev1 minT. MossNew
Forwards
J. Brewer27 minV. Zanki21 min · TRA. Finkley19 min · TRN. Collier14 minE. Rink12 min · TRB. Beatty10 min
Guards
J. Fiegen38 min · TRD. Simmons36 min · TRT. Perkins35 minE. Crawford26 min · TRW. Chiddick3 minB. MullerNew
Forwards
D. Royal32 min · TRK. Evans31 min · TRM. Hodge28 minA. Samb6 min · TR
Centers
N. OnyekwereNewL. SuigoNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.8 #336 | Points per game | 77.1 #113 |
| 1.00 #322 | Points per possession | 1.15 #64 |
| 66.4 #300 | Pace (possessions) | 67.3 #270 |
| Shooting | ||
| 45.4 #357 | Effective FG% | 53.8 #74 |
| 30.0 #342 | 3-point % | 35.7 #77 |
| 31.5 #333 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.7 #52 |
| 37.5 #113 | Free throw rate | 30.9 #284 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.2 #281 | Turnover rate | 15.0 #65 |
| 33.7 #75 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.2 #118 |
| 12.9 #221 | Assists per game | 15.5 #66 |
| Defense | ||
| 75.0 #186 | Points allowed | 71.2 #82 |
| 1.13 #293 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #105 |
| 55.0 #329 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.4 #181 |
| 36.5 #324 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.4 #148 |
| 17.2 #136 | Turnovers forced | 18.6 #70 |
| 67.7 #274 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.2 #246 |
| 6.7 #155 | Steals per game | 7.4 #93 |
| 2.6 #295 | Blocks per game | 2.1 #340 |
La Salle
8-23 in 2025-26 overall · 5-14 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs St Bonaventure80–99
- L@ Saint Joseph's76–88
- Wvs Fordham87–84
- L@ Davidson64–71
- Lvs G Washington77–104
A week or more of rest.
Villanova
24-9 in 2025-26 overall · 15-6 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Utah State76–86
- Lvs Georgetown64–78
- Wvs Xavier91–78
- W@ DePaul76–57
- L@ St John's57–89
A week or more of rest.