State Farm Field House · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | CIN | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UGA 79–79 · win probability UGA 52%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 157.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UGA has more of the edges
UGA 3, CIN 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: UGA 36.9, CIN 29.4. Allowed: UGA 30.2, CIN 30.0
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UGA 14.3%, CIN 17.0%. Forced: UGA 18.4%, CIN 18.2%
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UGA 34.9%, CIN 30.6%. Defensive: UGA 65.1%, CIN 72.7%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UGA 46%, CIN 1%. Transfers in: UGA 4, CIN 12. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 72 possessions: UGA plays 74.7 a game (8th fastest), CIN 69.4 (152nd). Faster games mean more points
Three-pointers
UGA hits 33.8% and allows 33.6%; CIN hits 33.9% and allows 31.0%. Threes are 44.3% and 43.8% of their shots
Even
CIN offense vs UGA defense
Offense 49th of 366 against a defense 75th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: UGA 54.2 and allows 50.6; CIN 50.5 and allows 47.4
Context
Schedule so far
UGA has played the 52nd-hardest schedule, CIN the 39th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Even
UGA offense vs CIN defense
Offense 19th of 366 against a defense 24th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UGA -0.6 | — |
| Total | — | 157.7 | — |
| Projected score | — | UGA 79.1 · CIN 78.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UGA -0.5 | — |
| 1H total | 73.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | UGA 37.1 · CIN 36.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | |
| 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
UGA 1–1 CINSeries tied · 2 games since 2021-22 · UGA 2-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2025-26 | CIN 65 vs UGA 84 | UGA -5.5 | UGA W |
| Nov 13, 2021-22 | UGA 68 @ CIN 73 | CIN -10.5 | UGA W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Georgia
33 games played
Straight up
22-11
67% wins
Against the spread
16-17
48% covers · avg +0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-15
55% overs · avg +5 pts vs the total
Against the spread
16-1748%
2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 104-59 | -23.5 | W +21.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 5 | vs | W 94-29 | -33.5 | W +31.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 120-81 | -28.5 | W +10.5 | 150.5 | O 201 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 92-87 | -15.5 | L −10.5 | 155.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 87-57 | -40.5 | L −10.5 | 170.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 78-77 | -10.5 | L −9.5 | 165.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 94-97 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | O 191 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 123-81 | -34.5 | W +7.5 | 160.5 | O 204 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 107-73 | +1.5 | W +35.5 | 176.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 84-65 | -5.5 | W +13.5 | 157.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 112-82 | -32.5 | L −2.5 | 167.5 | O 194 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 103-74 | -36.5 | L −7.5 | 173.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 89-74 | -30.5 | L −15.5 | 179.5 | U 163 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 104-100 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 173.5 | O 204 |
