Stegeman Coliseum · at Georgia
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UGA | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UGA 85–72 · win probability UGA 87%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 157.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UGA has more of the edges
BC 0, UGA 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BC 15.4%, UGA 14.3%. Forced: BC 14.8%, UGA 18.4%
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: BC plays 67.5 a game (257th fastest), UGA 74.7 (8th). Faster games mean more points
Free throws
Free throw rate: BC 32.4, UGA 36.9. Allowed: BC 34.6, UGA 30.2
Shooting
Effective FG%: BC 47.0 and allows 48.9; UGA 54.2 and allows 50.6
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BC 1%, UGA 46%. Transfers in: BC 11, UGA 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
UGA offense vs BC defense
Offense 19th of 366 against a defense 83rd, on the model’s ratings
Home court
UGA at home. This season: UGA 0-0 at home, BC 0-0 away
Even
Three-pointers
BC hits 29.4% and allows 31.9%; UGA hits 33.8% and allows 33.6%. Threes are 42.4% and 44.3% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
BC has played the 79th-hardest schedule, UGA the 52nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BC 28.3%, UGA 34.9%. Defensive: BC 71.4%, UGA 65.1%
Even
BC offense vs UGA defense
Offense 96th of 366 against a defense 75th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UGA -12.9 | — |
| Total | — | 157.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | BC 72.3 · UGA 85.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UGA -7.5 | — |
| 1H total | 73.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | BC 33 · UGA 40.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | |
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Boston College
31 games played
Straight up
11-20
35% wins
Against the spread
15-16
48% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-19
39% overs · avg −4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 78-83 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 76-47 | -15.5 | W +13.5 | 144.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 59-60 | -17.5 | L −18.5 | 136.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 76-71 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | O 147 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 63-52 | -12.5 | L −1.5 | 135.5 | U 115 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 49-59 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 140.5 | U 108 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 90-93 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 140.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 73-60 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 138.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 69-78 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 67-63 | -17.5 | L −13.5 | 126.5 | O 130 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 74-76 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 72-61 | -16.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 28 | vs | W 72-64 | -12.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 53-65 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 145.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 6 | vs | L 71-79 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 62-75 | +21.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 50-74 | +15.5 | L −8.5 | 136.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 81-73 | +5.5 | W +13.5 | 141.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 65-62 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 64-68 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 137.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 66-73 | +13.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 49-67 | +26.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | U 116 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 68-74 | +8.5 | W +2.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 64-70 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 139.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 75-86 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 72-80 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 148.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 70-94 | +15.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 68-67 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 54-76 | +15.5 | L −6.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 63-72 | +11.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 77-69 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 141.5 | O 146 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
FAU
L 78-83
−3.5
6
vs
CIT
W 76-47
+13.5
11
vs
CCSU
L 59-60
−18.5
15
@
TEM
W 76-71
+8.5
18
vs
HAMP
W 63-52
−1.5
21
vs
DAV
L 49-59
−11.5
23
vs
TULN
L 90-93
−5.5
26
vs
HARV
W 73-60
+5.5
3
vs
LSU
L 69-78
