The Coliseum · at West Georgia
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | WGA | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects WGA 74–71 · win probability WGA 58%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 144.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: WGA has more of the edges
USI 2, WGA 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: USI 37.2, WGA 29.2. Allowed: USI 36.2, WGA 36.9
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: USI 31.4%, WGA 31.5%. Defensive: USI 66.2%, WGA 71.0%
Three-pointers
USI hits 29.9% and allows 34.1%; WGA hits 33.1% and allows 33.1%. Threes are 39.8% and 33.0% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
USI has played the 362nd-hardest schedule, WGA the 270th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: USI 0%, WGA 31%. Transfers in: USI 0, WGA 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
WGA at home. This season: WGA 0-0 at home, USI 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: USI plays 69.0 a game (177th fastest), WGA 71.0 (75th). Faster games mean more points
Shooting
Effective FG%: USI 43.7 and allows 49.4; WGA 49.6 and allows 53.4
Even
WGA offense vs USI defense
Offense 278th of 366 against a defense 243rd, on the model’s ratings
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: USI 17.1%, WGA 15.9%. Forced: USI 16.5%, WGA 14.7%
Even
USI offense vs WGA defense
Offense 320th of 366 against a defense 312th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | WGA -2.3 | — |
| Total | — | 144.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | USI 71.3 · WGA 73.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | WGA -1.2 | — |
| 1H total | 67.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | USI 33.3 · WGA 34.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | |
| 5-5 50% | 8-2 80% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Southern Indiana Screaming Eagles
28 games played
Straight up
5-23
18% wins
Against the spread
12-16
43% covers · avg −1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-17
39% overs · avg −3.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | @ | L 58-88 | +22.5 | L −7.5 | 156.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 7 | vs | L 74-78 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 74-89 | +7.5 | L −7.5 | 164.5 | U 163 |
| Nov 20 | vs | L 81-87 | +9.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 73-84 | +11.5 | W +0.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 26 | @ | W 64-56 | +9.5 | W +17.5 | 150.5 | U 120 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 74-88 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 55-77 | +11.5 | L −10.5 | 158.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 18 | vs | L 62-77 | +2.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 60-64 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 55-59 | +10.5 | W +6.5 | 136.5 | U 114 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 80-83 | +9.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 76-84 | +7.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 56-73 | +5.5 | L −11.5 | 137.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 71-54 | +5.5 | W +22.5 | 142.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 67-73 | +8.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 51-59 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 135.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 96-64 | -6.5 | W +25.5 | 136.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 60-73 | +4.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 46-58 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 130.5 | U 104 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 54-76 | +10.5 | L −11.5 | 132.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 65-90 | +11.5 | L −13.5 | 141.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 71-73 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 74-82 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 77-70 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 140.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 70-68 | +4.5 | W +6.5 | 135.5 | O 138 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 63-64 | +7.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 70-89 | +5.5 | L −13.5 | 139.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