| Jan 6 | @ | L 77-92 | +9.5 | L −5.5 | 172.5 | U 169 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 75-70 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 163.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 95-97 | -10.5 | L −12.5 | 158.5 | O 192 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 90-76 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 181.5 | U 166 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 74-72 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 163.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 67-87 | +3.5 | L −16.5 | 168.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 85-86 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 157.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 77-92 | -4.5 | L −19.5 | 173.5 | U 169 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 83-71 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 161.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 66-86 | +8.5 | L −11.5 | 164.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 78-94 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 164.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 17 | @ | W 86-78 | +6.5 | W +14.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 91-80 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 162.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 80-88 | +7.5 | L −0.5 | 163.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 87-68 | -12.5 | W +6.5 | 158.5 | U 155 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 98-88 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 179.5 | O 186 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 102-96 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 167.5 | O 198 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 72-76 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 156.5 | U 148 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 77-102 | -1.5 | L −26.5 | 167.5 | O 179 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
BELL
W 104-59
+21.5
5
vs
UMES
W 94-29
+31.5
9
vs
MORE
W 120-81
+10.5
14
vs
GT
W 92-87
−10.5
17
vs
FAMU
W 87-57
−10.5
21
vs
XAV
W 78-77
−9.5
23
vs
CLEM
L 94-97
−1.5
29
vs
TNTC
W 123-81
+7.5
2
@
FSU
W 107-73
+35.5
13
vs
CIN
W 84-65
+13.5
18
vs
WCU
W 112-82
−2.5
22
vs
WGA
W 103-74
−7.5
29
vs
LIU
W 89-74
−15.5
3
vs
AUB
W 104-100
−2.5
6
@
FLA
L 77-92
−5.5
10
@
SC
W 75-70
+0.5
14
vs
MISS
L 95-97
−12.5
17
vs
ARK
W 90-76
+11.5
20
@
MIZ
W 74-72
+3.5
24
@
TEX
L 67-87
−16.5
28
vs
TENN
L 85-86
+0.5
31
vs
TA&M
L 77-92
−19.5
7
@
LSU
W 83-71
+10.5
11
vs
FLA
L 66-86
−11.5
14
@
OU
L 78-94
−14.5
17
@
UK
W 86-78
+14.5
21
vs
TEX
W 91-80
+8.5
25
@
VAN
L 80-88
−0.5
28
vs
SC
W 87-68
+6.5
3
vs
ALA
W 98-88
+11.5
7
@
MSST
W 102-96
+0.5
12
vs
MISS
L 72-76
−9.5
19
vs
SLU
L 77-102
−26.5
covered 16didn’t cover 17avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
BELL
W 104-59
+12.5
5
vs
UMES
W 94-29
−19.5
9
vs
MORE
W 120-81
+50.5
14
vs
GT
W 92-87
+23.5
17
vs
FAMU
W 87-57
−26.5
21
vs
XAV
W 78-77
−10.5
23
vs
CLEM
L 94-97
+38.5
29
vs
TNTC
W 123-81
+43.5
2
@
FSU
W 107-73
+3.5
13
vs
CIN
W 84-65
−8.5
18
vs
WCU
W 112-82
+26.5
22
vs
WGA
W 103-74
+3.5
29
vs
LIU
W 89-74
−16.5
3
vs
AUB
W 104-100
+30.5
6
@
FLA
L 77-92
−3.5
10
@
SC
W 75-70
−18.5
14
vs
MISS
L 95-97
+33.5
17
vs
ARK
W 90-76
−15.5
20
@
MIZ
W 74-72
−17.5
24
@
TEX
L 67-87
−14.5
28
vs
TENN
L 85-86
+13.5
31
vs
TA&M
L 77-92
−4.5
7
@
LSU
W 83-71
−7.5
11
vs
FLA
L 66-86
−12.5
14
@
OU
L 78-94
+7.5
17
@
UK
W 86-78
+2.5
21
vs
TEX
W 91-80
+8.5
25
@
VAN
L 80-88
+4.5
28
vs
SC
W 87-68
−3.5
3
vs
ALA
W 98-88
+6.5
7
@
MSST
W 102-96
+30.5
12
vs
MISS
L 72-76
−8.5
19
vs
SLU
L 77-102
+11.5
over 18under 15avg +5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Cincinnati
33 games played
Straight up
18-15
55% wins
Against the spread
14-19
42% covers · avg −0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-20
39% overs · avg −4.3 pts vs the total
Against the spread
14-1942%