−1.5
6
vs
NHVN
W 67-63
−13.5
10
vs
MASS
L 74-76
−3.5
22
vs
FDU
W 72-61
−5.5
28
vs
LEM
W 72-64
−4.5
3
@
GT
L 53-65
−5.5
6
vs
NCSU
L 71-79
+3.5
10
@
LOU
L 62-75
+8.5
13
@
CLEM
L 50-74
−8.5
17
vs
SYR
W 81-73
+13.5
21
vs
PITT
W 65-62
+5.5
24
@
ND
L 64-68
+3.5
31
vs
UVA
L 66-73
+6.5
3
@
DUKE
L 49-67
+8.5
7
vs
MIA
L 68-74
+2.5
11
vs
STAN
L 64-70
−2.5
14
vs
CAL
L 75-86
−7.5
17
@
FSU
L 72-80
+3.5
21
@
SMU
L 70-94
−8.5
25
vs
WAKE
W 68-67
+4.5
28
@
MIA
L 54-76
−6.5
3
@
VT
L 63-72
+2.5
7
vs
ND
W 77-69
+9.5
covered 15didn’t cover 16avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
FAU
L 78-83
+12.5
6
vs
CIT
W 76-47
−21.5
11
vs
CCSU
L 59-60
−17.5
15
@
TEM
W 76-71
+4.5
18
vs
HAMP
W 63-52
−20.5
21
vs
DAV
L 49-59
−32.5
23
vs
TULN
L 90-93
+42.5
26
vs
HARV
W 73-60
−5.5
3
vs
LSU
L 69-78
−2.5
6
vs
NHVN
W 67-63
+3.5
10
vs
MASS
L 74-76
+6.5
22
vs
FDU
W 72-61
−8.5
28
vs
LEM
W 72-64
−10.5
3
@
GT
L 53-65
−27.5
6
vs
NCSU
L 71-79
+8.5
10
@
LOU
L 62-75
−13.5
13
@
CLEM
L 50-74
−12.5
17
vs
SYR
W 81-73
+12.5
21
vs
PITT
W 65-62
−10.5
24
@
ND
L 64-68
−5.5
31
vs
UVA
L 66-73
−2.5
3
@
DUKE
L 49-67
−25.5
7
vs
MIA
L 68-74
+0.5
11
vs
STAN
L 64-70
−5.5
14
vs
CAL
L 75-86
+16.5
17
@
FSU
L 72-80
+3.5
21
@
SMU
L 70-94
+13.5
25
vs
WAKE
W 68-67
−10.5
28
@
MIA
L 54-76
−13.5
3
@
VT
L 63-72
−7.5
7
vs
ND
W 77-69
+4.5
over 12under 19avg −4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Georgia
33 games played
Straight up
22-11
67% wins
Against the spread
16-17
48% covers · avg +0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-15
55% overs · avg +5 pts vs the total
Against the spread
16-1748%
2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 104-59 | -23.5 | W +21.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 5 | vs | W 94-29 | -33.5 | W +31.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 120-81 | -28.5 | W +10.5 | 150.5 | O 201 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 92-87 | -15.5 | L −10.5 | 155.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 87-57 | -40.5 | L −10.5 | 170.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 78-77 | -10.5 | L −9.5 | 165.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 94-97 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | O 191 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 123-81 | -34.5 | W +7.5 | 160.5 | O 204 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 107-73 | +1.5 | W +35.5 | 176.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 84-65 | -5.5 | W +13.5 | 157.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 112-82 | -32.5 | L −2.5 | 167.5 | O 194 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 103-74 | -36.5 | L −7.5 | 173.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 89-74 | -30.5 | L −15.5 | 179.5 | U 163 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 104-100 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 173.5 | O 204 |
| Jan 6 | @ | L 77-92 | +9.5 | L −5.5 | 172.5 | U 169 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 75-70 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 163.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 95-97 | -10.5 | L −12.5 | 158.5 | O 192 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 90-76 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 181.5 | U 166 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 74-72 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 163.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 67-87 | +3.5 | L −16.5 | 168.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 85-86 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 157.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 77-92 | -4.5 | L −19.5 | 173.5 | U 169 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 83-71 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 161.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 66-86 | +8.5 | L −11.5 | 164.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 78-94 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 164.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 17 | @ | W 86-78 | +6.5 | W +14.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 91-80 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 162.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 80-88 | +7.5 | L −0.5 | 163.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 87-68 | -12.5 | W +6.5 | 158.5 | U 155 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 98-88 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 179.5 | O 186 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 102-96 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 167.5 | O 198 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 72-76 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 156.5 | U 148 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 77-102 | -1.5 | L −26.5 | 167.5 | O 179 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
BELL
W 104-59
+21.5
5
vs
UMES
W 94-29
+31.5
9
vs
MORE
