Benchmark International Arena · Neutral site
Line
FSU -25.5moved 1 toward FSU
Total156.5up 1 from 155.5
| This season | FSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects FSU 85–65 · win probability FSU 96%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Spread
Total
Winner
Line
FSU -25.5
moved 1 toward FSU
Total
156.5
model 149.6 · Under by 7
Model edge
FAMU by 5
model vs market
Public on the spread
92% FAMU
86% of the money
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: FSU has more of the edges
FAMU 2, FSU 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
FAMU has played the 323rd-hardest schedule, FSU the 73rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
FSU offense vs FAMU defense
Offense 73rd of 366 against a defense 303rd, on the model’s ratings
FAMU offense vs FSU defense
Offense 326th of 366 against a defense 98th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: FAMU 21.5%, FSU 15.2%. Forced: FAMU 19.1%, FSU 19.0%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: FAMU 43%, FSU 9%. Transfers in: FAMU 3, FSU 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: FAMU 30.9%, FSU 30.8%. Defensive: FAMU 69.1%, FSU 65.9%
Free throws
Free throw rate: FAMU 37.4, FSU 34.7. Allowed: FAMU 39.6, FSU 32.7
Shooting
Effective FG%: FAMU 49.2 and allows 51.2; FSU 52.3 and allows 52.2
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: FAMU plays 70.6 a game (92nd fastest), FSU 71.8 (41st). Faster games mean more points
Even
Three-pointers
FAMU hits 32.6% and allows 34.9%; FSU hits 33.1% and allows 34.6%. Threes are 37.7% and 50.6% of their shots
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
How games like this went
Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines
| Situation | Games | Favorite won | Favorite covered | Went over |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neutral-site favorites of 20 or more | 36 | 100% | 42% | 50% |
| Non-conference games at this spread | 1090 | 99% | 50% | 52% |
| Lines that moved 1+ toward the favorite | 6763 | 75% | 50% | 51% |
| Games with a total of 155 to 159.5 | 1555 | 74% | 51% | 49% |
Market
Open → current
Spread
OpenFSU -24.5
1 → FSU
NowFSU -25.5
1 pt toward FSU
Total
Open155.5
▲ 1
Now156.5
Up 1 since the open
Moneyline
FAMU +2750 · FSU -9500
Line movement
Median of 6 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot
Opened FSU -24.5 · now FSU -26 · moved 1.5 toward FSUmodel FSU -20.5
model FSU -20.5
Opened 155.5 · now 157 · moved 1.5 upmodel 149.5
model 149.5
Openline modelNow
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Public betting
Share of bets and of money
Bets
Money
Bets
Money
Books
6 sportsbooks · current prices
| Book | Spread | Total | Moneyline | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAMU | FSU | Over | Under | FAMU | FSU | |
| BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag | -26-115 | +26-105 | 159-110 | 159-110 | — | — |
| BetRiversBetRivers | -25.5-113 | +25.5-109 | 155.5-114 | 155.5-109 | — | — |
| BovadaBovada | -26-115 | +26-105 | 156-110 | 156-110 | — | — |
| DraftKingsDK | -25.5-108 | +25.5-112 | 157.5-105 | 157.5-115 | +2500 | -9000 |
| FanDuelFD | -24.5-110 | +24.5-110 | 154.5-115 | 154.5-105 | +3000 | -10000 |
| LowVig.agLowVig.ag | -26-111 | +26-101 | 159-108 | 159-108 | — | — |
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | FSU -25.5 | FSU -20.3 | FAMU +5.2 |
| Total | 156.5 | 149.6 | Under 6.9 |
| Projected score | — | FAMU 64.6 · FSU 85 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | FSU -11.9 | — |
| 1H total | 70.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | FAMU 29 · FSU 41 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | |
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Florida A&M
29 games played
Straight up
13-16
45% wins
Against the spread
16-13
55% covers · avg +0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-18