@
BTLR
L 58-88
−7.5
7
vs
VMI
L 74-78
−1.5
12
@
SDAK
L 74-89
−7.5
20
vs
UIW
L 81-87
+3.5
22
vs
UIC
L 73-84
+0.5
26
@
VAL
W 64-56
+17.5
3
@
WMU
L 74-88
−8.5
7
@
INST
L 55-77
−10.5
18
vs
LR
L 62-77
−12.5
20
vs
MORE
L 60-64
−2.5
1
@
SIUE
L 55-59
+6.5
3
@
LIN
L 80-83
+6.5
8
vs
SEMO
L 76-84
−0.5
10
vs
UTM
L 56-73
−11.5
15
@
TNTC
W 71-54
+22.5
17
@
TNST
L 67-73
+2.5
22
vs
EIU
L 51-59
−10.5
23
vs
WIU
W 96-64
+25.5
29
vs
LIN
L 60-73
−8.5
31
vs
SIUE
L 46-58
−10.5
5
@
UTM
L 54-76
−11.5
7
@
SEMO
L 65-90
−13.5
12
vs
TNST
L 71-73
+4.5
14
vs
TNTC
L 74-82
−6.5
19
@
WIU
W 77-70
+3.5
21
@
EIU
W 70-68
+6.5
24
@
MORE
L 63-64
+6.5
28
@
LR
L 70-89
−13.5
covered 12didn’t cover 16avg −1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
@
BTLR
L 58-88
−10.5
7
vs
VMI
L 74-78
−1.5
12
@
SDAK
L 74-89
−1.5
20
vs
UIW
L 81-87
+22.5
22
vs
UIC
L 73-84
+3.5
26
@
VAL
W 64-56
−30.5
3
@
WMU
L 74-88
+11.5
7
@
INST
L 55-77
−26.5
18
vs
LR
L 62-77
−1.5
20
vs
MORE
L 60-64
−21.5
1
@
SIUE
L 55-59
−22.5
3
@
LIN
L 80-83
+15.5
8
vs
SEMO
L 76-84
+13.5
10
vs
UTM
L 56-73
−8.5
15
@
TNTC
W 71-54
−17.5
17
@
TNST
L 67-73
−10.5
22
vs
EIU
L 51-59
−25.5
23
vs
WIU
W 96-64
+23.5
29
vs
LIN
L 60-73
−17.5
31
vs
SIUE
L 46-58
−26.5
5
@
UTM
L 54-76
−2.5
7
@
SEMO
L 65-90
+13.5
12
vs
TNST
L 71-73
−3.5
14
vs
TNTC
L 74-82
+15.5
19
@
WIU
W 77-70
+6.5
21
@
EIU
W 70-68
+2.5
24
@
MORE
L 63-64
−15.5
28
@
LR
L 70-89
+19.5
over 11under 17avg −3.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
West Georgia
30 games played
Straight up
13-17
43% wins
Against the spread
20-10
67% covers · avg +1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +2.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 53-86 | +24.5 | L −8.5 | 153.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 62-83 | +30.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 100-92 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 150.5 | O 192 |
| Nov 17 | @ | W 61-59 | +4.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 72-64 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 66-82 | +18.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 1 | @ | W 93-89 | +17.5 | W +21.5 | 150.5 | O 182 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 59-87 | -1.5 | L −29.5 | 150.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 85-91 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 74-103 | +36.5 | W +7.5 | 173.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 87-85 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 151.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 88-76 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 156.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 85-73 | -2.5 | W +9.5 | 164.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 43-75 | +1.5 | L −30.5 | 141.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 86-95 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 151.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 72-90 | +9.5 | L −8.5 | 152.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 65-86 | +3.5 | L −17.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 74-66 | +7.5 | W +15.5 | 162.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 74-77 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 78-81 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 73-81 | -5.5 | L −13.5 | 166.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 87-73 | +1.5 | W +15.5 | 138.