3 straight misses ATS1 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 94-63 | -22.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 74-64 | -29.5 | L −19.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 74-62 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 72-55 | -25.5 | L −8.5 | 145.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 64-74 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 163.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 94-67 | -34.5 | L −7.5 | 141.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 56-64 | -22.5 | L −30.5 | 146.5 | U 120 |
| Dec 1 | vs | W 76-58 | -24.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 5 | @ | L 74-79 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 65-84 | +5.5 | L −13.5 | 157.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 88-51 | -21.5 | W +15.5 | 145.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 65-68 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 89-62 | -13.5 | W +13.5 | 150.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 60-67 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 135.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 6 | @ | L 60-62 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 132.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 11 | @ | L 72-73 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 150.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 77-68 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 79-70 | +5.5 | W +14.5 | 141.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 51-77 | +13.5 | L −12.5 | 152.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 68-82 | -3.5 | L −17.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 67-57 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 54-76 | +13.5 | L −8.5 | 135.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 54-59 | -5.5 | L −10.5 | 127.5 | U 113 |
| Feb 8 | vs | W 92-72 | -4.5 | W +15.5 | 146.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 91-62 | -2.5 | W +26.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 69-65 | -12.5 | L −8.5 | 139.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 84-68 | +8.5 | W +24.5 | 139.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 68-80 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 91-68 | -9.5 | W +13.5 | 151.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 90-68 | -1.5 | W +20.5 | 151.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 63-73 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 73-66 | -12.5 | L −5.5 | 138.5 | O 139 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 65-66 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | U 131 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
WCU
W 94-63
+8.5
7
vs
GAST
W 74-64
−19.5
11
vs
DAY
W 74-62
+6.5
16
vs
MSM
W 72-55
−8.5
21
vs
LOU
L 64-74
−1.5
24
vs
NJIT
W 94-67
−7.5
26
vs
EMU
L 56-64
−30.5
1
vs
TAR
W 76-58
−6.5
5
@
XAV
L 74-79
−6.5
13
vs
UGA
L 65-84
−13.5
17
vs
ALST
W 88-51
+15.5
21
vs
CLEM
L 65-68
+0.5
29
vs
LIP
W 89-62
+13.5
3
vs
HOU
L 60-67
−2.5
6
@
WVU
L 60-62
−3.5
11
@
UCF
L 72-73
+1.5
14
vs
COLO
W 77-68
+0.5
17
vs
ISU
W 79-70
+14.5
21
@
ARIZ
L 51-77
−12.5
24
@
ASU
L 68-82
−17.5
28
vs
BAY
W 67-57
+6.5
31
@
HOU
L 54-76
−8.5
5
vs
WVU
L 54-59
−10.5
8
vs
UCF
W 92-72
+15.5
11
@
KSU
W 91-62
+26.5
15
vs
UTAH
W 69-65
−8.5
21
@
KU
W 84-68
+24.5
24
@
TTU
L 68-80
−5.5
28
vs
OKST
W 91-68
+13.5
3
vs
BYU
W 90-68
+20.5
7
@
TCU
L 63-73
−7.5
10
vs
UTAH
W 73-66
−5.5
11
vs
UCF
L 65-66
−4.5
covered 14didn’t cover 19avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
WCU
W 94-63
+13.5
7
vs
GAST
W 74-64
−13.5
11
vs
DAY
W 74-62
−11.5
16
vs
MSM
W 72-55
−18.5
21
vs
LOU
L 64-74
−25.5
24
vs
NJIT
W 94-67
+19.5
26
vs
EMU
L 56-64
−26.5
1
vs
TAR
W 76-58
−8.5
5
@
XAV
L 74-79
+5.5
13
vs
UGA
L 65-84
−8.5
17
vs
ALST
W 88-51
−6.5
21
vs
CLEM
L 65-68
−7.5
29
vs
