Hilton Coliseum · at Iowa State
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ISU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ISU 93–55 · win probability ISU 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 147.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ISU has more of the edges
SOU 0, ISU 9 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
SOU offense vs ISU defense
Offense 296th of 366 against a defense 6th, on the model’s ratings
ISU offense vs SOU defense
Offense 26th of 366 against a defense 309th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
SOU has played the 269th-hardest schedule, ISU the 38th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: SOU 49.1 and allows 53.2; ISU 56.2 and allows 49.8
Three-pointers
SOU hits 34.8% and allows 36.7%; ISU hits 38.3% and allows 32.0%. Threes are 32.0% and 38.8% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SOU 31.4%, ISU 35.1%. Defensive: SOU 68.7%, ISU 71.4%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SOU 2%, ISU 57%. Transfers in: SOU 8, ISU 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: SOU plays 72.3 a game (28th fastest), ISU 68.5 (204th). Faster games mean more points
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SOU 16.6%, ISU 14.9%. Forced: SOU 18.6%, ISU 22.6%
Free throws
Free throw rate: SOU 39.8, ISU 34.5. Allowed: SOU 42.9, ISU 28.1
Home court
ISU at home. This season: ISU 0-0 at home, SOU 0-0 away
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | ISU -37.5 | — |
| Total | — | 147.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | SOU 55.1 · ISU 92.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ISU -22.2 | — |
| 1H total | 69.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | SOU 23.5 · ISU 45.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% | |
| 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Southern
31 games played
Straight up
14-17
45% wins
Against the spread
12-19
39% covers · avg −1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-11
65% overs · avg +4.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 77-109 | +26.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 186 |
| Nov 5 | @ | L 82-100 | +24.5 | W +6.5 | 155.5 | O 182 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 93-99 | +23.5 | W +17.5 | 157.5 | O 192 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 66-80 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 29 | @ | W 75-73 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 8 | @ | L 69-95 | +22.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 83-86 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 67-75 | +12.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 67-111 | +26.5 | L −17.5 | 169.5 | O 178 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 55-90 | +33.5 | L −1.5 | 163.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 84-73 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 5 | vs | L 85-89 | -7.5 | L −11.5 | 160.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 59-67 | -4.5 | L −12.5 | 153.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 12 | @ | W 77-73 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 71-53 | +1.5 | W +19.5 | 153.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 74-75 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 80-69 | -20.5 | L −9.5 | 141.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 73-78 | -7.5 | L −12.5 | 147.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 2 | @ | W 96-91 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 187 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 81-68 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 69-68 | -6.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 87-82 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 159.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 73-74 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 87-73 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 71-82 | -8.5 | L −19.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 79-82 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 71-64 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 88-85 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | O 173 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 84-81 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | O 165 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 73-70 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | O 143 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 66-72 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | U 138 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
ARK
L 77-109
−5.5
5
@
MARQ
L 82-100
+6.5
18
@
WASH
L 93-99
+17.5
21
@
SJSU
L 66-80
−8.5
29
@
NWST
W 75-73
−1.5
8
@
TEX
L 69-95
−3.5
10
@
TXST
L 83-86
+0.5
16
@
CBU
L 67-75
+4.5
21
@
BAY
L 67-111
−17.5
29