38% overs · avg −1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 67-102 | +25.5 | L −9.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 72-92 | +11.5 | L −8.5 | 166.5 | U 164 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 60-97 | +23.5 | L −13.5 | 169.5 | U 157 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 57-87 | +40.5 | W +10.5 | 170.5 | U 144 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 82-85 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 138.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 72-65 | +3.5 | W +10.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 54-78 | +14.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 56-80 | +29.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 65-89 | +19.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 83-87 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 67-59 | +4.5 | W +12.5 | 153.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 12 | vs | W 91-84 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 71-67 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 149.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 62-48 | -11.5 | W +2.5 | 139.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 66-58 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 26 | vs | L 65-66 | -7.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 65-72 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 2 | @ | L 66-79 | +3.5 | L −9.5 | 139.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 57-62 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 146.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 100-96 | -3.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | O 196 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 60-80 | -2.5 | L −22.5 | 144.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 16 | @ | W 86-78 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 61-63 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 139.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 76-63 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 144.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 82-71 | +8.5 | W +19.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 66-59 | +4.5 | W +11.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 81-77 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 70-60 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 70-73 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | O 143 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
USF
L 67-102
−9.5
8
vs
KENN
L 72-92
−8.5
11
@
UCF
L 60-97
−13.5
17
@
UGA
L 57-87
+10.5
2
@
JAX
L 82-85
+7.5
17
vs
JAX
W 72-65
+10.5
19
@
TAR
L 54-78
−9.5
21
@
TCU
L 56-80
+5.5
28
@
GT
L 65-89
−4.5
3
@
BCU
L 83-87
+3.5
10
vs
SOU
W 67-59
+12.5
12
vs
GRAM
W 91-84
+8.5
17
@
UAPB
W 71-67
+6.5
19
@
MVSU
W 62-48
+2.5
24
vs
ALCN
W 66-58
−0.5
26
vs
JKST
L 65-66
−8.5
31
@
AAMU
L 65-72
−3.5
2
@
ALST
L 66-79
−9.5
7
vs
TXSO
L 57-62
−6.5
9
vs
PV
W 100-96
+0.5
14
@
JKST
L 60-80
−22.5
16
@
ALCN
W 86-78
+5.5
19
vs
AAMU
L 61-63
−3.5
21
vs
ALST
W 76-63
+14.5
26
@
SOU
W 82-71
+19.5
28
@
GRAM
W 66-59
+11.5
5
vs
BCU
W 81-77
+6.5
11
vs
JKST
W 70-60
+3.5
13
vs
SOU
L 70-73
−1.5
covered 16didn’t cover 13avg +0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
USF
L 67-102
+15.5
8
vs
KENN
L 72-92
−2.5
11
@
UCF
L 60-97
−12.5
17
@
UGA
L 57-87
−26.5
2
@
JAX
L 82-85
+28.5
17
vs
JAX
W 72-65
−2.5
19
@
TAR
L 54-78
−13.5
21
@
TCU
L 56-80
−6.5
28
@
GT
L 65-89
+7.5
3
@
BCU
L 83-87
+24.5
10
vs
SOU
W 67-59
−27.5
12
vs
GRAM
W 91-84
+33.5
17
@
UAPB
W 71-67
−11.5
19
@
MVSU
W 62-48
−29.5
24
vs
ALCN
W 66-58
−17.5
26
vs
JKST
L 65-66
−19.5
31
@
AAMU
L 65-72
−1.5
2
@
ALST
L 66-79
+5.5
7
vs
TXSO
L 57-62
−27.5
9
vs
PV
W 100-96
+46.5
14
@
JKST
L 60-80
−4.5
16
@
ALCN
W 86-78
+26.5
19
vs
AAMU
L 61-63
−15.5
21
vs
ALST
W 76-63
−5.5
26
@
SOU
W 82-71
+5.5
28
@
GRAM
W 66-59
−15.5
5
vs
BCU
W 81-77
+12.5
11
vs
JKST
W 70-60
−11.5
13
vs
SOU
L 70-73
+1.5
over 11under 18avg −1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Florida St
33 games played
Straight up
18-15
55% wins
Against the spread
20-13