LIP
W 89-62
+0.5
3
vs
HOU
L 60-67
−8.5
6
@
WVU
L 60-62
−10.5
11
@
UCF
L 72-73
−5.5
14
vs
COLO
W 77-68
−0.5
17
vs
ISU
W 79-70
+7.5
21
@
ARIZ
L 51-77
−24.5
24
@
ASU
L 68-82
+3.5
28
vs
BAY
W 67-57
−21.5
31
@
HOU
L 54-76
−5.5
5
vs
WVU
L 54-59
−14.5
8
vs
UCF
W 92-72
+17.5
11
@
KSU
W 91-62
+5.5
15
vs
UTAH
W 69-65
−5.5
21
@
KU
W 84-68
+12.5
24
@
TTU
L 68-80
+4.5
28
vs
OKST
W 91-68
+7.5
3
vs
BYU
W 90-68
+6.5
7
@
TCU
L 63-73
−4.5
10
vs
UTAH
W 73-66
+0.5
11
vs
UCF
L 65-66
−18.5
over 13under 20avg −4.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Georgia has the better starters
Position by position: Georgia 1, Cincinnati 0, even 4
GeorgiaBetterCincinnati
G B. Cain13.1 pts · 5.1 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 95
=Even
G J. Campbell TR19.3 pts · 4.4 reb · 5.1 ast
Score 95
G F. Dilione V TR14 pts · 3.2 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 93
←UGASmall
G T. Carson TR12.2 pts · 6.5 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 75
G M. Millender12 pts · 2.8 reb · 4.1 ast
Score 89
=Even
G M. Collins TR17.3 pts · 2.4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 94
F K. Catchings11.6 pts · 4.8 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 78
=Even
G T. Riley TR15 pts · 3.9 reb · 4.4 ast
Score 92
F J. Scott TR3.9 pts · 4.6 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 78
=Even
F T. Tejada TR17.9 pts · 5.4 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 91
GeorgiaBetterCincinnati
UGA offense19th of 366 · +7.8
=Even
CIN defense24th of 366 · +4.9
UGA defense75th of 366 · +0.7
=Even
CIN offense49th of 366 · +3.7
Backcourt+8.6 · 3 players
→CINBig
Backcourt+12.2 · 4 players
Frontcourt+2.4 · 2 players
→CINSmall
Frontcourt+4.0 · 1 player
Bench+0.4 · 5 players
→CINBig
Bench+6.3 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestUGA betterCIN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
B. Cain28 minF. Dilione V28 min · TRM. Millender26 minB. Klatsky2 minM. Jennings1 minK. MillenderNew
Forwards
K. Catchings23 minJ. Scott18 min · TRB. Dunlap17 min · TRK. Stagg13 minA. Osasuyi12 min · TRM. KuanyNew
Guards
J. Campbell35 min · TRT. Carson33 min · TRM. Collins31 min · TRT. Riley28 min · TRM. Colvin27 min · TRA. Fleming26 min · TR
Forwards
T. Tejada36 min · TRR. Allenspach25 min · TRJ. Hastings23 min · TRA. Elamin20 min · TRD. VadenNewD. IwezeNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 89.4 #3 | Points per game | 73.1 #221 |
| 1.19 #18 | Points per possession | 1.05 #243 |
| 74.7 #8 | Pace (possessions) | 69.4 #152 |
| Shooting | ||
| 54.2 #61 | Effective FG% | 50.5 #213 |
| 33.8 #185 | 3-point % | 33.9 #175 |
| 44.3 #83 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.8 #94 |
| 36.9 #131 | Free throw rate | 29.4 #323 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.3 #31 | Turnover rate | 17.0 #203 |
| 34.9 #49 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.6 #174 |
| 14.8 #102 | Assists per game | 16.6 #35 |
| Defense | ||
| 79.8 #314 | Points allowed | 67.6 #27 |
| 1.07 #135 | Points allowed per possession | 0.97 #9 |
| 50.6 #134 | Opponent effective FG% | 47.4 #27 |
| 33.6 #165 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.0 #35 |
| 18.4 #82 | Turnovers forced | 18.2 #89 |
| 65.1 #336 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.7 #45 |
| 8.4 #21 | Steals per game | 6.3 #208 |
| 6.0 #3 | Blocks per game | 4.2 #53 |
Georgia
22-11 in 2025-26 overall · 10-9 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Saint Louis77–102
- Lvs Ole Miss72–76
- W@ Mississippi St102–96
- Wvs Alabama98–88
- Wvs South Carolina87–68
A week or more of rest.
Cincinnati
18-15 in 2025-26 overall · 10-10 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UCF65–66
- Wvs Utah73–66
- L@ TCU63–73
- Wvs BYU90–68
- Wvs Oklahoma St91–68
A week or more of rest.