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 82-73 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 62-79 | +10.5 | L −6.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 80-81 | +7.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 84-91 | +11.5 | W +4.5 | 161.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 84-78 | +5.5 | W +11.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 75-63 | -4.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 93-85 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 160.5 | O 178 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 63-71 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 164.5 | U 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
NEB
L 53-86
−8.5
10
@
UCLA
L 62-83
+9.5
14
vs
CIT
W 100-92
+1.5
17
@
TNTC
W 61-59
+6.5
21
vs
UPST
W 72-64
+5.5
23
@
GT
L 66-82
+2.5
1
@
TROY
W 93-89
+21.5
6
vs
TNTC
L 59-87
−29.5
13
vs
GASO
L 85-91
−2.5
22
@
UGA
L 74-103
+7.5
1
vs
BELL
W 87-85
+3.5
3
vs
EKU
W 88-76
+13.5
8
@
UNF
W 85-73
+9.5
10
@
JAX
L 43-75
−30.5
15
@
STET
L 86-95
−10.5
17
@
FGCU
L 72-90
−8.5
22
vs
CARK
L 65-86
−17.5
24
vs
QUC
W 74-66
+15.5
28
@
BELL
L 74-77
−0.5
31
vs
APSU
L 78-81
+4.5
5
vs
UNF
L 73-81
−13.5
7
vs
JAX
W 87-73
+15.5
11
@
UNA
W 82-73
+10.5
14
@
CARK
L 62-79
−6.5
18
@
EKU
L 80-81
+6.5
21
@
QUC
L 84-91
+4.5
25
vs
LIP
W 84-78
+11.5
28
vs
UNA
W 75-63
+7.5
4
vs
UNF
W 93-85
+4.5
6
vs
QUC
L 63-71
+0.5
covered 20didn’t cover 10avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
NEB
L 53-86
−14.5
10
@
UCLA
L 62-83
−1.5
14
vs
CIT
W 100-92
+41.5
17
@
TNTC
W 61-59
−32.5
21
vs
UPST
W 72-64
−17.5
23
@
GT
L 66-82
+3.5
1
@
TROY
W 93-89
+31.5
6
vs
TNTC
L 59-87
−4.5
13
vs
GASO
L 85-91
+21.5
22
@
UGA
L 74-103
+3.5
1
vs
BELL
W 87-85
+20.5
3
vs
EKU
W 88-76
+7.5
8
@
UNF
W 85-73
−6.5
10
@
JAX
L 43-75
−23.5
15
@
STET
L 86-95
+29.5
17
@
FGCU
L 72-90
+9.5
22
vs
CARK
L 65-86
−3.5
24
vs
QUC
W 74-66
−22.5
28
@
BELL
L 74-77
−0.5
31
vs
APSU
L 78-81
+8.5
5
vs
UNF
L 73-81
−12.5
7
vs
JAX
W 87-73
+21.5
11
@
UNA
W 82-73
+9.5
14
@
CARK
L 62-79
−9.5
18
@
EKU
L 80-81
+6.5
21
@
QUC
L 84-91
+13.5
25
vs
LIP
W 84-78
+8.5
28
vs
UNA
W 75-63
−8.5
4
vs
UNF
W 93-85
+17.5
6
vs
QUC
L 63-71
−30.5
over 16under 14avg +2.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.0 #333 | Points per game | 75.3 #156 |
| 0.97 #346 | Points per possession | 1.06 #224 |
| 69.0 #177 | Pace (possessions) | 71.0 #75 |
| Shooting | ||
| 43.7 #363 | Effective FG% | 49.6 #261 |
| 29.9 #345 | 3-point % | 33.1 #222 |
| 39.8 #178 | 3-point attempt rate | 33.0 #316 |
| 37.2 #123 | Free throw rate | 29.2 #329 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.1 #212 | Turnover rate | 15.9 #130 |
| 31.4 #145 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.5 #142 |
| 9.7 #360 | Assists per game | 12.3 #265 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.3 #165 | Points allowed | 80.5 #326 |
| 1.08 #165 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #297 |
| 49.4 #80 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.4 #281 |
| 34.1 #193 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.1 #129 |
| 16.5 #183 | Turnovers forced | 14.7 #312 |
| 66.2 #315 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.0 #102 |
| 6.2 #210 | Steals per game | 6.4 #191 |
| 4.2 #56 | Blocks per game | 4.7 #25 |
Southern Indiana Screaming Eagles
5-23 in 2025-26 overall · 4-16 in conference · Ohio Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Little Rock70–89
- L@ Morehead St63–64
- W@ E Illinois70–68
- W@ W Illinois77–70
- Lvs Tennessee Tech74–82
A week or more of rest.
West Georgia
13-17 in 2025-26 overall · 9-11 in conference · United Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Queens University Royals63–71
- Wvs North Florida93–85
- Wvs North Alabama75–63
- Wvs Lipscomb84–78
- L@ Queens University Royals84–91
A week or more of rest.