61% covers · avg −0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-16
52% overs · avg −2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 108-76 | -27.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | O 184 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 101-64 | -24.5 | W +12.5 | 166.5 | U 165 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 76-78 | +17.5 | W +15.5 | 180.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 87-73 | -19.5 | L −5.5 | 165.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 98-72 | -18.5 | W +7.5 | 175.5 | U 170 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 89-59 | -26.5 | W +3.5 | 159.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 59-95 | -1.5 | L −37.5 | 174.5 | U 154 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 73-107 | -1.5 | L −35.5 | 176.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 67-82 | +12.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 95-103 | -12.5 | L −20.5 | 165.5 | O 198 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 69-97 | +6.5 | L −21.5 | 162.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 96-49 | -40.5 | W +6.5 | 164.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 87-63 | -23.5 | W +0.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 66-79 | +12.5 | L −0.5 | 166.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 87-91 | +16.5 | W +12.5 | 163.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 69-113 | +4.5 | L −39.5 | 160.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 86-94 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 160.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 68-69 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 168.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 65-63 | +10.5 | W +12.5 | 163.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 80-83 | +11.5 | W +8.5 | 163.5 | U 163 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 63-61 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 88-80 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 82-79 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 10 | vs | L 58-61 | +8.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 92-69 | +4.5 | W +27.5 | 156.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 80-72 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 148.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 70-65 | +8.5 | W +13.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 73-83 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 80-71 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 158.5 | U 151 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 75-74 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | O 149 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 91-78 | -1.5 | W +11.5 | 158.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 95-89 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | O 184 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 79-80 | +16.5 | W +15.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
ALCN
W 108-76
+4.5
7
vs
ALST
W 101-64
+12.5
11
@
FLA
L 76-78
+15.5
18
vs
UTM
W 87-73
−5.5
21
vs
GASO
W 98-72
+7.5
25
vs
CSUB
W 89-59
+3.5
28
vs
TA&M
L 59-95
−37.5
2
vs
UGA
L 73-107
−35.5
6
vs
HOU
L 67-82
−2.5
13
vs
MASS
L 95-103
−20.5
16
@
DAY
L 69-97
−21.5
19
vs
MVSU
W 96-49
+6.5
22
vs
JAX
W 87-63
+0.5
30
@
UNC
L 66-79
−0.5
3
vs
DUKE
L 87-91
+12.5
10
vs
NCSU
L 69-113
−39.5
13
@
SYR
L 86-94
−3.5
17
vs
WAKE
L 68-69
+0.5
20
@
MIA
W 65-63
+12.5
24
@
SMU
L 80-83
+8.5
28
vs
CAL
W 63-61
−1.5
31
vs
STAN
W 88-80
+4.5
7
@
ND
W 82-79
+4.5
10
vs
UVA
L 58-61
+5.5
14
@
VT
W 92-69
+27.5
17
vs
BC
W 80-72
−3.5
21
@
CLEM
W 70-65
+13.5
24
vs
MIA
L 73-83
−7.5
28
@
GT
W 80-71
+3.5
4
@
PITT
W 75-74
−0.5
7
vs
SMU
W 91-78
+11.5
11
vs
CAL
W 95-89
+4.5
12
vs
DUKE
L 79-80
+15.5
covered 20didn’t cover 13avg −0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
ALCN
W 108-76
+27.5
7
vs
ALST
W 101-64
−1.5
11
@
FLA
L 76-78
−26.5
18
vs
UTM
W 87-73
−5.5
21
vs
GASO
W 98-72