@
ILL
L 55-90
−1.5
3
vs
TXSO
W 84-73
+4.5
5
vs
PV
L 85-89
−11.5
10
@
FAMU
L 59-67
−12.5
12
@
BCU
W 77-73
+7.5
17
@
GRAM
W 71-53
+19.5
24
vs
UAPB
L 74-75
−10.5
28
vs
MVSU
W 80-69
−9.5
31
@
ALCN
L 73-78
−12.5
2
@
JKST
W 96-91
−0.5
7
vs
AAMU
W 81-68
+6.5
9
vs
ALST
W 69-68
−5.5
14
@
PV
W 87-82
−0.5
16
@
TXSO
L 73-74
−5.5
21
vs
GRAM
W 87-73
+8.5
26
vs
FAMU
L 71-82
−19.5
28
vs
BCU
L 79-82
−5.5
3
@
ALST
W 71-64
+8.5
5
@
AAMU
W 88-85
+1.5
12
vs
UAPB
W 84-81
−1.5
13
vs
FAMU
W 73-70
+1.5
14
vs
PV
L 66-72
−9.5
covered 12didn’t cover 19avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
ARK
L 77-109
+35.5
5
@
MARQ
L 82-100
+26.5
18
@
WASH
L 93-99
+34.5
21
@
SJSU
L 66-80
−4.5
29
@
NWST
W 75-73
+3.5
8
@
TEX
L 69-95
+5.5
10
@
TXST
L 83-86
+26.5
16
@
CBU
L 67-75
−13.5
21
@
BAY
L 67-111
+8.5
29
@
ILL
L 55-90
−18.5
3
vs
TXSO
W 84-73
+3.5
5
vs
PV
L 85-89
+13.5
10
@
FAMU
L 59-67
−27.5
12
@
BCU
W 77-73
−1.5
17
@
GRAM
W 71-53
−29.5
24
vs
UAPB
L 74-75
−5.5
28
vs
MVSU
W 80-69
+7.5
31
@
ALCN
L 73-78
+3.5
2
@
JKST
W 96-91
+34.5
7
vs
AAMU
W 81-68
+5.5
9
vs
ALST
W 69-68
−12.5
14
@
PV
W 87-82
+9.5
16
@
TXSO
L 73-74
−4.5
21
vs
GRAM
W 87-73
+17.5
26
vs
FAMU
L 71-82
+5.5
28
vs
BCU
L 79-82
+7.5
3
@
ALST
W 71-64
−18.5
5
@
AAMU
W 88-85
+27.5
12
vs
UAPB
W 84-81
+13.5
13
vs
FAMU
W 73-70
+1.5
14
vs
PV
L 66-72
−7.5
over 20under 11avg +4.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Iowa State
37 games played
Straight up
29-8
78% wins
Against the spread
22-15
59% covers · avg +2.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-22
41% overs · avg −1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 88-50 | -37.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 102-62 | -33.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 96-80 | -5.5 | W +10.5 | 150.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 96-57 | -40.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 83-82 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 78-60 | -9.5 | W +8.5 | 152.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 95-64 | -10.5 | W +20.5 | 145.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 132-68 | -42.5 | W +21.5 | 151.5 | O 200 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 81-58 | +4.5 | W +27.5 | 154.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 11 | vs | W 66-62 | -11.5 | L −7.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 78-53 | -43.5 | L −18.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 91-60 | -37.5 | L −6.5 | 149.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 89-61 | -35.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 80-59 | -16.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 70-60 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 155.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 83-71 | -19.5 | L −7.5 | 165.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 63-84 | -3.5 | L −24.5 | 152.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 70-79 | -5.5 | L −14.5 | 141.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 87-57 | -14.5 | W +15.5 | 156.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 84-71 | -10.5 | W +2.5 | 162.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 97-67 | -17.5 | W +12.5 | 152.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 95-61 | -12.5 | W +21.5 | 156.5 | U 156 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 72-69 | -14.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 55-62 | -7.5 | L −14.5 | 147.5 | U 117 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 74-56 | -7.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 70-67 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | O 137 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 69-79 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 154.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 24 | @ | W 75-59 | -14.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 73-82 | -10.5 | L −19.5 | 145.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 2 | @ | L 57-73 | +7.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 86-65 | -16.5 | W +4.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 91-42 | -13.5 | W +35.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 75-53 | -7.5 | W +14.5 | 143.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 80-82 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 108-74 | -24.5 | W +9.5 | 147.5 | O 182 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 82-63 | -5.5 | W +13.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 27 | vs | L 62-76 | -2.5 | L −16.5 | 139.5 | U 138 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
FDU
W 88-50
+0.5
6
vs
GRAM
W 102-62
+6.5
10
vs
MSST
W 96-80
+10.5
17
vs
STO
W 96-57
−1.5
24
vs
SJU
W 83-82
−1.5
25
vs
CREI
W 78-60
+8.5
26
vs
SYR
W 95-64
+20.5
3
vs
ALCN
W 132-68
+21.5
6
@
PUR
W 81-58
+27.5
11
vs
IOWA
W 66-62
−7.5
14
vs
EIU
