Memorial Gymnasium (TN) · at Vanderbilt
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | VAN | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects VAN 94–61 · win probability VAN 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 154.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: VAN has more of the edges
SOU 0, VAN 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
VAN offense vs SOU defense
Offense 22nd of 366 against a defense 309th, on the model’s ratings
SOU offense vs VAN defense
Offense 296th of 366 against a defense 29th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
SOU has played the 269th-hardest schedule, VAN the 21st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: SOU 49.1 and allows 53.2; VAN 55.3 and allows 49.0
Three-pointers
SOU hits 34.8% and allows 36.7%; VAN hits 35.6% and allows 32.6%. Threes are 32.0% and 44.2% of their shots
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SOU 16.6%, VAN 13.5%. Forced: SOU 18.6%, VAN 17.7%
Home court
VAN at home. This season: VAN 0-0 at home, SOU 0-0 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SOU 2%, VAN 26%. Transfers in: SOU 8, VAN 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 72 possessions: SOU plays 72.3 a game (28th fastest), VAN 70.9 (80th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SOU 31.4%, VAN 31.2%. Defensive: SOU 68.7%, VAN 68.5%
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: SOU 39.8, VAN 38.1. Allowed: SOU 42.9, VAN 39.5
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | VAN -33.2 | — |
| Total | — | 154.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | SOU 60.7 · VAN 93.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | VAN -19.6 | — |
| 1H total | 72.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | SOU 26.3 · VAN 45.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% | |
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Southern
31 games played
Straight up
14-17
45% wins
Against the spread
12-19
39% covers · avg −1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-11
65% overs · avg +4.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 77-109 | +26.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 186 |
| Nov 5 | @ | L 82-100 | +24.5 | W +6.5 | 155.5 | O 182 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 93-99 | +23.5 | W +17.5 | 157.5 | O 192 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 66-80 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 29 | @ | W 75-73 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 8 | @ | L 69-95 | +22.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 83-86 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 67-75 | +12.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 67-111 | +26.5 | L −17.5 | 169.5 | O 178 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 55-90 | +33.5 | L −1.5 | 163.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 84-73 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 5 | vs | L 85-89 | -7.5 | L −11.5 | 160.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 59-67 | -4.5 | L −12.5 | 153.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 12 | @ | W 77-73 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 71-53 | +1.5 | W +19.5 | 153.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 74-75 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 80-69 | -20.5 | L −9.5 | 141.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 73-78 | -7.5 | L −12.5 | 147.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 2 | @ | W 96-91 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 187 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 81-68 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 69-68 | -6.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 87-82 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 159.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 73-74 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 87-73 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 71-82 | -8.5 | L −19.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 79-82 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 71-64 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 88-85 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | O 173 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 84-81 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | O 165 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 73-70 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | O 143 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 66-72 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | U 138 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
ARK
L 77-109
−5.5
5
@
MARQ
L 82-100
+6.5
18
@
WASH
L 93-99
+17.5
21
@
SJSU
L 66-80
−8.5
29
@
NWST
W 75-73
−1.5
8
@
TEX
L 69-95
−3.5
10
@
TXST
L 83-86
+0.5
16
@
CBU
L 67-75
+4.5
21
@
BAY
L 67-111
−17.5
29
@
ILL
L 55-90
−1.5
3
vs
TXSO
W 84-73
+4.5
5
vs
PV
L 85-89
−11.5
10
@
FAMU
L 59-67
−12.5