−5.5
25
vs
CSUB
W 89-59
−11.5
28
vs
TA&M
L 59-95
−20.5
2
vs
UGA
L 73-107
+3.5
6
vs
HOU
L 67-82
+0.5
13
vs
MASS
L 95-103
+32.5
16
@
DAY
L 69-97
+3.5
19
vs
MVSU
W 96-49
−19.5
22
vs
JAX
W 87-63
−9.5
30
@
UNC
L 66-79
−21.5
3
vs
DUKE
L 87-91
+14.5
10
vs
NCSU
L 69-113
+21.5
13
@
SYR
L 86-94
+19.5
17
vs
WAKE
L 68-69
−31.5
20
@
MIA
W 65-63
−35.5
24
@
SMU
L 80-83
−0.5
28
vs
CAL
W 63-61
−33.5
31
vs
STAN
W 88-80
+15.5
7
@
ND
W 82-79
+6.5
10
vs
UVA
L 58-61
−36.5
14
@
VT
W 92-69
+4.5
17
vs
BC
W 80-72
+3.5
21
@
CLEM
W 70-65
−10.5
24
vs
MIA
L 73-83
+3.5
28
@
GT
W 80-71
−7.5
4
@
PITT
W 75-74
+4.5
7
vs
SMU
W 91-78
+10.5
11
vs
CAL
W 95-89
+29.5
12
vs
DUKE
L 79-80
+8.5
over 17under 16avg −2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Florida St has the better starters
Position by position: Florida A&M 0, Florida St 3, even 2
Florida A&MBetterFlorida St
G J. Kempson TR10.7 pts · 4.4 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 33
→FSUBig
G K. Taylor TR19.8 pts · 5 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 90
G J. Sanders12 pts · 3.2 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 42
→FSUSmall
G A. Robinson TR8.9 pts · 3.1 reb · 3 ast
Score 73
G A. Baker9.6 pts · 3.4 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 35
→FSUBig
F S. Rancik TR12.3 pts · 5.6 reb · 2 ast
Score 82
G R. Martino6.5 pts · 2.2 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 44
=Even
F C. Schwieger TR5.1 pts · 2.5 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 32
F D. Williford TR2.2 pts · 0.8 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F S. Abaev TR7 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 68
Florida A&MBetterFlorida St
FAMU offense326th of 366 · -10.6
→FSUBig
FSU defense98th of 366 · -0.7
FAMU defense303rd of 366 · -7.8
→FSUBig
FSU offense73rd of 366 · +1.4
Backcourt-5.5 · 4 players
→FSUBig
Backcourt+3.7 · 2 players
Frontcourt-0.3 · 1 player
→FSUSmall
Frontcourt+1.4 · 3 players
Bench-0.2 · 2 players
=Even
Bench-0.2 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestFAMU betterFSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Kempson32 min · TRJ. Sanders32 minA. Baker27 minR. Martino22 minC. DavisNewA. WilliamsNew
Forwards
D. Williford6 min · TRT. Onuoha5 minM. StijovicNewJ. LomickaNewB. NdourNew
Centers
A. Mbaye1 min · TRJ. MokwezaNew
Guards
K. Taylor36 min · TRA. Robinson27 min · TRJ. Crawford1 minJ. LopezNewA. RobinsonNewB. BassNew
Forwards
S. Rancik28 min · TRC. Schwieger20 min · TRS. Abaev16 min · TRA. Swinton16 minC. PaulNew
Centers
M. PonderNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 70.0 #285 | Points per game | 80.4 #58 |
| 0.99 #334 | Points per possession | 1.12 #101 |
| 70.6 #92 | Pace (possessions) | 71.8 #41 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.2 #283 | Effective FG% | 52.3 #132 |
| 32.6 #249 | 3-point % | 33.1 #226 |
| 37.7 #219 | 3-point attempt rate | 50.6 #13 |
| 37.4 #116 | Free throw rate | 34.7 #191 |
| Possessions | ||
| 21.5 #359 | Turnover rate | 15.2 #80 |
| 30.9 #168 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.8 #170 |
| 12.7 #236 | Assists per game | 14.3 #124 |
| Defense | ||
| 75.1 #192 | Points allowed | 77.9 #264 |
| 1.06 #114 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #178 |
| 51.2 #171 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.2 #226 |
| 34.9 #243 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.6 #228 |
| 19.1 #43 | Turnovers forced | 19.0 #51 |
| 69.1 #198 | Defensive rebound rate | 65.9 #319 |
| 8.1 #35 | Steals per game | 7.9 #44 |
| 3.0 #220 | Blocks per game | 3.9 #84 |
Florida A&M
13-16 in 2025-26 overall · 12-8 in conference · Southwestern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Southern70–73
- Wvs Jackson St70–60
- Wvs Bethune81–77
- W@ Grambling66–59
- W@ Southern82–71
A week or more of rest.
Florida St
18-15 in 2025-26 overall · 11-9 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Duke79–80
- Wvs California95–89
- Wvs SMU91–78
- W@ Pitt75–74
- W@ Georgia Tech80–71
A week or more of rest.