W 78-53
−18.5
21
vs
LBSU
W 91-60
−6.5
29
vs
HCU
W 89-61
−7.5
2
vs
WVU
W 80-59
+4.5
7
@
BAY
W 70-60
+6.5
10
vs
OKST
W 83-71
−7.5
13
@
KU
L 63-84
−24.5
17
@
CIN
L 70-79
−14.5
20
vs
UCF
W 87-57
+15.5
24
@
OKST
W 84-71
+2.5
29
vs
COLO
W 97-67
+12.5
1
@
KSU
W 95-61
+21.5
7
vs
BAY
W 72-69
−11.5
10
@
TCU
L 55-62
−14.5
14
vs
KU
W 74-56
+10.5
16
vs
HOU
W 70-67
+0.5
21
@
BYU
L 69-79
−12.5
24
@
UTAH
W 75-59
+1.5
28
vs
TTU
L 73-82
−19.5
2
@
ARIZ
L 57-73
−8.5
7
vs
ASU
W 86-65
+4.5
11
vs
ASU
W 91-42
+35.5
12
vs
TTU
W 75-53
+14.5
13
vs
ARIZ
L 80-82
+1.5
20
vs
TNST
W 108-74
+9.5
22
vs
UK
W 82-63
+13.5
27
vs
TENN
L 62-76
−16.5
covered 22didn’t cover 15avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
FDU
W 88-50
−9.5
6
vs
GRAM
W 102-62
+19.5
10
vs
MSST
W 96-80
+25.5
17
vs
STO
W 96-57
+6.5
24
vs
SJU
W 83-82
+6.5
25
vs
CREI
W 78-60
−14.5
26
vs
SYR
W 95-64
+13.5
3
vs
ALCN
W 132-68
+48.5
6
@
PUR
W 81-58
−15.5
11
vs
IOWA
W 66-62
−13.5
14
vs
EIU
W 78-53
−13.5
21
vs
LBSU
W 91-60
+1.5
29
vs
HCU
W 89-61
+4.5
2
vs
WVU
W 80-59
−3.5
7
@
BAY
W 70-60
−25.5
10
vs
OKST
W 83-71
−11.5
13
@
KU
L 63-84
−5.5
17
@
CIN
L 70-79
+7.5
20
vs
UCF
W 87-57
−12.5
24
@
OKST
W 84-71
−7.5
29
vs
COLO
W 97-67
+11.5
1
@
KSU
W 95-61
−0.5
7
vs
BAY
W 72-69
−10.5
10
@
TCU
L 55-62
−30.5
14
vs
KU
W 74-56
−17.5
16
vs
HOU
W 70-67
+2.5
21
@
BYU
L 69-79
−6.5
24
@
UTAH
W 75-59
−10.5
28
vs
TTU
L 73-82
+9.5
2
@
ARIZ
L 57-73
−19.5
7
vs
ASU
W 86-65
+2.5
11
vs
ASU
W 91-42
−15.5
12
vs
TTU
W 75-53
−15.5
13
vs
ARIZ
L 80-82
+17.5
20
vs
TNST
W 108-74
+34.5
22
vs
UK
W 82-63
−1.5
27
vs
TENN
L 62-76
−1.5
over 15under 22avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Iowa State has the better starters
Position by position: Southern 0, Iowa State 5, even 0
SouthernBetterIowa State
G J. Page TR12.3 pts · 2.2 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 42
→ISUBig
G R. Prather TR16.1 pts · 3.9 reb · 3.7 ast
Score 84
G D. Dormu TR5.4 pts · 1.3 reb · 2 ast
Score 14
→ISUBig
G L. Bond TR12.1 pts · 4.7 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 74
G M. Ferguson TR5.2 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 9
→ISUBig
G T. Lipsey13.5 pts · 3.9 reb · 5.1 ast
Score 98
F R. King TR4.7 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 42
→ISUBig
G J. Johnson TR16.8 pts · 4 reb · 3.6 ast
Score 98
C I. Olajuwon TR3.7 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 20
→ISUBig
G K. Toure8.6 pts · 3.5 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 79
SouthernBetterIowa State
SOU offense296th of 366 · -9.2
→ISUBig
ISU defense6th of 366 · +9.3
SOU defense309th of 366 · -8.0
→ISUBig
ISU offense26th of 366 · +7.0
Backcourt-5.4 · 3 players
→ISUBig
Backcourt+14.4 · 5 players
Frontcourt-1.5 · 2 players
=No call
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
Bench-3.3 · 4 players
→ISUBig
Bench+4.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestSOU betterISU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Page30 min · TRD. Dormu19 min · TRM. Ferguson17 min · TRL. Larvadain11 min · TRS. Van Dorn3 min · TRJ. HunterNew
Forwards
R. King13 min · TRA. HallNew
Centers
I. Olajuwon14 min · TRN. Boyde11 min · TRL. Bell5 min
Guards
R. Prather35 min · TRL. Bond33 min · TRT. Lipsey32 minJ. Johnson31 min · TRK. Toure25 minJ. Batemon16 min
Forwards
T. Singleton25 min · TRB. Buchanan25 minT. Manning21 min · TRD. Pleta11 minX. Mitchell3 minD. Rinaldo-KomlanNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76.2 #136 | Points per game | 82.0 #32 |
| 1.06 #239 | Points per possession | 1.19 #20 |
| 72.3 #28 | Pace (possessions) | 68.5 #204 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.1 #287 | Effective FG% | 56.2 #20 |
| 34.8 #129 | 3-point % | 38.3 #12 |
| 32.0 #329 | 3-point attempt rate | 38.8 #196 |
| 39.8 #61 | Free throw rate | 34.5 #194 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.6 #169 | Turnover rate | 14.9 #58 |
| 31.4 #144 | Offensive rebound rate | 35.1 #45 |
| 13.9 #156 | Assists per game | 17.4 #16 |
| Defense | ||
| 80.2 #324 | Points allowed | 65.6 #9 |
| 1.11 #236 | Points allowed per possession | 0.96 #4 |
| 53.2 #274 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.8 #92 |
| 36.7 #339 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.0 #63 |
| 18.6 #67 | Turnovers forced | 22.6 #4 |
| 68.7 #217 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.4 #85 |
| 8.3 #26 | Steals per game | 9.0 #9 |
| 3.8 #97 | Blocks per game | 2.6 #289 |
Southern
14-17 in 2025-26 overall · 13-8 in conference · Southwestern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Prairie View66–72
- Wvs Florida A&M73–70
- Wvs AR-Pine Bluff84–81
- W@ Alabama A&M88–85
- W@ Alabama St71–64
A week or more of rest.
Iowa State
29-8 in 2025-26 overall · 14-7 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Tennessee62–76
- Wvs Kentucky82–63
- Wvs Tennessee St108–74
- Lvs Arizona80–82
- Wvs Texas Tech75–53
A week or more of rest.