12
@
BCU
W 77-73
+7.5
17
@
GRAM
W 71-53
+19.5
24
vs
UAPB
L 74-75
−10.5
28
vs
MVSU
W 80-69
−9.5
31
@
ALCN
L 73-78
−12.5
2
@
JKST
W 96-91
−0.5
7
vs
AAMU
W 81-68
+6.5
9
vs
ALST
W 69-68
−5.5
14
@
PV
W 87-82
−0.5
16
@
TXSO
L 73-74
−5.5
21
vs
GRAM
W 87-73
+8.5
26
vs
FAMU
L 71-82
−19.5
28
vs
BCU
L 79-82
−5.5
3
@
ALST
W 71-64
+8.5
5
@
AAMU
W 88-85
+1.5
12
vs
UAPB
W 84-81
−1.5
13
vs
FAMU
W 73-70
+1.5
14
vs
PV
L 66-72
−9.5
covered 12didn’t cover 19avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
ARK
L 77-109
+35.5
5
@
MARQ
L 82-100
+26.5
18
@
WASH
L 93-99
+34.5
21
@
SJSU
L 66-80
−4.5
29
@
NWST
W 75-73
+3.5
8
@
TEX
L 69-95
+5.5
10
@
TXST
L 83-86
+26.5
16
@
CBU
L 67-75
−13.5
21
@
BAY
L 67-111
+8.5
29
@
ILL
L 55-90
−18.5
3
vs
TXSO
W 84-73
+3.5
5
vs
PV
L 85-89
+13.5
10
@
FAMU
L 59-67
−27.5
12
@
BCU
W 77-73
−1.5
17
@
GRAM
W 71-53
−29.5
24
vs
UAPB
L 74-75
−5.5
28
vs
MVSU
W 80-69
+7.5
31
@
ALCN
L 73-78
+3.5
2
@
JKST
W 96-91
+34.5
7
vs
AAMU
W 81-68
+5.5
9
vs
ALST
W 69-68
−12.5
14
@
PV
W 87-82
+9.5
16
@
TXSO
L 73-74
−4.5
21
vs
GRAM
W 87-73
+17.5
26
vs
FAMU
L 71-82
+5.5
28
vs
BCU
L 79-82
+7.5
3
@
ALST
W 71-64
−18.5
5
@
AAMU
W 88-85
+27.5
12
vs
UAPB
W 84-81
+13.5
13
vs
FAMU
W 73-70
+1.5
14
vs
PV
L 66-72
−7.5
over 20under 11avg +4.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Vanderbilt
36 games played
Straight up
27-9
75% wins
Against the spread
18-18
50% covers · avg +0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-19
47% overs · avg +1.2 pts vs the total
Against the spread
18-1850%
3 straight misses ATS1 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 105-61 | -26.5 | W +17.5 | 154.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 8 | @ | W 105-93 | -10.5 | W +1.5 | 166.5 | O 198 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 92-62 | -28.5 | W +1.5 | 168.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 104-75 | -41.5 | L −12.5 | 172.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 109-74 | -36.5 | L −1.5 | 164.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 83-78 | -18.5 | L −13.5 | 168.5 | U 161 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 89-74 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 161.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 96-71 | -4.5 | W +20.5 | 149.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 88-69 | -10.5 | W +8.5 | 165.5 | U 157 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 83-72 | -36.5 | L −25.5 | 158.5 | U 155 |
| Dec 17 | @ | W 77-70 | -9.5 | L −2.5 | 159.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 98-67 | -5.5 | W +25.5 | 164.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 96-53 | -39.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 83-71 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 96-90 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 176.5 | O 186 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 84-73 | -13.5 | L −2.5 | 159.5 | U 157 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 64-80 | -3.5 | L −19.5 | 163.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 94-98 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 164.5 | O 192 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 68-93 | +1.5 | L −23.5 | 173.5 | U 161 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 88-56 | -7.5 | W +24.5 | 159.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 80-55 | -5.5 | W +19.5 | 155.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 71-68 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 91-92 | -11.5 | L −12.5 | 159.5 | O 183 |
| Feb 10 | @ | W 84-76 | +3.5 | W +11.5 | 161.5 | U 160 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 82-69 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 165.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 80-81 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 154.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 65-69 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 150.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 88-80 | -7.5 | W +0.5 | 163.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 77-91 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 157.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 89-86 | -7.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | O 175 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 86-82 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 146.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 75-68 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 91-74 | +7.5 | W +24.5 | 161.5 | O 165 |
| Mar 15 | vs | L 75-86 | -2.5 | L −13.5 | 165.5 | U 161 |
| Mar 19 | vs | W 78-68 | -12.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 21 | vs | L 72-74 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | U 146 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
LIP
W 105-61
+17.5
8
@
UCF
W 105-93
+1.5
12
vs
EKU
W 92-62
+1.5
15
vs
UAPB
W 104-75
−12.5
20
vs
TXSO
W 109-74
−1.5
26
vs
WKU
W 83-78
−13.5
27
vs
VCU
W 89-74
+8.5
28
vs
SMC