W 120-81
+10.5
14
vs
GT
W 92-87
−10.5
17
vs
FAMU
W 87-57
−10.5
21
vs
XAV
W 78-77
−9.5
23
vs
CLEM
L 94-97
−1.5
29
vs
TNTC
W 123-81
+7.5
2
@
FSU
W 107-73
+35.5
13
vs
CIN
W 84-65
+13.5
18
vs
WCU
W 112-82
−2.5
22
vs
WGA
W 103-74
−7.5
29
vs
LIU
W 89-74
−15.5
3
vs
AUB
W 104-100
−2.5
6
@
FLA
L 77-92
−5.5
10
@
SC
W 75-70
+0.5
14
vs
MISS
L 95-97
−12.5
17
vs
ARK
W 90-76
+11.5
20
@
MIZ
W 74-72
+3.5
24
@
TEX
L 67-87
−16.5
28
vs
TENN
L 85-86
+0.5
31
vs
TA&M
L 77-92
−19.5
7
@
LSU
W 83-71
+10.5
11
vs
FLA
L 66-86
−11.5
14
@
OU
L 78-94
−14.5
17
@
UK
W 86-78
+14.5
21
vs
TEX
W 91-80
+8.5
25
@
VAN
L 80-88
−0.5
28
vs
SC
W 87-68
+6.5
3
vs
ALA
W 98-88
+11.5
7
@
MSST
W 102-96
+0.5
12
vs
MISS
L 72-76
−9.5
19
vs
SLU
L 77-102
−26.5
covered 16didn’t cover 17avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
BELL
W 104-59
+12.5
5
vs
UMES
W 94-29
−19.5
9
vs
MORE
W 120-81
+50.5
14
vs
GT
W 92-87
+23.5
17
vs
FAMU
W 87-57
−26.5
21
vs
XAV
W 78-77
−10.5
23
vs
CLEM
L 94-97
+38.5
29
vs
TNTC
W 123-81
+43.5
2
@
FSU
W 107-73
+3.5
13
vs
CIN
W 84-65
−8.5
18
vs
WCU
W 112-82
+26.5
22
vs
WGA
W 103-74
+3.5
29
vs
LIU
W 89-74
−16.5
3
vs
AUB
W 104-100
+30.5
6
@
FLA
L 77-92
−3.5
10
@
SC
W 75-70
−18.5
14
vs
MISS
L 95-97
+33.5
17
vs
ARK
W 90-76
−15.5
20
@
MIZ
W 74-72
−17.5
24
@
TEX
L 67-87
−14.5
28
vs
TENN
L 85-86
+13.5
31
vs
TA&M
L 77-92
−4.5
7
@
LSU
W 83-71
−7.5
11
vs
FLA
L 66-86
−12.5
14
@
OU
L 78-94
+7.5
17
@
UK
W 86-78
+2.5
21
vs
TEX
W 91-80
+8.5
25
@
VAN
L 80-88
+4.5
28
vs
SC
W 87-68
−3.5
3
vs
ALA
W 98-88
+6.5
7
@
MSST
W 102-96
+30.5
12
vs
MISS
L 72-76
−8.5
19
vs
SLU
L 77-102
+11.5
over 18under 15avg +5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Georgia has the better starters
Position by position: Boston College 0, Georgia 2, even 3
Boston CollegeBetterGeorgia
G E. Shelton TR15.9 pts · 3.1 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 65
→UGASmall
G B. Cain13.1 pts · 5.1 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 95
G A. Zeigler TR12.3 pts · 4.9 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 60
→UGASmall
G F. Dilione V TR14 pts · 3.2 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 93
G M. Williams TR21.6 pts · 4.3 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 96
=Even
G M. Millender12 pts · 2.8 reb · 4.1 ast
Score 89
F B. Benjamin TR14.2 pts · 10.4 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 89
=Even
F K. Catchings11.6 pts · 4.8 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 78
F A. Bukumirovic TR13.7 pts · 7.7 reb · 1 ast
Score 86
=Even
F J. Scott TR3.9 pts · 4.6 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 78
Boston CollegeBetterGeorgia
BC offense96th of 366 · -0.7
=Even
UGA defense75th of 366 · +0.7
BC defense83rd of 366 · +0.1
→UGASmall
UGA offense19th of 366 · +7.8
Backcourt+4.7 · 3 players
→UGABig
Backcourt+8.6 · 3 players
Frontcourt+5.8 · 2 players
←BCBig
Frontcourt+2.4 · 2 players
Bench-4.5 · 5 players
→UGABig
Bench+0.4 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestBC betterUGA betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
E. Shelton37 min · TRA. Zeigler33 min · TRM. Williams32 min · TRJ. Frankel21 min · TRJ. O'Toole3 min · TRJ. Furphy3 min · TR
Forwards
B. Benjamin31 min · TRA. Bukumirovic30 min · TRC. Duggan28 min · TRL. Hunger19 min · TRA. Tounkara18 min · TRJ. BaileyNew
Guards
B. Cain28 minF. Dilione V28 min · TRM. Millender26 minB. Klatsky2 minM. Jennings1 minK. MillenderNew
Forwards
K. Catchings23 minJ. Scott18 min · TRB. Dunlap17 min · TRK. Stagg13 minA. Osasuyi12 min · TRM. KuanyNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.4 #326 | Points per game | 89.4 #3 |
| 1.00 #323 | Points per possession | 1.19 #18 |
| 67.5 #257 | Pace (possessions) | 74.7 #8 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.0 #338 | Effective FG% | 54.2 #61 |
| 29.4 #348 | 3-point % | 33.8 #185 |
| 42.4 #130 | 3-point attempt rate | 44.3 #83 |
| 32.4 #251 | Free throw rate | 36.9 #131 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.4 #102 | Turnover rate | 14.3 #31 |
| 28.3 #254 | Offensive rebound rate | 34.9 #49 |
| 11.3 #323 | Assists per game | 14.8 #102 |
| Defense | ||
| 70.7 #70 | Points allowed | 79.8 #314 |
| 1.04 #81 | Points allowed per possession | 1.07 #135 |
| 48.9 #62 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.6 #134 |
| 31.9 #59 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.6 #165 |
| 14.8 #303 | Turnovers forced | 18.4 #82 |
| 71.4 #87 | Defensive rebound rate | 65.1 #336 |
| 4.8 #341 | Steals per game | 8.4 #21 |
| 4.1 #62 | Blocks per game | 6.0 #3 |
Boston College
11-20 in 2025-26 overall · 4-14 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Notre Dame77–69
- L@ Virginia Tech63–72
- L@ Miami54–76
- Wvs Wake Forest68–67
- L@ SMU70–94
A week or more of rest.
Georgia
22-11 in 2025-26 overall · 10-9 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Saint Louis77–102
- Lvs Ole Miss72–76
- W@ Mississippi St102–96
- Wvs Alabama98–88
- Wvs South Carolina87–68
A week or more of rest.