W 96-71
+20.5
3
vs
SMU
W 88-69
+8.5
13
vs
CARK
W 83-72
−25.5
17
@
MEM
W 77-70
−2.5
21
@
WAKE
W 98-67
+25.5
29
vs
NHVN
W 96-53
+3.5
3
@
SC
W 83-71
+2.5
7
vs
ALA
W 96-90
+2.5
10
vs
LSU
W 84-73
−2.5
14
@
TEX
L 64-80
−19.5
17
vs
FLA
L 94-98
−2.5
20
@
ARK
L 68-93
−23.5
24
@
MSST
W 88-56
+24.5
27
vs
UK
W 80-55
+19.5
31
vs
MISS
W 71-68
−7.5
7
vs
OU
L 91-92
−12.5
10
@
AUB
W 84-76
+11.5
14
vs
TA&M
W 82-69
+5.5
18
@
MIZ
L 80-81
−4.5
21
vs
TENN
L 65-69
−6.5
25
vs
UGA
W 88-80
+0.5
28
@
UK
L 77-91
−12.5
3
@
MISS
W 89-86
−4.5
7
@
TENN
W 86-82
+6.5
13
vs
TENN
W 75-68
+8.5
14
vs
FLA
W 91-74
+24.5
15
vs
ARK
L 75-86
−13.5
19
vs
MCN
W 78-68
−2.5
21
vs
NEB
L 72-74
−3.5
covered 18didn’t cover 18avg +0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
LIP
W 105-61
+11.5
8
@
UCF
W 105-93
+31.5
12
vs
EKU
W 92-62
−14.5
15
vs
UAPB
W 104-75
+6.5
20
vs
TXSO
W 109-74
+18.5
26
vs
WKU
W 83-78
−7.5
27
vs
VCU
W 89-74
+1.5
28
vs
SMC
W 96-71
+17.5
3
vs
SMU
W 88-69
−8.5
13
vs
CARK
W 83-72
−3.5
17
@
MEM
W 77-70
−12.5
21
@
WAKE
W 98-67
+0.5
29
vs
NHVN
W 96-53
+3.5
3
@
SC
W 83-71
−1.5
7
vs
ALA
W 96-90
+9.5
10
vs
LSU
W 84-73
−2.5
14
@
TEX
L 64-80
−19.5
17
vs
FLA
L 94-98
+27.5
20
@
ARK
L 68-93
−12.5
24
@
MSST
W 88-56
−15.5
27
vs
UK
W 80-55
−20.5
31
vs
MISS
W 71-68
−10.5
7
vs
OU
L 91-92
+23.5
10
@
AUB
W 84-76
−1.5
14
vs
TA&M
W 82-69
−14.5
18
@
MIZ
L 80-81
+6.5
21
vs
TENN
L 65-69
−16.5
25
vs
UGA
W 88-80
+4.5
28
@
UK
L 77-91
+10.5
3
@
MISS
W 89-86
+19.5
7
@
TENN
W 86-82
+21.5
13
vs
TENN
W 75-68
−4.5
14
vs
FLA
W 91-74
+3.5
15
vs
ARK
L 75-86
−4.5
19
vs
MCN
W 78-68
−2.5
21
vs
NEB
L 72-74
−0.5
over 17under 19avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Vanderbilt has the better starters
Position by position: Southern 0, Vanderbilt 5, even 0
SouthernBetterVanderbilt
G J. Page TR12.3 pts · 2.2 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 42
→VANBig
G T. Tanner19.5 pts · 3.6 reb · 5.1 ast
Score 100
G D. Dormu TR5.4 pts · 1.3 reb · 2 ast
Score 14
→VANBig
G A. Glass TR16.1 pts · 3 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 86
G M. Ferguson TR5.2 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 9
→VANBig
F S. Williams-Adams TR7 pts · 3.5 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 55
F R. King TR4.7 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 42
→VANBig
F B. Dak TR11.5 pts · 6.5 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 90
C I. Olajuwon TR3.7 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 20
→VANBig
C B. Buyuktuncel TR6.5 pts · 5.6 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 61
SouthernBetterVanderbilt
SOU offense296th of 366 · -9.2
→VANBig
VAN defense29th of 366 · +3.7
SOU defense309th of 366 · -8.0
→VANBig
VAN offense22nd of 366 · +7.6
Backcourt-5.4 · 3 players
→VANBig
Backcourt+10.2 · 2 players
Frontcourt-1.5 · 2 players
→VANBig
Frontcourt+3.7 · 3 players
Bench-3.3 · 4 players
→VANSmall
Bench-0.4 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestSOU betterVAN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Page30 min · TRD. Dormu19 min · TRM. Ferguson17 min · TRL. Larvadain11 min · TRS. Van Dorn3 min · TRJ. HunterNew
Forwards
R. King13 min · TRA. HallNew
Centers
I. Olajuwon14 min · TRN. Boyde11 min · TRL. Bell5 min
Guards
T. Tanner34 minA. Glass29 min · TRA. BrownNewM. HawkinsNewB. AllenNewC. ByingtonNew
Forwards
S. Williams-Adams27 min · TRB. Dak26 min · TRT. Barrett23 min · TRC. Bing15 minE. MgbakoNewG. NesmithNew
Centers
B. Buyuktuncel24 min · TRJ. Leverett4 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76.2 #136 | Points per game | 85.7 #14 |
| 1.06 #239 | Points per possession | 1.21 #9 |
| 72.3 #28 | Pace (possessions) | 70.9 #80 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.1 #287 | Effective FG% | 55.3 #31 |
| 34.8 #129 | 3-point % | 35.6 #86 |
| 32.0 #329 | 3-point attempt rate | 44.2 #85 |
| 39.8 #61 | Free throw rate | 38.1 #101 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.6 #169 | Turnover rate | 13.5 #15 |
| 31.4 #144 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.2 #158 |
| 13.9 #156 | Assists per game | 16.3 #40 |
| Defense | ||
| 80.2 #324 | Points allowed | 75.0 #187 |
| 1.11 #236 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #99 |
| 53.2 #274 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.0 #67 |
| 36.7 #339 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.6 #96 |
| 18.6 #67 | Turnovers forced | 17.7 #112 |
| 68.7 #217 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.5 #231 |
| 8.3 #26 | Steals per game | 7.9 #40 |
| 3.8 #97 | Blocks per game | 4.5 #36 |
Southern
14-17 in 2025-26 overall · 13-8 in conference · Southwestern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Prairie View66–72
- Wvs Florida A&M73–70
- Wvs AR-Pine Bluff84–81
- W@ Alabama A&M88–85
- W@ Alabama St71–64
A week or more of rest.
Vanderbilt
27-9 in 2025-26 overall · 13-8 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Nebraska72–74
- Wvs McNeese78–68
- Lvs Arkansas75–86
- Wvs Florida91–74
- Wvs Tennessee75–68
A week or more of rest.